Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.9T. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while NVDA trades at $202.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 34.73. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NVDA's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while TSM trades at $398.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 33.19. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TSM's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while AVGO trades at $370.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 45.61. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AVGO's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 808.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while AMD trades at $495.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 108.24. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMD's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 673.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while ASML trades at $1,747.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 54.58. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ASML's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 487.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while INTC trades at $95.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 170.14. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check INTC's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 420.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while AMAT trades at $529.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 53.56. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMAT's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 391.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while LRCX trades at $313.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 58.78. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check LRCX's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 284.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while ARM trades at $267.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 150.95. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ARM's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 277.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while KLAC trades at $212.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check KLAC's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 258.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while TXN trades at $284.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 48.63. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TXN's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 182.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while ADI trades at $375.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 38.07. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ADI's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 181.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while QCOM trades at $171.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check QCOM's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 165.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while MRVL trades at $188.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 62.27. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MRVL's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while ASX trades at $38.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 56.43. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ASX's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while NXPI trades at $266.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NXPI's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while MPWR trades at $1,312.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 69.68. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MPWR's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while TEL trades at $203.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TEL's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while STM trades at $62.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 105.19. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check STM's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while UMC trades at $21.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 32.71. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check UMC's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while ALAB trades at $303.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 143.22. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ALAB's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while TER trades at $322.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 55.77. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TER's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while MCHP trades at $80.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 49.67. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MCHP's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while CBRS trades at $172.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -4321.50. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CBRS's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while CRDO trades at $202.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 59.26. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CRDO's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while ON trades at $87.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 35.82. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ON's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while GFS trades at $57.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 32.29. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check GFS's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while Q trades at $136.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 41.72. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check Q's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while TSEM trades at $234.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 94.40. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TSEM's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while ENTG trades at $138.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 47.19. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ENTG's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while MTSI trades at $267.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 67.69. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MTSI's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while LSCC trades at $125.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 100.18. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check LSCC's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while AMKR trades at $62.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 35.97. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMKR's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while SITM trades at $554.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 128.76. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SITM's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while ONTO trades at $279.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 57.69. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ONTO's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while NVMI trades at $437.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 49.54. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NVMI's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while SMTC trades at $124.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 67.91. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SMTC's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while RMBS trades at $101.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 39.94. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check RMBS's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CREE's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while SWKS trades at $59.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SWKS's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while SIMO trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 58.35. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SIMO's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while ALGM trades at $46.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 86.07. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ALGM's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while FORM trades at $105.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 65.17. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check FORM's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check BRKS's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while QRVO trades at $85.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check QRVO's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while SLAB trades at $217.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 143.07. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SLAB's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while CRUS trades at $137.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CRUS's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while CAMT trades at $146.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 46.84. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CAMT's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while MXL trades at $71.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 126.04. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MXL's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while ACMR trades at $83.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 56.32. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ACMR's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while VSH trades at $37.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 1260.00. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check VSH's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while KLIC trades at $97.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 61.53. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check KLIC's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while SYNA trades at $114.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SYNA's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while IPGP trades at $104.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 73.83. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check IPGP's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while PI trades at $138.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 68.40. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check PI's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while ACLS trades at $136.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ACLS's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while UCTT trades at $92.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 85.58. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check UCTT's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while DIOD trades at $87.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 59.60. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check DIOD's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while POWI trades at $70.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 59.20. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check POWI's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while LASR trades at $69.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 144.27. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check LASR's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while VECO trades at $52.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 47.52. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check VECO's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while ICHR trades at $82.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 418.70. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ICHR's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while NVTS trades at $11.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -60.32. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NVTS's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while AMBA trades at $61.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 93.70. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMBA's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while AEHR trades at $81.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 2701.67. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AEHR's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while IMOS trades at $68.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 96.12. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check IMOS's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while COHU trades at $51.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -284.39. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU and COHU have similar daily volatility (11.71).Check COHU's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while OUST trades at $37.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -39.40. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check OUST's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while HIMX trades at $12.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 64.00. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check HIMX's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while AXTI trades at $45.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -191.08. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AXTI's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while AMBQ trades at $72.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMBQ's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while PLAB trades at $28.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check PLAB's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while WOLF trades at $29.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check WOLF's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while SKYT trades at $31.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -784.00. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SKYT's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while AIP trades at $31.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -110.86. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AIP's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SGH's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while CEVA trades at $37.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 94.93. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CEVA's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 975.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while POET trades at $7.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -17.12. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check POET's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 935.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while AOSL trades at $31.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -107.83. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AOSL's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 805M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while INDI trades at $3.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check INDI's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 706M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while KOPN trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 718.87. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check KOPN's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 472.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while QNC trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check QNC's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 417.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while NVEC trades at $86.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NVEC's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 362.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while LAES trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check LAES's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 341.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while MRAM trades at $14.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 110.06. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MRAM's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TGAN's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while ASYS trades at $16.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 57.48. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ASYS's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 230.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while QUIK trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check QUIK's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 206.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while ALMU trades at $14.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -121.67. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ALMU's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 184.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while VLN trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check VLN's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check VLN-WT's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while ATOM trades at $5.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -8.65. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ATOM's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while GSIT trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -13.28. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check GSIT's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 172.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while INTT trades at $13.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 41.58. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check INTT's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check OIIM's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 125.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while MX trades at $3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MX's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 119.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while GCTS trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check GCTS's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 102.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while TRT trades at $10.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 182.41. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TRT's competition here

MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 958.8B. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $848.95, while IDBA trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MU currently has a P/E ratio of 18.82, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check IDBA's competition here