KLA Corporation
KLA Corporation (KLAC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KLAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | $1,838.24 | -0.38% | 236.6B | 51.27 | $35.33 | +0.43% |
| NVDA | $227.05 | +3.47% | 5.4T | 45.15 | $4.89 | +0.02% |
| TSM | $398.76 | -1.43% | 2.1T | 33.87 | $11.73 | +0.80% |
| AVGO | $415.39 | -3.04% | 2T | 81.58 | $5.14 | +0.60% |
| MU | $796.00 | +0.08% | 864.5B | 36.23 | $21.16 | +0.07% |
| AMD | $447.42 | -2.48% | 731B | 149.43 | $3.00 | N/A |
| INTC | $121.11 | -6.44% | 606.2B | -201.02 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,560.98 | -0.31% | 586.2B | 50.01 | $30.41 | +0.58% |
| LRCX | $294.83 | -0.41% | 361.7B | 54.57 | $5.30 | +0.35% |
| AMAT | $432.24 | -2.57% | 342.2B | 44.23 | $9.75 | +0.43% |
Stock Comparison
KLAC vs NVDA Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while NVDA trades at $227.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 45.15. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check NVDA's competition here
KLAC vs TSM Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while TSM trades at $398.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 33.87. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check TSM's competition here
KLAC vs AVGO Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while AVGO trades at $415.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 81.58. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AVGO's competition here
KLAC vs MU Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 864.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while MU trades at $796.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 36.23. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check MU's competition here
KLAC vs AMD Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 731B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while AMD trades at $447.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 149.43. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AMD's competition here
KLAC vs INTC Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 606.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while INTC trades at $121.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -201.02. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check INTC's competition here
KLAC vs ASML Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 586.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while ASML trades at $1,560.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 50.01. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ASML's competition here
KLAC vs LRCX Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 361.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while LRCX trades at $294.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 54.57. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check LRCX's competition here
KLAC vs AMAT Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 342.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while AMAT trades at $432.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 44.23. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AMAT's competition here
KLAC vs TXN Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 268.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while TXN trades at $305.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 50.54. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check TXN's competition here
KLAC vs QCOM Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 221.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while QCOM trades at $214.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check QCOM's competition here
KLAC vs ARM Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 221.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while ARM trades at $217.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 244.61. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ARM's competition here
KLAC vs ADI Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 204.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while ADI trades at $432.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 77.00. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ADI's competition here
KLAC vs MRVL Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 143.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while MRVL trades at $176.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 53.76. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check MRVL's competition here
KLAC vs MPWR Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 78.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while MPWR trades at $1,662.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 114.66. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check MPWR's competition here
KLAC vs ASX Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while ASX trades at $35.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 52.74. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ASX's competition here
KLAC vs NXPI Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while NXPI trades at $298.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check NXPI's competition here
KLAC vs TER Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while TER trades at $360.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 66.38. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check TER's competition here
KLAC vs MCHP Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while MCHP trades at $97.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 444.09. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check MCHP's competition here
KLAC vs STM Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while STM trades at $62.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 362.06. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check STM's competition here
KLAC vs ON Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while ON trades at $114.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 76.55. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ON's competition here
KLAC vs GFS Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while GFS trades at $74.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 51.91. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check GFS's competition here
KLAC vs UMC Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while UMC trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check UMC's competition here
KLAC vs Q Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while Q trades at $166.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check Q's competition here
KLAC vs ALAB Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while ALAB trades at $217.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 139.06. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ALAB's competition here
KLAC vs MTSI Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while MTSI trades at $378.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 155.03. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check MTSI's competition here
KLAC vs TSEM Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while TSEM trades at $254.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 113.83. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check TSEM's competition here
KLAC vs SITM Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while SITM trades at $833.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -920.86. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check SITM's competition here
KLAC vs ENTG Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while ENTG trades at $144.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 83.99. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ENTG's competition here
KLAC vs AMKR Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while AMKR trades at $74.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 42.21. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AMKR's competition here
KLAC vs LSCC Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while LSCC trades at $125.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 895.93. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check LSCC's competition here
KLAC vs NVMI Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while NVMI trades at $493.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 62.11. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check NVMI's competition here
KLAC vs AAOI Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while AAOI trades at $209.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -289.66. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AAOI's competition here
KLAC vs RMBS Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while RMBS trades at $133.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 62.04. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check RMBS's competition here
KLAC vs ONTO Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while ONTO trades at $278.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 129.88. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ONTO's competition here
KLAC vs SMTC Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while SMTC trades at $140.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -287.13. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check SMTC's competition here
KLAC vs FORM Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while FORM trades at $128.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 153.51. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check FORM's competition here
KLAC vs SWKS Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while SWKS trades at $67.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check SWKS's competition here
KLAC vs CREE Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check CREE's competition here
KLAC vs SIMO Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while SIMO trades at $267.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 57.62. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check SIMO's competition here
KLAC vs ALGM Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while ALGM trades at $46.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -573.37. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ALGM's competition here
KLAC vs CRUS Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while CRUS trades at $167.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check CRUS's competition here
KLAC vs MXL Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while MXL trades at $91.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -60.48. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check MXL's competition here
KLAC vs CAMT Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while CAMT trades at $167.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 178.19. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check CAMT's competition here
KLAC vs QRVO Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while QRVO trades at $90.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check QRVO's competition here
KLAC vs BRKS Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check BRKS's competition here
KLAC vs SLAB Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while SLAB trades at $216.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -142.49. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check SLAB's competition here
