GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. (GCTS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while NVDA trades at $211.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check NVDA's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while TSM trades at $418.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 35.75. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check TSM's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while AVGO trades at $446.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 87.36. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AVGO's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while MU trades at $971.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 45.91. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check MU's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 842.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while AMD trades at $516.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 171.02. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AMD's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 621.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while ASML trades at $1,612.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 53.69. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ASML's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 576.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while INTC trades at $114.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -188.00. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check INTC's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 398.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while LRCX trades at $318.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 60.32. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check LRCX's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 375.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while ARM trades at $353.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 415.64. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ARM's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 357.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while AMAT trades at $450.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 42.38. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AMAT's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 278.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while TXN trades at $305.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 52.26. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check TXN's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 264.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while QCOM trades at $251.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check QCOM's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 251B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while KLAC trades at $1,921.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 55.38. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check KLAC's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 201.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while ADI trades at $413.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 61.58. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ADI's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 179.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while MRVL trades at $205.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 70.45. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check MRVL's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while ASX trades at $38.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 59.02. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ASX's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while NXPI trades at $321.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check NXPI's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while MPWR trades at $1,566.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 111.47. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check MPWR's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while STM trades at $69.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 433.25. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check STM's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while ALAB trades at $342.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 233.20. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ALAB's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while TER trades at $374.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 69.75. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check TER's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while UMC trades at $22.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check UMC's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while CBRS trades at $236.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 578.02. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check CBRS's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while MCHP trades at $94.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 430.23. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check MCHP's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while ON trades at $120.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 88.69. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ON's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while GFS trades at $79.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 45.44. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check GFS's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while Q trades at $156.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 50.14. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check Q's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while TSEM trades at $255.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 117.62. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check TSEM's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while MTSI trades at $364.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 155.17. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check MTSI's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while ENTG trades at $138.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 80.23. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ENTG's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while LSCC trades at $147.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 980.53. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check LSCC's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while SITM trades at $710.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -755.53. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check SITM's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while AMKR trades at $69.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 39.98. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AMKR's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while NVMI trades at $502.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 62.87. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check NVMI's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while RMBS trades at $145.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 68.94. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check RMBS's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while SMTC trades at $152.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -363.19. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check SMTC's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while ONTO trades at $258.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 120.80. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ONTO's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while AAOI trades at $158.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -247.52. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AAOI's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while SWKS trades at $77.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 32.44. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check SWKS's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check CREE's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while FORM trades at $124.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 146.55. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check FORM's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while SIMO trades at $276.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 54.93. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check SIMO's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while QRVO trades at $103.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 29.79. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check QRVO's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while ALGM trades at $47.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -598.37. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ALGM's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while CRUS trades at $169.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check CRUS's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while MXL trades at $92.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -61.14. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check MXL's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while CAMT trades at $171.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 175.16. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check CAMT's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check BRKS's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while SLAB trades at $217.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -142.22. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check SLAB's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while VSH trades at $52.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 5206.00. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check VSH's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while NVTS trades at $26.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -46.67. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check NVTS's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while ACMR trades at $86.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 66.08. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ACMR's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while KLIC trades at $101.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 98.92. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check KLIC's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while SYNA trades at $137.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -109.82. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check SYNA's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while IPGP trades at $114.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 168.41. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check IPGP's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while DIOD trades at $105.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 56.93. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check DIOD's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while AXTI trades at $103.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -322.37. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AXTI's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while POWI trades at $84.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check POWI's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while ACLS trades at $150.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 46.71. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ACLS's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while PI trades at $151.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -169.66. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check PI's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while LASR trades at $74.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -247.07. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check LASR's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while UCTT trades at $85.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -19.95. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check UCTT's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while HIMX trades at $20.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 108.26. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check HIMX's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while VECO trades at $57.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 151.68. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check VECO's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while AMBA trades at $72.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -44.83. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AMBA's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while AEHR trades at $92.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -242.97. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AEHR's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while WOLF trades at $59.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check WOLF's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while COHU trades at $52.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -44.33. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check COHU's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while ICHR trades at $71.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -48.32. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ICHR's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while IMOS trades at $70.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 87.83. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check IMOS's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while SKYT trades at $38.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check SKYT's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while PLAB trades at $32.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check PLAB's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while AMBQ trades at $79.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AMBQ's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while AIP trades at $35.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -45.51. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AIP's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while POET trades at $12.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -14.63. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check POET's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while AOSL trades at $45.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AOSL's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while CEVA trades at $39.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -86.91. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check CEVA's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check SGH's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while INDI trades at $4.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check INDI's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 713M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while QNC trades at $3.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check QNC's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 618.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while MRAM trades at $26.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 2638.00. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check MRAM's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 496.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while LAES trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check LAES's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 473.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while NVEC trades at $97.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 31.19. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check NVEC's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 383.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while XPER trades at $7.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -8.02. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check XPER's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 370.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while VLN trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -10.35. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check VLN's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 367.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while QUIK trades at $20.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -28.01. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check QUIK's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 324.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while ATOM trades at $9.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -15.35. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ATOM's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check TGAN's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 319.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while MX trades at $8.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -21.39. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check MX's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 308.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while ASYS trades at $21.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 118.17. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ASYS's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 305.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while ALMU trades at $21.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -61.66. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ALMU's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 289.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while GSIT trades at $9.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check GSIT's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 212M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while INTT trades at $16.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 421.88. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check INTT's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 196.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while BZAI trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check BZAI's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 179.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while NA trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check NA's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check OIIM's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while ARBE trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ARBE's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 127.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while TRT trades at $12.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 315.50. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check TRT's competition here

GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 194.2M. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $3.37, while IDBA trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.19, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check IDBA's competition here