Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while NVDA trades at $212.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 32.26. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check NVDA's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while TSM trades at $468.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 39.74. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check TSM's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while AVGO trades at $401.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 68.22. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AVGO's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while MU trades at $1,183.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 53.41. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check MU's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 876.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while AMD trades at $552.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 179.72. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AMD's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 743.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while ASML trades at $1,930.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 64.45. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ASML's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 673.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while INTC trades at $137.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -223.32. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check INTC's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 490B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while AMAT trades at $630.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 58.05. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AMAT's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 486.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while LRCX trades at $395.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 73.68. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check LRCX's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 467.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while ARM trades at $428.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 529.47. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ARM's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 339.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while KLAC trades at $263.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 73.32. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check KLAC's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 271.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while MRVL trades at $303.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 107.10. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check MRVL's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 238.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while QCOM trades at $224.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check QCOM's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 211.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while ADI trades at $439.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 64.46. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ADI's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 89B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while ASX trades at $43.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 63.38. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ASX's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while NXPI trades at $323.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check NXPI's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 76.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while MPWR trades at $1,558.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 112.17. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check MPWR's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while ALAB trades at $435.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 281.80. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ALAB's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while STM trades at $79.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 489.94. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check STM's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while TER trades at $446.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 81.10. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check TER's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while UMC trades at $27.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 38.84. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check UMC's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while MCHP trades at $102.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 453.50. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check MCHP's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while CBRS trades at $236.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 558.83. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check CBRS's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while ON trades at $130.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 89.43. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ON's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while GFS trades at $89.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 54.67. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check GFS's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while Q trades at $172.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 54.33. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check Q's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while TSEM trades at $294.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 133.37. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check TSEM's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while MTSI trades at $395.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 165.85. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check MTSI's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while ENTG trades at $183.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 111.04. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ENTG's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while AMKR trades at $93.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 51.99. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AMKR's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while LSCC trades at $153.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 1098.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check LSCC's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while SITM trades at $733.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -819.15. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check SITM's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while NVMI trades at $579.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 72.09. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check NVMI's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while ONTO trades at $342.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 155.24. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ONTO's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while RMBS trades at $144.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 66.91. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check RMBS's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while SMTC trades at $169.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -395.57. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check SMTC's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while AAOI trades at $164.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -249.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AAOI's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while FORM trades at $151.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 171.90. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check FORM's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while ALGM trades at $59.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -737.50. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ALGM's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while SWKS trades at $73.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 30.19. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check SWKS's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while SIMO trades at $347.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 63.82. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check SIMO's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check CREE's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while CAMT trades at $201.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 201.20. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check CAMT's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while VSH trades at $66.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 6490.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check VSH's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while QRVO trades at $99.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check QRVO's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while CRUS trades at $166.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check CRUS's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while MXL trades at $96.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -58.39. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check MXL's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check BRKS's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while SLAB trades at $219.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -145.53. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check SLAB's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while ACMR trades at $108.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 83.87. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ACMR's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while KLIC trades at $119.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 117.18. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check KLIC's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while NVTS trades at $24.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -38.13. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check NVTS's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while ACLS trades at $182.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 58.24. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ACLS's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while DIOD trades at $124.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 64.57. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check DIOD's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while SYNA trades at $142.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -111.82. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check SYNA's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while UCTT trades at $120.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -28.27. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check UCTT's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while IPGP trades at $117.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 173.54. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check IPGP's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while VECO trades at $77.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 209.61. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check VECO's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while POWI trades at $90.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 290.37. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check POWI's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while AXTI trades at $87.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -264.28. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AXTI's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while PI trades at $130.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -144.62. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check PI's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while LASR trades at $63.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -215.77. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check LASR's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while AEHR trades at $114.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -303.42. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AEHR's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while ICHR trades at $96.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -66.63. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ICHR's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while COHU trades at $70.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -58.32. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check COHU's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while HIMX trades at $18.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 95.32. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check HIMX's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while AMBA trades at $71.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -43.46. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AMBA's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while WOLF trades at $55.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check WOLF's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while IMOS trades at $71.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 84.28. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check IMOS's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while AIP trades at $44.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -55.84. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AIP's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while PLAB trades at $33.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check PLAB's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while AMBQ trades at $89.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -19.67. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AMBQ's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while SKYT trades at $36.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check SKYT's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while POET trades at $11.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -14.46. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check POET's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while AOSL trades at $49.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -13.34. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AOSL's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while CEVA trades at $49.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -108.09. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check CEVA's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check SGH's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 898M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while INDI trades at $4.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check INDI's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 702M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while QNC trades at $3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check QNC's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 635.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while MRAM trades at $26.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 2711.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check MRAM's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 534.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while NVEC trades at $111.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 35.18. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check NVEC's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 444.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while LAES trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check LAES's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 388.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while QUIK trades at $22.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -29.20. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check QUIK's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 383.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while XPER trades at $7.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -8.02. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check XPER's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while ALMU trades at $23.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -69.11. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ALMU's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check TGAN's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 319.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while ASYS trades at $22.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 122.44. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ASYS's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 292.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while ATOM trades at $8.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -13.85. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ATOM's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 256.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while VLN trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -7.87. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check VLN's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 241.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while GSIT trades at $7.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -18.05. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check GSIT's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 239M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check VLN-WT's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 236.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while INTT trades at $18.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 470.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check INTT's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 215.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while MX trades at $6.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -14.44. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check MX's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 181.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while GCTS trades at $2.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check GCTS's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 160.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while TRT trades at $17.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 316.60. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check TRT's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 157.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while BZAI trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check BZAI's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, BZAIW has a market cap of 157.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while BZAIW trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas BZAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BZAIW's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to BZAIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check BZAIW's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check OIIM's competition here

TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 293.8B. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 100.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $329.62, while ARBE trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 55.28, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ARBE's competition here