Energous Corporation
Energous Corporation (WATT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WATT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WATT | $24.52 | -7.09% | 36.4M | -3.80 | -$6.46 | N/A |
| SNDK | $1,407.61 | +1.80% | 208.5B | 48.16 | $29.23 | N/A |
| GLW | $191.81 | -7.91% | 165.2B | 92.28 | $2.08 | +0.57% |
| APH | $125.00 | -3.24% | 153.8B | 35.92 | $3.48 | +0.66% |
| COHR | $382.45 | -5.55% | 60.7B | 183.12 | $2.09 | N/A |
| TEL | $205.11 | -0.76% | 59.9B | 20.97 | $9.78 | +1.39% |
| KEYS | $349.01 | -3.47% | 59.9B | 61.56 | $5.67 | N/A |
| FLEX | $137.86 | -4.00% | 50.7B | 59.17 | $2.33 | N/A |
| GRMN | $225.75 | -3.70% | 43.5B | 25.20 | $8.96 | +1.59% |
| CLS | $358.55 | -6.04% | 41.2B | 43.52 | $8.24 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WATT vs SNDK Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 208.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while SNDK trades at $1,407.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is 48.16. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SNDK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SNDK's competition here
WATT vs GLW Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 165.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while GLW trades at $191.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 92.28. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check GLW's competition here
WATT vs APH Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 153.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while APH trades at $125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 35.92. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check APH's competition here
WATT vs COHR Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while COHR trades at $382.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 183.12. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check COHR's competition here
WATT vs TEL Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while TEL trades at $205.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TEL's competition here
WATT vs KEYS Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while KEYS trades at $349.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 61.56. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check KEYS's competition here
WATT vs FLEX Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while FLEX trades at $137.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 59.17. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check FLEX's competition here
WATT vs GRMN Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while GRMN trades at $225.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check GRMN's competition here
WATT vs CLS Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while CLS trades at $358.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 43.52. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check CLS's competition here
WATT vs JBL Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while JBL trades at $339.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 45.73. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check JBL's competition here
WATT vs IIVI Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check IIVI's competition here
WATT vs TDY Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while TDY trades at $616.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 31.28. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TDY's competition here
WATT vs FN Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while FN trades at $722.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 62.14. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check FN's competition here
WATT vs MKSI Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while MKSI trades at $303.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 62.51. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MKSI's competition here
WATT vs WDCVV Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check WDCVV's competition here
WATT vs TTMI Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while TTMI trades at $167.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 90.89. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TTMI's competition here
WATT vs TRMB Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while TRMB trades at $55.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 28.86. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TRMB's competition here
WATT vs SANM Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while SANM trades at $235.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 49.86. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SANM's competition here
WATT vs VICR Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while VICR trades at $273.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 91.22. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VICR's competition here
WATT vs LFUS Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while LFUS trades at $446.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is -263.97. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LFUS's competition here
WATT vs CGNX Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while CGNX trades at $64.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 75.60. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check CGNX's competition here
WATT vs ESE Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while ESE trades at $289.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 57.19. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ESE's competition here
WATT vs ST Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while ST trades at $48.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 146.94. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ST's competition here
WATT vs PLXS Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while PLXS trades at $258.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check PLXS's competition here
WATT vs NOVT Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while NOVT trades at $152.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 110.86. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check NOVT's competition here
WATT vs MDA Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, MDA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while MDA trades at $37.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas MDA's P/E ratio is 64.20. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MDA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MDA's competition here
WATT vs OLED Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while OLED trades at $92.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OLED's competition here
WATT vs VNT Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while VNT trades at $28.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VNT's competition here
WATT vs ITRI Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while ITRI trades at $79.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ITRI's competition here
WATT vs OSIS Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while OSIS trades at $205.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OSIS's competition here
WATT vs BMI Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while BMI trades at $114.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 25.85. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BMI's competition here
WATT vs BELFB Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while BELFB trades at $256.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 61.71. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BELFB's competition here
WATT vs BHE Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while BHE trades at $84.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 90.40. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BHE's competition here
WATT vs BELFA Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while BELFA trades at $230.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 55.60. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BELFA's competition here
WATT vs ROG Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while ROG trades at $139.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -45.52. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ROG's competition here
WATT vs PENG Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while PENG trades at $46.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 66.84. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check PENG's competition here
WATT vs NOVTU Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while NOVTU trades at $65.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check NOVTU's competition here
WATT vs OUST Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while OUST trades at $34.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -37.48. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OUST's competition here
WATT vs CTS Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while CTS trades at $58.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check CTS's competition here
WATT vs BKSY Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while BKSY trades at $38.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -15.55. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BKSY's competition here
WATT vs VPG Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while VPG trades at $97.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 216.62. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VPG's competition here
WATT vs SATL Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while SATL trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -14.44. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SATL's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SATL's competition here
WATT vs ALNT Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while ALNT trades at $61.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 42.89. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ALNT's competition here
WATT vs KODK Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 945.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while KODK trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check KODK's competition here
