GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See GFS's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for GFS and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFS | $50.17 | +3.06% | 27.5B | 27.57 | $1.82 | +0.48% |
| NVDA | $233.95 | +1.34% | 5.7T | 40.06 | $5.84 | +0.22% |
| TSM | $472.78 | +2.96% | 2.5T | 34.24 | $13.81 | +0.80% |
| AVGO | $355.14 | +3.35% | 1.7T | 36.39 | $9.76 | +0.73% |
| SKHY | $195.13 | +0.84% | 1.4T | 12.76 | $15.29 | +0.01% |
| MU | $1,074.89 | -2.05% | 1.2T | 14.24 | $75.51 | +0.05% |
| AMD | $633.91 | +2.95% | 1T | 110.05 | $5.76 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,867.31 | +3.25% | 719.7B | 58.32 | $32.02 | +0.49% |
| INTC | $119.33 | -0.56% | 601.9B | 209.35 | $0.57 | N/A |
| LRCX | $347.49 | +2.17% | 434.6B | 59.71 | $5.82 | +0.32% |
Stock Comparison
NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ: NVDA)
GFS vs NVDA Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.7T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while NVDA trades at $233.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVDA's competition here
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (NYSE: TSM)
GFS vs TSM Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.5T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while TSM trades at $472.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 34.24. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TSM's competition here
Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ: AVGO)
GFS vs AVGO Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while AVGO trades at $355.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 36.39. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AVGO's competition here
SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHY)
GFS vs SKHY Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, SKHY has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while SKHY trades at $195.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas SKHY's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKHY's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SKHY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SKHY's competition here
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU)
GFS vs MU Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while MU trades at $1,074.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MU's competition here
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMD)
GFS vs AMD Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while AMD trades at $633.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 110.05. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMD's competition here
ASML Holding N.V. (NASDAQ: ASML)
GFS vs ASML Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 719.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while ASML trades at $1,867.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 58.32. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ASML's competition here
Intel Corp. (NASDAQ: INTC)
GFS vs INTC Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 601.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while INTC trades at $119.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 209.35. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check INTC's competition here
Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX)
GFS vs LRCX Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 434.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while LRCX trades at $347.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 59.71. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LRCX's competition here
Applied Materials, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMAT)
GFS vs AMAT Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 428.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while AMAT trades at $540.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMAT's competition here
Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: ARM)
GFS vs ARM Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 328.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while ARM trades at $307.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 173.72. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ARM's competition here
KLA Corporation (NASDAQ: KLAC)
GFS vs KLAC Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 270.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while KLAC trades at $206.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 55.02. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check KLAC's competition here
Texas Instruments Incorporated (NASDAQ: TXN)
GFS vs TXN Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 268.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while TXN trades at $293.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 44.72. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to TXN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TXN's competition here
Marvell Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MRVL)
GFS vs MRVL Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 238.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while MRVL trades at $272.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 82.51. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MRVL's competition here
Analog Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: ADI)
GFS vs ADI Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 203.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while ADI trades at $417.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 42.31. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ADI's competition here
QUALCOMM Incorporated (NASDAQ: QCOM)
GFS vs QCOM Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 194.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while QCOM trades at $184.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check QCOM's competition here
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. (NYSE: ASX)
GFS vs ASX Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while ASX trades at $47.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 55.19. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ASX's competition here
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: MPWR)
GFS vs MPWR Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while MPWR trades at $1,439.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 76.46. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MPWR's competition here
Teradyne, Inc. (NASDAQ: TER)
GFS vs TER Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while TER trades at $449.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 58.47. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TER's competition here
United Microelectronics Corporation (NYSE: UMC)
GFS vs UMC Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 65.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while UMC trades at $26.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check UMC's competition here
TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL)
GFS vs TEL Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 63.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while TEL trades at $220.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is similarly volatile compared to TEL. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TEL's competition here
NXP Semiconductors N.V. (NASDAQ: NXPI)
GFS vs NXPI Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while NXPI trades at $243.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NXPI's competition here
Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: ALAB)
GFS vs ALAB Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while ALAB trades at $350.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 141.26. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ALAB's competition here
STMicroelectronics N.V. (NYSE: STM)
GFS vs STM Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while STM trades at $57.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 97.10. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to STM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check STM's competition here
Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ: MCHP)
GFS vs MCHP Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while MCHP trades at $81.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 49.89. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MCHP's competition here
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (NASDAQ: CRDO)
GFS vs CRDO Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while CRDO trades at $218.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 63.93. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CRDO's competition here
Cerebras Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: CBRS)
GFS vs CBRS Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while CBRS trades at $166.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -4160.75. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CBRS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CBRS's competition here
Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ: MCHPP)
GFS vs MCHPP Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, MCHPP has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while MCHPP trades at $69.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas MCHPP's P/E ratio is 101.96. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCHPP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to MCHPP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MCHPP's competition here
