KLA Corporation (KLAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KLAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | $267.42 | +12.02% | 339.1B | 73.32 | $3.54 | +0.31% |
| NVDA | $208.91 | +2.08% | 5.1T | 32.26 | $6.53 | +0.13% |
| TSM | $467.20 | +8.11% | 2.4T | 39.74 | $11.63 | +0.76% |
| AVGO | $396.58 | +0.94% | 2T | 68.22 | $6.03 | +0.60% |
| MU | $1,199.46 | +14.98% | 1.3T | 53.41 | $21.23 | +0.04% |
| AMD | $545.60 | +6.46% | 876.2B | 179.72 | $2.99 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,892.56 | +1.32% | 743.7B | 64.45 | $29.94 | +0.46% |
| INTC | $140.36 | +15.90% | 673.4B | -223.32 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| AMAT | $625.92 | +5.57% | 490B | 58.05 | $10.63 | +0.31% |
| LRCX | $397.48 | +6.23% | 486.5B | 73.68 | $5.28 | +0.27% |
Stock Comparison
KLAC vs NVDA Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while NVDA trades at $208.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 32.26. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check NVDA's competition here
KLAC vs TSM Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.4T. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while TSM trades at $467.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 39.74. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check TSM's competition here
KLAC vs AVGO Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while AVGO trades at $396.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 68.22. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AVGO's competition here
KLAC vs MU Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while MU trades at $1,199.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 53.41. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check MU's competition here
KLAC vs AMD Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 876.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while AMD trades at $545.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 179.72. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AMD's competition here
KLAC vs ASML Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 743.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while ASML trades at $1,892.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 64.45. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ASML's competition here
KLAC vs INTC Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 673.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while INTC trades at $140.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -223.32. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check INTC's competition here
KLAC vs AMAT Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 490B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while AMAT trades at $625.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 58.05. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AMAT's competition here
KLAC vs LRCX Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 486.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while LRCX trades at $397.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 73.68. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check LRCX's competition here
KLAC vs ARM Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 467.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while ARM trades at $409.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 529.47. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ARM's competition here
KLAC vs TXN Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 293.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while TXN trades at $329.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 55.28. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check TXN's competition here
KLAC vs MRVL Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 271.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while MRVL trades at $306.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 107.10. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check MRVL's competition here
KLAC vs QCOM Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 238.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while QCOM trades at $227.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check QCOM's competition here
KLAC vs ADI Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 211.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while ADI trades at $442.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 64.46. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ADI's competition here
KLAC vs ASX Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 89B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while ASX trades at $43.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 63.38. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ASX's competition here
KLAC vs NXPI Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while NXPI trades at $321.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check NXPI's competition here
KLAC vs MPWR Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 76.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while MPWR trades at $1,534.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 112.17. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check MPWR's competition here
KLAC vs ALAB Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while ALAB trades at $428.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 281.80. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ALAB's competition here
KLAC vs STM Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while STM trades at $80.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 489.94. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check STM's competition here
KLAC vs TER Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while TER trades at $450.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 81.10. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check TER's competition here
KLAC vs UMC Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while UMC trades at $27.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 38.84. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check UMC's competition here
KLAC vs MCHP Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while MCHP trades at $102.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 453.50. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check MCHP's competition here
KLAC vs CBRS Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while CBRS trades at $232.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 558.83. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check CBRS's competition here
KLAC vs ON Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while ON trades at $130.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 89.43. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ON's competition here
KLAC vs GFS Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while GFS trades at $90.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 54.67. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check GFS's competition here
KLAC vs Q Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while Q trades at $175.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 54.33. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check Q's competition here
KLAC vs TSEM Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while TSEM trades at $314.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 133.37. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check TSEM's competition here
KLAC vs MTSI Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while MTSI trades at $391.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 165.85. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check MTSI's competition here
KLAC vs ENTG Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while ENTG trades at $181.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 111.04. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ENTG's competition here
KLAC vs AMKR Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while AMKR trades at $92.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 51.99. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AMKR's competition here
KLAC vs LSCC Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while LSCC trades at $156.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 1098.00. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check LSCC's competition here
KLAC vs SITM Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while SITM trades at $742.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -819.15. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check SITM's competition here
KLAC vs NVMI Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while NVMI trades at $568.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 72.09. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check NVMI's competition here
KLAC vs ONTO Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while ONTO trades at $344.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 155.24. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ONTO's competition here
KLAC vs RMBS Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while RMBS trades at $137.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 66.91. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check RMBS's competition here
KLAC vs SMTC Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while SMTC trades at $174.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -395.57. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check SMTC's competition here
KLAC vs AAOI Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while AAOI trades at $174.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -249.00. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AAOI's competition here
KLAC vs FORM Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while FORM trades at $154.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 171.90. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check FORM's competition here
KLAC vs ALGM Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while ALGM trades at $60.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -737.50. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ALGM's competition here
KLAC vs SWKS Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while SWKS trades at $77.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 30.19. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check SWKS's competition here
KLAC vs SIMO Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while SIMO trades at $339.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 63.82. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check SIMO's competition here
KLAC vs CREE Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check CREE's competition here
KLAC vs CAMT Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while CAMT trades at $197.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 201.20. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check CAMT's competition here
KLAC vs VSH Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while VSH trades at $64.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 6490.00. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check VSH's competition here
KLAC vs QRVO Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while QRVO trades at $103.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check QRVO's competition here
KLAC vs CRUS Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while CRUS trades at $167.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check CRUS's competition here
KLAC vs MXL Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while MXL trades at $97.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -58.39. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check MXL's competition here
