Penguin Solutions, Inc. (PENG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PENG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PENG | $62.28 | -6.72% | 3.3B | 32.61 | $1.91 | N/A |
| SNDK | $2,090.71 | -10.46% | 309.6B | 64.07 | $32.63 | N/A |
| APH | $163.72 | -0.87% | 201.1B | 43.36 | $3.77 | +0.56% |
| GLW | $223.00 | -2.20% | 191.9B | 107.21 | $2.08 | +0.52% |
| COHR | $380.56 | -6.55% | 60.3B | 78.22 | $4.86 | N/A |
| KEYS | $328.66 | -8.72% | 57.4B | 38.75 | $8.67 | N/A |
| FLEX | $146.70 | -9.04% | 53.7B | 44.24 | $3.31 | N/A |
| GRMN | $232.51 | -1.23% | 44.8B | 25.75 | $9.03 | +1.62% |
| CLS | $337.53 | -6.60% | 38.8B | 48.04 | $7.02 | N/A |
| JBL | $358.60 | -4.28% | 37.9B | 29.95 | $11.99 | +0.09% |
Stock Comparison
PENG vs SNDK Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 309.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while SNDK trades at $2,090.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is 64.07. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNDK's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SNDK's competition here
PENG vs APH Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 201.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while APH trades at $163.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 43.36. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check APH's competition here
PENG vs GLW Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 191.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while GLW trades at $223.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 107.21. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check GLW's competition here
PENG vs COHR Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while COHR trades at $380.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is 78.22. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check COHR's competition here
PENG vs KEYS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while KEYS trades at $328.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 38.75. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check KEYS's competition here
PENG vs FLEX Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while FLEX trades at $146.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 44.24. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check FLEX's competition here
PENG vs GRMN Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while GRMN trades at $232.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check GRMN's competition here
PENG vs CLS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while CLS trades at $337.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 48.04. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check CLS's competition here
PENG vs JBL Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while JBL trades at $358.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 29.95. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check JBL's competition here
PENG vs IIVI Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check IIVI's competition here
PENG vs TDY Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while TDY trades at $624.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check TDY's competition here
PENG vs MKSI Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while MKSI trades at $388.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 45.88. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check MKSI's competition here
PENG vs TTMI Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while TTMI trades at $191.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 70.92. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check TTMI's competition here
PENG vs FN Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while FN trades at $524.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 41.52. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check FN's competition here
PENG vs WDCVV Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WDCVV has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while WDCVV trades at $52.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas WDCVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WDCVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to WDCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check WDCVV's competition here
PENG vs VICR Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while VICR trades at $326.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 109.34. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check VICR's competition here
PENG vs SANM Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while SANM trades at $236.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SANM's competition here
PENG vs TRMB Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while TRMB trades at $50.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check TRMB's competition here
PENG vs CGNX Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while CGNX trades at $66.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 55.93. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check CGNX's competition here
PENG vs ESE Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while ESE trades at $339.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 45.54. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ESE's competition here
PENG vs RAL Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RAL has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while RAL trades at $72.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas RAL's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to RAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check RAL's competition here
PENG vs PLXS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while PLXS trades at $287.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 36.52. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check PLXS's competition here
PENG vs ST Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while ST trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ST's competition here
PENG vs NOVT Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while NOVT trades at $157.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 47.03. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check NOVT's competition here
PENG vs MDA Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MDA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while MDA trades at $35.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas MDA's P/E ratio is 58.62. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to MDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check MDA's competition here
PENG vs VNT Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while VNT trades at $29.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check VNT's competition here
PENG vs BMI Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while BMI trades at $140.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 32.13. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check BMI's competition here
PENG vs OLED Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while OLED trades at $87.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check OLED's competition here
PENG vs BELFB Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while BELFB trades at $310.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 41.14. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check BELFB's competition here
PENG vs BELFA Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while BELFA trades at $265.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 37.08. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check BELFA's competition here
PENG vs ITRI Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while ITRI trades at $83.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ITRI's competition here
PENG vs OSIS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while OSIS trades at $218.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check OSIS's competition here
PENG vs BHE Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while BHE trades at $92.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 37.38. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check BHE's competition here
PENG vs ROG Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while ROG trades at $160.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 55.72. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ROG's competition here
PENG vs INFQ Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, INFQ has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while INFQ trades at $13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas INFQ's P/E ratio is -17.75. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INFQ's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to INFQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check INFQ's competition here
PENG vs NOVTU Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NOVTU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while NOVTU trades at $66.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas NOVTU's P/E ratio is 32.96. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NOVTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to NOVTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check NOVTU's competition here
PENG vs CTS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while CTS trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check CTS's competition here
PENG vs VPG Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while VPG trades at $127.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 221.91. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check VPG's competition here
PENG vs ALNT Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while ALNT trades at $97.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 44.18. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ALNT's competition here
PENG vs DAKT Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 943M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while DAKT trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check DAKT's competition here
PENG vs KODK Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 932.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while KODK trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check KODK's competition here
PENG vs BKSY Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 918.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while BKSY trades at $24.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -13.17. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check BKSY's competition here
PENG vs FARO Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 849.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while FARO trades at $43.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1099.75. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check FARO's competition here
PENG vs LYTS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 827.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while LYTS trades at $26.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 35.41. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check LYTS's competition here
PENG vs OUST-WTA Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check OUST-WTA's competition here
PENG vs MEI Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 683.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while MEI trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -25.03. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check MEI's competition here
