Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See WATT's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for WATT and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WATT | $11.10 | -6.17% | 61.1M | -2.25 | -$4.94 | N/A |
| NVDA | $217.55 | -4.57% | 5.3T | 37.24 | $5.84 | +0.13% |
| TSM | $417.52 | -2.29% | 2.2T | 30.24 | $13.81 | +0.83% |
| AVGO | $368.79 | -0.74% | 1.8T | 45.36 | $8.13 | +0.69% |
| SKHY | $161.04 | -0.35% | 1.1T | 10.53 | $15.29 | N/A |
| MU | $932.86 | -0.27% | 1.1T | 20.68 | $45.12 | +0.06% |
| AMD | $465.58 | -2.33% | 759.2B | 80.83 | $5.76 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,696.16 | -2.24% | 653.7B | 52.97 | $32.02 | +0.53% |
| INTC | $89.47 | -2.85% | 451.3B | 156.96 | $0.57 | N/A |
| LRCX | $301.90 | -5.24% | 377.5B | 51.87 | $5.82 | +0.34% |
Stock Comparison
NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ: NVDA)
WATT vs NVDA Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.3T. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while NVDA trades at $217.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check NVDA's competition here
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (NYSE: TSM)
WATT vs TSM Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while TSM trades at $417.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TSM's competition here
Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ: AVGO)
WATT vs AVGO Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while AVGO trades at $368.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 45.36. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check AVGO's competition here
SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHY)
WATT vs SKHY Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, SKHY has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while SKHY trades at $161.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas SKHY's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SKHY's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SKHY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SKHY's competition here
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU)
WATT vs MU Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while MU trades at $932.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MU's competition here
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMD)
WATT vs AMD Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 759.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while AMD trades at $465.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 80.83. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check AMD's competition here
ASML Holding N.V. (NASDAQ: ASML)
WATT vs ASML Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 653.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while ASML trades at $1,696.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 52.97. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ASML's competition here
Intel Corp. (NASDAQ: INTC)
WATT vs INTC Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 451.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while INTC trades at $89.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 156.96. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check INTC's competition here
Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX)
WATT vs LRCX Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 377.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while LRCX trades at $301.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 51.87. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LRCX's competition here
Applied Materials, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMAT)
WATT vs AMAT Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 366.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while AMAT trades at $461.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 46.68. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check AMAT's competition here
Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: ARM)
WATT vs ARM Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 255.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while ARM trades at $239.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 135.06. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ARM's competition here
KLA Corporation (NASDAQ: KLAC)
WATT vs KLAC Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 240.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while KLAC trades at $175.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 53.58. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check KLAC's competition here
Texas Instruments Incorporated (NASDAQ: TXN)
WATT vs TXN Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 236.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while TXN trades at $258.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TXN's competition here
Marvell Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MRVL)
WATT vs MRVL Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 189.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while MRVL trades at $216.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 65.64. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MRVL's competition here
Analog Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: ADI)
WATT vs ADI Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 176.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while ADI trades at $361.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 36.69. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ADI's competition here
QUALCOMM Incorporated (NASDAQ: QCOM)
WATT vs QCOM Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 172.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while QCOM trades at $164.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check QCOM's competition here
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. (NYSE: ASX)
WATT vs ASX Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 83B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while ASX trades at $37.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 43.92. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ASX's competition here
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: MPWR)
WATT vs MPWR Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while MPWR trades at $1,256.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 66.72. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MPWR's competition here
TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL)
WATT vs TEL Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while TEL trades at $202.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TEL's competition here
NXP Semiconductors N.V. (NASDAQ: NXPI)
WATT vs NXPI Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while NXPI trades at $223.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check NXPI's competition here
Teradyne, Inc. (NASDAQ: TER)
WATT vs TER Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while TER trades at $354.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 46.22. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TER's competition here
Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: ALAB)
WATT vs ALAB Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while ALAB trades at $289.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 116.72. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ALAB's competition here
United Microelectronics Corporation (NYSE: UMC)
WATT vs UMC Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while UMC trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check UMC's competition here
STMicroelectronics N.V. (NYSE: STM)
WATT vs STM Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while STM trades at $49.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 83.69. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check STM's competition here
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (NASDAQ: CRDO)
WATT vs CRDO Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while CRDO trades at $232.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 68.06. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check CRDO's competition here
Cerebras Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: CBRS)
WATT vs CBRS Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while CBRS trades at $179.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -4477.00. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CBRS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check CBRS's competition here
Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ: MCHP)
WATT vs MCHP Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while MCHP trades at $72.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 44.74. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MCHP's competition here
ON Semiconductor Corporation (NASDAQ: ON)
WATT vs ON Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while ON trades at $72.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ON's competition here
Qnity Electronics, Inc. (NYSE: Q)
WATT vs Q Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while Q trades at $120.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 31.42. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check Q's competition here
