Arteris, Inc. (AIP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while NVDA trades at $215.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check NVDA's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while TSM trades at $439.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 38.11. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check TSM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while AVGO trades at $485.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 93.69. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AVGO's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while MU trades at $1,083.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 50.26. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check MU's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 850.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while AMD trades at $542.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 174.43. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AMD's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 657.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while ASML trades at $1,741.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 56.85. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ASML's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 542.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while INTC trades at $112.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -179.77. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check INTC's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 428.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while ARM trades at $411.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 473.78. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ARM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 418.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while LRCX trades at $345.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 63.34. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check LRCX's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 388.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while AMAT trades at $503.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 46.12. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AMAT's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 280.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while TXN trades at $310.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 52.76. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check TXN's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 267.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while KLAC trades at $2,142.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 57.92. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check KLAC's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 254.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while MRVL trades at $301.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 99.93. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check MRVL's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 253.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while QCOM trades at $251.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check QCOM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 206.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while ADI trades at $437.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 63.16. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ADI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 86.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while ASX trades at $40.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 60.41. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ASX's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while NXPI trades at $321.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check NXPI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while MPWR trades at $1,685.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 116.57. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check MPWR's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while STM trades at $80.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 496.88. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check STM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while TER trades at $408.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 72.80. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check TER's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while ALAB trades at $361.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 242.01. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ALAB's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while UMC trades at $21.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 35.62. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check UMC's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while MCHP trades at $96.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 440.73. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check MCHP's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while CBRS trades at $216.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 550.05. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check CBRS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while ON trades at $134.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 94.59. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ON's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while GFS trades at $86.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 53.89. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check GFS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while Q trades at $155.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 50.23. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check Q's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while TSEM trades at $267.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 126.59. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check TSEM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while MTSI trades at $389.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 164.10. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check MTSI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while ENTG trades at $140.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 82.61. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ENTG's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while LSCC trades at $155.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 1009.00. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check LSCC's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while AMKR trades at $75.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 42.95. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AMKR's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while SITM trades at $711.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -762.04. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check SITM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while RMBS trades at $170.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 79.80. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check RMBS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while NVMI trades at $532.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 65.47. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check NVMI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while AAOI trades at $185.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -311.34. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AAOI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while SMTC trades at $163.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -406.41. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check SMTC's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while ONTO trades at $282.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 129.85. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ONTO's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while SWKS trades at $81.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 32.97. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check SWKS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while SIMO trades at $307.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 59.78. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check SIMO's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check CREE's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while FORM trades at $126.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 143.80. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check FORM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while ALGM trades at $53.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -629.12. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ALGM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while QRVO trades at $105.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check QRVO's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while CRUS trades at $179.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check CRUS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while CAMT trades at $185.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 191.06. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check CAMT's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while VSH trades at $63.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 6248.00. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check VSH's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while MXL trades at $92.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -58.39. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check MXL's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check BRKS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while SLAB trades at $218.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -143.91. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check SLAB's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while NVTS trades at $30.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -41.05. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check NVTS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while ACMR trades at $89.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 70.18. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ACMR's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while KLIC trades at $108.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 105.20. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check KLIC's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while SYNA trades at $145.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -116.83. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check SYNA's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while DIOD trades at $117.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 61.69. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check DIOD's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while IPGP trades at $123.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 179.35. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check IPGP's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while AXTI trades at $105.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -346.66. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AXTI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while ACLS trades at $159.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 49.31. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ACLS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while POWI trades at $85.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 280.63. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check POWI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while PI trades at $139.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -159.18. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check PI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while LASR trades at $77.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -254.53. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check LASR's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while HIMX trades at $24.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 126.21. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check HIMX's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while UCTT trades at $92.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -21.03. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check UCTT's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while VECO trades at $60.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 160.61. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check VECO's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while AEHR trades at $114.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -297.37. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AEHR's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while AMBA trades at $73.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -48.68. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AMBA's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while WOLF trades at $63.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check WOLF's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while COHU trades at $56.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -48.39. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check COHU's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while ICHR trades at $73.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -50.64. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ICHR's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while IMOS trades at $62.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 80.79. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check IMOS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while SKYT trades at $38.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check SKYT's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while PLAB trades at $32.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check PLAB's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while POET trades at $15.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check POET's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while AMBQ trades at $85.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AMBQ's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while AOSL trades at $52.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -14.82. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check AOSL's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while CEVA trades at $49.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -107.85. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check CEVA's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check SGH's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while INDI trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check INDI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 753.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while QNC trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check QNC's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 706M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while MRAM trades at $28.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 3011.00. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check MRAM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 543.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while NVEC trades at $109.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check NVEC's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 529M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while LAES trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -15.46. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check LAES's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while QUIK trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check QUIK's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 385.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while XPER trades at $7.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check XPER's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 376.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while ALMU trades at $27.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -75.89. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ALMU's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 346.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while VLN trades at $3.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check VLN's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check TGAN's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 320.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while ATOM trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -15.15. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ATOM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 318.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while ASYS trades at $21.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 121.94. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ASYS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while GSIT trades at $9.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -24.88. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check GSIT's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 303.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while MX trades at $9.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -20.34. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check MX's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while BZAI trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check BZAI's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 214.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while INTT trades at $16.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 426.50. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check INTT's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while GCTS trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check GCTS's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 171M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while NA trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.51. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check NA's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check OIIM's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 138.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while ARBE trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check ARBE's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 126.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while TRT trades at $12.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 313.75. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check TRT's competition here

AIP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AIP stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIP is priced at $37.28, while IDBA trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AIP currently has a P/E ratio of -48.03, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, AIP's ROE is +4.46%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AIP is less volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIP.Check IDBA's competition here