GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.2T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while NVDA trades at $215.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 44.01. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVDA's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while TSM trades at $411.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 35.48. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TSM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while AVGO trades at $430.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 83.82. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AVGO's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 842.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while MU trades at $746.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 35.24. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MU's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 742.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while AMD trades at $455.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 152.75. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMD's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 627.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while INTC trades at $124.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -208.16. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check INTC's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 613.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while ASML trades at $1,592.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 52.44. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ASML's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 367.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while LRCX trades at $294.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 55.59. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LRCX's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 345.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while AMAT trades at $435.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 44.56. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMAT's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 262B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while TXN trades at $287.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 49.22. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TXN's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 244.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while KLAC trades at $1,869.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 52.88. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check KLAC's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 230.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while QCOM trades at $219.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check QCOM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 226.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while ARM trades at $213.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 250.91. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ARM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 203.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while ADI trades at $416.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 76.29. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ADI's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 148.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while MRVL trades at $170.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 55.42. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MRVL's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 78.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while MPWR trades at $1,600.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 114.02. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MPWR's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 74.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while ASX trades at $34.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 52.65. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ASX's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while NXPI trades at $294.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 28.15. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NXPI's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while TER trades at $359.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 66.62. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TER's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while MCHP trades at $99.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -330.30. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MCHP's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while STM trades at $59.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 369.78. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check STM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while ON trades at $103.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 75.88. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ON's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while UMC trades at $15.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check UMC's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while ALAB trades at $199.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 134.09. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ALAB's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while Q trades at $147.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 44.65. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check Q's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while MTSI trades at $359.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 153.79. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MTSI's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while TSEM trades at $211.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 108.77. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TSEM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while ENTG trades at $149.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 86.19. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ENTG's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while SITM trades at $833.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -946.68. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SITM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while AMKR trades at $76.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 44.03. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMKR's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while LSCC trades at $127.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 908.50. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LSCC's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while NVMI trades at $521.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 65.47. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVMI's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while ONTO trades at $284.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 133.12. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ONTO's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while RMBS trades at $129.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 61.55. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check RMBS's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while AAOI trades at $148.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -229.14. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AAOI's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while FORM trades at $147.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 169.97. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check FORM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while SMTC trades at $121.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -264.80. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SMTC's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while SWKS trades at $66.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SWKS's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CREE's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while CAMT trades at $205.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 199.55. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CAMT's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while ALGM trades at $48.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -611.87. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ALGM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while MXL trades at $99.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -65.68. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MXL's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while CRUS trades at $171.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CRUS's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while SIMO trades at $253.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 56.60. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SIMO's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while QRVO trades at $90.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check QRVO's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check BRKS's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while SLAB trades at $217.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -110.38. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SLAB's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while AXTI trades at $116.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -363.62. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AXTI's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while KLIC trades at $102.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 99.67. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check KLIC's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while DIOD trades at $111.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 77.91. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check DIOD's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while ACLS trades at $163.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 42.79. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ACLS's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while SYNA trades at $125.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -78.89. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SYNA's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while VSH trades at $34.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -489.43. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check VSH's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while IPGP trades at $104.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 153.66. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check IPGP's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while OLED trades at $91.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check OLED's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while NVTS trades at $18.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -28.89. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVTS's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while LASR trades at $73.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -157.26. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LASR's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while POWI trades at $73.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 187.90. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check POWI's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while ACMR trades at $59.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 45.69. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ACMR's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while UCTT trades at $87.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -20.30. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check UCTT's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while VECO trades at $59.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 156.37. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check VECO's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while AMBA trades at $76.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -42.87. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMBA's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while PLAB trades at $53.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check PLAB's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while HIMX trades at $17.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 68.42. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check HIMX's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while AEHR trades at $97.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -255.87. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AEHR's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while ICHR trades at $74.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -50.28. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ICHR's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while COHU trades at $49.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -41.63. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check COHU's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while IMOS trades at $60.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 123.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check IMOS's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while WOLF trades at $46.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check WOLF's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while SKYT trades at $33.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SKYT's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while AIP trades at $31.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -38.85. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AIP's ROE of +3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AIP's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while POET trades at $10.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -16.57. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check POET's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while DQ trades at $18.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check DQ's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while AOSL trades at $37.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -10.53. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AOSL's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SGH's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while CEVA trades at $36.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -84.02. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CEVA's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 943.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while AMBQ trades at $44.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -9.66. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMBQ's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 906M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while INDI trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.89. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check INDI's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 632.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while MRAM trades at $26.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 2699.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MRAM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 594.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while QNC trades at $2.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check QNC's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 436.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while NVEC trades at $90.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 28.73. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVEC's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 418.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while LAES trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -11.73. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LAES's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 376.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while XPER trades at $8.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check XPER's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 352.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while QUIK trades at $19.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -26.17. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check QUIK's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 345.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while ALMU trades at $24.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -187.77. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ALMU's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TGAN's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 309.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while ASYS trades at $21.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -10.09. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ASYS's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 293.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while VLN trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check VLN's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 273.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while ATOM trades at $8.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ATOM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 246.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while GSIT trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -22.84. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check GSIT's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 229.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while BZAI trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -9.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check BZAI's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 215.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while INTT trades at $17.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 431.50. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check INTT's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 164.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while MX trades at $4.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MX's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check OIIM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 123.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while TRT trades at $12.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is -1232.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TRT's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 111.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while NA trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NA's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while GCTS trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check GCTS's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while MOSY trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MOSY's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 41.2B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $74.12, while WISA trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.32, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WISA's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check WISA's competition here