Energous Corporation (WATT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WATT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WATT | $15.10 | -0.40% | 22.4M | -3.07 | -$4.92 | N/A |
| APH | $151.20 | -1.27% | 186.1B | 40.12 | $3.77 | +0.61% |
| GLW | $154.61 | -2.39% | 133B | 57.46 | $2.69 | +0.72% |
| KEYS | $315.90 | +1.00% | 54B | 36.42 | $8.67 | N/A |
| GRMN | $249.56 | -0.57% | 48.1B | 27.65 | $9.03 | +1.50% |
| COHR | $277.60 | +0.23% | 44.1B | 57.18 | $4.86 | N/A |
| FLEX | $119.25 | -1.54% | 43.7B | 36.03 | $3.31 | N/A |
| CLS | $301.34 | -0.83% | 34.6B | 42.88 | $7.02 | N/A |
| JBL | $301.01 | -1.97% | 31.5B | 25.10 | $11.99 | +0.11% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | +5.28% |
Stock Comparison
WATT vs APH Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 186.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while APH trades at $151.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 40.12. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check APH's competition here
WATT vs GLW Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 133B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while GLW trades at $154.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 57.46. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check GLW's competition here
WATT vs KEYS Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while KEYS trades at $315.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 36.42. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check KEYS's competition here
WATT vs GRMN Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while GRMN trades at $249.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check GRMN's competition here
WATT vs COHR Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while COHR trades at $277.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 57.18. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check COHR's competition here
WATT vs FLEX Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while FLEX trades at $119.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 36.03. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check FLEX's competition here
WATT vs CLS Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while CLS trades at $301.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 42.88. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check CLS's competition here
WATT vs JBL Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while JBL trades at $301.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check JBL's competition here
WATT vs IIVI Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check IIVI's competition here
WATT vs TDY Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while TDY trades at $635.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TDY's competition here
WATT vs MKSI Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while MKSI trades at $324.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MKSI's competition here
WATT vs WDCVV Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check WDCVV's competition here
WATT vs FN Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while FN trades at $478.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check FN's competition here
WATT vs TTMI Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while TTMI trades at $132.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 48.90. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TTMI's competition here
WATT vs TRMB Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while TRMB trades at $52.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TRMB's competition here
WATT vs VICR Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while VICR trades at $237.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 79.47. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VICR's competition here
WATT vs CGNX Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while CGNX trades at $64.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 53.84. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check CGNX's competition here
WATT vs SANM Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while SANM trades at $197.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SANM's competition here
WATT vs LFUS Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while LFUS trades at $397.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 33.71. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LFUS's competition here
WATT vs ESE Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while ESE trades at $318.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 42.65. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ESE's competition here
WATT vs RAL Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, RAL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while RAL trades at $70.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas RAL's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RAL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to RAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check RAL's competition here
WATT vs PLXS Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while PLXS trades at $250.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 31.85. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check PLXS's competition here
WATT vs ST Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while ST trades at $45.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ST's competition here
WATT vs NOVT Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while NOVT trades at $148.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 44.39. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check NOVT's competition here
WATT vs VNT Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while VNT trades at $30.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VNT's competition here
WATT vs MDA Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, MDA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while MDA trades at $30.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MDA's P/E ratio is 49.74. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MDA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MDA's competition here
WATT vs ITRI Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while ITRI trades at $85.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ITRI's competition here
WATT vs OLED Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while OLED trades at $80.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OLED's competition here
WATT vs OSIS Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while OSIS trades at $212.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OSIS's competition here
WATT vs BELFA Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while BELFA trades at $228.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 31.90. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BELFA's competition here
WATT vs BELFB Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while BELFB trades at $270.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BELFB's competition here
WATT vs PENG Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while PENG trades at $60.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check PENG's competition here
WATT vs KN Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while KN trades at $35.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 35.95. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check KN's competition here
WATT vs BHE Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while BHE trades at $78.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 31.89. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BHE's competition here
WATT vs PLUG Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while PLUG trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -4.13. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check PLUG's competition here
WATT vs ROG Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while ROG trades at $132.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 45.88. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ROG's competition here
WATT vs NOVTU Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while NOVTU trades at $63.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is 31.74. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check NOVTU's competition here
WATT vs IQMX Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, IQMX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while IQMX trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas IQMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to IQMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to IQMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check IQMX's competition here
WATT vs CTS Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while CTS trades at $59.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check CTS's competition here
WATT vs INFQ Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, INFQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while INFQ trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas INFQ's P/E ratio is -43.12. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to INFQ's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to INFQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check INFQ's competition here
WATT vs VPG Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while VPG trades at $103.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 182.19. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VPG's competition here
WATT vs DAKT Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 923.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while DAKT trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check DAKT's competition here
WATT vs FARO Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check FARO's competition here
WATT vs BKSY Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 824.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while BKSY trades at $22.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BKSY's competition here
