Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (VLN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VLN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VLN | $3.35 | -5.10% | 353.3M | -10.82 | -$0.31 | N/A |
| NVDA | $224.36 | +6.26% | 5.4T | 34.42 | $6.52 | +0.02% |
| TSM | $435.63 | +4.11% | 2.3T | 37.37 | $11.67 | +0.72% |
| AVGO | $459.97 | +2.95% | 2.2T | 89.49 | $5.14 | +0.55% |
| MU | $1,035.50 | +6.64% | 1.2T | 48.91 | $21.17 | +0.05% |
| AMD | $510.13 | -1.16% | 831.8B | 170.61 | $2.99 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,628.57 | +0.98% | 627.7B | 54.29 | $30.00 | +0.55% |
| INTC | $109.33 | -4.67% | 549.5B | -182.22 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| ARM | $408.85 | +15.73% | 435B | 481.00 | $0.85 | N/A |
| LRCX | $317.12 | -0.33% | 396.6B | 60.06 | $5.28 | +0.32% |
Stock Comparison
VLN vs NVDA Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while NVDA trades at $224.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 34.42. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check NVDA's competition here
VLN vs TSM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while TSM trades at $435.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 37.37. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check TSM's competition here
VLN vs AVGO Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while AVGO trades at $459.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 89.49. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AVGO's competition here
VLN vs MU Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while MU trades at $1,035.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 48.91. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check MU's competition here
VLN vs AMD Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 831.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while AMD trades at $510.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 170.61. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AMD's competition here
VLN vs ASML Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 627.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while ASML trades at $1,628.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 54.29. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ASML's competition here
VLN vs INTC Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 549.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while INTC trades at $109.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -182.22. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check INTC's competition here
VLN vs ARM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 435B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while ARM trades at $408.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 481.00. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ARM's competition here
VLN vs LRCX Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 396.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while LRCX trades at $317.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 60.06. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check LRCX's competition here
VLN vs AMAT Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 363.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while AMAT trades at $458.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AMAT's competition here
VLN vs TXN Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 266.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while TXN trades at $293.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 50.22. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check TXN's competition here
VLN vs KLAC Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 253.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while KLAC trades at $1,940.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 54.87. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check KLAC's competition here
VLN vs QCOM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 241.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while QCOM trades at $228.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check QCOM's competition here
VLN vs ADI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 196.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while ADI trades at $402.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 60.10. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ADI's competition here
VLN vs MRVL Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 192B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while MRVL trades at $219.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 75.41. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check MRVL's competition here
VLN vs ASX Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 83.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while ASX trades at $38.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 58.71. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ASX's competition here
VLN vs NXPI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 78.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while NXPI trades at $311.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check NXPI's competition here
VLN vs MPWR Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 75.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while MPWR trades at $1,542.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 109.78. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check MPWR's competition here
VLN vs STM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while STM trades at $69.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 431.37. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check STM's competition here
VLN vs TER Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while TER trades at $369.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 68.55. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check TER's competition here
VLN vs UMC Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while UMC trades at $22.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 36.33. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check UMC's competition here
VLN vs ALAB Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while ALAB trades at $320.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 217.75. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ALAB's competition here
VLN vs MCHP Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while MCHP trades at $91.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 416.00. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check MCHP's competition here
VLN vs ON Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while ON trades at $120.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 88.95. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ON's competition here
VLN vs CBRS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 46.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while CBRS trades at $213.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 496.00. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check CBRS's competition here
VLN vs GFS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while GFS trades at $79.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 50.91. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check GFS's competition here
VLN vs Q Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while Q trades at $151.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 49.01. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check Q's competition here
VLN vs TSEM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while TSEM trades at $252.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 116.37. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check TSEM's competition here
VLN vs MTSI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while MTSI trades at $353.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 151.84. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check MTSI's competition here
VLN vs ENTG Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while ENTG trades at $135.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 78.46. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ENTG's competition here
VLN vs LSCC Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while LSCC trades at $144.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 964.93. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check LSCC's competition here
VLN vs AMKR Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while AMKR trades at $72.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AMKR's competition here
VLN vs SITM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while SITM trades at $665.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -722.51. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check SITM's competition here
VLN vs RMBS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while RMBS trades at $147.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 70.56. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check RMBS's competition here
VLN vs NVMI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while NVMI trades at $481.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 60.30. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check NVMI's competition here
VLN vs AAOI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while AAOI trades at $185.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -285.65. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AAOI's competition here
VLN vs SMTC Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while SMTC trades at $149.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -364.83. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check SMTC's competition here
VLN vs ONTO Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while ONTO trades at $255.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 119.12. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ONTO's competition here
VLN vs SWKS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while SWKS trades at $75.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check SWKS's competition here
VLN vs CREE Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check CREE's competition here
VLN vs SIMO Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while SIMO trades at $268.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 53.18. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check SIMO's competition here
VLN vs FORM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while FORM trades at $115.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 132.26. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check FORM's competition here
VLN vs QRVO Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while QRVO trades at $99.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check QRVO's competition here
VLN vs ALGM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while ALGM trades at $47.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -589.12. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ALGM's competition here
VLN vs CRUS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while CRUS trades at $167.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check CRUS's competition here
VLN vs BRKS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check BRKS's competition here
VLN vs MXL Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while MXL trades at $86.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -56.73. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check MXL's competition here
