Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (VLN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VLN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VLN | $2.20 | -9.84% | 231.1M | -7.08 | -$0.31 | N/A |
| NVDA | $208.65 | -0.97% | 5.1T | 31.95 | $6.53 | +0.13% |
| TSM | $467.67 | +1.20% | 2.4T | 40.15 | $11.65 | +0.75% |
| AVGO | $392.13 | -4.67% | 1.9T | 65.25 | $6.01 | +0.64% |
| MU | $1,211.38 | +6.82% | 1.4T | 57.11 | $21.21 | +0.04% |
| AMD | $551.63 | +2.65% | 899.5B | 183.27 | $3.01 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,929.25 | -0.02% | 743.6B | 64.09 | $30.10 | +0.46% |
| INTC | $140.94 | +16.38% | 673.4B | -223.32 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| LRCX | $409.54 | +5.27% | 512.2B | 77.42 | $5.29 | +0.26% |
| AMAT | $640.18 | +3.74% | 508.3B | 60.34 | $10.61 | +0.30% |
Stock Comparison
VLN vs NVDA Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while NVDA trades at $208.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check NVDA's competition here
VLN vs TSM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while TSM trades at $467.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 40.15. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check TSM's competition here
VLN vs AVGO Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while AVGO trades at $392.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 65.25. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AVGO's competition here
VLN vs MU Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while MU trades at $1,211.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 57.11. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check MU's competition here
VLN vs AMD Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 899.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while AMD trades at $551.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 183.27. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AMD's competition here
VLN vs ASML Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 743.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while ASML trades at $1,929.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 64.09. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ASML's competition here
VLN vs INTC Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 673.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while INTC trades at $140.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -223.32. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check INTC's competition here
VLN vs LRCX Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 512.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while LRCX trades at $409.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 77.42. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check LRCX's competition here
VLN vs AMAT Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 508.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while AMAT trades at $640.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 60.34. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AMAT's competition here
VLN vs ARM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 433.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while ARM trades at $407.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 491.23. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ARM's competition here
VLN vs KLAC Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 351.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while KLAC trades at $269.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 76.03. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check KLAC's competition here
VLN vs TXN Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 302.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while TXN trades at $332.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 56.91. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check TXN's competition here
VLN vs MRVL Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 269.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while MRVL trades at $307.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 105.43. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check MRVL's competition here
VLN vs QCOM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 233.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while QCOM trades at $221.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check QCOM's competition here
VLN vs ADI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 217B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while ADI trades at $445.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 66.19. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ADI's competition here
VLN vs ASX Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 95.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while ASX trades at $43.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 68.16. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ASX's competition here
VLN vs NXPI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while NXPI trades at $323.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check NXPI's competition here
VLN vs MPWR Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while MPWR trades at $1,537.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 110.48. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check MPWR's competition here
VLN vs ALAB Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while ALAB trades at $439.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 301.14. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ALAB's competition here
VLN vs TER Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while TER trades at $457.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 84.79. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check TER's competition here
VLN vs STM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while STM trades at $79.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 498.75. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check STM's competition here
VLN vs UMC Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while UMC trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 44.34. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check UMC's competition here
VLN vs MCHP Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 55.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while MCHP trades at $102.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 466.86. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check MCHP's competition here
VLN vs ON Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while ON trades at $131.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 96.73. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ON's competition here
VLN vs CBRS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while CBRS trades at $224.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 534.36. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check CBRS's competition here
VLN vs GFS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while GFS trades at $89.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 53.38. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check GFS's competition here
VLN vs Q Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while Q trades at $175.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 56.48. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check Q's competition here
VLN vs TSEM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while TSEM trades at $316.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 147.37. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check TSEM's competition here
VLN vs MTSI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while MTSI trades at $396.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 167.91. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check MTSI's competition here
VLN vs ENTG Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while ENTG trades at $184.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 106.36. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ENTG's competition here
VLN vs AMKR Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while AMKR trades at $93.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 53.76. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AMKR's competition here
VLN vs LSCC Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while LSCC trades at $155.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 1109.07. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check LSCC's competition here
VLN vs SITM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while SITM trades at $753.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -792.76. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check SITM's competition here
VLN vs NVMI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while NVMI trades at $583.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 72.89. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check NVMI's competition here
VLN vs ONTO Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while ONTO trades at $347.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 162.60. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ONTO's competition here
VLN vs SMTC Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while SMTC trades at $174.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -426.17. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check SMTC's competition here
VLN vs RMBS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while RMBS trades at $140.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 66.83. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check RMBS's competition here
VLN vs AAOI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while AAOI trades at $171.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -263.43. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AAOI's competition here
VLN vs FORM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while FORM trades at $156.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 180.07. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check FORM's competition here
VLN vs ALGM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while ALGM trades at $61.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -769.75. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ALGM's competition here
VLN vs SWKS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while SWKS trades at $76.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 31.74. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check SWKS's competition here
VLN vs SIMO Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while SIMO trades at $336.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 66.85. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check SIMO's competition here
VLN vs CREE Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check CREE's competition here
VLN vs CAMT Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while CAMT trades at $195.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 199.71. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check CAMT's competition here
VLN vs QRVO Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while QRVO trades at $101.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check QRVO's competition here
VLN vs VSH Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while VSH trades at $64.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 6428.00. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check VSH's competition here
VLN vs MXL Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while MXL trades at $96.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -63.45. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check MXL's competition here