ON Semiconductor Corporation (NASDAQ: ON)
GFS vs ON Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while ON trades at $84.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 32.03. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ON's competition here
Qnity Electronics, Inc. (NYSE: Q)
GFS vs Q Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while Q trades at $131.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 34.33. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check Q's competition here
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (NASDAQ: TSEM)
GFS vs TSEM Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while TSEM trades at $240.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 84.20. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TSEM's competition here
Entegris, Inc. (NASDAQ: ENTG)
GFS vs ENTG Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while ENTG trades at $166.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 51.86. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ENTG's competition here
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MTSI)
GFS vs MTSI Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while MTSI trades at $321.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 72.27. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MTSI's competition here
SiTime Corporation (NASDAQ: SITM)
GFS vs SITM Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while SITM trades at $709.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 114.80. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SITM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SITM's competition here
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (NASDAQ: LSCC)
GFS vs LSCC Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while LSCC trades at $134.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 87.01. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LSCC's competition here
Semtech Corporation (NASDAQ: SMTC)
GFS vs SMTC Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while SMTC trades at $194.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 105.91. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMTC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SMTC's competition here
Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO)
GFS vs ONTO Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while ONTO trades at $327.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 67.58. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ONTO's competition here
Amkor Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMKR)
GFS vs AMKR Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while AMKR trades at $56.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMKR's competition here
Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: SWKS)
GFS vs SWKS Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while SWKS trades at $85.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SWKS's competition here
Nova Ltd. (NASDAQ: NVMI)
GFS vs NVMI Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while NVMI trades at $396.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 43.34. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVMI's competition here
Rambus Inc. (NASDAQ: RMBS)
GFS vs RMBS Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while RMBS trades at $111.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 44.08. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check RMBS's competition here
FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM)
GFS vs FORM Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while FORM trades at $149.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 92.07. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check FORM's competition here
Qorvo, Inc. (NASDAQ: QRVO)
GFS vs QRVO Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while QRVO trades at $114.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check QRVO's competition here
Wolfspeed, Inc. (NASDAQ: CREE)
GFS vs CREE Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CREE's ROE of -3.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CREE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CREE's competition here
MaxLinear, Inc. (NASDAQ: MXL)
GFS vs MXL Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while MXL trades at $105.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 185.84. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MXL's competition here
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (NASDAQ: SIMO)
GFS vs SIMO Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while SIMO trades at $280.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 61.85. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SIMO's competition here
Brooks Automation, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRKS)
GFS vs BRKS Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check BRKS's competition here
Camtek Ltd. (NASDAQ: CAMT)
GFS vs CAMT Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while CAMT trades at $165.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 52.95. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CAMT's competition here
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALGM)
GFS vs ALGM Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while ALGM trades at $39.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 73.20. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALGM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ALGM's competition here
Silicon Laboratories Inc. (NASDAQ: SLAB)
GFS vs SLAB Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while SLAB trades at $222.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 146.55. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SLAB's competition here
Cirrus Logic, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRUS)
GFS vs CRUS Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while CRUS trades at $121.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CRUS's competition here
Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI)
GFS vs PI Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while PI trades at $189.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 93.92. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check PI's competition here
Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (NYSE: VSH)
GFS vs VSH Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while VSH trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 131.69. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check VSH's competition here
ACM Research, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACMR)
GFS vs ACMR Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while ACMR trades at $83.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 55.96. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ACMR's competition here
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: KLIC)
GFS vs KLIC Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while KLIC trades at $100.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 37.18. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check KLIC's competition here
Diodes Incorporated (NASDAQ: DIOD)
GFS vs DIOD Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while DIOD trades at $103.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 56.43. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check DIOD's competition here
Synaptics Incorporated (NASDAQ: SYNA)
GFS vs SYNA Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while SYNA trades at $121.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SYNA's competition here
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACLS)
GFS vs ACLS Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while ACLS trades at $147.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 32.98. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ACLS's competition here
AXT, Inc. (NASDAQ: AXTI)
GFS vs AXTI Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while AXTI trades at $85.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -357.79. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AXTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AXTI's competition here
IPG Photonics Corporation (NASDAQ: IPGP)
GFS vs IPGP Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while IPGP trades at $84.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 86.65. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check IPGP's competition here
Veeco Instruments Inc. (NASDAQ: VECO)
GFS vs VECO Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while VECO trades at $57.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 53.63. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check VECO's competition here
Aehr Test Systems (NASDAQ: AEHR)
GFS vs AEHR Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while AEHR trades at $107.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 3573.67. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AEHR's competition here
Cohu, Inc. (NASDAQ: COHU)
GFS vs COHU Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while COHU trades at $73.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -408.22. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check COHU's competition here
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: UCTT)
GFS vs UCTT Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while UCTT trades at $72.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 48.14. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check UCTT's competition here
Navitas Semiconductor Corp (NASDAQ: NVTS)
