Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (UCTT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UCTT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCTT | $106.27 | +0.08% | 4.8B | 98.40 | $1.08 | N/A |
| NVDA | $210.96 | +4.03% | 5.1T | 36.12 | $5.84 | +0.13% |
| TSM | $434.11 | -0.65% | 2.3T | 36.06 | $12.04 | +0.80% |
| AVGO | $399.97 | -0.28% | 1.9T | 49.20 | $8.13 | +0.64% |
| MU | $979.30 | -1.24% | 1.1T | 21.70 | $45.12 | +0.05% |
| AMD | $557.89 | +2.04% | 909.7B | 121.81 | $4.58 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,797.32 | -0.38% | 692.7B | 59.57 | $30.17 | +0.49% |
| INTC | $109.84 | -2.40% | 552.1B | 192.70 | $0.57 | N/A |
| AMAT | $602.50 | +2.35% | 478.4B | 60.92 | $9.89 | +0.32% |
| LRCX | $350.33 | +5.16% | 441.7B | 66.26 | $5.33 | +0.30% |
Stock Comparison
UCTT vs NVDA Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while NVDA trades at $210.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 36.12. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check NVDA's competition here
UCTT vs TSM Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while TSM trades at $434.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 36.06. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check TSM's competition here
UCTT vs AVGO Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while AVGO trades at $399.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 49.20. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AVGO's competition here
UCTT vs MU Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while MU trades at $979.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check MU's competition here
UCTT vs AMD Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 909.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while AMD trades at $557.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 121.81. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AMD's competition here
UCTT vs ASML Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 692.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while ASML trades at $1,797.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 59.57. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ASML's competition here
UCTT vs INTC Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 552.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while INTC trades at $109.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 192.70. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check INTC's competition here
UCTT vs AMAT Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 478.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while AMAT trades at $602.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 60.92. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AMAT's competition here
UCTT vs LRCX Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 441.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while LRCX trades at $350.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 66.26. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check LRCX's competition here
UCTT vs ARM Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 344.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while ARM trades at $323.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 182.71. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ARM's competition here
UCTT vs KLAC Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 302.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while KLAC trades at $231.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check KLAC's competition here
UCTT vs TXN Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 283.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while TXN trades at $311.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 53.34. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check TXN's competition here
UCTT vs MRVL Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 206.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while MRVL trades at $235.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 77.83. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check MRVL's competition here
UCTT vs QCOM Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 199.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while QCOM trades at $189.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check QCOM's competition here
UCTT vs ADI Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 192.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while ADI trades at $395.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 40.13. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ADI's competition here
UCTT vs ASX Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 93.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while ASX trades at $42.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 62.78. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ASX's competition here
UCTT vs NXPI Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while NXPI trades at $292.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check NXPI's competition here
UCTT vs ALAB Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while ALAB trades at $412.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 194.59. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ALAB's competition here
UCTT vs MPWR Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while MPWR trades at $1,352.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 71.84. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check MPWR's competition here
UCTT vs STM Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while STM trades at $71.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 121.10. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check STM's competition here
UCTT vs UMC Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while UMC trades at $24.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 37.45. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check UMC's competition here
UCTT vs TEL Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while TEL trades at $200.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check TEL's competition here
UCTT vs TER Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while TER trades at $359.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 62.21. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check TER's competition here
UCTT vs CBRS Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while CBRS trades at $215.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -5377.00. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check CBRS's competition here
UCTT vs MCHP Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while MCHP trades at $88.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 54.35. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check MCHP's competition here
UCTT vs GFS Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while GFS trades at $68.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 38.75. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check GFS's competition here
UCTT vs ON Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while ON trades at $95.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 39.33. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ON's competition here
UCTT vs Q Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while Q trades at $143.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 43.98. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check Q's competition here
UCTT vs TSEM Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while TSEM trades at $222.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 89.82. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check TSEM's competition here
UCTT vs MTSI Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while MTSI trades at $308.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 78.11. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check MTSI's competition here
UCTT vs ENTG Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while ENTG trades at $145.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 49.44. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ENTG's competition here
UCTT vs LSCC Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while LSCC trades at $137.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 111.62. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check LSCC's competition here
UCTT vs AMKR Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while AMKR trades at $70.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AMKR's competition here
UCTT vs SITM Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while SITM trades at $628.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 145.93. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check SITM's competition here
UCTT vs ONTO Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while ONTO trades at $321.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 66.30. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ONTO's competition here
UCTT vs NVMI Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while NVMI trades at $475.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 53.90. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check NVMI's competition here
UCTT vs SMTC Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while SMTC trades at $136.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 74.04. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check SMTC's competition here
UCTT vs RMBS Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while RMBS trades at $112.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 44.14. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check RMBS's competition here
UCTT vs SIMO Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while SIMO trades at $326.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 72.04. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check SIMO's competition here
UCTT vs ALGM Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while ALGM trades at $54.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 101.61. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ALGM's competition here
UCTT vs CREE Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check CREE's competition here
UCTT vs AAOI Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while AAOI trades at $119.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -363.39. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AAOI's competition here
UCTT vs FORM Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while FORM trades at $117.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 72.54. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check FORM's competition here
UCTT vs SWKS Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while SWKS trades at $60.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check SWKS's competition here
UCTT vs MXL Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while MXL trades at $91.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 160.18. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check MXL's competition here
UCTT vs BRKS Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check BRKS's competition here
UCTT vs CRUS Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while CRUS trades at $150.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check CRUS's competition here
UCTT vs QRVO Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while QRVO trades at $85.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check QRVO's competition here
