IPG Photonics Corporation
IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IPGP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPGP | $103.48 | -0.97% | 4.4B | 152.18 | $0.68 | N/A |
| NVDA | $219.44 | +1.97% | 5.3T | 44.69 | $4.91 | +0.02% |
| TSM | $404.54 | -1.73% | 2.1T | 34.59 | $11.69 | +0.79% |
| AVGO | $428.43 | -0.37% | 2T | 83.68 | $5.12 | +0.58% |
| MU | $795.33 | +6.50% | 896.9B | 37.50 | $21.21 | +0.06% |
| AMD | $458.79 | +0.79% | 748.1B | 152.93 | $3.00 | N/A |
| INTC | $129.44 | +3.62% | 650.6B | -215.73 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,565.81 | -1.65% | 603.5B | 51.49 | $30.41 | +0.56% |
| LRCX | $296.05 | +0.68% | 370.2B | 55.96 | $5.29 | +0.34% |
| AMAT | $443.62 | +1.88% | 352.1B | 45.50 | $9.75 | +0.41% |
Stock Comparison
IPGP vs NVDA Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.3T. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while NVDA trades at $219.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 44.69. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check NVDA's competition here
IPGP vs TSM Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while TSM trades at $404.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check TSM's competition here
IPGP vs AVGO Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while AVGO trades at $428.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 83.68. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check AVGO's competition here
IPGP vs MU Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 896.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while MU trades at $795.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check MU's competition here
IPGP vs AMD Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 748.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while AMD trades at $458.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 152.93. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check AMD's competition here
IPGP vs INTC Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 650.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while INTC trades at $129.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -215.73. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check INTC's competition here
IPGP vs ASML Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 603.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while ASML trades at $1,565.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 51.49. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check ASML's competition here
IPGP vs LRCX Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 370.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while LRCX trades at $296.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 55.96. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check LRCX's competition here
IPGP vs AMAT Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 352.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while AMAT trades at $443.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 45.50. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check AMAT's competition here
IPGP vs TXN Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 271B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while TXN trades at $297.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 50.99. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check TXN's competition here
IPGP vs QCOM Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 250.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while QCOM trades at $237.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check QCOM's competition here
IPGP vs KLAC Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 241B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while KLAC trades at $1,845.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 52.23. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check KLAC's competition here
IPGP vs ARM Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 226.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while ARM trades at $212.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 250.18. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check ARM's competition here
IPGP vs ADI Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 206.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while ADI trades at $422.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 77.42. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check ADI's competition here
IPGP vs MRVL Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 149.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while MRVL trades at $170.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 55.83. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check MRVL's competition here
IPGP vs MPWR Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while MPWR trades at $1,661.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 119.25. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check MPWR's competition here
IPGP vs NXPI Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while NXPI trades at $305.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check NXPI's competition here
IPGP vs ASX Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 77.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while ASX trades at $35.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check ASX's competition here
IPGP vs TER Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while TER trades at $366.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 67.90. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check TER's competition here
IPGP vs MCHP Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while MCHP trades at $99.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 450.27. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check MCHP's competition here
IPGP vs STM Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while STM trades at $60.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 375.56. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check STM's competition here
IPGP vs ON Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while ON trades at $107.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 78.85. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check ON's competition here
IPGP vs GFS Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while GFS trades at $74.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 53.95. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check GFS's competition here
IPGP vs UMC Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while UMC trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check UMC's competition here
IPGP vs ALAB Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while ALAB trades at $207.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 140.10. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check ALAB's competition here
IPGP vs Q Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while Q trades at $153.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 46.48. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check Q's competition here
IPGP vs MTSI Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while MTSI trades at $365.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 156.36. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check MTSI's competition here
IPGP vs TSEM Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while TSEM trades at $228.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 117.75. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check TSEM's competition here
IPGP vs SITM Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while SITM trades at $901.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -980.00. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check SITM's competition here
IPGP vs ENTG Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while ENTG trades at $149.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 86.21. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check ENTG's competition here
IPGP vs AMKR Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while AMKR trades at $76.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check AMKR's competition here
IPGP vs LSCC Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while LSCC trades at $128.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 921.14. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check LSCC's competition here
IPGP vs NVMI Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while NVMI trades at $526.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP and NVMI have similar daily volatility (4.26).Check NVMI's competition here
IPGP vs AAOI Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while AAOI trades at $184.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -280.15. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check AAOI's competition here
IPGP vs RMBS Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while RMBS trades at $134.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 64.05. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check RMBS's competition here
IPGP vs ONTO Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while ONTO trades at $287.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 133.08. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check ONTO's competition here
IPGP vs SMTC Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while SMTC trades at $136.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -296.80. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check SMTC's competition here
IPGP vs FORM Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while FORM trades at $151.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 174.02. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check FORM's competition here
IPGP vs SWKS Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while SWKS trades at $70.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check SWKS's competition here
IPGP vs CREE Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check CREE's competition here
IPGP vs CAMT Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while CAMT trades at $207.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 197.58. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check CAMT's competition here
IPGP vs MXL Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while MXL trades at $102.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -67.28. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check MXL's competition here
IPGP vs ALGM Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while ALGM trades at $48.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -604.87. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check ALGM's competition here
IPGP vs CRUS Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while CRUS trades at $174.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check CRUS's competition here
IPGP vs SIMO Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while SIMO trades at $262.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 58.36. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check SIMO's competition here
IPGP vs QRVO Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while QRVO trades at $93.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check QRVO's competition here
IPGP vs BRKS Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check BRKS's competition here
IPGP vs SLAB Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while SLAB trades at $217.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -142.90. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check SLAB's competition here