GFS vs NVTS Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while NVTS trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -65.26. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVTS's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NASDAQ: OUST)
GFS vs OUST Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while OUST trades at $44.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -54.13. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check OUST's competition here
Penguin Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: PENG)
GFS vs PENG Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while PENG trades at $61.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check PENG's competition here
Power Integrations, Inc. (NASDAQ: POWI)
GFS vs POWI Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while POWI trades at $54.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 45.01. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check POWI's competition here
Ambarella, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMBA)
GFS vs AMBA Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while AMBA trades at $68.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 104.02. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMBA's competition here
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES Inc. (NASDAQ: IMOS)
GFS vs IMOS Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while IMOS trades at $83.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 40.63. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check IMOS's competition here
Himax Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: HIMX)
GFS vs HIMX Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while HIMX trades at $15.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 70.15. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check HIMX's competition here
nLIGHT, Inc. (NASDAQ: LASR)
GFS vs LASR Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while LASR trades at $40.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 84.54. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LASR's competition here
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (NASDAQ: ICHR)
GFS vs ICHR Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while ICHR trades at $62.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 123.37. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ICHR's competition here
Photronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: PLAB)
GFS vs PLAB Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while PLAB trades at $31.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check PLAB's competition here
Wolfspeed Inc. (NYSE: WOLF)
GFS vs WOLF Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while WOLF trades at $35.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check WOLF's competition here
Ambiq Micro, Inc. (NYSE: AMBQ)
GFS vs AMBQ Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while AMBQ trades at $68.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMBQ's competition here
SkyWater Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: SKYT)
GFS vs SKYT Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while SKYT trades at $32.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -811.50. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SKYT's competition here
Arteris, Inc. (NASDAQ: AIP)
GFS vs AIP Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while AIP trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -88.07. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIP's ROE of -3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AIP's competition here
SMART Global Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SGH)
GFS vs SGH Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SGH's competition here
CEVA, Inc. (NASDAQ: CEVA)
GFS vs CEVA Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while CEVA trades at $37.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 92.75. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CEVA's competition here
POET Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: POET)
GFS vs POET Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while POET trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -18.05. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check POET's competition here
Aeva Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AEVA)
GFS vs AEVA Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 996.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while AEVA trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -8.79. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AEVA's competition here
Kopin Corp. (NASDAQ: KOPN)
GFS vs KOPN Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 909.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while KOPN trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 123.68. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check KOPN's competition here
Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (NASDAQ: AOSL)
GFS vs AOSL Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 905.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while AOSL trades at $30.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -104.28. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AOSL's competition here
Daqo New Energy Corp. (NYSE: DQ)
GFS vs DQ Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 745M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while DQ trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check DQ's competition here
indie Semiconductor, Inc. (NASDAQ: INDI)
GFS vs INDI Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 627.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while INDI trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -10.61. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check INDI's competition here
NVE Corporation (NASDAQ: NVEC)
GFS vs NVEC Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 539M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while NVEC trades at $111.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 29.95. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVEC's competition here
Everspin Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: MRAM)
GFS vs MRAM Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 441.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while MRAM trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -393.93. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MRAM's competition here
Valens Semiconductor Ltd. WT (NYSE: VLN-WT)
GFS vs VLN-WT Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 399.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check VLN-WT's competition here
Quantum eMotion Corp. (AMEX: QNC)
GFS vs QNC Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 356.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while QNC trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is -35.73. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check QNC's competition here
SEALSQ Corp (NASDAQ: LAES)
GFS vs LAES Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 337.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while LAES trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LAES's competition here
Transphorm, Inc. (NASDAQ: TGAN)
GFS vs TGAN Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TGAN's competition here
Amtech Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: ASYS)
GFS vs ASYS Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 314.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while ASYS trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 48.68. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ASYS's competition here
Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU)
GFS vs ALMU Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 240.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while ALMU trades at $13.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -109.33. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ALMU's competition here
QuickLogic Corporation (NASDAQ: QUIK)
GFS vs QUIK Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 210.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while QUIK trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -22.40. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check QUIK's competition here
GSI Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: GSIT)
GFS vs GSIT Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 209.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while GSIT trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check GSIT's competition here
Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (NYSE: VLN)
GFS vs VLN Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 206.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while VLN trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -11.24. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check VLN's competition here
GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. (NYSE: GCTS)
GFS vs GCTS Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 203.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while GCTS trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check GCTS's competition here
Atomera Incorporated (NASDAQ: ATOM)
GFS vs ATOM Comparison October 2026
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 27.5B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 182.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $50.17 on the NASDAQ, while ATOM trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 27.57, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ATOM's competition here