VLN vs VSH Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while VSH trades at $55.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 5598.00. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check VSH's competition here
VLN vs CAMT Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while CAMT trades at $163.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 166.42. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check CAMT's competition here
VLN vs SLAB Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while SLAB trades at $217.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -143.35. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check SLAB's competition here
VLN vs NVTS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while NVTS trades at $24.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -39.46. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check NVTS's competition here
VLN vs KLIC Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while KLIC trades at $103.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 100.33. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check KLIC's competition here
VLN vs ACMR Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while ACMR trades at $82.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 62.63. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ACMR's competition here
VLN vs SYNA Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while SYNA trades at $134.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -107.94. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check SYNA's competition here
VLN vs AXTI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while AXTI trades at $109.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -342.34. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AXTI's competition here
VLN vs IPGP Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while IPGP trades at $115.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 169.35. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check IPGP's competition here
VLN vs DIOD Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while DIOD trades at $101.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 55.11. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check DIOD's competition here
VLN vs ACLS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while ACLS trades at $150.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 46.71. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ACLS's competition here
VLN vs POWI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while POWI trades at $81.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 272.92. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check POWI's competition here
VLN vs PI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while PI trades at $142.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -156.78. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check PI's competition here
VLN vs LASR Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while LASR trades at $70.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -235.27. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check LASR's competition here
VLN vs HIMX Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while HIMX trades at $21.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 115.32. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check HIMX's competition here
VLN vs UCTT Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while UCTT trades at $84.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -19.74. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check UCTT's competition here
VLN vs VECO Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while VECO trades at $57.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 150.64. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check VECO's competition here
VLN vs AMBA Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while AMBA trades at $75.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -47.00. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AMBA's competition here
VLN vs AEHR Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while AEHR trades at $93.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -246.37. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AEHR's competition here
VLN vs COHU Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while COHU trades at $54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -45.80. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check COHU's competition here
VLN vs WOLF Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while WOLF trades at $53.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check WOLF's competition here
VLN vs ICHR Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while ICHR trades at $70.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -47.30. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ICHR's competition here
VLN vs IMOS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while IMOS trades at $66.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 84.27. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check IMOS's competition here
VLN vs SKYT Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while SKYT trades at $38.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check SKYT's competition here
VLN vs PLAB Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while PLAB trades at $31.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check PLAB's competition here
VLN vs POET Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while POET trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -16.54. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check POET's competition here
VLN vs AIP Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while AIP trades at $36.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -45.58. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AIP's competition here
VLN vs AMBQ Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while AMBQ trades at $77.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -16.86. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AMBQ's competition here
VLN vs AOSL Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while AOSL trades at $43.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -12.19. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AOSL's competition here
VLN vs CEVA Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while CEVA trades at $44.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -97.20. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check CEVA's competition here
VLN vs SGH Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check SGH's competition here
VLN vs INDI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while INDI trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -6.41. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check INDI's competition here
VLN vs MRAM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 706M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while MRAM trades at $30.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 3011.00. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check MRAM's competition here
VLN vs QNC Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 688.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while QNC trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check QNC's competition here
VLN vs LAES Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while LAES trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -14.79. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check LAES's competition here
VLN vs NVEC Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 488.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while NVEC trades at $100.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 32.15. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check NVEC's competition here
VLN vs XPER Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 376.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while XPER trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -7.88. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check XPER's competition here
VLN vs ALMU Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 371.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while ALMU trades at $26.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -74.89. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ALMU's competition here
VLN vs QUIK Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 366M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while QUIK trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -27.53. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check QUIK's competition here
VLN vs TGAN Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check TGAN's competition here
VLN vs GSIT Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 318.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while GSIT trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -25.96. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check GSIT's competition here
VLN vs ATOM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 314.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while ATOM trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -14.88. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ATOM's competition here
VLN vs ASYS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 299.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while ASYS trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 114.72. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ASYS's competition here
VLN vs MX Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 285M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while MX trades at $7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -19.07. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check MX's competition here
VLN vs BZAI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while BZAI trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check BZAI's competition here
VLN vs INTT Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 205.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while INTT trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 408.25. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check INTT's competition here
VLN vs GCTS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while GCTS trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check GCTS's competition here
VLN vs NA Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 184.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while NA trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.72. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check NA's competition here
VLN vs ARBE Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 153.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while ARBE trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ARBE's competition here
VLN vs OIIM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check OIIM's competition here
VLN vs TRT Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 123.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while TRT trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 305.25. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check TRT's competition here
VLN vs IDBA Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 353.3M. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $3.35, while IDBA trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.82, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check IDBA's competition here