WATT vs DAKT Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 928.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while DAKT trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 34.62. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check DAKT's competition here
WATT vs FARO Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check FARO's competition here
WATT vs LYTS Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 726.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while LYTS trades at $23.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 31.51. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LYTS's competition here
WATT vs OUST-WTA Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
WATT vs LPTH Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 551.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while LPTH trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LPTH's competition here
WATT vs AMOT Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check AMOT's competition here
WATT vs MLAB Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 533M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while MLAB trades at $96.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is 148.42. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MLAB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MLAB's competition here
WATT vs OUST-WT Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OUST-WT's competition here
WATT vs SATLW Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 454.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while SATLW trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SATLW's competition here
WATT vs MEI Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 373.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while MEI trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MEI's competition here
WATT vs VLDR Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VLDR's competition here
WATT vs SLNHP Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 299.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while SLNHP trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -6.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SLNHP's competition here
WATT vs OPTX Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 285.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while OPTX trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -143.20. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OPTX's competition here
WATT vs RELL Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 245.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while RELL trades at $16.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 62.81. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check RELL's competition here
WATT vs MPTI Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 240.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while MPTI trades at $79.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 30.01. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MPTI's competition here
WATT vs BKSY-WT Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 237.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BKSY-WT's competition here
WATT vs MVIS Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 182.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while MVIS trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MVIS's competition here
WATT vs EMAN Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check EMAN's competition here
WATT vs KULR Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 168.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while KULR trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check KULR's competition here
WATT vs WRAP Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 82.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while WRAP trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check WRAP's competition here
WATT vs GNSS Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while GNSS trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check GNSS's competition here
WATT vs SOTK Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while SOTK trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 50.30. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SOTK's competition here
WATT vs ODYS Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 76.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while ODYS trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ODYS's competition here
WATT vs CPSH Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 70.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while CPSH trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 153.00. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check CPSH's competition here
WATT vs SLNH Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while SLNH trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -6.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SLNH's competition here
WATT vs MIND Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while MIND trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 73.39. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MIND's competition here
WATT vs LINK Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while LINK trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -27.15. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LINK's competition here
WATT vs ELTK Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 53.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while ELTK trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 66.83. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ELTK's competition here
WATT vs DSWL Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while DSWL trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check DSWL's competition here
WATT vs UEIC Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while UEIC trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check UEIC's competition here
WATT vs ACFN Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while ACFN trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ACFN's competition here
WATT vs LUNA Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while LUNA trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -36.67. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LUNA's competition here
WATT vs LGL Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while LGL trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 705.00. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LGL's competition here
WATT vs OPTXW Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while OPTXW trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OPTXW's competition here
WATT vs ISNS Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ISNS's competition here
WATT vs NSYS Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while NSYS trades at $12.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -136.89. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NSYS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check NSYS's competition here
WATT vs DAIO Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while DAIO trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check DAIO's competition here
WATT vs WBX Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while WBX trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check WBX's competition here
WATT vs REFR Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while REFR trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check REFR's competition here
WATT vs NEON Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while NEON trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check NEON's competition here
WATT vs ELSE Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while ELSE trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 85.00. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ELSE's competition here
WATT vs TMPOW Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TMPOW's competition here
WATT vs HOLO Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while HOLO trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to HOLO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check HOLO's competition here
WATT vs SGMA Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SGMA's competition here
WATT vs VIAO Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VIAO's competition here
WATT vs GAUZ Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while GAUZ trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check GAUZ's competition here
WATT vs KNW Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while KNW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check KNW's competition here
WATT vs SVRE Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while SVRE trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SVRE's competition here
WATT vs MTEK Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while MTEK trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MTEK's competition here
WATT vs SVREW Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while SVREW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SVREW's competition here
WATT vs OST Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while OST trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OST's competition here
WATT vs SELX Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while SELX trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SELX's competition here
WATT vs BNSO Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BNSO's competition here
WATT vs MINDP Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MINDP's competition here
WATT vs USBC Comparison May 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 36.4M. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $24.52, while USBC trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.80, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to USBC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to USBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check USBC's competition here