UCTT vs SLAB Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while SLAB trades at $218.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 143.84. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check SLAB's competition here
UCTT vs CAMT Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while CAMT trades at $143.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 46.09. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check CAMT's competition here
UCTT vs ACMR Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while ACMR trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 69.13. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ACMR's competition here
UCTT vs VSH Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while VSH trades at $44.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 1489.50. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check VSH's competition here
UCTT vs KLIC Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while KLIC trades at $113.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 71.78. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check KLIC's competition here
UCTT vs SYNA Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while SYNA trades at $126.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check SYNA's competition here
UCTT vs IPGP Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while IPGP trades at $107.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 76.95. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check IPGP's competition here
UCTT vs DIOD Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while DIOD trades at $96.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 66.01. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check DIOD's competition here
UCTT vs ACLS Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while ACLS trades at $143.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 31.51. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ACLS's competition here
UCTT vs PI Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while PI trades at $144.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 71.30. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check PI's competition here
UCTT vs LASR Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while LASR trades at $72.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 150.10. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check LASR's competition here
UCTT vs POWI Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while POWI trades at $72.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 60.56. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check POWI's competition here
UCTT vs VECO Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while VECO trades at $57.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 52.18. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check VECO's competition here
UCTT vs ICHR Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while ICHR trades at $100.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 501.50. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ICHR's competition here
UCTT vs AMBA Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while AMBA trades at $77.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 117.12. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AMBA's competition here
UCTT vs NVTS Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while NVTS trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -70.89. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check NVTS's competition here
UCTT vs OUST Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while OUST trades at $43.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -46.04. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check OUST's competition here
UCTT vs HIMX Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while HIMX trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 76.15. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check HIMX's competition here
UCTT vs AXTI Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while AXTI trades at $57.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -238.37. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AXTI's competition here
UCTT vs IMOS Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while IMOS trades at $75.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 102.41. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check IMOS's competition here
UCTT vs COHU Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while COHU trades at $56.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -312.06. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check COHU's competition here
UCTT vs AEHR Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while AEHR trades at $72.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -806.67. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AEHR's competition here
UCTT vs AMBQ Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while AMBQ trades at $85.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AMBQ's competition here
UCTT vs WOLF Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while WOLF trades at $35.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check WOLF's competition here
UCTT vs PLAB Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while PLAB trades at $29.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check PLAB's competition here
UCTT vs AIP Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while AIP trades at $34.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -124.18. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AIP's competition here
UCTT vs SKYT Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while SKYT trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -813.50. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check SKYT's competition here
UCTT vs CEVA Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while CEVA trades at $45.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 113.85. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check CEVA's competition here
UCTT vs AOSL Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while AOSL trades at $37.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -129.52. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check AOSL's competition here
UCTT vs SGH Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check SGH's competition here
UCTT vs POET Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while POET trades at $8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check POET's competition here
UCTT vs INDI Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 938.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while INDI trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -15.86. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check INDI's competition here
UCTT vs KOPN Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 722.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while KOPN trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 735.85. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check KOPN's competition here
UCTT vs QNC Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 603.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while QNC trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check QNC's competition here
UCTT vs NVEC Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 439.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while NVEC trades at $90.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 28.91. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check NVEC's competition here
UCTT vs MRAM Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 431.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while MRAM trades at $18.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 73.04. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check MRAM's competition here
UCTT vs LAES Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 399.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while LAES trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check LAES's competition here
UCTT vs XPER Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 375.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while XPER trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check XPER's competition here
UCTT vs VLN-WT Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 348.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while VLN-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check VLN-WT's competition here
UCTT vs TGAN Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check TGAN's competition here
UCTT vs QUIK Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 277.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while QUIK trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -29.53. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check QUIK's competition here
UCTT vs ASYS Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 270.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while ASYS trades at $18.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 64.34. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ASYS's competition here
UCTT vs ALMU Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 249.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while ALMU trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -146.67. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ALMU's competition here
UCTT vs VLN Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 224.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while VLN trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -12.21. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check VLN's competition here
UCTT vs ATOM Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 215.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while ATOM trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check ATOM's competition here
UCTT vs GSIT Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 209.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while GSIT trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -16.05. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check GSIT's competition here
UCTT vs INTT Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 189.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while INTT trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 45.70. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check INTT's competition here
UCTT vs MX Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while MX trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -14.36. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check MX's competition here
UCTT vs OIIM Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check OIIM's competition here
UCTT vs GCTS Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 140.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while GCTS trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check GCTS's competition here
UCTT vs TRT Comparison July 2026
UCTT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UCTT stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 104.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UCTT is priced at $106.27, while TRT trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UCTT currently has a P/E ratio of 98.40, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 185.46. In terms of profitability, UCTT's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UCTT is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UCTT.Check TRT's competition here