Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LRCX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | $344.58 | +8.66% | 418.2B | 63.34 | $5.28 | +0.30% |
| NVDA | $216.44 | -3.53% | 5.4T | 34.17 | $6.52 | +0.02% |
| TSM | $441.40 | +1.32% | 2.3T | 38.11 | $11.72 | +0.71% |
| AVGO | $487.35 | +5.95% | 2.3T | 93.69 | $5.14 | +0.52% |
| MU | $1,067.17 | +3.06% | 1.2T | 50.26 | $21.17 | +0.05% |
| AMD | $536.09 | +5.09% | 850.4B | 174.43 | $2.99 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,727.48 | +6.07% | 657.3B | 56.85 | $30.00 | +0.52% |
| INTC | $112.43 | +2.84% | 542.1B | -179.77 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| ARM | $397.77 | -2.71% | 428.5B | 473.78 | $0.85 | N/A |
| AMAT | $507.25 | +10.71% | 388.9B | 46.12 | $10.62 | +0.39% |
Stock Comparison
LRCX vs NVDA Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while NVDA trades at $216.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check NVDA's competition here
LRCX vs TSM Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while TSM trades at $441.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 38.11. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check TSM's competition here
LRCX vs AVGO Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while AVGO trades at $487.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 93.69. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AVGO's competition here
LRCX vs MU Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while MU trades at $1,067.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 50.26. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check MU's competition here
LRCX vs AMD Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 850.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while AMD trades at $536.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 174.43. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AMD's competition here
LRCX vs ASML Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 657.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while ASML trades at $1,727.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 56.85. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ASML's competition here
LRCX vs INTC Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 542.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while INTC trades at $112.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -179.77. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check INTC's competition here
LRCX vs ARM Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 428.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while ARM trades at $397.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 473.78. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ARM's competition here
LRCX vs AMAT Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 388.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while AMAT trades at $507.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 46.12. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AMAT's competition here
LRCX vs TXN Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 280.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while TXN trades at $306.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 52.76. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check TXN's competition here
LRCX vs KLAC Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 267.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while KLAC trades at $2,097.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 57.92. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check KLAC's competition here
LRCX vs MRVL Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 254.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while MRVL trades at $308.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 99.93. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check MRVL's competition here
LRCX vs QCOM Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 253.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while QCOM trades at $250.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check QCOM's competition here
LRCX vs ADI Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 206.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while ADI trades at $432.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 63.16. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ADI's competition here
LRCX vs ASX Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 86.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while ASX trades at $40.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 60.41. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ASX's competition here
LRCX vs NXPI Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while NXPI trades at $322.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check NXPI's competition here
LRCX vs MPWR Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while MPWR trades at $1,672.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 116.57. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check MPWR's competition here
LRCX vs STM Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while STM trades at $79.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 496.88. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check STM's competition here
LRCX vs TER Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while TER trades at $412.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 72.80. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check TER's competition here
LRCX vs ALAB Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while ALAB trades at $356.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 242.01. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ALAB's competition here
LRCX vs UMC Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while UMC trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 35.62. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check UMC's competition here
LRCX vs MCHP Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while MCHP trades at $96.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 440.73. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check MCHP's competition here
LRCX vs CBRS Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while CBRS trades at $218.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 550.05. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check CBRS's competition here
LRCX vs ON Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while ON trades at $132.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 94.59. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ON's competition here
LRCX vs GFS Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while GFS trades at $86.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 53.89. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check GFS's competition here
LRCX vs Q Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while Q trades at $158.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 50.23. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check Q's competition here
LRCX vs TSEM Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while TSEM trades at $272.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 126.59. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check TSEM's competition here
LRCX vs MTSI Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while MTSI trades at $391.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 164.10. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check MTSI's competition here
LRCX vs ENTG Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while ENTG trades at $143.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 82.61. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ENTG's competition here
LRCX vs LSCC Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while LSCC trades at $153.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 1009.00. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check LSCC's competition here
LRCX vs AMKR Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while AMKR trades at $77.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 42.95. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AMKR's competition here
LRCX vs SITM Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while SITM trades at $690.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -762.04. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check SITM's competition here
LRCX vs RMBS Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while RMBS trades at $170.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 79.80. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check RMBS's competition here
LRCX vs NVMI Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while NVMI trades at $532.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 65.47. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check NVMI's competition here
LRCX vs AAOI Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while AAOI trades at $193.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -311.34. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AAOI's competition here
LRCX vs SMTC Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while SMTC trades at $163.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -406.41. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check SMTC's competition here
LRCX vs ONTO Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while ONTO trades at $281.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 129.85. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ONTO's competition here
LRCX vs SWKS Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while SWKS trades at $80.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 32.97. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check SWKS's competition here
LRCX vs SIMO Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while SIMO trades at $306.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 59.78. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check SIMO's competition here
LRCX vs CREE Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check CREE's competition here
LRCX vs FORM Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while FORM trades at $126.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 143.80. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check FORM's competition here
LRCX vs ALGM Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while ALGM trades at $52.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -629.12. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ALGM's competition here
LRCX vs QRVO Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while QRVO trades at $104.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check QRVO's competition here
LRCX vs CRUS Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while CRUS trades at $177.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check CRUS's competition here
LRCX vs CAMT Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while CAMT trades at $184.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 191.06. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check CAMT's competition here
LRCX vs VSH Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while VSH trades at $65.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 6248.00. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check VSH's competition here
