FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.7T. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while NVDA trades at $233.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check NVDA's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while TSM trades at $472.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 34.24. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check TSM's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while AVGO trades at $355.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 36.39. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check AVGO's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SKHY has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while SKHY trades at $195.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas SKHY's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKHY's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to SKHY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check SKHY's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while MU trades at $1,074.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check MU's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while AMD trades at $633.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 110.05. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check AMD's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 719.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while ASML trades at $1,867.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 58.32. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check ASML's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 601.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while INTC trades at $119.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 209.35. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check INTC's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 434.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while LRCX trades at $347.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 59.71. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check LRCX's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 428.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while AMAT trades at $540.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check AMAT's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 328.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while ARM trades at $307.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 173.72. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check ARM's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 270.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while KLAC trades at $206.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 55.02. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check KLAC's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 268.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while TXN trades at $293.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 44.72. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check TXN's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 238.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while MRVL trades at $272.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 82.51. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check MRVL's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 203.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while ADI trades at $417.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 42.31. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check ADI's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 194.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while QCOM trades at $184.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check QCOM's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while ASX trades at $47.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 55.19. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check ASX's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while MPWR trades at $1,439.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 76.46. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check MPWR's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while TER trades at $449.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 58.47. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check TER's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 65.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while UMC trades at $26.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check UMC's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 63.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while TEL trades at $220.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check TEL's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while NXPI trades at $243.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check NXPI's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while ALAB trades at $350.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 141.26. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check ALAB's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while STM trades at $57.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 97.10. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to STM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check STM's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while MCHP trades at $81.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 49.89. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check MCHP's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while CRDO trades at $218.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 63.93. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check CRDO's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while CBRS trades at $166.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -4160.75. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBRS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check CBRS's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, MCHPP has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while MCHPP trades at $69.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas MCHPP's P/E ratio is 101.96. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCHPP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to MCHPP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check MCHPP's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while ON trades at $84.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 32.03. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check ON's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while GFS trades at $50.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check GFS's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while Q trades at $131.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 34.33. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check Q's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while TSEM trades at $240.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 84.20. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check TSEM's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while ENTG trades at $166.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 51.86. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check ENTG's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while MTSI trades at $321.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 72.27. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check MTSI's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while SITM trades at $709.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 114.80. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SITM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check SITM's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while LSCC trades at $134.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 87.01. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check LSCC's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while SMTC trades at $194.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 105.91. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMTC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check SMTC's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while ONTO trades at $327.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 67.58. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check ONTO's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while AMKR trades at $56.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check AMKR's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while SWKS trades at $85.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check SWKS's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while NVMI trades at $396.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 43.34. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check NVMI's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while RMBS trades at $111.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 44.08. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check RMBS's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while QRVO trades at $114.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check QRVO's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CREE's ROE of -3.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check CREE's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while MXL trades at $105.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 185.84. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check MXL's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while SIMO trades at $280.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 61.85. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check SIMO's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check BRKS's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while CAMT trades at $165.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 52.95. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check CAMT's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while ALGM trades at $39.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 73.20. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALGM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check ALGM's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while SLAB trades at $222.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 146.55. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check SLAB's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while CRUS trades at $121.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check CRUS's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while PI trades at $189.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 93.92. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check PI's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while VSH trades at $38.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 131.69. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check VSH's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while ACMR trades at $83.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 55.96. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check ACMR's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while KLIC trades at $100.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 37.18. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check KLIC's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while DIOD trades at $103.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 56.43. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check DIOD's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while SYNA trades at $121.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check SYNA's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while ACLS trades at $147.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 32.98. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check ACLS's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while AXTI trades at $85.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -357.79. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check AXTI's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while IPGP trades at $84.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 86.65. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check IPGP's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while VECO trades at $57.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 53.63. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check VECO's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while AEHR trades at $107.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 3573.67. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check AEHR's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while COHU trades at $73.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -408.22. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check COHU's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while UCTT trades at $72.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 48.14. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check UCTT's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while NVTS trades at $12.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -65.26. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check NVTS's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while OUST trades at $44.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -54.13. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check OUST's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while PENG trades at $61.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check PENG's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while POWI trades at $54.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 45.01. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check POWI's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while AMBA trades at $68.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 104.02. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check AMBA's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while IMOS trades at $83.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 40.63. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check IMOS's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while HIMX trades at $15.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 70.15. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check HIMX's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while LASR trades at $40.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 84.54. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check LASR's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while ICHR trades at $62.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 123.37. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check ICHR's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while PLAB trades at $31.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check PLAB's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while WOLF trades at $35.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check WOLF's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while AMBQ trades at $68.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check AMBQ's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while SKYT trades at $32.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -811.50. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check SKYT's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while AIP trades at $24.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -88.07. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIP's ROE of -3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is similarly volatile compared to AIP. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check AIP's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check SGH's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while CEVA trades at $37.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 92.75. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check CEVA's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while POET trades at $7.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -18.05. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check POET's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 996.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while AEVA trades at $14.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -8.79. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check AEVA's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 909.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while KOPN trades at $4.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 123.68. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check KOPN's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 905.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while AOSL trades at $30.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -104.28. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check AOSL's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 745M. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while DQ trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check DQ's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 627.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while INDI trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -10.61. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check INDI's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 539M. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while NVEC trades at $111.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 29.95. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check NVEC's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 441.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while MRAM trades at $18.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -393.93. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check MRAM's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 399.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check VLN-WT's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 356.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while QNC trades at $1.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is -35.73. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check QNC's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 337.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while LAES trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check LAES's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check TGAN's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 314.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while ASYS trades at $18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 48.68. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check ASYS's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 240.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while ALMU trades at $13.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -109.33. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check ALMU's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 210.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while QUIK trades at $11.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -22.40. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check QUIK's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 209.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while GSIT trades at $5.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check GSIT's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 206.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while VLN trades at $1.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -11.24. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check VLN's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 203.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while GCTS trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check GCTS's competition here

FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FORM stands at 11.6B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 182.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FORM is priced at $149.15 on the NASDAQ, while ATOM trades at $4.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FORM currently has a P/E ratio of 92.07, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, FORM's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FORM is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORM.Check ATOM's competition here