Navitas Semiconductor Corp (NVTS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.7T. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while NVDA trades at $194.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 33.36. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check NVDA's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while TSM trades at $434.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 36.06. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TSM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while AVGO trades at $360.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 44.34. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AVGO's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while MU trades at $975.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MU's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 844.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while AMD trades at $517.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 113.06. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AMD's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 681.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while ASML trades at $1,769.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 58.65. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ASML's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 604.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while INTC trades at $120.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 211.14. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check INTC's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 478.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while AMAT trades at $603.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 60.97. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AMAT's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 439.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while LRCX trades at $351.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 65.93. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check LRCX's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 335.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while ARM trades at $315.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 178.12. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ARM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 307.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while KLAC trades at $235.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check KLAC's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 266.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while TXN trades at $293.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 50.18. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TXN's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 214.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while MRVL trades at $245.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 80.95. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MRVL's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 185.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while QCOM trades at $176.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check QCOM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 183.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while ADI trades at $377.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 38.25. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ADI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 91.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while ASX trades at $41.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 61.57. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ASX's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while ALAB trades at $406.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 191.71. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ALAB's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while NXPI trades at $273.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check NXPI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while MPWR trades at $1,288.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 68.41. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MPWR's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while UMC trades at $24.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 37.64. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check UMC's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while STM trades at $68.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 115.85. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check STM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while TER trades at $369.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TER's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while TEL trades at $197.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TEL's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while MCHP trades at $84.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 51.93. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MCHP's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while CBRS trades at $204.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -5121.50. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check CBRS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while GFS trades at $69.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 39.24. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check GFS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while ON trades at $91.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 37.39. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ON's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while Q trades at $141.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 40.07. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check Q's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while MTSI trades at $322.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 81.58. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MTSI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while TSEM trades at $219.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 88.33. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TSEM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while ENTG trades at $146.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 49.88. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ENTG's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while LSCC trades at $136.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 109.22. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check LSCC's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while AMKR trades at $69.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 39.80. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AMKR's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while SITM trades at $601.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 139.60. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SITM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while ONTO trades at $307.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 63.42. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ONTO's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while NVMI trades at $470.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 53.24. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check NVMI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while SMTC trades at $135.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 73.52. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SMTC's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while RMBS trades at $112.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check RMBS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while ALGM trades at $55.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 102.75. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ALGM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while SIMO trades at $300.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 66.38. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SIMO's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check CREE's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while AAOI trades at $120.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -366.52. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AAOI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while FORM trades at $123.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 76.29. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check FORM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while SWKS trades at $62.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SWKS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while MXL trades at $93.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 163.37. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MXL's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check BRKS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while QRVO trades at $87.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check QRVO's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while CRUS trades at $146.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check CRUS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while SLAB trades at $218.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 143.57. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SLAB's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while CAMT trades at $142.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 45.67. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check CAMT's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while VSH trades at $45.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 1531.50. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check VSH's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while KLIC trades at $121.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 76.79. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check KLIC's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while ACMR trades at $97.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 65.62. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ACMR's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while UCTT trades at $106.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 98.59. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check UCTT's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while SYNA trades at $119.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SYNA's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while IPGP trades at $105.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 75.19. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check IPGP's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while ACLS trades at $144.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ACLS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while DIOD trades at $96.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 65.92. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check DIOD's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while PI trades at $141.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 70.09. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check PI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while POWI trades at $72.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 61.34. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check POWI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while LASR trades at $63.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 131.77. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check LASR's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while VECO trades at $57.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 52.26. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check VECO's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while AMBA trades at $78.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 118.73. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AMBA's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while ICHR trades at $98.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 491.10. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ICHR's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while OUST trades at $49.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -53.02. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check OUST's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while COHU trades at $59.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -329.28. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check COHU's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while AXTI trades at $56.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -235.92. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AXTI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while HIMX trades at $13.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 65.75. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check HIMX's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while IMOS trades at $63.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 86.39. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check IMOS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while AEHR trades at $69.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -777.33. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AEHR's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while WOLF trades at $40.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check WOLF's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while AMBQ trades at $82.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AMBQ's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while PLAB trades at $28.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check PLAB's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while SKYT trades at $34.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -856.00. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SKYT's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while AIP trades at $35.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -125.21. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AIP's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while POET trades at $8.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -20.29. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check POET's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while CEVA trades at $40.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 101.05. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check CEVA's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while AOSL trades at $37.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -127.97. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AOSL's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SGH's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 914.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while INDI trades at $4.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -15.46. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check INDI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 722.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while KOPN trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 735.85. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check KOPN's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 653.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while QNC trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check QNC's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 475.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while NVEC trades at $98.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 31.28. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check NVEC's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 448.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while MRAM trades at $19.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 75.89. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MRAM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 432.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while LAES trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -10.85. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check LAES's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 395.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while XPER trades at $8.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check XPER's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TGAN's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 283.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while QUIK trades at $16.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -30.23. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check QUIK's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 272.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while ASYS trades at $18.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 64.83. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ASYS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 267.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while ALMU trades at $18.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -157.08. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ALMU's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 242.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check VLN-WT's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 240.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while ATOM trades at $7.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ATOM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 224.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while VLN trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -12.18. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check VLN's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 217.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while GSIT trades at $6.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -16.63. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check GSIT's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 197.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while INTT trades at $15.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 47.58. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check INTT's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 150.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while MX trades at $4.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -14.71. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MX's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 149.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while GCTS trades at $2.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check GCTS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check OIIM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 3.5B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 105M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $14.46, while TRT trades at $10.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -76.11, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 186.36. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TRT's competition here