LRCX vs MXL Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while MXL trades at $95.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -58.39. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check MXL's competition here
LRCX vs BRKS Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check BRKS's competition here
LRCX vs SLAB Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while SLAB trades at $219.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -143.91. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check SLAB's competition here
LRCX vs NVTS Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while NVTS trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -41.05. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check NVTS's competition here
LRCX vs ACMR Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while ACMR trades at $90.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 70.18. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ACMR's competition here
LRCX vs KLIC Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while KLIC trades at $108.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 105.20. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check KLIC's competition here
LRCX vs SYNA Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while SYNA trades at $145.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -116.83. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check SYNA's competition here
LRCX vs DIOD Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while DIOD trades at $121.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 61.69. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check DIOD's competition here
LRCX vs IPGP Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while IPGP trades at $133.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 179.35. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check IPGP's competition here
LRCX vs AXTI Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while AXTI trades at $111.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -346.66. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AXTI's competition here
LRCX vs ACLS Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while ACLS trades at $161.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 49.31. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ACLS's competition here
LRCX vs POWI Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while POWI trades at $84.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 280.63. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check POWI's competition here
LRCX vs PI Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while PI trades at $138.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -159.18. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check PI's competition here
LRCX vs LASR Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while LASR trades at $78.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -254.53. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check LASR's competition here
LRCX vs HIMX Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while HIMX trades at $23.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 126.21. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check HIMX's competition here
LRCX vs UCTT Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while UCTT trades at $93.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -21.03. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check UCTT's competition here
LRCX vs VECO Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while VECO trades at $61.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 160.61. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check VECO's competition here
LRCX vs AEHR Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while AEHR trades at $116.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -297.37. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AEHR's competition here
LRCX vs AMBA Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while AMBA trades at $73.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -48.68. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AMBA's competition here
LRCX vs WOLF Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while WOLF trades at $61.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check WOLF's competition here
LRCX vs COHU Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while COHU trades at $57.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -48.39. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check COHU's competition here
LRCX vs ICHR Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while ICHR trades at $73.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -50.64. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ICHR's competition here
LRCX vs IMOS Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while IMOS trades at $61.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 80.79. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check IMOS's competition here
LRCX vs SKYT Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while SKYT trades at $39.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check SKYT's competition here
LRCX vs PLAB Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while PLAB trades at $32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check PLAB's competition here
LRCX vs POET Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while POET trades at $14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check POET's competition here
LRCX vs AMBQ Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while AMBQ trades at $81.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AMBQ's competition here
LRCX vs AIP Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while AIP trades at $37.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -48.03. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AIP's competition here
LRCX vs AOSL Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while AOSL trades at $51.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -14.82. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check AOSL's competition here
LRCX vs CEVA Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while CEVA trades at $50.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -107.85. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check CEVA's competition here
LRCX vs SGH Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check SGH's competition here
LRCX vs INDI Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while INDI trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check INDI's competition here
LRCX vs QNC Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 753.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while QNC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check QNC's competition here
LRCX vs MRAM Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 706M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while MRAM trades at $29.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 3011.00. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check MRAM's competition here
LRCX vs NVEC Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 543.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while NVEC trades at $111.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check NVEC's competition here
LRCX vs LAES Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 529M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while LAES trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -15.46. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check LAES's competition here
LRCX vs QUIK Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while QUIK trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check QUIK's competition here
LRCX vs XPER Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 385.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while XPER trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check XPER's competition here
LRCX vs ALMU Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 376.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while ALMU trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -75.89. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ALMU's competition here
LRCX vs VLN Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 346.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while VLN trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check VLN's competition here
LRCX vs TGAN Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check TGAN's competition here
LRCX vs ATOM Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 320.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while ATOM trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -15.15. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ATOM's competition here
LRCX vs ASYS Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 318.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while ASYS trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 121.94. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ASYS's competition here
LRCX vs GSIT Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while GSIT trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -24.88. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check GSIT's competition here
LRCX vs MX Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 303.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while MX trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -20.34. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check MX's competition here
LRCX vs BZAI Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while BZAI trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check BZAI's competition here
LRCX vs INTT Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 214.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while INTT trades at $16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 426.50. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check INTT's competition here
LRCX vs GCTS Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while GCTS trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check GCTS's competition here
LRCX vs NA Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 171M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while NA trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.51. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check NA's competition here
LRCX vs OIIM Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check OIIM's competition here
LRCX vs ARBE Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 138.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while ARBE trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check ARBE's competition here
LRCX vs TRT Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 126.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while TRT trades at $12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 313.75. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check TRT's competition here
LRCX vs IDBA Comparison June 2026
LRCX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LRCX stands at 418.2B. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LRCX is priced at $344.58, while IDBA trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LRCX currently has a P/E ratio of 63.34, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, LRCX's ROE is +0.66%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LRCX is less volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LRCX.Check IDBA's competition here