Arteris, Inc.

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.3T. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while NVDA trades at $219.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 44.69. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check NVDA's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while TSM trades at $404.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check TSM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while AVGO trades at $428.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 83.68. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AVGO's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 896.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while MU trades at $795.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check MU's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 748.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while AMD trades at $458.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 152.93. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AMD's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 650.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while INTC trades at $129.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -215.73. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check INTC's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 603.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while ASML trades at $1,565.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 51.49. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ASML's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 370.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while LRCX trades at $296.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 55.96. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check LRCX's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 352.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while AMAT trades at $443.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 45.50. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AMAT's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 271B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while TXN trades at $297.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 50.99. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check TXN's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 250.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while QCOM trades at $237.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check QCOM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 241B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while KLAC trades at $1,845.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 52.23. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check KLAC's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 226.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while ARM trades at $212.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 250.18. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ARM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 206.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while ADI trades at $422.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 77.42. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ADI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 149.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while MRVL trades at $170.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 55.83. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check MRVL's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while MPWR trades at $1,661.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 119.25. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check MPWR's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while NXPI trades at $305.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check NXPI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 77.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while ASX trades at $35.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ASX's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while TER trades at $366.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 67.90. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check TER's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while MCHP trades at $99.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 450.27. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check MCHP's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while STM trades at $60.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 375.56. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check STM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while ON trades at $107.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 78.85. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ON's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while GFS trades at $74.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 53.95. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check GFS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while UMC trades at $15.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check UMC's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while ALAB trades at $207.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 140.10. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ALAB's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while Q trades at $153.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 46.48. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check Q's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while MTSI trades at $365.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 156.36. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check MTSI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while TSEM trades at $228.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 117.75. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check TSEM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while SITM trades at $901.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -980.00. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check SITM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while ENTG trades at $149.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 86.21. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ENTG's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while AMKR trades at $76.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AMKR's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while LSCC trades at $128.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 921.14. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check LSCC's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while NVMI trades at $526.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check NVMI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while AAOI trades at $184.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -280.15. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AAOI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while RMBS trades at $134.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 64.05. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check RMBS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while ONTO trades at $287.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 133.08. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ONTO's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while SMTC trades at $136.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -296.80. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check SMTC's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while FORM trades at $151.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 174.02. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check FORM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while SWKS trades at $70.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check SWKS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check CREE's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while CAMT trades at $207.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 197.58. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check CAMT's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while MXL trades at $102.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -67.28. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check MXL's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while ALGM trades at $48.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -604.87. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ALGM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while CRUS trades at $174.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check CRUS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while SIMO trades at $262.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 58.36. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check SIMO's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while QRVO trades at $93.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check QRVO's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check BRKS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while SLAB trades at $217.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -142.90. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check SLAB's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while AXTI trades at $125.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -381.24. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AXTI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while KLIC trades at $104.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 100.27. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check KLIC's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while NVTS trades at $22.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -35.92. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check NVTS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while DIOD trades at $111.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 60.54. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check DIOD's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while ACLS trades at $165.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 51.11. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ACLS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while SYNA trades at $126.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -101.24. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check SYNA's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while VSH trades at $34.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -497.71. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check VSH's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while LASR trades at $84.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -283.17. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check LASR's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while IPGP trades at $103.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 152.18. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check IPGP's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while ACMR trades at $64.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 49.37. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ACMR's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while OLED trades at $90.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check OLED's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while POWI trades at $74.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 247.80. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check POWI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while UCTT trades at $85.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -19.92. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check UCTT's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while VECO trades at $61.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 160.97. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check VECO's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while HIMX trades at $20.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 108.68. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check HIMX's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while AMBA trades at $79.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -44.79. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AMBA's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while AEHR trades at $104.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -275.16. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AEHR's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while PLAB trades at $54.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check PLAB's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while ICHR trades at $76.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -51.99. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ICHR's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while WOLF trades at $50.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check WOLF's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while COHU trades at $51.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -43.09. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check COHU's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while IMOS trades at $57.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 116.67. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check IMOS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while SKYT trades at $35.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check SKYT's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while POET trades at $13.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -20.44. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check POET's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while DQ trades at $19.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check DQ's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while AOSL trades at $38.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AOSL's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check SGH's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while CEVA trades at $36.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -82.86. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check CEVA's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 998.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while INDI trades at $4.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check INDI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 972.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while AMBQ trades at $45.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -9.96. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AMBQ's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 934.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while MRAM trades at $39.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 3986.00. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check MRAM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 655.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while QNC trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check QNC's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 461.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while NVEC trades at $95.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check NVEC's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 436.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while LAES trades at $3.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check LAES's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 399.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while ALMU trades at $28.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -216.77. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ALMU's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 387.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while XPER trades at $8.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check XPER's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 366.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while QUIK trades at $20.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -27.22. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check QUIK's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 342M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while GSIT trades at $11.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -27.90. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check GSIT's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 328.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while ASYS trades at $22.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 126.00. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ASYS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check TGAN's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 299.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while VLN trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -9.18. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check VLN's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 269.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while ATOM trades at $8.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -12.74. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ATOM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 221M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while BZAI trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -9.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check BZAI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 219.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while INTT trades at $17.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 438.50. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check INTT's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 156.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while MX trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -11.30. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check MX's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check OIIM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while NA trades at $2.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.04. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check NA's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 128.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while TRT trades at $12.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is -1280.00. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to TRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check TRT's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while GCTS trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check GCTS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while MOSY trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check MOSY's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $33.13, while WISA trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -40.40, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +3.62%, compared to WISA's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check WISA's competition here