United Microelectronics Corporation

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.5T. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while NVDA trades at $225.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 46.18. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check NVDA's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while TSM trades at $399.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check TSM's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while AVGO trades at $416.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 81.09. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check AVGO's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 906.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while MU trades at $803.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check MU's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 726.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while AMD trades at $445.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 148.50. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check AMD's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 609.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while ASML trades at $1,581.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 52.01. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check ASML's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 604.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while INTC trades at $120.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -200.48. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check INTC's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 369.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while LRCX trades at $295.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 55.74. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check LRCX's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 346.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while AMAT trades at $436.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 44.78. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check AMAT's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 278.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while TXN trades at $306.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 52.47. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check TXN's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 241.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while KLAC trades at $1,849.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 52.36. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check KLAC's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 235.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while ARM trades at $221.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 260.25. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check ARM's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 224.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while QCOM trades at $213.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check QCOM's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 211.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while ADI trades at $432.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 79.34. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check ADI's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 155.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while MRVL trades at $177.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 57.78. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check MRVL's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while MPWR trades at $1,650.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 118.30. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check MPWR's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 77.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while ASX trades at $35.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 54.56. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check ASX's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while NXPI trades at $298.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check NXPI's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while TER trades at $363.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 67.25. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check TER's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while STM trades at $63.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 396.23. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check STM's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while MCHP trades at $96.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 439.59. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check MCHP's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while ON trades at $115.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 85.08. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check ON's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while GFS trades at $74.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 53.95. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check GFS's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while ALAB trades at $224.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 152.44. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check ALAB's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while Q trades at $162.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 52.25. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check Q's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while TSEM trades at $270.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 139.57. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check TSEM's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while MTSI trades at $381.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 163.06. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check MTSI's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while ENTG trades at $145.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 83.84. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check ENTG's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while SITM trades at $835.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -907.95. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check SITM's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while AMKR trades at $74.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 42.88. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check AMKR's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while AAOI trades at $223.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -343.23. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check AAOI's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while LSCC trades at $125.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 897.50. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check LSCC's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while NVMI trades at $503.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 63.43. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check NVMI's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while RMBS trades at $134.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 64.22. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check RMBS's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while ONTO trades at $276.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 129.53. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check ONTO's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while SMTC trades at $139.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -303.78. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check SMTC's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while SWKS trades at $68.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check SWKS's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while FORM trades at $129.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 150.36. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check FORM's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check CREE's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while SIMO trades at $269.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 60.10. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check SIMO's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while ALGM trades at $45.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -574.62. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check ALGM's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while CRUS trades at $166.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check CRUS's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while QRVO trades at $91.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check QRVO's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while MXL trades at $87.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -57.72. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check MXL's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check BRKS's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while CAMT trades at $168.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 172.33. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check CAMT's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while SLAB trades at $216.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -142.73. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check SLAB's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while AXTI trades at $121.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -393.34. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check AXTI's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while KLIC trades at $104.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 100.26. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check KLIC's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while VSH trades at $38.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -550.00. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check VSH's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while SYNA trades at $131.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -104.85. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check SYNA's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while ACLS trades at $162.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 50.36. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check ACLS's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while NVTS trades at $21.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -33.60. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check NVTS's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while DIOD trades at $101.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 55.11. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check DIOD's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while LASR trades at $80.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -268.07. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check LASR's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while IPGP trades at $106.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 156.76. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check IPGP's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while ACMR trades at $64.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 49.43. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check ACMR's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while OLED trades at $90.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check OLED's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while POWI trades at $71.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 237.23. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check POWI's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while UCTT trades at $85.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -19.82. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check UCTT's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while VECO trades at $60.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 158.58. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check VECO's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while AMBA trades at $82.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -46.12. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check AMBA's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while HIMX trades at $20.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 108.34. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check HIMX's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while AEHR trades at $103.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -271.71. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check AEHR's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while PLAB trades at $51.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check PLAB's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while WOLF trades at $62.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check WOLF's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while ICHR trades at $74.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -50.21. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check ICHR's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while COHU trades at $49.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -41.31. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check COHU's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while IMOS trades at $54.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 68.19. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check IMOS's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while POET trades at $14.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -21.13. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check POET's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while SKYT trades at $34.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check SKYT's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while AIP trades at $35.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -43.35. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIP's ROE of +3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check AIP's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while AMBQ trades at $71.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check AMBQ's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while DQ trades at $19.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check DQ's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while AOSL trades at $41.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -11.55. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check AOSL's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check SGH's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while CEVA trades at $38.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -82.93. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check CEVA's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 972.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while MRAM trades at $41.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 4146.00. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check MRAM's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 950.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while INDI trades at $4.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.93. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check INDI's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 615.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while QNC trades at $2.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check QNC's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 462.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while NVEC trades at $95.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check NVEC's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 446.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while ALMU trades at $31.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -242.23. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check ALMU's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 422.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while LAES trades at $2.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check LAES's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 397.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while XPER trades at $8.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check XPER's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 386.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while QUIK trades at $21.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -28.72. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check QUIK's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while GSIT trades at $12.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -29.18. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check GSIT's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check TGAN's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 321.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while ATOM trades at $9.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -15.22. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check ATOM's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 310.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while VLN trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check VLN's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 300.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while ASYS trades at $20.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 115.06. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check ASYS's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 236.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while INTT trades at $18.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 469.75. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check INTT's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 205.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while BZAI trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -9.71%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check BZAI's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 173.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while NA trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check NA's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 149M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while MX trades at $4.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -10.76. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check MX's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check OIIM's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 107.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while TRT trades at $10.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is -535.50. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check TRT's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 76.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while GCTS trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check GCTS's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while MOSY trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check MOSY's competition here

UMC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UMC stands at 39.7B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, UMC is priced at $15.92, while WISA trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UMC currently has a P/E ratio of 25.27, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UMC's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WISA's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, UMC is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMC.Check WISA's competition here