Energous Corporation
Energous Corporation (WATT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WATT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WATT | $28.19 | +20.42% | 41.9M | -4.36 | -$6.46 | N/A |
| APH | $149.71 | -0.31% | 184.1B | 44.70 | $3.35 | +0.55% |
| GLW | $175.89 | +3.77% | 151.1B | 95.57 | $1.84 | +0.63% |
| SNDK | $989.90 | +6.16% | 146.1B | -132.69 | -$7.46 | N/A |
| TEL | $214.67 | -1.41% | 63B | 21.89 | $9.80 | +1.33% |
| KEYS | $346.96 | +0.12% | 59.5B | 61.10 | $5.68 | N/A |
| COHR | $336.09 | -0.47% | 53.3B | 326.30 | $1.03 | N/A |
| GRMN | $259.39 | -0.54% | 49.9B | 30.24 | $8.58 | +1.39% |
| CLS | $410.21 | +4.75% | 47.2B | 57.14 | $7.18 | N/A |
| JBL | $341.65 | +0.92% | 36.1B | 45.99 | $7.43 | +0.09% |
Stock Comparison
WATT vs APH Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 184.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while APH trades at $149.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 44.70. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check APH's competition here
WATT vs GLW Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 151.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while GLW trades at $175.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 95.57. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check GLW's competition here
WATT vs SNDK Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 146.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while SNDK trades at $989.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is -132.69. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SNDK's competition here
WATT vs TEL Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while TEL trades at $214.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TEL's competition here
WATT vs KEYS Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while KEYS trades at $346.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 61.10. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check KEYS's competition here
WATT vs COHR Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while COHR trades at $336.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 326.30. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check COHR's competition here
WATT vs GRMN Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while GRMN trades at $259.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check GRMN's competition here
WATT vs CLS Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while CLS trades at $410.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 57.14. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check CLS's competition here
WATT vs JBL Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while JBL trades at $341.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 45.99. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check JBL's competition here
WATT vs FLEX Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while FLEX trades at $91.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 40.99. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check FLEX's competition here
WATT vs IIVI Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check IIVI's competition here
WATT vs TDY Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while TDY trades at $648.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TDY's competition here
WATT vs FN Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while FN trades at $720.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 69.06. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check FN's competition here
WATT vs FTV Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while FTV trades at $61.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check FTV's competition here
WATT vs MKSI Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while MKSI trades at $280.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 64.30. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MKSI's competition here
WATT vs WDCVV Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check WDCVV's competition here
WATT vs TRMB Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while TRMB trades at $67.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 38.27. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TRMB's competition here
WATT vs TTMI Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while TTMI trades at $149.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 88.70. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TTMI's competition here
WATT vs VICR Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while VICR trades at $273.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 105.20. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VICR's competition here
WATT vs SANM Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while SANM trades at $192.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 46.07. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SANM's competition here
WATT vs LFUS Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while LFUS trades at $407.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is -141.37. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to LFUS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LFUS's competition here
WATT vs CGNX Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while CGNX trades at $54.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 79.79. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check CGNX's competition here
WATT vs ESE Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while ESE trades at $319.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 66.33. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ESE's competition here
WATT vs PLXS Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while PLXS trades at $254.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 39.58. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check PLXS's competition here
WATT vs ST Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while ST trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 198.62. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ST's competition here
WATT vs VNT Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while VNT trades at $36.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VNT's competition here
WATT vs OSIS Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while OSIS trades at $292.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 33.14. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OSIS's competition here
WATT vs NOVT Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while NOVT trades at $134.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 91.22. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check NOVT's competition here
WATT vs MDA Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, MDA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while MDA trades at $32.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas MDA's P/E ratio is 52.87. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MDA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MDA's competition here
WATT vs ITRI Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while ITRI trades at $88.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ITRI's competition here
WATT vs BMI Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while BMI trades at $121.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BMI's competition here
WATT vs BELFB Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while BELFB trades at $276.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 59.49. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BELFB's competition here
WATT vs BELFA Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while BELFA trades at $252.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 54.50. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BELFA's competition here
WATT vs BHE Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while BHE trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 102.21. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BHE's competition here
WATT vs ROG Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while ROG trades at $131.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is -38.61. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ROG's competition here
WATT vs NOVTU Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while NOVTU trades at $59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check NOVTU's competition here
WATT vs OUST Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while OUST trades at $28.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -26.37. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OUST's competition here
WATT vs CTS Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while CTS trades at $56.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check CTS's competition here
WATT vs PENG Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while PENG trades at $30.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 43.84. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check PENG's competition here
WATT vs ALNT Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while ALNT trades at $74.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 56.57. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ALNT's competition here
WATT vs BKSY Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while BKSY trades at $33.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -16.19. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BKSY's competition here
WATT vs DAKT Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 973.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while DAKT trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check DAKT's competition here
WATT vs FARO Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check FARO's competition here
WATT vs VPG Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 805.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while VPG trades at $60.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 151.41. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VPG's competition here
WATT vs OUST-WTA Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
