Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRUS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRUS | $178.90 | +4.85% | 9B | 22.79 | $7.85 | N/A |
| NVDA | $214.75 | -3.62% | 5.2T | 32.91 | $6.53 | +0.02% |
| AVGO | $479.23 | -0.49% | 2.3T | 93.05 | $5.15 | +0.51% |
| TSM | $436.69 | -2.24% | 2.3T | 37.30 | $11.72 | +0.72% |
| MU | $1,079.57 | +1.45% | 1.2T | 50.85 | $21.23 | +0.05% |
| AMD | $542.52 | +4.02% | 884.6B | 179.64 | $3.02 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,726.36 | +1.23% | 665.4B | 57.55 | $30.00 | +0.51% |
| INTC | $112.71 | +4.43% | 566.5B | -187.85 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| ARM | $411.83 | +2.26% | 438.2B | 484.51 | $0.85 | N/A |
| LRCX | $343.71 | +2.78% | 429.8B | 64.85 | $5.30 | +0.29% |
Stock Comparison
CRUS vs NVDA Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.2T. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while NVDA trades at $214.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 32.91. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check NVDA's competition here
CRUS vs AVGO Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while AVGO trades at $479.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 93.05. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AVGO's competition here
CRUS vs TSM Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while TSM trades at $436.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 37.30. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check TSM's competition here
CRUS vs MU Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while MU trades at $1,079.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 50.85. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check MU's competition here
CRUS vs AMD Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 884.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while AMD trades at $542.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 179.64. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AMD's competition here
CRUS vs ASML Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 665.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while ASML trades at $1,726.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 57.55. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ASML's competition here
CRUS vs INTC Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 566.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while INTC trades at $112.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -187.85. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check INTC's competition here
CRUS vs ARM Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 438.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while ARM trades at $411.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 484.51. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ARM's competition here
CRUS vs LRCX Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 429.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while LRCX trades at $343.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 64.85. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check LRCX's competition here
CRUS vs AMAT Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 397.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while AMAT trades at $500.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 47.15. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AMAT's competition here
CRUS vs TXN Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 280.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while TXN trades at $308.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 52.66. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check TXN's competition here
CRUS vs KLAC Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 277.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while KLAC trades at $2,125.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 60.19. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check KLAC's competition here
CRUS vs MRVL Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 263.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while MRVL trades at $301.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 103.66. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check MRVL's competition here
CRUS vs QCOM Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 263.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while QCOM trades at $250.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check QCOM's competition here
CRUS vs ADI Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 213.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while ADI trades at $437.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 65.03. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ADI's competition here
CRUS vs ASX Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while ASX trades at $39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 61.42. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ASX's competition here
CRUS vs MPWR Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 83B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while MPWR trades at $1,689.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 120.36. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check MPWR's competition here
CRUS vs NXPI Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while NXPI trades at $321.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check NXPI's competition here
CRUS vs STM Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while STM trades at $79.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 498.19. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check STM's competition here
CRUS vs TER Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while TER trades at $409.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 75.93. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check TER's competition here
CRUS vs ALAB Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while ALAB trades at $363.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 243.99. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ALAB's competition here
CRUS vs UMC Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while UMC trades at $21.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 33.95. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check UMC's competition here
CRUS vs ON Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while ON trades at $133.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 99.19. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ON's competition here
CRUS vs MCHP Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while MCHP trades at $96.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 438.68. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check MCHP's competition here
CRUS vs GFS Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while GFS trades at $85.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 51.80. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check GFS's competition here
CRUS vs CBRS Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while CBRS trades at $214.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 500.67. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check CBRS's competition here
CRUS vs Q Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while Q trades at $155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 50.02. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check Q's competition here
CRUS vs TSEM Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while TSEM trades at $267.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 123.46. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check TSEM's competition here
CRUS vs MTSI Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while MTSI trades at $390.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 166.81. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check MTSI's competition here
CRUS vs ENTG Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while ENTG trades at $140.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 81.59. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ENTG's competition here
CRUS vs LSCC Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while LSCC trades at $154.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 1104.29. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check LSCC's competition here
CRUS vs SITM Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while SITM trades at $712.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -774.73. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check SITM's competition here
CRUS vs AMKR Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while AMKR trades at $75.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 43.22. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AMKR's competition here
CRUS vs RMBS Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while RMBS trades at $170.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 81.66. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check RMBS's competition here
CRUS vs NVMI Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while NVMI trades at $530.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 66.34. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check NVMI's competition here
CRUS vs SMTC Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while SMTC trades at $163.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -389.29. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check SMTC's competition here
CRUS vs AAOI Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while AAOI trades at $184.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -283.18. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AAOI's competition here
CRUS vs ONTO Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while ONTO trades at $279.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 130.85. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ONTO's competition here
CRUS vs SWKS Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while SWKS trades at $80.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check SWKS's competition here
CRUS vs SIMO Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while SIMO trades at $306.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 60.83. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check SIMO's competition here
CRUS vs ALGM Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while ALGM trades at $53.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -663.87. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ALGM's competition here
CRUS vs CREE Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check CREE's competition here
CRUS vs FORM Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while FORM trades at $126.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 144.85. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check FORM's competition here
CRUS vs QRVO Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while QRVO trades at $104.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 28.94. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check QRVO's competition here
CRUS vs VSH Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while VSH trades at $63.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 6398.00. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check VSH's competition here
CRUS vs CAMT Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while CAMT trades at $183.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 187.19. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check CAMT's competition here