KLAC vs BRKS Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check BRKS's competition here
KLAC vs SLAB Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while SLAB trades at $219.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -145.53. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check SLAB's competition here
KLAC vs ACMR Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while ACMR trades at $104.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 83.87. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ACMR's competition here
KLAC vs KLIC Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while KLIC trades at $120.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 117.18. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check KLIC's competition here
KLAC vs NVTS Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while NVTS trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -38.13. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check NVTS's competition here
KLAC vs ACLS Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while ACLS trades at $182.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 58.24. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ACLS's competition here
KLAC vs DIOD Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while DIOD trades at $123.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 64.57. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check DIOD's competition here
KLAC vs SYNA Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while SYNA trades at $143.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -111.82. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check SYNA's competition here
KLAC vs UCTT Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while UCTT trades at $121.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -28.27. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check UCTT's competition here
KLAC vs IPGP Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while IPGP trades at $119.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 173.54. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check IPGP's competition here
KLAC vs VECO Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while VECO trades at $76.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 209.61. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check VECO's competition here
KLAC vs POWI Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while POWI trades at $89.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 290.37. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check POWI's competition here
KLAC vs AXTI Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while AXTI trades at $93.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -264.28. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AXTI's competition here
KLAC vs PI Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while PI trades at $130.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -144.62. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check PI's competition here
KLAC vs LASR Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while LASR trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -215.77. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check LASR's competition here
KLAC vs AEHR Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while AEHR trades at $116.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -303.42. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AEHR's competition here
KLAC vs ICHR Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while ICHR trades at $96.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -66.63. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ICHR's competition here
KLAC vs COHU Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while COHU trades at $70.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -58.32. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check COHU's competition here
KLAC vs HIMX Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while HIMX trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 95.32. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check HIMX's competition here
KLAC vs AMBA Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while AMBA trades at $70.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -43.46. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AMBA's competition here
KLAC vs WOLF Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while WOLF trades at $54.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check WOLF's competition here
KLAC vs IMOS Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while IMOS trades at $72.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 84.28. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check IMOS's competition here
KLAC vs AIP Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while AIP trades at $44.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -55.84. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AIP's competition here
KLAC vs PLAB Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while PLAB trades at $33.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check PLAB's competition here
KLAC vs AMBQ Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while AMBQ trades at $87.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -19.67. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AMBQ's competition here
KLAC vs SKYT Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while SKYT trades at $37.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check SKYT's competition here
KLAC vs POET Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while POET trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -14.46. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check POET's competition here
KLAC vs AOSL Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while AOSL trades at $49.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -13.34. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AOSL's competition here
KLAC vs CEVA Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while CEVA trades at $48.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -108.09. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check CEVA's competition here
KLAC vs SGH Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check SGH's competition here
KLAC vs INDI Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 898M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while INDI trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check INDI's competition here
KLAC vs QNC Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 702M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while QNC trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check QNC's competition here
KLAC vs MRAM Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 635.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while MRAM trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 2711.00. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check MRAM's competition here
KLAC vs NVEC Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 534.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while NVEC trades at $109.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 35.18. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check NVEC's competition here
KLAC vs LAES Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 444.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while LAES trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check LAES's competition here
KLAC vs QUIK Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 388.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while QUIK trades at $21.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -29.20. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check QUIK's competition here
KLAC vs XPER Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 383.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while XPER trades at $7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -8.02. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check XPER's competition here
KLAC vs ALMU Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while ALMU trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -69.11. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ALMU's competition here
KLAC vs TGAN Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check TGAN's competition here
KLAC vs ASYS Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 319.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while ASYS trades at $22.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 122.44. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ASYS's competition here
KLAC vs ATOM Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 292.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while ATOM trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -13.85. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ATOM's competition here
KLAC vs VLN Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 256.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while VLN trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -7.87. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check VLN's competition here
KLAC vs GSIT Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 241.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while GSIT trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -18.05. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check GSIT's competition here
KLAC vs VLN-WT Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 239M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check VLN-WT's competition here
KLAC vs INTT Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 236.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while INTT trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 470.00. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check INTT's competition here
KLAC vs MX Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 215.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while MX trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -14.44. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check MX's competition here
KLAC vs GCTS Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 181.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while GCTS trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check GCTS's competition here
KLAC vs TRT Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 160.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while TRT trades at $14.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 316.60. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check TRT's competition here
KLAC vs BZAIW Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, BZAIW has a market cap of 157.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while BZAIW trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas BZAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to BZAIW's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to BZAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check BZAIW's competition here
KLAC vs BZAI Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 157.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while BZAI trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check BZAI's competition here
KLAC vs OIIM Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check OIIM's competition here
KLAC vs ARBE Comparison June 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 339.1B. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 100.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $267.42, while ARBE trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 73.32, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ARBE's competition here