VLN vs CRUS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while CRUS trades at $165.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check CRUS's competition here
VLN vs BRKS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check BRKS's competition here
VLN vs SLAB Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while SLAB trades at $219.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -144.59. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check SLAB's competition here
VLN vs ACMR Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while ACMR trades at $103.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 78.76. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ACMR's competition here
VLN vs KLIC Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while KLIC trades at $124.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 119.44. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check KLIC's competition here
VLN vs NVTS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while NVTS trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -37.62. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check NVTS's competition here
VLN vs ACLS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while ACLS trades at $183.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 56.94. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ACLS's competition here
VLN vs DIOD Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while DIOD trades at $122.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 66.36. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check DIOD's competition here
VLN vs SYNA Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while SYNA trades at $143.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -115.03. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check SYNA's competition here
VLN vs UCTT Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while UCTT trades at $123.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -28.70. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check UCTT's competition here
VLN vs IPGP Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while IPGP trades at $118.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 173.54. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check IPGP's competition here
VLN vs POWI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while POWI trades at $87.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 291.17. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check POWI's competition here
VLN vs VECO Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while VECO trades at $77.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 203.84. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check VECO's competition here
VLN vs AXTI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while AXTI trades at $92.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -288.62. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AXTI's competition here
VLN vs PI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while PI trades at $131.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -147.85. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check PI's competition here
VLN vs LASR Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while LASR trades at $65.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -217.33. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check LASR's competition here
VLN vs AEHR Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while AEHR trades at $113.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -298.24. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AEHR's competition here
VLN vs ICHR Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while ICHR trades at $99.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -67.30. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ICHR's competition here
VLN vs COHU Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while COHU trades at $70.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -58.88. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check COHU's competition here
VLN vs HIMX Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while HIMX trades at $18.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 97.58. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check HIMX's competition here
VLN vs AMBA Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while AMBA trades at $70.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -43.92. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AMBA's competition here
VLN vs WOLF Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while WOLF trades at $52.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check WOLF's competition here
VLN vs IMOS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while IMOS trades at $70.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 88.97. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check IMOS's competition here
VLN vs AIP Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while AIP trades at $44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -56.33. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AIP's competition here
VLN vs PLAB Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while PLAB trades at $34.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check PLAB's competition here
VLN vs AMBQ Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while AMBQ trades at $88.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -19.23. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AMBQ's competition here
VLN vs SKYT Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while SKYT trades at $37.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check SKYT's competition here
VLN vs POET Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while POET trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -14.39. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check POET's competition here
VLN vs AOSL Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while AOSL trades at $49.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -13.71. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check AOSL's competition here
VLN vs CEVA Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while CEVA trades at $48.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -105.24. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check CEVA's competition here
VLN vs SGH Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check SGH's competition here
VLN vs INDI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 898M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while INDI trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check INDI's competition here
VLN vs QNC Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 772.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while QNC trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check QNC's competition here
VLN vs MRAM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 598.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while MRAM trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 2553.00. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check MRAM's competition here
VLN vs NVEC Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 535.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while NVEC trades at $110.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check NVEC's competition here
VLN vs LAES Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 442M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while LAES trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check LAES's competition here
VLN vs QUIK Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 388.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while QUIK trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -29.25. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check QUIK's competition here
VLN vs XPER Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 383.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while XPER trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -8.02. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check XPER's competition here
VLN vs ALMU Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 330.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while ALMU trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -66.70. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ALMU's competition here
VLN vs TGAN Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check TGAN's competition here
VLN vs ASYS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 319.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while ASYS trades at $22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 122.39. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ASYS's competition here
VLN vs ATOM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 268.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while ATOM trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -12.71. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check ATOM's competition here
VLN vs VLN-WT Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 256.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check VLN-WT's competition here
VLN vs INTT Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 236.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while INTT trades at $18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 470.00. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check INTT's competition here
VLN vs GSIT Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 234.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while GSIT trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -17.52. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check GSIT's competition here
VLN vs MX Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 209.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while MX trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check MX's competition here
VLN vs BZAI Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 182.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while BZAI trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check BZAI's competition here
VLN vs GCTS Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 165.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while GCTS trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check GCTS's competition here
VLN vs BZAIW Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, BZAIW has a market cap of 161.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while BZAIW trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas BZAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BZAIW's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to BZAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check BZAIW's competition here
VLN vs TRT Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 145.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while TRT trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 360.75. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check TRT's competition here
VLN vs OIIM Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check OIIM's competition here
VLN vs IDBA Comparison June 2026
VLN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN stands at 231.1M. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN is priced at $2.20, while IDBA trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.08, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, VLN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN is more volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN.Check IDBA's competition here