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS)
WATT vs GFS Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while GFS trades at $44.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check GFS's competition here
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (NASDAQ: TSEM)
WATT vs TSEM Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while TSEM trades at $208.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 72.73. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TSEM's competition here
Entegris, Inc. (NASDAQ: ENTG)
WATT vs ENTG Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while ENTG trades at $134.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 42.03. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ENTG's competition here
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MTSI)
WATT vs MTSI Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while MTSI trades at $265.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 59.61. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MTSI's competition here
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (NASDAQ: LSCC)
WATT vs LSCC Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while LSCC trades at $114.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 74.29. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LSCC's competition here
SiTime Corporation (NASDAQ: SITM)
WATT vs SITM Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while SITM trades at $557.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 90.27. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SITM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SITM's competition here
Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO)
WATT vs ONTO Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while ONTO trades at $270.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 55.81. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ONTO's competition here
Semtech Corporation (NASDAQ: SMTC)
WATT vs SMTC Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while SMTC trades at $131.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 71.29. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SMTC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SMTC's competition here
Amkor Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMKR)
WATT vs AMKR Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while AMKR trades at $47.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check AMKR's competition here
Nova Ltd. (NASDAQ: NVMI)
WATT vs NVMI Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while NVMI trades at $349.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 38.23. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check NVMI's competition here
Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: SWKS)
WATT vs SWKS Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while SWKS trades at $65.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SWKS's competition here
Wolfspeed, Inc. (NASDAQ: CREE)
WATT vs CREE Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CREE's ROE of -3.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check CREE's competition here
Rambus Inc. (NASDAQ: RMBS)
WATT vs RMBS Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while RMBS trades at $85.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 33.76. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check RMBS's competition here
Qorvo, Inc. (NASDAQ: QRVO)
WATT vs QRVO Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while QRVO trades at $94.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check QRVO's competition here
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (NASDAQ: SIMO)
WATT vs SIMO Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while SIMO trades at $245.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 54.26. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SIMO's competition here
FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM)
WATT vs FORM Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while FORM trades at $101.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 62.77. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check FORM's competition here
Brooks Automation, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRKS)
WATT vs BRKS Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BRKS's competition here
Silicon Laboratories Inc. (NASDAQ: SLAB)
WATT vs SLAB Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while SLAB trades at $218.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 143.78. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SLAB's competition here
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALGM)
WATT vs ALGM Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while ALGM trades at $35.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 66.24. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALGM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ALGM's competition here
Camtek Ltd. (NASDAQ: CAMT)
WATT vs CAMT Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while CAMT trades at $135.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 43.45. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check CAMT's competition here
MaxLinear, Inc. (NASDAQ: MXL)
WATT vs MXL Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while MXL trades at $61.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 108.30. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MXL's competition here
Cirrus Logic, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRUS)
WATT vs CRUS Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while CRUS trades at $108.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check CRUS's competition here
Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI)
WATT vs PI Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while PI trades at $170.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 84.24. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check PI's competition here
ACM Research, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACMR)
WATT vs ACMR Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while ACMR trades at $74.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 49.95. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ACMR's competition here
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: KLIC)
WATT vs KLIC Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while KLIC trades at $81.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check KLIC's competition here
Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (NYSE: VSH)
WATT vs VSH Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while VSH trades at $30.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 105.38. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VSH's competition here
Diodes Incorporated (NASDAQ: DIOD)
WATT vs DIOD Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while DIOD trades at $88.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 47.83. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check DIOD's competition here
Synaptics Incorporated (NASDAQ: SYNA)
WATT vs SYNA Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while SYNA trades at $95.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SYNA's competition here
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACLS)
WATT vs ACLS Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while ACLS trades at $115.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ACLS's competition here
IPG Photonics Corporation (NASDAQ: IPGP)
WATT vs IPGP Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while IPGP trades at $76.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 78.90. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check IPGP's competition here
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: UCTT)
WATT vs UCTT Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while UCTT trades at $69.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 46.01. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check UCTT's competition here
Ambarella, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMBA)
WATT vs AMBA Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while AMBA trades at $70.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 107.02. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check AMBA's competition here
Navitas Semiconductor Corp (NASDAQ: NVTS)
WATT vs NVTS Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while NVTS trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -60.42. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check NVTS's competition here
AXT, Inc. (NASDAQ: AXTI)
WATT vs AXTI Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while AXTI trades at $58.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -244.29. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AXTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check AXTI's competition here
Power Integrations, Inc. (NASDAQ: POWI)
WATT vs POWI Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while POWI trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check POWI's competition here
Veeco Instruments Inc. (NASDAQ: VECO)
WATT vs VECO Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while VECO trades at $44.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 41.40. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VECO's competition here
