Transphorm, Inc. (TGAN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TGAN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGAN | $5.10 | +7.14% | 323.1M | -7.29 | -$0.70 | N/A |
| NVDA | $222.82 | -0.69% | 5.4T | 34.17 | $6.52 | +0.02% |
| TSM | $446.69 | +2.54% | 2.3T | 38.11 | $11.72 | +0.71% |
| AVGO | $481.57 | +4.70% | 2.3T | 93.69 | $5.14 | +0.52% |
| MU | $1,064.10 | +2.76% | 1.2T | 50.26 | $21.17 | +0.05% |
| AMD | $521.54 | +2.24% | 850.4B | 174.43 | $2.99 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,705.37 | +4.72% | 657.3B | 56.85 | $30.00 | +0.52% |
| INTC | $107.93 | -1.28% | 542.1B | -179.77 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| ARM | $402.71 | -1.50% | 428.5B | 473.78 | $0.85 | N/A |
| LRCX | $334.41 | +5.45% | 418.2B | 63.34 | $5.28 | +0.30% |
Stock Comparison
TGAN vs NVDA Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while NVDA trades at $222.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check NVDA's competition here
TGAN vs TSM Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while TSM trades at $446.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 38.11. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check TSM's competition here
TGAN vs AVGO Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while AVGO trades at $481.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 93.69. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check AVGO's competition here
TGAN vs MU Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while MU trades at $1,064.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 50.26. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check MU's competition here
TGAN vs AMD Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 850.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while AMD trades at $521.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 174.43. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check AMD's competition here
TGAN vs ASML Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 657.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while ASML trades at $1,705.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 56.85. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check ASML's competition here
TGAN vs INTC Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 542.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while INTC trades at $107.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -179.77. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check INTC's competition here
TGAN vs ARM Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 428.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while ARM trades at $402.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 473.78. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check ARM's competition here
TGAN vs LRCX Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 418.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while LRCX trades at $334.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 63.34. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check LRCX's competition here
TGAN vs AMAT Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 388.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while AMAT trades at $490.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 46.12. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check AMAT's competition here
TGAN vs TXN Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 280.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while TXN trades at $308.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 52.76. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check TXN's competition here
TGAN vs KLAC Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 267.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while KLAC trades at $2,045.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 57.92. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check KLAC's competition here
TGAN vs MRVL Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 254.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while MRVL trades at $290.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 99.93. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check MRVL's competition here
TGAN vs QCOM Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 253.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while QCOM trades at $240.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check QCOM's competition here
TGAN vs ADI Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 206.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while ADI trades at $423.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 63.16. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check ADI's competition here
TGAN vs ASX Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 86.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while ASX trades at $39.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 60.41. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check ASX's competition here
TGAN vs NXPI Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while NXPI trades at $323.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check NXPI's competition here
TGAN vs MPWR Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while MPWR trades at $1,624.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 116.57. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check MPWR's competition here
TGAN vs STM Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while STM trades at $79.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 496.88. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check STM's competition here
TGAN vs TER Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while TER trades at $392.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 72.80. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check TER's competition here
TGAN vs ALAB Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while ALAB trades at $355.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 242.01. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check ALAB's competition here
TGAN vs UMC Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while UMC trades at $22.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 35.62. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check UMC's competition here
TGAN vs MCHP Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while MCHP trades at $96.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 440.73. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check MCHP's competition here
TGAN vs CBRS Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while CBRS trades at $236.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 550.05. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check CBRS's competition here
TGAN vs ON Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while ON trades at $128.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 94.59. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check ON's competition here
TGAN vs GFS Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while GFS trades at $84.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 53.89. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check GFS's competition here
TGAN vs Q Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while Q trades at $155.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 50.23. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check Q's competition here
TGAN vs TSEM Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while TSEM trades at $274.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 126.59. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check TSEM's competition here
TGAN vs MTSI Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while MTSI trades at $382.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 164.10. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check MTSI's competition here
TGAN vs ENTG Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while ENTG trades at $142.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 82.61. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check ENTG's competition here
TGAN vs LSCC Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while LSCC trades at $151.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 1009.00. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check LSCC's competition here
TGAN vs AMKR Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while AMKR trades at $74.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 42.95. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check AMKR's competition here
TGAN vs SITM Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while SITM trades at $701.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -762.04. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check SITM's competition here
TGAN vs RMBS Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while RMBS trades at $166.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 79.80. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check RMBS's competition here
TGAN vs NVMI Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while NVMI trades at $523.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 65.47. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check NVMI's competition here
TGAN vs AAOI Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while AAOI trades at $202.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -311.34. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check AAOI's competition here
TGAN vs SMTC Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while SMTC trades at $166.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -406.41. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check SMTC's competition here
TGAN vs ONTO Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while ONTO trades at $278.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 129.85. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check ONTO's competition here
TGAN vs SWKS Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while SWKS trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 32.97. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check SWKS's competition here
TGAN vs SIMO Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while SIMO trades at $301.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 59.78. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check SIMO's competition here
TGAN vs CREE Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check CREE's competition here
TGAN vs FORM Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while FORM trades at $125.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 143.80. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check FORM's competition here
TGAN vs ALGM Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while ALGM trades at $50.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -629.12. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check ALGM's competition here
TGAN vs QRVO Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while QRVO trades at $102.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check QRVO's competition here
TGAN vs CRUS Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while CRUS trades at $170.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check CRUS's competition here
TGAN vs CAMT Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while CAMT trades at $187.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 191.06. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check CAMT's competition here