KLAC vs AXTI Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while AXTI trades at $119.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -396.45. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AXTI's competition here
KLAC vs KLIC Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while KLIC trades at $102.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 94.23. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check KLIC's competition here
KLAC vs ACLS Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while ACLS trades at $161.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 50.20. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ACLS's competition here
KLAC vs DIOD Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while DIOD trades at $103.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 55.92. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check DIOD's competition here
KLAC vs LASR Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while LASR trades at $78.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -279.37. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check LASR's competition here
KLAC vs SYNA Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while SYNA trades at $132.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -95.67. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check SYNA's competition here
KLAC vs VSH Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while VSH trades at $37.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -480.43. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check VSH's competition here
KLAC vs NVTS Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while NVTS trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -30.56. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check NVTS's competition here
KLAC vs IPGP Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while IPGP trades at $107.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 150.90. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check IPGP's competition here
KLAC vs OLED Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while OLED trades at $90.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check OLED's competition here
KLAC vs ACMR Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while ACMR trades at $65.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 48.08. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ACMR's competition here
KLAC vs POWI Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while POWI trades at $72.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 236.37. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check POWI's competition here
KLAC vs VECO Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while VECO trades at $61.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 161.74. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check VECO's competition here
KLAC vs UCTT Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while UCTT trades at $83.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -19.34. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check UCTT's competition here
KLAC vs AMBA Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while AMBA trades at $82.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -43.93. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AMBA's competition here
KLAC vs HIMX Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while HIMX trades at $20.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 100.58. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check HIMX's competition here
KLAC vs PLAB Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while PLAB trades at $52.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check PLAB's competition here
KLAC vs AEHR Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while AEHR trades at $98.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -254.53. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AEHR's competition here
KLAC vs WOLF Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while WOLF trades at $66.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check WOLF's competition here
KLAC vs ICHR Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while ICHR trades at $74.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -49.51. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ICHR's competition here
KLAC vs COHU Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while COHU trades at $49.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -41.45. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check COHU's competition here
KLAC vs IMOS Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while IMOS trades at $54.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 67.00. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check IMOS's competition here
KLAC vs SKYT Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while SKYT trades at $35.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check SKYT's competition here
KLAC vs POET Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while POET trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -20.19. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check POET's competition here
KLAC vs AIP Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while AIP trades at $33.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -39.55. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AIP's ROE of +3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AIP's competition here
KLAC vs AMBQ Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while AMBQ trades at $68.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -14.88. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AMBQ's competition here
KLAC vs DQ Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while DQ trades at $19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check DQ's competition here
KLAC vs AOSL Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while AOSL trades at $42.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -10.48. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check AOSL's competition here
KLAC vs SGH Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check SGH's competition here
KLAC vs CEVA Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while CEVA trades at $37.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -80.61. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check CEVA's competition here
KLAC vs MRAM Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while MRAM trades at $43.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 4401.00. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check MRAM's competition here
KLAC vs INDI Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 971.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while INDI trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check INDI's competition here
KLAC vs QNC Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 603.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while QNC trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check QNC's competition here
KLAC vs NVEC Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 444.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while NVEC trades at $96.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 29.26. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check NVEC's competition here
KLAC vs LAES Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 419.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while LAES trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check LAES's competition here
KLAC vs XPER Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 386.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while XPER trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -8.09. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check XPER's competition here
KLAC vs ALMU Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while ALMU trades at $30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -208.54. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ALMU's competition here
KLAC vs QUIK Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 337.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while QUIK trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -25.07. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check QUIK's competition here
KLAC vs GSIT Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 336.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while GSIT trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -27.48. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check GSIT's competition here
KLAC vs TGAN Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check TGAN's competition here
KLAC vs ASYS Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 303.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while ASYS trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 116.44. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ASYS's competition here
KLAC vs VLN Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 284.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while VLN trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -8.71. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check VLN's competition here
KLAC vs ATOM Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 271.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while ATOM trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -12.85. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check ATOM's competition here
KLAC vs INTT Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 209.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while INTT trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 416.75. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check INTT's competition here
KLAC vs BZAI Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 200.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while BZAI trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -9.71%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check BZAI's competition here
KLAC vs NA Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while NA trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check NA's competition here
KLAC vs MX Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 143.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while MX trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -10.37. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check MX's competition here
KLAC vs OIIM Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check OIIM's competition here
KLAC vs TRT Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while TRT trades at $10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is -550.50. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to TRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check TRT's competition here
KLAC vs GCTS Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while GCTS trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check GCTS's competition here
KLAC vs MOSY Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check MOSY's competition here
KLAC vs WISA Comparison May 2026
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 236.6B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $1,838.24, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 51.27, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +0.89%, compared to WISA's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.Check WISA's competition here