Aehr Test Systems (NASDAQ: AEHR)
WATT vs AEHR Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while AEHR trades at $80.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 2693.67. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check AEHR's competition here
Penguin Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: PENG)
WATT vs PENG Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while PENG trades at $49.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check PENG's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NASDAQ: OUST)
WATT vs OUST Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while OUST trades at $34.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -36.83. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OUST's competition here
nLIGHT, Inc. (NASDAQ: LASR)
WATT vs LASR Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while LASR trades at $42.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 89.46. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LASR's competition here
Himax Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: HIMX)
WATT vs HIMX Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while HIMX trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 66.21. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check HIMX's competition here
Cohu, Inc. (NASDAQ: COHU)
WATT vs COHU Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while COHU trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -266.67. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check COHU's competition here
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES Inc. (NASDAQ: IMOS)
WATT vs IMOS Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while IMOS trades at $55.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check IMOS's competition here
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (NASDAQ: ICHR)
WATT vs ICHR Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while ICHR trades at $55.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 108.72. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ICHR's competition here
Photronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: PLAB)
WATT vs PLAB Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while PLAB trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check PLAB's competition here
SkyWater Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: SKYT)
WATT vs SKYT Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while SKYT trades at $32.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -811.50. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SKYT's competition here
Ambiq Micro, Inc. (NYSE: AMBQ)
WATT vs AMBQ Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while AMBQ trades at $57.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check AMBQ's competition here
Wolfspeed Inc. (NYSE: WOLF)
WATT vs WOLF Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while WOLF trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check WOLF's competition here
SMART Global Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SGH)
WATT vs SGH Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SGH's competition here
Aeva Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AEVA)
WATT vs AEVA Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while AEVA trades at $15.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -9.30. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check AEVA's competition here
Arteris, Inc. (NASDAQ: AIP)
WATT vs AIP Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while AIP trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -78.61. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AIP's ROE of -3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check AIP's competition here
POET Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: POET)
WATT vs POET Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 990.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while POET trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -17.37. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check POET's competition here
Daqo New Energy Corp. (NYSE: DQ)
WATT vs DQ Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 926M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while DQ trades at $13.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check DQ's competition here
Kopin Corp. (NASDAQ: KOPN)
WATT vs KOPN Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 830.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while KOPN trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 845.28. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check KOPN's competition here
indie Semiconductor, Inc. (NASDAQ: INDI)
WATT vs INDI Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 798.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while INDI trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check INDI's competition here
CEVA, Inc. (NASDAQ: CEVA)
WATT vs CEVA Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while CEVA trades at $27.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 67.80. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check CEVA's competition here
Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (NASDAQ: AOSL)
WATT vs AOSL Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 737.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while AOSL trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -84.93. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check AOSL's competition here
NVE Corporation (NASDAQ: NVEC)
WATT vs NVEC Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 488M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while NVEC trades at $100.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 27.12. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check NVEC's competition here
Quantum eMotion Corp. (AMEX: QNC)
WATT vs QNC Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 443.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while QNC trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is -202.00. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check QNC's competition here
Everspin Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: MRAM)
WATT vs MRAM Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 388.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while MRAM trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -346.23. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MRAM's competition here
Valens Semiconductor Ltd. WT (NYSE: VLN-WT)
WATT vs VLN-WT Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 369.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VLN-WT's competition here
SEALSQ Corp (NASDAQ: LAES)
WATT vs LAES Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while LAES trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LAES's competition here
Transphorm, Inc. (NASDAQ: TGAN)
WATT vs TGAN Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TGAN's competition here
Amtech Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: ASYS)
WATT vs ASYS Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 263.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while ASYS trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 40.70. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ASYS's competition here
Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU)
WATT vs ALMU Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 240.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while ALMU trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -109.50. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ALMU's competition here
GSI Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: GSIT)
WATT vs GSIT Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 218.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while GSIT trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -12.39. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check GSIT's competition here
Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (NYSE: VLN)
WATT vs VLN Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 195.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while VLN trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VLN's competition here
QuickLogic Corporation (NASDAQ: QUIK)
WATT vs QUIK Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 191.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while QUIK trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -20.40. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check QUIK's competition here
GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. (NYSE: GCTS)
WATT vs GCTS Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 169.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while GCTS trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check GCTS's competition here
Atomera Incorporated (NASDAQ: ATOM)
WATT vs ATOM Comparison September 2026
Energous Corporation (NASDAQ: WATT) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 61.1M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $11.10 on the NASDAQ, while ATOM trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.25, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ATOM's competition here