CRUS vs MXL Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while MXL trades at $91.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -60.12. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check MXL's competition here
CRUS vs BRKS Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check BRKS's competition here
CRUS vs SLAB Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while SLAB trades at $219.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -144.16. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check SLAB's competition here
CRUS vs NVTS Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while NVTS trades at $30.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -48.90. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check NVTS's competition here
CRUS vs ACMR Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while ACMR trades at $88.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 67.83. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ACMR's competition here
CRUS vs KLIC Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while KLIC trades at $108.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 105.24. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check KLIC's competition here
CRUS vs SYNA Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while SYNA trades at $144.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -115.98. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check SYNA's competition here
CRUS vs DIOD Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while DIOD trades at $116.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 62.82. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check DIOD's competition here
CRUS vs IPGP Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while IPGP trades at $121.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 178.85. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check IPGP's competition here
CRUS vs AXTI Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while AXTI trades at $106.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -333.44. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AXTI's competition here
CRUS vs ACLS Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while ACLS trades at $159.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 49.44. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ACLS's competition here
CRUS vs POWI Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while POWI trades at $84.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 283.30. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check POWI's competition here
CRUS vs LASR Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while LASR trades at $76.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -254.63. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check LASR's competition here
CRUS vs HIMX Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while HIMX trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 127.32. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check HIMX's competition here
CRUS vs PI Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while PI trades at $137.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -153.07. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check PI's competition here
CRUS vs UCTT Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while UCTT trades at $92.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -21.57. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check UCTT's competition here
CRUS vs VECO Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while VECO trades at $60.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 159.11. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check VECO's competition here
CRUS vs AEHR Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while AEHR trades at $114.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -301.55. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AEHR's competition here
CRUS vs AMBA Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while AMBA trades at $73.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -45.84. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AMBA's competition here
CRUS vs WOLF Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while WOLF trades at $61.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check WOLF's competition here
CRUS vs COHU Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while COHU trades at $56.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -47.16. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check COHU's competition here
CRUS vs ICHR Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while ICHR trades at $72.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -48.95. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ICHR's competition here
CRUS vs IMOS Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while IMOS trades at $62.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 79.43. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check IMOS's competition here
CRUS vs POET Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while POET trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -18.31. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check POET's competition here
CRUS vs PLAB Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while PLAB trades at $32.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check PLAB's competition here
CRUS vs SKYT Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while SKYT trades at $38.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check SKYT's competition here
CRUS vs AMBQ Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while AMBQ trades at $82.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -18.02. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AMBQ's competition here
CRUS vs AIP Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while AIP trades at $37.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -47.46. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AIP's competition here
CRUS vs AOSL Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while AOSL trades at $52.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -14.64. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AOSL's competition here
CRUS vs CEVA Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while CEVA trades at $50.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -108.83. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check CEVA's competition here
CRUS vs SGH Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check SGH's competition here
CRUS vs INDI Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while INDI trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check INDI's competition here
CRUS vs QNC Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 739.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while QNC trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check QNC's competition here
CRUS vs MRAM Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 669.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while MRAM trades at $28.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 2857.00. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check MRAM's competition here
CRUS vs NVEC Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 532.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while NVEC trades at $110.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check NVEC's competition here
CRUS vs LAES Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 493.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while LAES trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check LAES's competition here
CRUS vs QUIK Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 408.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while QUIK trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -30.73. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check QUIK's competition here
CRUS vs ALMU Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 379.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while ALMU trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -76.57. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ALMU's competition here
CRUS vs XPER Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 361.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while XPER trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check XPER's competition here
CRUS vs VLN Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 339M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while VLN trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -10.39. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check VLN's competition here
CRUS vs MX Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 325.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while MX trades at $8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -21.77. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check MX's competition here
CRUS vs TGAN Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check TGAN's competition here
CRUS vs ASYS Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while ASYS trades at $21.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 117.06. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ASYS's competition here
CRUS vs ATOM Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while ATOM trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ATOM's competition here
CRUS vs GSIT Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 284.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while GSIT trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -23.24. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check GSIT's competition here
CRUS vs INTT Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 208.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while INTT trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 414.75. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check INTT's competition here
CRUS vs BZAI Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 200.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while BZAI trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check BZAI's competition here
CRUS vs GCTS Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 187.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while GCTS trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check GCTS's competition here
CRUS vs NA Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 155.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while NA trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.28. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check NA's competition here
CRUS vs OIIM Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check OIIM's competition here
CRUS vs ARBE Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 132.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while ARBE trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ARBE's competition here
CRUS vs TRT Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 119.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while TRT trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 237.00. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check TRT's competition here
CRUS vs IDBA Comparison June 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 9B. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $178.90, while IDBA trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.79, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check IDBA's competition here