TGAN vs VSH Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while VSH trades at $62.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 6248.00. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check VSH's competition here
TGAN vs MXL Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while MXL trades at $88.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -58.39. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check MXL's competition here
TGAN vs BRKS Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check BRKS's competition here
TGAN vs SLAB Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while SLAB trades at $218.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -143.91. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check SLAB's competition here
TGAN vs NVTS Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while NVTS trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -41.05. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check NVTS's competition here
TGAN vs ACMR Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while ACMR trades at $91.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 70.18. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check ACMR's competition here
TGAN vs KLIC Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while KLIC trades at $108.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 105.20. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check KLIC's competition here
TGAN vs SYNA Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while SYNA trades at $146.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -116.83. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check SYNA's competition here
TGAN vs DIOD Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while DIOD trades at $114.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 61.69. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check DIOD's competition here
TGAN vs IPGP Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while IPGP trades at $121.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 179.35. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check IPGP's competition here
TGAN vs AXTI Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while AXTI trades at $110.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -346.66. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check AXTI's competition here
TGAN vs ACLS Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while ACLS trades at $158.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 49.31. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check ACLS's competition here
TGAN vs POWI Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while POWI trades at $84.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 280.63. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check POWI's competition here
TGAN vs PI Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while PI trades at $143.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -159.18. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check PI's competition here
TGAN vs LASR Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while LASR trades at $76.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -254.53. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check LASR's competition here
TGAN vs HIMX Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while HIMX trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 126.21. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check HIMX's competition here
TGAN vs UCTT Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while UCTT trades at $90.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -21.03. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check UCTT's competition here
TGAN vs VECO Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while VECO trades at $61.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 160.61. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check VECO's competition here
TGAN vs AEHR Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while AEHR trades at $113.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -297.37. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check AEHR's competition here
TGAN vs AMBA Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while AMBA trades at $78.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -48.68. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check AMBA's competition here
TGAN vs WOLF Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while WOLF trades at $61.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check WOLF's competition here
TGAN vs COHU Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while COHU trades at $57.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -48.39. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check COHU's competition here
TGAN vs ICHR Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while ICHR trades at $74.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -50.64. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check ICHR's competition here
TGAN vs IMOS Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while IMOS trades at $64.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 80.79. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check IMOS's competition here
TGAN vs SKYT Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while SKYT trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check SKYT's competition here
TGAN vs PLAB Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while PLAB trades at $33.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check PLAB's competition here
TGAN vs POET Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while POET trades at $13.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check POET's competition here
TGAN vs AMBQ Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while AMBQ trades at $82.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check AMBQ's competition here
TGAN vs AIP Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while AIP trades at $37.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -48.03. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check AIP's competition here
TGAN vs AOSL Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while AOSL trades at $53.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -14.82. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check AOSL's competition here
TGAN vs CEVA Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while CEVA trades at $49.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -107.85. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check CEVA's competition here
TGAN vs SGH Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check SGH's competition here
TGAN vs INDI Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while INDI trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check INDI's competition here
TGAN vs QNC Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 753.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while QNC trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check QNC's competition here
TGAN vs MRAM Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 706M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while MRAM trades at $30.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 3011.00. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check MRAM's competition here
TGAN vs NVEC Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 543.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while NVEC trades at $112.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check NVEC's competition here
TGAN vs LAES Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 529M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while LAES trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -15.46. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check LAES's competition here
TGAN vs QUIK Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while QUIK trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check QUIK's competition here
TGAN vs XPER Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 385.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while XPER trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check XPER's competition here
TGAN vs ALMU Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 376.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while ALMU trades at $26.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -75.89. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check ALMU's competition here
TGAN vs VLN Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 346.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while VLN trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check VLN's competition here
TGAN vs ATOM Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 320.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while ATOM trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -15.15. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check ATOM's competition here
TGAN vs ASYS Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 318.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while ASYS trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 121.94. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check ASYS's competition here
TGAN vs GSIT Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while GSIT trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -24.88. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check GSIT's competition here
TGAN vs MX Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 303.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while MX trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -20.34. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check MX's competition here
TGAN vs BZAI Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while BZAI trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check BZAI's competition here
TGAN vs INTT Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 214.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while INTT trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 426.50. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check INTT's competition here
TGAN vs GCTS Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while GCTS trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check GCTS's competition here
TGAN vs NA Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 171M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while NA trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.51. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check NA's competition here
TGAN vs OIIM Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check OIIM's competition here
TGAN vs ARBE Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 138.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while ARBE trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check ARBE's competition here
TGAN vs TRT Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 126.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while TRT trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 313.75. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check TRT's competition here
TGAN vs IDBA Comparison June 2026
TGAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGAN stands at 323.1M. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TGAN is priced at $5.10, while IDBA trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGAN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.29, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, TGAN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TGAN is less volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGAN.Check IDBA's competition here