WATT vs LPTH Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 701.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while LPTH trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -30.94. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LPTH's competition here
WATT vs LYTS Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 688M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while LYTS trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 29.86. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LYTS's competition here
WATT vs SATL Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 674.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while SATL trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -34.28. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SATL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SATL's competition here
WATT vs KOPN Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 658.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while KOPN trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 370.00. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check KOPN's competition here
WATT vs AMOT Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check AMOT's competition here
WATT vs MLAB Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 541.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while MLAB trades at $97.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is 150.71. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MLAB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MLAB's competition here
WATT vs OUST-WT Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OUST-WT's competition here
WATT vs OPTX Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 354.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while OPTX trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -191.60. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OPTX's competition here
WATT vs BKSY-WT Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 316.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BKSY-WT's competition here
WATT vs VLDR Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VLDR's competition here
WATT vs MEI Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while MEI trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MEI's competition here
WATT vs RELL Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 209M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while RELL trades at $14.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 53.48. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check RELL's competition here
WATT vs SLNHP Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 207.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while SLNHP trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -6.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SLNHP's competition here
WATT vs MVIS Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 200M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while MVIS trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MVIS's competition here
WATT vs MPTI Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 181.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while MPTI trades at $63.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MPTI's competition here
WATT vs EMAN Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check EMAN's competition here
WATT vs SATLW Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 165.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while SATLW trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SATLW's competition here
WATT vs KULR Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while KULR trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check KULR's competition here
WATT vs WRAP Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 88.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while WRAP trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check WRAP's competition here
WATT vs GNSS Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while GNSS trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -3.91%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check GNSS's competition here
WATT vs ODYS Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while ODYS trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ODYS's competition here
WATT vs CPSH Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 80.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while CPSH trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 176.00. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check CPSH's competition here
WATT vs SOTK Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while SOTK trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 46.50. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SOTK's competition here
WATT vs OPTXW Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 65.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while OPTXW trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OPTXW's competition here
WATT vs MIND Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while MIND trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 71.33. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MIND's competition here
WATT vs ELTK Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while ELTK trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 70.17. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ELTK's competition here
WATT vs UEIC Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while UEIC trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check UEIC's competition here
WATT vs DSWL Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while DSWL trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check DSWL's competition here
WATT vs LINK Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while LINK trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -22.77. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LINK's competition here
WATT vs ACFN Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while ACFN trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ACFN's competition here
WATT vs LGL Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while LGL trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 67.27. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LGL's competition here
WATT vs NSYS Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while NSYS trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -158.33. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check NSYS's competition here
WATT vs LUNA Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while LUNA trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -36.67. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check LUNA's competition here
WATT vs SLNH Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while SLNH trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -6.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SLNH's competition here
WATT vs ISNS Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ISNS's competition here
WATT vs REFR Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while REFR trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check REFR's competition here
WATT vs WBX Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while WBX trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check WBX's competition here
WATT vs NEON Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while NEON trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check NEON's competition here
WATT vs ELSE Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while ELSE trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 84.56. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check ELSE's competition here
WATT vs DAIO Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while DAIO trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check DAIO's competition here
WATT vs HOLO Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while HOLO trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to HOLO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check HOLO's competition here
WATT vs TMPOW Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check TMPOW's competition here
WATT vs SGMA Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SGMA's competition here
WATT vs VIAO Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check VIAO's competition here
WATT vs KNW Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while KNW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check KNW's competition here
WATT vs SELX Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while SELX trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SELX's competition here
WATT vs SVREW Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while SVREW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SVREW's competition here
WATT vs MTEK Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while MTEK trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MTEK's competition here
WATT vs GAUZ Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while GAUZ trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check GAUZ's competition here
WATT vs OST Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while OST trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check OST's competition here
WATT vs SVRE Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while SVRE trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check SVRE's competition here
WATT vs BNSO Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check BNSO's competition here
WATT vs MINDP Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MINDP's competition here
WATT vs MMAT Comparison April 2026
WATT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WATT stands at 41.9M. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WATT is priced at $28.19, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WATT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.36, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WATT's ROE is -0.86%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WATT is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WATT.Check MMAT's competition here