ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ACMR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACMR | $91.92 | +12.03% | 5.9B | 70.18 | $1.31 | N/A |
| NVDA | $222.82 | -0.69% | 5.4T | 34.17 | $6.52 | +0.02% |
| TSM | $446.69 | +2.54% | 2.3T | 38.11 | $11.72 | +0.71% |
| AVGO | $481.57 | +4.70% | 2.3T | 93.69 | $5.14 | +0.52% |
| MU | $1,064.10 | +2.76% | 1.2T | 50.26 | $21.17 | +0.05% |
| AMD | $521.54 | +2.24% | 850.4B | 174.43 | $2.99 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,705.37 | +4.72% | 657.3B | 56.85 | $30.00 | +0.52% |
| INTC | $107.93 | -1.28% | 542.1B | -179.77 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| ARM | $402.71 | -1.50% | 428.5B | 473.78 | $0.85 | N/A |
| LRCX | $334.41 | +5.45% | 418.2B | 63.34 | $5.28 | +0.30% |
Stock Comparison
ACMR vs NVDA Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while NVDA trades at $222.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check NVDA's competition here
ACMR vs TSM Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while TSM trades at $446.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 38.11. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check TSM's competition here
ACMR vs AVGO Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while AVGO trades at $481.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 93.69. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AVGO's competition here
ACMR vs MU Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while MU trades at $1,064.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 50.26. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check MU's competition here
ACMR vs AMD Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 850.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while AMD trades at $521.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 174.43. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AMD's competition here
ACMR vs ASML Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 657.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while ASML trades at $1,705.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 56.85. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ASML's competition here
ACMR vs INTC Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 542.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while INTC trades at $107.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -179.77. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check INTC's competition here
ACMR vs ARM Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 428.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while ARM trades at $402.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 473.78. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ARM's competition here
ACMR vs LRCX Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 418.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while LRCX trades at $334.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 63.34. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check LRCX's competition here
ACMR vs AMAT Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 388.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while AMAT trades at $490.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 46.12. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AMAT's competition here
ACMR vs TXN Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 280.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while TXN trades at $308.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 52.76. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check TXN's competition here
ACMR vs KLAC Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 267.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while KLAC trades at $2,045.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 57.92. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check KLAC's competition here
ACMR vs MRVL Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 254.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while MRVL trades at $290.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 99.93. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check MRVL's competition here
ACMR vs QCOM Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 253.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while QCOM trades at $240.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check QCOM's competition here
ACMR vs ADI Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 206.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while ADI trades at $423.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 63.16. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ADI's competition here
ACMR vs ASX Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 86.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while ASX trades at $39.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 60.41. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ASX's competition here
ACMR vs NXPI Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while NXPI trades at $323.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check NXPI's competition here
ACMR vs MPWR Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while MPWR trades at $1,624.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 116.57. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check MPWR's competition here
ACMR vs STM Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while STM trades at $79.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 496.88. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check STM's competition here
ACMR vs TER Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while TER trades at $392.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 72.80. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check TER's competition here
ACMR vs ALAB Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while ALAB trades at $355.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 242.01. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ALAB's competition here
ACMR vs UMC Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while UMC trades at $22.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 35.62. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check UMC's competition here
ACMR vs MCHP Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while MCHP trades at $96.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 440.73. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check MCHP's competition here
ACMR vs CBRS Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while CBRS trades at $236.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 550.05. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check CBRS's competition here
ACMR vs ON Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while ON trades at $128.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 94.59. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ON's competition here
ACMR vs GFS Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while GFS trades at $84.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 53.89. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check GFS's competition here
ACMR vs Q Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while Q trades at $155.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 50.23. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check Q's competition here
ACMR vs TSEM Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while TSEM trades at $274.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 126.59. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check TSEM's competition here
ACMR vs MTSI Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while MTSI trades at $382.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 164.10. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check MTSI's competition here
ACMR vs ENTG Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while ENTG trades at $142.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 82.61. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ENTG's competition here
ACMR vs LSCC Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while LSCC trades at $151.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 1009.00. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check LSCC's competition here
ACMR vs AMKR Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while AMKR trades at $74.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 42.95. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AMKR's competition here
ACMR vs SITM Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while SITM trades at $701.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -762.04. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check SITM's competition here
ACMR vs RMBS Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while RMBS trades at $166.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 79.80. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check RMBS's competition here
ACMR vs NVMI Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while NVMI trades at $523.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 65.47. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check NVMI's competition here
ACMR vs AAOI Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while AAOI trades at $202.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -311.34. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AAOI's competition here
ACMR vs SMTC Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while SMTC trades at $166.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -406.41. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check SMTC's competition here
ACMR vs ONTO Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while ONTO trades at $278.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 129.85. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ONTO's competition here
ACMR vs SWKS Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while SWKS trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 32.97. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check SWKS's competition here
ACMR vs SIMO Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while SIMO trades at $301.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 59.78. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check SIMO's competition here
ACMR vs CREE Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check CREE's competition here
ACMR vs FORM Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while FORM trades at $125.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 143.80. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check FORM's competition here
ACMR vs ALGM Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while ALGM trades at $50.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -629.12. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ALGM's competition here
ACMR vs QRVO Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while QRVO trades at $102.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check QRVO's competition here
ACMR vs CRUS Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while CRUS trades at $170.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check CRUS's competition here
ACMR vs CAMT Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while CAMT trades at $187.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 191.06. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check CAMT's competition here
