SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.2T. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while NVDA trades at $216.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 36.99. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check NVDA's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while TSM trades at $424.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check TSM's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while AVGO trades at $329.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 33.73. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check AVGO's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while MU trades at $903.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to MU's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check MU's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SKHY has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while SKHY trades at $142.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas SKHY's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to SKHY's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to SKHY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check SKHY's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 867.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while AMD trades at $531.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 92.24. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check AMD's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 613.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while ASML trades at $1,590.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check ASML's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 478.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while INTC trades at $90.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 158.72. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check INTC's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 307.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while AMAT trades at $387.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 35.53. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check AMAT's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 297.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while LRCX trades at $237.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 40.81. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check LRCX's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 272.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while TXN trades at $298.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 45.38. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check TXN's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 238.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while ARM trades at $223.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 126.19. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check ARM's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 204.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while MRVL trades at $233.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 70.84. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check MRVL's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 197.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while ADI trades at $407.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 41.37. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check ADI's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 194.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while KLAC trades at $149.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 39.68. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check KLAC's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 191.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while QCOM trades at $179.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check QCOM's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 87.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while ASX trades at $39.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check ASX's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while NXPI trades at $245.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check NXPI's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while TEL trades at $213.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check TEL's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while MPWR trades at $1,167.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 61.99. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check MPWR's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while TER trades at $309.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 40.26. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to TER's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check TER's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while UMC trades at $19.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check UMC's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while ALAB trades at $259.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 104.64. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check ALAB's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while MCHP trades at $75.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 46.56. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check MCHP's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while STM trades at $45.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 76.62. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to STM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check STM's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MCHPP has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while MCHPP trades at $65.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas MCHPP's P/E ratio is 96.31. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to MCHPP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to MCHPP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check MCHPP's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while ON trades at $74.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check ON's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while CRDO trades at $151.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 44.20. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check CRDO's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while GFS trades at $45.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check GFS's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while CBRS trades at $108.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -2709.25. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to CBRS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check CBRS's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while Q trades at $114.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 29.78. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check Q's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while ENTG trades at $140.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 43.68. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check ENTG's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while TSEM trades at $178.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 62.50. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check TSEM's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while MTSI trades at $243.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 54.74. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check MTSI's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while LSCC trades at $98.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 63.88. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check LSCC's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while SITM trades at $464.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 75.19. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to SITM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check SITM's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while SMTC trades at $136.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 74.31. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to SMTC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check SMTC's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while SWKS trades at $83.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check SWKS's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while QRVO trades at $114.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check QRVO's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while NVMI trades at $316.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 34.61. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check NVMI's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while ONTO trades at $203.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 41.93. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check ONTO's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to CREE's ROE of -3.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check CREE's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while RMBS trades at $90.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 35.56. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check RMBS's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while AMKR trades at $36.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check AMKR's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while FORM trades at $101.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 62.41. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check FORM's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check BRKS's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while SLAB trades at $221.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 145.56. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check SLAB's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while SIMO trades at $189.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 41.76. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check SIMO's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while MXL trades at $66.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 116.61. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check MXL's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while ALGM trades at $32.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 59.85. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to ALGM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check ALGM's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while CAMT trades at $123.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 39.52. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check CAMT's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while CRUS trades at $113.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check CRUS's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while PI trades at $172.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 85.46. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to PI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check PI's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while SYNA trades at $117.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check SYNA's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while KLIC trades at $75.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check KLIC's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while DIOD trades at $83.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 45.16. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check DIOD's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while VSH trades at $26.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 91.86. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check VSH's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while AXTI trades at $56.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -234.46. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to AXTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check AXTI's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while ACLS trades at $109.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check ACLS's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while ACMR trades at $50.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 34.20. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check ACMR's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while IPGP trades at $72.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 75.06. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check IPGP's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while AMBA trades at $66.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 101.24. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check AMBA's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while PENG trades at $54.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check PENG's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while POWI trades at $47.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 39.16. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check POWI's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while VECO trades at $42.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 39.76. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check VECO's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while COHU trades at $48.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -271.39. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check COHU's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while NVTS trades at $8.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -44.21. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check NVTS's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while OUST trades at $29.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -36.23. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check OUST's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while LASR trades at $36.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 76.48. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check LASR's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while UCTT trades at $46.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check UCTT's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while IMOS trades at $57.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check IMOS's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while HIMX trades at $11.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 55.83. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check HIMX's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while AEHR trades at $56.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 1886.67. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check AEHR's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while PLAB trades at $27.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check PLAB's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while SKYT trades at $32.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -811.50. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check SKYT's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while ICHR trades at $38.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 74.63. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check ICHR's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while WOLF trades at $23.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check WOLF's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while AMBQ trades at $51.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check AMBQ's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check SGH's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 955.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while AIP trades at $19.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -69.43. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to AIP's ROE of -3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check AIP's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 828M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while CEVA trades at $29.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 73.52. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check CEVA's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 708.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while POET trades at $5.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to POET's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check POET's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 690.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while AEVA trades at $9.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to AEVA's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check AEVA's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 684.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while DQ trades at $10.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check DQ's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 665.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while AOSL trades at $21.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -75.76. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check AOSL's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 632M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while KOPN trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 85.64. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check KOPN's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 366M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while NVEC trades at $75.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check NVEC's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 346.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while INDI trades at $1.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check INDI's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check TGAN's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 311.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while MRAM trades at $12.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -267.57. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check MRAM's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 232.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while QNC trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is -23.31. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check QNC's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 221.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while ASYS trades at $12.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 34.16. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check ASYS's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 216.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while LAES trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check LAES's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 182.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while INTT trades at $14.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 43.21. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check INTT's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 173.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while VLN trades at $1.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -9.41. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check VLN's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 172.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while VLN-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is similarly volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check VLN-WT's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 160.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while QUIK trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -16.51. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check QUIK's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 151.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while GSIT trades at $3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check GSIT's competition here

SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHYV) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SKHYV stands at 1.2T. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, SKHYV is priced at $168.01 on the NASDAQ, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SKHYV currently has a P/E ratio of 39.55, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, SKHYV's ROE is N/A, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKHYV is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKHYV.Check OIIM's competition here