GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc.
GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. (GCTS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GCTS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCTS | $1.40 | -14.11% | 76.7M | -1.76 | -$0.82 | N/A |
| NVDA | $235.13 | +6.50% | 5.5T | 46.18 | $4.89 | +0.02% |
| TSM | $418.36 | +5.31% | 2.1T | 34.08 | $11.73 | +0.79% |
| AVGO | $437.92 | +4.44% | 2T | 81.09 | $5.14 | +0.59% |
| MU | $794.16 | +3.60% | 906.3B | 37.98 | $21.16 | +0.06% |
| AMD | $452.35 | +0.91% | 726.4B | 148.50 | $3.00 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,596.40 | +4.96% | 609.6B | 52.01 | $30.41 | +0.56% |
| INTC | $117.05 | -2.95% | 604.6B | -200.48 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| LRCX | $298.88 | +3.33% | 369.5B | 55.74 | $5.30 | +0.34% |
| AMAT | $445.75 | +3.37% | 346.5B | 44.78 | $9.75 | +0.42% |
Stock Comparison
GCTS vs NVDA Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.5T. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while NVDA trades at $235.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 46.18. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check NVDA's competition here
GCTS vs TSM Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while TSM trades at $418.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check TSM's competition here
GCTS vs AVGO Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while AVGO trades at $437.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 81.09. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AVGO's competition here
GCTS vs MU Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 906.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while MU trades at $794.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check MU's competition here
GCTS vs AMD Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 726.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while AMD trades at $452.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 148.50. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AMD's competition here
GCTS vs ASML Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 609.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while ASML trades at $1,596.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 52.01. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ASML's competition here
GCTS vs INTC Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 604.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while INTC trades at $117.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -200.48. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check INTC's competition here
GCTS vs LRCX Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 369.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while LRCX trades at $298.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 55.74. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check LRCX's competition here
GCTS vs AMAT Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 346.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while AMAT trades at $445.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 44.78. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AMAT's competition here
GCTS vs TXN Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 278.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while TXN trades at $308.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 52.47. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check TXN's competition here
GCTS vs KLAC Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 241.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while KLAC trades at $1,888.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 52.36. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check KLAC's competition here
GCTS vs ARM Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 235.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while ARM trades at $222.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 260.25. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ARM's competition here
GCTS vs QCOM Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 224.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while QCOM trades at $203.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check QCOM's competition here
GCTS vs ADI Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 211.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while ADI trades at $427.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 79.34. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ADI's competition here
GCTS vs MRVL Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 155.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while MRVL trades at $186.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 57.78. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check MRVL's competition here
GCTS vs MPWR Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while MPWR trades at $1,625.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 118.30. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check MPWR's competition here
GCTS vs ASX Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 77.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while ASX trades at $35.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 54.56. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ASX's competition here
GCTS vs NXPI Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while NXPI trades at $295.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check NXPI's competition here
GCTS vs TER Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while TER trades at $361.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 67.25. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check TER's competition here
GCTS vs STM Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while STM trades at $65.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 396.23. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check STM's competition here
GCTS vs MCHP Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while MCHP trades at $96.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 439.59. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check MCHP's competition here
GCTS vs ON Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while ON trades at $117.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 85.08. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ON's competition here
GCTS vs GFS Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while GFS trades at $73.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 53.95. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check GFS's competition here
GCTS vs UMC Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while UMC trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check UMC's competition here
GCTS vs ALAB Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while ALAB trades at $221.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 152.44. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ALAB's competition here
GCTS vs Q Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while Q trades at $162.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 52.25. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check Q's competition here
GCTS vs TSEM Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while TSEM trades at $274.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 139.57. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check TSEM's competition here
GCTS vs MTSI Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while MTSI trades at $379.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 163.06. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check MTSI's competition here
GCTS vs ENTG Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while ENTG trades at $140.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 83.84. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ENTG's competition here
GCTS vs SITM Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while SITM trades at $838.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -907.95. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check SITM's competition here
GCTS vs AMKR Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while AMKR trades at $74.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 42.88. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AMKR's competition here
GCTS vs AAOI Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while AAOI trades at $206.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -343.23. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AAOI's competition here
GCTS vs LSCC Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while LSCC trades at $124.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 897.50. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check LSCC's competition here
GCTS vs NVMI Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while NVMI trades at $563.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 63.43. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check NVMI's competition here
GCTS vs RMBS Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while RMBS trades at $131.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 64.22. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check RMBS's competition here
GCTS vs ONTO Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while ONTO trades at $280.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 129.53. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ONTO's competition here
GCTS vs SMTC Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while SMTC trades at $139.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -303.78. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check SMTC's competition here
GCTS vs SWKS Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while SWKS trades at $67.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check SWKS's competition here
GCTS vs FORM Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while FORM trades at $128.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 150.36. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check FORM's competition here
GCTS vs CREE Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check CREE's competition here
GCTS vs SIMO Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while SIMO trades at $269.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 60.10. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check SIMO's competition here
GCTS vs ALGM Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while ALGM trades at $45.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -574.62. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ALGM's competition here
GCTS vs CRUS Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while CRUS trades at $164.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check CRUS's competition here
GCTS vs QRVO Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while QRVO trades at $90.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check QRVO's competition here
GCTS vs MXL Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while MXL trades at $90.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -57.72. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check MXL's competition here
GCTS vs BRKS Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check BRKS's competition here
GCTS vs CAMT Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while CAMT trades at $167.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 172.33. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check CAMT's competition here