WATT vs LYTS Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 745.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while LYTS trades at $23.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LYTS's competition here
WATT vs OUST-WTA Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
WATT vs AMOT Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check AMOT's competition here
WATT vs MEI Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 530.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while MEI trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -13.85. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MEI's competition here
WATT vs LPTH Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 500.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while LPTH trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -61.53. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LPTH's competition here
WATT vs OUST-WT Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OUST-WT's competition here
WATT vs SATLW Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 331.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while SATLW trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SATLW's competition here
WATT vs OPTX Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 301.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while OPTX trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -68.84. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OPTX's competition here
WATT vs OPTXW Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while OPTXW trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OPTXW's competition here
WATT vs VLDR Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VLDR's competition here
WATT vs SLNHP Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 282.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while SLNHP trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SLNHP's competition here
WATT vs RELL Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 248.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while RELL trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 55.42. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check RELL's competition here
WATT vs MPTI Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 231.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while MPTI trades at $75.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MPTI's competition here
WATT vs SLNH Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while SLNH trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SLNH's competition here
WATT vs EMAN Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check EMAN's competition here
WATT vs BKSY-WT Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 158.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BKSY-WT's competition here
WATT vs USBC Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 132.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while USBC trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to USBC's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to USBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check USBC's competition here
WATT vs WRAP Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 114.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while WRAP trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check WRAP's competition here
WATT vs MVIS Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 102.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while MVIS trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MVIS's competition here
WATT vs ODYS Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while ODYS trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ODYS's competition here
WATT vs CPSH Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 70.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while CPSH trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 6228.57. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check CPSH's competition here
WATT vs UEIC Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while UEIC trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check UEIC's competition here
WATT vs ELTK Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while ELTK trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -19.02. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ELTK's competition here
WATT vs DSWL Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while DSWL trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check DSWL's competition here
WATT vs ACFN Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 50.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while ACFN trades at $20.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ACFN's competition here
WATT vs WBX Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while WBX trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to WBX's ROE of -12.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check WBX's competition here
WATT vs MIND Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while MIND trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 30.41. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MIND's competition here
WATT vs LGL Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while LGL trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 584.42. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LGL's competition here
WATT vs AMPGR Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while AMPGR trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is -8.05. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check AMPGR's competition here
WATT vs ISNS Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ISNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ISNS's competition here
WATT vs DAIO Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while DAIO trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check DAIO's competition here
WATT vs ELSE Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while ELSE trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 96.62. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ELSE's competition here
WATT vs AMPGZ Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while AMPGZ trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check AMPGZ's competition here
WATT vs TMPOW Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TMPOW's competition here
WATT vs HOLOW Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while HOLOW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check HOLOW's competition here
WATT vs REFR Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while REFR trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check REFR's competition here
WATT vs SGMA Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SGMA's competition here
WATT vs VIAO Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VIAO's competition here
WATT vs KNW Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while KNW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check KNW's competition here
WATT vs NEON Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while NEON trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check NEON's competition here
WATT vs OST Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while OST trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OST's competition here
WATT vs SVRE Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while SVRE trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SVRE's competition here
WATT vs MTEKW Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, MTEKW has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while MTEKW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MTEKW's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MTEKW's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MTEKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MTEKW's competition here
WATT vs SVREW Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while SVREW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SVREW's competition here
WATT vs GAUZ Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while GAUZ trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check GAUZ's competition here
WATT vs BNSO Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BNSO's competition here
WATT vs MINDP Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MINDP's competition here
WATT vs MMAT Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MMAT's competition here
WATT vs IMTE Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while IMTE trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check IMTE's competition here
WATT vs EXYNW Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, EXYNW has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while EXYNW trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas EXYNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EXYNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to EXYNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check EXYNW's competition here
WATT vs SOBR Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while SOBR trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SOBR's competition here
WATT vs FCUV Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 545.6K. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while FCUV trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check FCUV's competition here
WATT vs LGL-WT Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 295.8K. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while LGL-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LGL-WT's competition here
WATT vs OUSTZ Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 125.6K. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while OUSTZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OUSTZ's competition here
WATT vs OUSTW Comparison July 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 22.4M. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 114.6K. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $15.10, while OUSTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -3.07, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OUSTW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OUSTW's competition here