PENG vs LPTH Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 628.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while LPTH trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -77.24. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check LPTH's competition here
PENG vs SATL Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 555.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while SATL trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is 92.40. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SATL's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SATL's competition here
PENG vs AMOT Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check AMOT's competition here
PENG vs OUST-WT Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check OUST-WT's competition here
PENG vs OPTXW Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 453.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while OPTXW trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check OPTXW's competition here
PENG vs SATLW Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 431.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while SATLW trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SATLW's competition here
PENG vs OPTX Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 425.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while OPTX trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is -106.88. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check OPTX's competition here
PENG vs SLNHP Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 330.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while SLNHP trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SLNHP's competition here
PENG vs VLDR Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check VLDR's competition here
PENG vs MPTI Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while MPTI trades at $93.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check MPTI's competition here
PENG vs RELL Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 255.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while RELL trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is 56.87. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RELL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check RELL's competition here
PENG vs SLNH Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 225.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while SLNH trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SLNH's competition here
PENG vs EMAN Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check EMAN's competition here
PENG vs BKSY-WT Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 147M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check BKSY-WT's competition here
PENG vs USBC Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, USBC has a market cap of 121.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while USBC trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas USBC's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USBC's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to USBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check USBC's competition here
PENG vs MVIS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 100.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while MVIS trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check MVIS's competition here
PENG vs CPSH Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 91.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while CPSH trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is 8114.29. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check CPSH's competition here
PENG vs SOTK Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while SOTK trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 48.36. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SOTK's competition here
PENG vs ODYS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 70.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while ODYS trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ODYS's competition here
PENG vs WRAP Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 65.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while WRAP trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check WRAP's competition here
PENG vs ELTK Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 62.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while ELTK trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is -20.67. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELTK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ELTK's competition here
PENG vs DSWL Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 59.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while DSWL trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check DSWL's competition here
PENG vs UEIC Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while UEIC trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check UEIC's competition here
PENG vs NSYS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while NSYS trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -71.39. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSYS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check NSYS's competition here
PENG vs MIND Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 45.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while MIND trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 29.35. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check MIND's competition here
PENG vs ACFN Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while ACFN trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 35.18. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ACFN's competition here
PENG vs WBX Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while WBX trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check WBX's competition here
PENG vs LGL Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while LGL trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 3422.89. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check LGL's competition here
PENG vs DAIO Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while DAIO trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check DAIO's competition here
PENG vs ISNS Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ISNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ISNS's competition here
PENG vs WATT Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while WATT trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WATT's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check WATT's competition here
PENG vs AMPGR Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AMPGR has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while AMPGR trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas AMPGR's P/E ratio is -6.95. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMPGR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to AMPGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check AMPGR's competition here
PENG vs ELSE Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while ELSE trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 95.75. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check ELSE's competition here
PENG vs AMPGZ Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, AMPGZ has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while AMPGZ trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas AMPGZ's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMPGZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to AMPGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check AMPGZ's competition here
PENG vs TMPOW Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check TMPOW's competition here
PENG vs HOLOW Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while HOLOW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check HOLOW's competition here
PENG vs REFR Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while REFR trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REFR's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check REFR's competition here
PENG vs SGMA Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while SGMA trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SGMA's competition here
PENG vs VIAO Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check VIAO's competition here
PENG vs KNW Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while KNW trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KNW's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check KNW's competition here
PENG vs MTEKW Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MTEKW has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while MTEKW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas MTEKW's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTEKW's ROE of -2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to MTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check MTEKW's competition here
PENG vs NEON Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while NEON trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEON's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check NEON's competition here
PENG vs OST Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while OST trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OST's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check OST's competition here
PENG vs GAUZ Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, GAUZ has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while GAUZ trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas GAUZ's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GAUZ's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to GAUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check GAUZ's competition here
PENG vs SVREW Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while SVREW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SVREW's competition here
PENG vs SVRE Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while SVRE trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SVRE's competition here
PENG vs BNSO Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check BNSO's competition here
PENG vs MINDP Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check MINDP's competition here
PENG vs MMAT Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check MMAT's competition here
PENG vs IMTE Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while IMTE trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check IMTE's competition here
PENG vs EXYNW Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, EXYNW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while EXYNW trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas EXYNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXYNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is more volatile compared to EXYNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check EXYNW's competition here
PENG vs SOBR Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 998.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while SOBR trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check SOBR's competition here
PENG vs FCUV Comparison June 2026
PENG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENG stands at 3.3B. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 879.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PENG is priced at $62.28, while FCUV trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENG currently has a P/E ratio of 32.61, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, PENG's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PENG is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENG.Check FCUV's competition here