Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (UCTT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UCTT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCTT | $83.01 | +6.10% | 3.8B | -20.75 | -$4.00 | N/A |
| NVDA | $208.27 | +4.32% | 5.1T | 42.59 | $4.89 | +0.02% |
| TSM | $402.46 | +5.17% | 2.1T | 34.40 | $11.70 | +0.79% |
| AVGO | $422.76 | +0.67% | 2T | 82.57 | $5.12 | +0.59% |
| AMD | $347.81 | +13.91% | 567.1B | 132.75 | $2.62 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,457.70 | +2.81% | 561.8B | 48.03 | $30.35 | +0.51% |
| MU | $496.72 | +3.11% | 560.2B | 23.42 | $21.21 | +0.10% |
| INTC | $82.54 | +23.60% | 414.6B | -137.62 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| LRCX | $267.78 | +3.57% | 334.4B | 50.52 | $5.30 | +0.37% |
| AMAT | $417.04 | +3.25% | 331B | 42.78 | $9.75 | +0.44% |
Stock Comparison
UCTT vs NVDA Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while NVDA trades at $208.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 42.59. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check NVDA's competition here
UCTT vs TSM Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while TSM trades at $402.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 34.40. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check TSM's competition here
UCTT vs AVGO Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while AVGO trades at $422.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 82.57. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AVGO's competition here
UCTT vs AMD Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 567.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while AMD trades at $347.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 132.75. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AMD's competition here
UCTT vs ASML Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 561.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while ASML trades at $1,457.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 48.03. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ASML's competition here
UCTT vs MU Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 560.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while MU trades at $496.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check MU's competition here
UCTT vs INTC Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 414.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while INTC trades at $82.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -137.62. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check INTC's competition here
UCTT vs LRCX Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 334.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while LRCX trades at $267.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 50.52. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check LRCX's competition here
UCTT vs AMAT Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 331B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while AMAT trades at $417.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 42.78. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AMAT's competition here
UCTT vs KLAC Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 254.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while KLAC trades at $1,935.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 56.25. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check KLAC's competition here
UCTT vs TXN Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 252.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while TXN trades at $277.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 47.46. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check TXN's competition here
UCTT vs ARM Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 249.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while ARM trades at $234.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 313.08. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ARM's competition here
UCTT vs ADI Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 195.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while ADI trades at $399.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 73.18. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ADI's competition here
UCTT vs QCOM Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 159B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while QCOM trades at $148.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 30.01. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check QCOM's competition here
UCTT vs MRVL Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 143.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while MRVL trades at $164.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 52.16. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check MRVL's competition here
UCTT vs MPWR Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 80.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while MPWR trades at $1,632.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 126.32. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check MPWR's competition here
UCTT vs ASX Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 70B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while ASX trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 58.16. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ASX's competition here
UCTT vs TER Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 65.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while TER trades at $418.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 121.18. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check TER's competition here
UCTT vs NXPI Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while NXPI trades at $244.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check NXPI's competition here
UCTT vs MCHP Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while MCHP trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -298.13. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check MCHP's competition here
UCTT vs STM Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while STM trades at $50.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 315.56. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check STM's competition here
UCTT vs ON Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while ON trades at $98.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 339.41. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ON's competition here
UCTT vs ALAB Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while ALAB trades at $212.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 173.04. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ALAB's competition here
UCTT vs GFS Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while GFS trades at $61.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 38.86. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check GFS's competition here
UCTT vs UMC Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while UMC trades at $12.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check UMC's competition here
UCTT vs Q Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while Q trades at $144.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 43.78. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check Q's competition here
UCTT vs ENTG Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while ENTG trades at $155.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 101.29. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ENTG's competition here
UCTT vs TSEM Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while TSEM trades at $200.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 102.74. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check TSEM's competition here
UCTT vs MTSI Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while MTSI trades at $287.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 129.57. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check MTSI's competition here
UCTT vs AMKR Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while AMKR trades at $78.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 52.07. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AMKR's competition here
UCTT vs NVMI Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while NVMI trades at $542.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 68.04. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check NVMI's competition here
UCTT vs RMBS Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while RMBS trades at $158.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 75.07. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check RMBS's competition here
UCTT vs LSCC Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while LSCC trades at $122.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 6140.00. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check LSCC's competition here
UCTT vs ONTO Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while ONTO trades at $307.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 111.16. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ONTO's competition here
UCTT vs SITM Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while SITM trades at $570.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -329.63. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check SITM's competition here
UCTT vs AAOI Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while AAOI trades at $162.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -253.39. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AAOI's competition here
UCTT vs FORM Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while FORM trades at $155.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 221.54. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check FORM's competition here
UCTT vs SMTC Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while SMTC trades at $109.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -238.67. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check SMTC's competition here
UCTT vs CREE Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CREE's ROE of +11.47%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check CREE's competition here
UCTT vs SWKS Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while SWKS trades at $63.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check SWKS's competition here
UCTT vs CAMT Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while CAMT trades at $203.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 195.19. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check CAMT's competition here
UCTT vs CRUS Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while CRUS trades at $174.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check CRUS's competition here
UCTT vs ALGM Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while ALGM trades at $44.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -630.43. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ALGM's competition here
UCTT vs QRVO Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while QRVO trades at $87.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check QRVO's competition here
UCTT vs BRKS Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check BRKS's competition here
UCTT vs SLAB Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while SLAB trades at $215.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -109.39. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check SLAB's competition here