IPGP vs AXTI Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while AXTI trades at $125.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -381.24. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check AXTI's competition here
IPGP vs KLIC Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while KLIC trades at $104.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 100.27. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check KLIC's competition here
IPGP vs NVTS Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while NVTS trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -35.92. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check NVTS's competition here
IPGP vs DIOD Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while DIOD trades at $111.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 60.54. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check DIOD's competition here
IPGP vs ACLS Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while ACLS trades at $165.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 51.11. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check ACLS's competition here
IPGP vs SYNA Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while SYNA trades at $126.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -101.24. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check SYNA's competition here
IPGP vs VSH Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while VSH trades at $34.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -497.71. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check VSH's competition here
IPGP vs LASR Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while LASR trades at $84.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -283.17. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check LASR's competition here
IPGP vs ACMR Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while ACMR trades at $64.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 49.37. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check ACMR's competition here
IPGP vs OLED Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while OLED trades at $90.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check OLED's competition here
IPGP vs POWI Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while POWI trades at $74.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 247.80. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check POWI's competition here
IPGP vs UCTT Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while UCTT trades at $85.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -19.92. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check UCTT's competition here
IPGP vs VECO Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while VECO trades at $61.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 160.97. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check VECO's competition here
IPGP vs HIMX Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while HIMX trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 108.68. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check HIMX's competition here
IPGP vs AMBA Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while AMBA trades at $79.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -44.79. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check AMBA's competition here
IPGP vs AEHR Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while AEHR trades at $104.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -275.16. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check AEHR's competition here
IPGP vs PLAB Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while PLAB trades at $54.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check PLAB's competition here
IPGP vs ICHR Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while ICHR trades at $76.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -51.99. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check ICHR's competition here
IPGP vs WOLF Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while WOLF trades at $50.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check WOLF's competition here
IPGP vs COHU Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while COHU trades at $51.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -43.09. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check COHU's competition here
IPGP vs IMOS Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while IMOS trades at $57.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 116.67. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check IMOS's competition here
IPGP vs SKYT Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while SKYT trades at $35.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check SKYT's competition here
IPGP vs POET Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while POET trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -20.44. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check POET's competition here
IPGP vs AIP Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while AIP trades at $33.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -40.40. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIP's ROE of +3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check AIP's competition here
IPGP vs DQ Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while DQ trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check DQ's competition here
IPGP vs AOSL Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while AOSL trades at $38.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check AOSL's competition here
IPGP vs SGH Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check SGH's competition here
IPGP vs CEVA Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while CEVA trades at $36.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -82.86. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check CEVA's competition here
IPGP vs INDI Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 998.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while INDI trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check INDI's competition here
IPGP vs AMBQ Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 972.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while AMBQ trades at $45.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -9.96. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check AMBQ's competition here
IPGP vs MRAM Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 934.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while MRAM trades at $39.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 3986.00. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check MRAM's competition here
IPGP vs QNC Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 655.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while QNC trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check QNC's competition here
IPGP vs NVEC Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 461.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while NVEC trades at $95.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check NVEC's competition here
IPGP vs LAES Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 436.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while LAES trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check LAES's competition here
IPGP vs ALMU Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 399.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while ALMU trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -216.77. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check ALMU's competition here
IPGP vs XPER Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 387.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while XPER trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check XPER's competition here
IPGP vs QUIK Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 366.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while QUIK trades at $20.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -27.22. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check QUIK's competition here
IPGP vs GSIT Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 342M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while GSIT trades at $11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -27.90. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check GSIT's competition here
IPGP vs ASYS Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 328.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while ASYS trades at $22.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 126.00. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check ASYS's competition here
IPGP vs TGAN Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check TGAN's competition here
IPGP vs VLN Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 299.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while VLN trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -9.18. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check VLN's competition here
IPGP vs ATOM Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 269.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while ATOM trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -12.74. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check ATOM's competition here
IPGP vs BZAI Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 221M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while BZAI trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -9.71%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check BZAI's competition here
IPGP vs INTT Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 219.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while INTT trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 438.50. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check INTT's competition here
IPGP vs MX Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 156.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while MX trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -11.30. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check MX's competition here
IPGP vs OIIM Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check OIIM's competition here
IPGP vs NA Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while NA trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.04. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check NA's competition here
IPGP vs TRT Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 128.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while TRT trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is -1280.00. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check TRT's competition here
IPGP vs GCTS Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while GCTS trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check GCTS's competition here
IPGP vs MOSY Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check MOSY's competition here
IPGP vs WISA Comparison May 2026
IPGP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPGP stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, IPGP is priced at $103.48, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPGP currently has a P/E ratio of 152.18, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IPGP's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WISA's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, IPGP is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPGP.Check WISA's competition here