ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while NVDA trades at $202.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check NVDA's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while TSM trades at $442.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 40.15. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check TSM's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while AVGO trades at $383.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 65.25. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AVGO's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while MU trades at $1,074.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 57.11. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check MU's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 899.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while AMD trades at $523.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 183.27. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AMD's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 743.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while ASML trades at $1,780.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 64.09. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ASML's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 673.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while INTC trades at $133.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -223.32. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check INTC's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 512.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while LRCX trades at $372.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 77.42. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check LRCX's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 508.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while AMAT trades at $589.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 60.34. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AMAT's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 433.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while ARM trades at $371.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 491.23. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ARM's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 351.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while KLAC trades at $245.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 76.03. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check KLAC's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 302.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while TXN trades at $303.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 56.91. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check TXN's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 269.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while MRVL trades at $281.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 105.43. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check MRVL's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 233.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while QCOM trades at $202.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check QCOM's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 217B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while ADI trades at $407.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 66.19. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ADI's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 95.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while ASX trades at $39.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 68.16. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ASX's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while NXPI trades at $298.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check NXPI's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while MPWR trades at $1,413.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 110.48. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check MPWR's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while ALAB trades at $402.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 301.14. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ALAB's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while TER trades at $424.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 84.79. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check TER's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while STM trades at $72.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 498.75. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check STM's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while UMC trades at $26.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 44.34. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check UMC's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 55.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while MCHP trades at $93.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 466.86. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check MCHP's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while ON trades at $117.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 96.73. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ON's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while CBRS trades at $229.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 534.36. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check CBRS's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while GFS trades at $83.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 53.38. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check GFS's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while Q trades at $163.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 56.48. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check Q's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while TSEM trades at $284.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 147.37. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check TSEM's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while MTSI trades at $370.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 167.91. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check MTSI's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while ENTG trades at $167.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 106.36. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ENTG's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while AMKR trades at $86.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 53.76. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AMKR's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while LSCC trades at $144.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 1109.07. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check LSCC's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while SITM trades at $711.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -792.76. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check SITM's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while NVMI trades at $530.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 72.89. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check NVMI's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while ONTO trades at $317.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 162.60. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ONTO's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while SMTC trades at $164.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -426.17. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check SMTC's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while RMBS trades at $129.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 66.83. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check RMBS's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while AAOI trades at $151.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -263.43. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AAOI's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while FORM trades at $142.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 180.07. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check FORM's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while ALGM trades at $56.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -769.75. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ALGM's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while SWKS trades at $72.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 31.74. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check SWKS's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while SIMO trades at $316.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 66.85. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check SIMO's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check CREE's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while CAMT trades at $171.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 199.71. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check CAMT's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while QRVO trades at $98.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check QRVO's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while VSH trades at $59.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 6428.00. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check VSH's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while MXL trades at $88.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -63.45. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check MXL's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while CRUS trades at $157.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check CRUS's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check BRKS's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while SLAB trades at $219.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -144.59. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check SLAB's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while KLIC trades at $125.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 119.44. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check KLIC's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while NVTS trades at $21.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -37.62. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check NVTS's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while ACLS trades at $172.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 56.94. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ACLS's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while DIOD trades at $112.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 66.36. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check DIOD's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while SYNA trades at $135.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -115.03. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check SYNA's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while UCTT trades at $110.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -28.70. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check UCTT's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while IPGP trades at $109.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 173.54. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check IPGP's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while POWI trades at $81.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 291.17. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check POWI's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while VECO trades at $74.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 203.84. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check VECO's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while AXTI trades at $78.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -288.62. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AXTI's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while PI trades at $126.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -147.85. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check PI's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while LASR trades at $66.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -217.33. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check LASR's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while AEHR trades at $103.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -298.24. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AEHR's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while ICHR trades at $92.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -67.30. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ICHR's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while COHU trades at $64.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -58.88. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check COHU's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while HIMX trades at $16.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 97.58. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check HIMX's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while AMBA trades at $67.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -43.92. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AMBA's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while WOLF trades at $50.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check WOLF's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while IMOS trades at $65.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 88.97. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check IMOS's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while AIP trades at $42.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -56.33. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AIP's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while PLAB trades at $31.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check PLAB's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while AMBQ trades at $84.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -19.23. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AMBQ's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while SKYT trades at $36.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check SKYT's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while POET trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -14.39. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check POET's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while AOSL trades at $45.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -13.71. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check AOSL's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while CEVA trades at $46.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -105.24. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check CEVA's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check SGH's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 898M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while INDI trades at $3.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check INDI's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 772.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while QNC trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check QNC's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 598.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while MRAM trades at $23.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 2553.00. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check MRAM's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 535.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while NVEC trades at $98.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check NVEC's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 442M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while LAES trades at $3.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check LAES's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 388.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while QUIK trades at $20.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -29.25. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check QUIK's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 383.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while XPER trades at $8.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -8.02. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check XPER's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 330.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while ALMU trades at $22.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -66.70. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ALMU's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check TGAN's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 319.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while ASYS trades at $20.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 122.39. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ASYS's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 268.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while ATOM trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -12.71. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check ATOM's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 256.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while VLN-WT trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check VLN-WT's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 236.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while INTT trades at $17.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 470.00. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check INTT's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 234.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while GSIT trades at $7.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -17.52. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check GSIT's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 231.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while VLN trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check VLN's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 209.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while MX trades at $5.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check MX's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 182.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while BZAI trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check BZAI's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 165.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while GCTS trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check GCTS's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BZAIW has a market cap of 161.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while BZAIW trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas BZAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BZAIW's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to BZAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check BZAIW's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 145.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while TRT trades at $13.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 360.75. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check TRT's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check OIIM's competition here

ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 6.6B. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $98.77, while IDBA trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 78.76, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.Check IDBA's competition here