ACMR vs VSH Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while VSH trades at $62.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 6248.00. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check VSH's competition here
ACMR vs MXL Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while MXL trades at $88.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -58.39. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check MXL's competition here
ACMR vs BRKS Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check BRKS's competition here
ACMR vs SLAB Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while SLAB trades at $218.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -143.91. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check SLAB's competition here
ACMR vs NVTS Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while NVTS trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -41.05. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check NVTS's competition here
ACMR vs KLIC Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while KLIC trades at $108.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 105.20. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check KLIC's competition here
ACMR vs SYNA Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while SYNA trades at $146.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -116.83. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check SYNA's competition here
ACMR vs DIOD Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while DIOD trades at $114.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 61.69. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check DIOD's competition here
ACMR vs IPGP Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while IPGP trades at $121.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 179.35. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check IPGP's competition here
ACMR vs AXTI Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while AXTI trades at $110.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -346.66. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AXTI's competition here
ACMR vs ACLS Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while ACLS trades at $158.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 49.31. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ACLS's competition here
ACMR vs POWI Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while POWI trades at $84.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 280.63. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check POWI's competition here
ACMR vs PI Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while PI trades at $143.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -159.18. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check PI's competition here
ACMR vs LASR Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while LASR trades at $76.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -254.53. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check LASR's competition here
ACMR vs HIMX Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while HIMX trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 126.21. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check HIMX's competition here
ACMR vs UCTT Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while UCTT trades at $90.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -21.03. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check UCTT's competition here
ACMR vs VECO Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while VECO trades at $61.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 160.61. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check VECO's competition here
ACMR vs AEHR Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while AEHR trades at $113.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -297.37. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AEHR's competition here
ACMR vs AMBA Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while AMBA trades at $78.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -48.68. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AMBA's competition here
ACMR vs WOLF Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while WOLF trades at $61.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check WOLF's competition here
ACMR vs COHU Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while COHU trades at $57.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -48.39. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check COHU's competition here
ACMR vs ICHR Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while ICHR trades at $74.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -50.64. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ICHR's competition here
ACMR vs IMOS Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while IMOS trades at $64.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 80.79. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check IMOS's competition here
ACMR vs SKYT Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while SKYT trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check SKYT's competition here
ACMR vs PLAB Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while PLAB trades at $33.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check PLAB's competition here
ACMR vs POET Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while POET trades at $13.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check POET's competition here
ACMR vs AMBQ Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while AMBQ trades at $82.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AMBQ's competition here
ACMR vs AIP Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while AIP trades at $37.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -48.03. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AIP's competition here
ACMR vs AOSL Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while AOSL trades at $53.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -14.82. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AOSL's competition here
ACMR vs CEVA Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while CEVA trades at $49.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -107.85. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check CEVA's competition here
ACMR vs SGH Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check SGH's competition here
ACMR vs INDI Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while INDI trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check INDI's competition here
ACMR vs QNC Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 753.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while QNC trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check QNC's competition here
ACMR vs MRAM Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 706M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while MRAM trades at $30.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 3011.00. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check MRAM's competition here
ACMR vs NVEC Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 543.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while NVEC trades at $112.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check NVEC's competition here
ACMR vs LAES Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 529M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while LAES trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -15.46. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check LAES's competition here
ACMR vs QUIK Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while QUIK trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check QUIK's competition here
ACMR vs XPER Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 385.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while XPER trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check XPER's competition here
ACMR vs ALMU Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 376.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while ALMU trades at $26.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -75.89. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ALMU's competition here
ACMR vs VLN Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 346.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while VLN trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check VLN's competition here
ACMR vs TGAN Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check TGAN's competition here
ACMR vs ATOM Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 320.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while ATOM trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -15.15. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ATOM's competition here
ACMR vs ASYS Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 318.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while ASYS trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 121.94. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ASYS's competition here
ACMR vs GSIT Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while GSIT trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -24.88. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check GSIT's competition here
ACMR vs MX Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 303.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while MX trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -20.34. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check MX's competition here
ACMR vs BZAI Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while BZAI trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check BZAI's competition here
ACMR vs INTT Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 214.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while INTT trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 426.50. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check INTT's competition here
ACMR vs GCTS Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while GCTS trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check GCTS's competition here
ACMR vs NA Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 171M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while NA trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.51. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check NA's competition here
ACMR vs OIIM Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check OIIM's competition here
ACMR vs ARBE Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 138.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while ARBE trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ARBE's competition here
ACMR vs TRT Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 126.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while TRT trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 313.75. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check TRT's competition here
ACMR vs IDBA Comparison June 2026
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 5.9B. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $91.92, while IDBA trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 70.18, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check IDBA's competition here