Navitas Semiconductor Corporation (NVTS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5T. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while NVDA trades at $205.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check NVDA's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while TSM trades at $423.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 36.37. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TSM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while AVGO trades at $382.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 63.36. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AVGO's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while MU trades at $981.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 46.24. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MU's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 834.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while AMD trades at $511.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 170.52. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AMD's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 718.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while ASML trades at $1,863.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 62.39. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ASML's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 626.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while INTC trades at $124.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -207.62. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check INTC's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 458.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while LRCX trades at $366.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 69.34. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check LRCX's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 450.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while AMAT trades at $567.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 53.36. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AMAT's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 405.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while ARM trades at $380.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 453.35. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ARM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 332.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while KLAC trades at $254.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check KLAC's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 274B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while TXN trades at $301.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 51.47. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TXN's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 244.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while MRVL trades at $279.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 96.12. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MRVL's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 223.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while QCOM trades at $211.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check QCOM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 203.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while ADI trades at $417.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 62.17. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ADI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 83.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while ASX trades at $38.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 59.53. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ASX's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 77.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while MPWR trades at $1,577.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 112.75. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MPWR's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while NXPI trades at $304.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 29.12. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check NXPI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while STM trades at $77.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 482.75. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check STM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while TER trades at $403.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 74.81. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TER's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while ALAB trades at $367.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 249.76. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ALAB's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while UMC trades at $21.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check UMC's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while MCHP trades at $95.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 432.91. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MCHP's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while CBRS trades at $214.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 497.67. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check CBRS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while ON trades at $116.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 85.88. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ON's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while GFS trades at $81.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 51.51. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check GFS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while Q trades at $150.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check Q's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while TSEM trades at $262.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 122.29. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TSEM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while MTSI trades at $379.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 162.34. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MTSI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while ENTG trades at $150.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 87.01. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ENTG's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while AMKR trades at $82.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 47.57. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AMKR's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while LSCC trades at $144.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 1032.36. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check LSCC's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while SITM trades at $729.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -793.36. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SITM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while NVMI trades at $583.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 73.10. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check NVMI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while ONTO trades at $323.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 151.46. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ONTO's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while RMBS trades at $146.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 69.79. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check RMBS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while SMTC trades at $166.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -406.61. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SMTC's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while AAOI trades at $169.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -256.14. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AAOI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while SWKS trades at $73.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SWKS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while FORM trades at $139.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 160.01. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check FORM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check CREE's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while SIMO trades at $280.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 55.65. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SIMO's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while ALGM trades at $50.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -630.06. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ALGM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while CAMT trades at $193.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 197.21. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check CAMT's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while QRVO trades at $98.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check QRVO's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while CRUS trades at $164.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check CRUS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while VSH trades at $59.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 5943.00. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check VSH's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check BRKS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while MXL trades at $84.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -55.57. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MXL's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while SLAB trades at $219.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -143.47. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SLAB's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while ACMR trades at $93.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 71.72. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ACMR's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while KLIC trades at $113.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 109.83. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check KLIC's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while ACLS trades at $180.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 55.76. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ACLS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while SYNA trades at $138.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -110.75. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SYNA's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while DIOD trades at $108.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 58.78. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check DIOD's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while UCTT trades at $108.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check UCTT's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while IPGP trades at $114.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 168.60. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check IPGP's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while VECO trades at $77.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 203.89. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check VECO's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while AXTI trades at $97.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -303.69. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AXTI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while POWI trades at $78.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 261.27. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check POWI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while PI trades at $132.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -147.52. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check PI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while LASR trades at $69.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -232.20. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check LASR's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while AEHR trades at $108.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -285.45. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AEHR's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while HIMX trades at $17.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 93.16. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check HIMX's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while ICHR trades at $86.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -58.65. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ICHR's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while AMBA trades at $67.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -42.10. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AMBA's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while COHU trades at $61.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -51.54. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check COHU's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while IMOS trades at $61.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 78.42. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check IMOS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while WOLF trades at $43.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check WOLF's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while AIP trades at $41.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -51.90. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AIP's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while PLAB trades at $31.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check PLAB's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while AMBQ trades at $84.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -18.41. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AMBQ's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while SKYT trades at $36.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SKYT's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while POET trades at $12.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -14.92. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check POET's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while AOSL trades at $45.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -13.38. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check AOSL's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while CEVA trades at $46.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -100.07. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check CEVA's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check SGH's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 866.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while INDI trades at $4.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check INDI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 648.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while QNC trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check QNC's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 572.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while MRAM trades at $24.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 2441.00. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MRAM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 565.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while NVEC trades at $116.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check NVEC's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 442M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while LAES trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check LAES's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 386.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while QUIK trades at $21.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -29.08. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check QUIK's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 372.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while XPER trades at $7.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check XPER's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 357.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while ALMU trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ALMU's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 347.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while ASYS trades at $23.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 133.28. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ASYS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TGAN's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 292.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while ATOM trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -13.85. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ATOM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 251.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while GSIT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -18.79. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check GSIT's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 232.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while VLN trades at $2.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -7.13. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check VLN's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 227.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while MX trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -15.24. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check MX's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 218.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while INTT trades at $17.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 435.00. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check INTT's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while BZAI trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check BZAI's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BZAIW has a market cap of 151.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while BZAIW trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas BZAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BZAIW's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to BZAIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check BZAIW's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 144.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while GCTS trades at $2.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check GCTS's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check OIIM's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 110.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while TRT trades at $10.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 218.40. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check TRT's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 107.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while ARBE trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check ARBE's competition here

NVTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVTS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 103.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVTS is priced at $23.39, while VLN-WT trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVTS currently has a P/E ratio of -37.14, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVTS's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NVTS is more volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVTS.Check VLN-WT's competition here