UCTT vs MXL Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while MXL trades at $60.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -39.68. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check MXL's competition here
UCTT vs IPGP Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while IPGP trades at $124.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 170.62. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check IPGP's competition here
UCTT vs SIMO Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while SIMO trades at $153.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 42.04. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check SIMO's competition here
UCTT vs DIOD Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while DIOD trades at $104.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 73.01. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check DIOD's competition here
UCTT vs OLED Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while OLED trades at $99.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check OLED's competition here
UCTT vs KLIC Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while KLIC trades at $87.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is -73.71. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to KLIC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check KLIC's competition here
UCTT vs ACLS Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while ACLS trades at $143.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ACLS's competition here
UCTT vs LASR Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while LASR trades at $75.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -161.26. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check LASR's competition here
UCTT vs POWI Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while POWI trades at $73.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 188.56. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check POWI's competition here
UCTT vs NVTS Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while NVTS trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -30.32. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check NVTS's competition here
UCTT vs VSH Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while VSH trades at $28.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -402.71. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check VSH's competition here
UCTT vs ACMR Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while ACMR trades at $56.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 40.95. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ACMR's competition here
UCTT vs SYNA Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while SYNA trades at $93.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -59.03. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check SYNA's competition here
UCTT vs AXTI Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while AXTI trades at $76.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -155.43. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AXTI's competition here
UCTT vs VECO Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while VECO trades at $51.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 87.68. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check VECO's competition here
UCTT vs PLAB Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while PLAB trades at $52.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check PLAB's competition here
UCTT vs AEHR Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while AEHR trades at $95.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -252.39. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AEHR's competition here
UCTT vs AMBA Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while AMBA trades at $66.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -37.60. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AMBA's competition here
UCTT vs ICHR Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while ICHR trades at $70.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -46.06. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ICHR's competition here
UCTT vs COHU Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while COHU trades at $46.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -29.52. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check COHU's competition here
UCTT vs HIMX Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while HIMX trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 46.50. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check HIMX's competition here
UCTT vs POET Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while POET trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -22.21. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check POET's competition here
UCTT vs SKYT Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while SKYT trades at $33.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check SKYT's competition here
UCTT vs IMOS Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while IMOS trades at $45.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 93.08. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check IMOS's competition here
UCTT vs DQ Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while DQ trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check DQ's competition here
UCTT vs WOLF Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while WOLF trades at $31.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to WOLF's ROE of +10.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check WOLF's competition here
UCTT vs AOSL Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while AOSL trades at $44.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -12.66. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AOSL's competition here
UCTT vs AIP Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while AIP trades at $26.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -32.59. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AIP's ROE of +3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AIP's competition here
UCTT vs SGH Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check SGH's competition here
UCTT vs CEVA Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 801.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while CEVA trades at $28.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -65.61. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check CEVA's competition here
UCTT vs INDI Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 758.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while INDI trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check INDI's competition here
UCTT vs AMBQ Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 754.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while AMBQ trades at $35.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -7.76. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AMBQ's competition here
UCTT vs QNC Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 589.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while QNC trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check QNC's competition here
UCTT vs LAES Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 420.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while LAES trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check LAES's competition here
UCTT vs NVEC Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 397.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while NVEC trades at $82.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check NVEC's competition here
UCTT vs MRAM Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 325.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while MRAM trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -469.00. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check MRAM's competition here
UCTT vs TGAN Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check TGAN's competition here
UCTT vs XPER Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while XPER trades at $6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check XPER's competition here
UCTT vs ATOM Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 279.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while ATOM trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -13.23. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ATOM's competition here
UCTT vs ALMU Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 272.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while ALMU trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -147.73. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ALMU's competition here
UCTT vs ASYS Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 270.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while ASYS trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ASYS's competition here
UCTT vs BZAI Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 246.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while BZAI trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -9.71%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check BZAI's competition here
UCTT vs QUIK Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 231.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while QUIK trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -16.77. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check QUIK's competition here
UCTT vs INTT Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 230.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while INTT trades at $18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -87.81. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check INTT's competition here
UCTT vs GSIT Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 228.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while GSIT trades at $7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -21.16. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check GSIT's competition here
UCTT vs MX Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 191.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while MX trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -13.46. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check MX's competition here
UCTT vs VLN Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 187.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while VLN trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check VLN's competition here
UCTT vs NA Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 148.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while NA trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.21. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check NA's competition here
UCTT vs TRT Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while TRT trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is -823.97. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check TRT's competition here
UCTT vs OIIM Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check OIIM's competition here
UCTT vs GCTS Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 71.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while GCTS trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check GCTS's competition here
UCTT vs MOSY Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check MOSY's competition here
UCTT vs WISA Comparison April 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 3.8B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $83.01, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of -20.75, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to WISA's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check WISA's competition here