GCTS vs SLAB Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while SLAB trades at $217.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -142.73. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check SLAB's competition here
GCTS vs AXTI Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while AXTI trades at $119.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -393.34. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AXTI's competition here
GCTS vs KLIC Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while KLIC trades at $104.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 100.26. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check KLIC's competition here
GCTS vs VSH Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while VSH trades at $37.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -550.00. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check VSH's competition here
GCTS vs SYNA Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while SYNA trades at $128.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -104.85. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check SYNA's competition here
GCTS vs ACLS Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while ACLS trades at $164.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 50.36. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ACLS's competition here
GCTS vs NVTS Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while NVTS trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -33.60. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check NVTS's competition here
GCTS vs DIOD Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while DIOD trades at $101.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 55.11. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check DIOD's competition here
GCTS vs LASR Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while LASR trades at $80.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -268.07. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check LASR's competition here
GCTS vs IPGP Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while IPGP trades at $107.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 156.76. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check IPGP's competition here
GCTS vs ACMR Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while ACMR trades at $64.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 49.43. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ACMR's competition here
GCTS vs OLED Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while OLED trades at $92.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check OLED's competition here
GCTS vs POWI Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while POWI trades at $70.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 237.23. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check POWI's competition here
GCTS vs UCTT Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while UCTT trades at $86.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -19.82. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check UCTT's competition here
GCTS vs VECO Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while VECO trades at $61.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 158.58. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check VECO's competition here
GCTS vs AMBA Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while AMBA trades at $81.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -46.12. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AMBA's competition here
GCTS vs HIMX Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while HIMX trades at $20.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 108.34. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check HIMX's competition here
GCTS vs AEHR Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while AEHR trades at $104.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -271.71. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AEHR's competition here
GCTS vs PLAB Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while PLAB trades at $52.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check PLAB's competition here
GCTS vs WOLF Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while WOLF trades at $71.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check WOLF's competition here
GCTS vs ICHR Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while ICHR trades at $74.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -50.21. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ICHR's competition here
GCTS vs COHU Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while COHU trades at $49.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -41.31. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check COHU's competition here
GCTS vs IMOS Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while IMOS trades at $53.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 68.19. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check IMOS's competition here
GCTS vs POET Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while POET trades at $19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -21.13. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check POET's competition here
GCTS vs SKYT Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while SKYT trades at $35.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check SKYT's competition here
GCTS vs AIP Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while AIP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -43.35. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AIP's competition here
GCTS vs AMBQ Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while AMBQ trades at $72.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AMBQ's competition here
GCTS vs DQ Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while DQ trades at $18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check DQ's competition here
GCTS vs AOSL Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while AOSL trades at $41.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -11.55. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check AOSL's competition here
GCTS vs SGH Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check SGH's competition here
GCTS vs CEVA Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while CEVA trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -82.93. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check CEVA's competition here
GCTS vs MRAM Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 972.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while MRAM trades at $38.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 4146.00. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check MRAM's competition here
GCTS vs INDI Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 950.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while INDI trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.93. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check INDI's competition here
GCTS vs QNC Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 615.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while QNC trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check QNC's competition here
GCTS vs NVEC Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 462.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while NVEC trades at $94.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check NVEC's competition here
GCTS vs ALMU Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 446.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while ALMU trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -242.23. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ALMU's competition here
GCTS vs LAES Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 422.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while LAES trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check LAES's competition here
GCTS vs XPER Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 397.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while XPER trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check XPER's competition here
GCTS vs QUIK Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 386.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while QUIK trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -28.72. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check QUIK's competition here
GCTS vs GSIT Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while GSIT trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -29.18. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check GSIT's competition here
GCTS vs TGAN Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check TGAN's competition here
GCTS vs ATOM Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 321.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while ATOM trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -15.22. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ATOM's competition here
GCTS vs VLN Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 310.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while VLN trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check VLN's competition here
GCTS vs ASYS Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 300.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while ASYS trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 115.06. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check ASYS's competition here
GCTS vs INTT Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 236.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while INTT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 469.75. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check INTT's competition here
GCTS vs BZAI Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 205.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while BZAI trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -9.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check BZAI's competition here
GCTS vs NA Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 173.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while NA trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check NA's competition here
GCTS vs MX Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 149M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while MX trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -10.76. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check MX's competition here
GCTS vs OIIM Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check OIIM's competition here
GCTS vs TRT Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 107.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while TRT trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is -535.50. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to TRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check TRT's competition here
GCTS vs MOSY Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check MOSY's competition here
GCTS vs WISA Comparison May 2026
GCTS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GCTS stands at 76.7M. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, GCTS is priced at $1.40, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GCTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.76, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GCTS's ROE is +0.60%, compared to WISA's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GCTS is more volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GCTS.Check WISA's competition here