Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See MU's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for MU and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MU | $877.57 | -0.44% | 991.1B | 19.45 | $45.12 | +0.06% |
| NVDA | $223.96 | +2.27% | 5.4T | 38.35 | $5.84 | +0.13% |
| TSM | $420.04 | +0.44% | 2.2T | 34.99 | $12.00 | +0.83% |
| AVGO | $427.76 | +1.71% | 2T | 52.62 | $8.13 | +0.59% |
| SKHY | $137.91 | -3.92% | 979B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AMD | $483.36 | -1.21% | 788.2B | 83.92 | $5.76 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,740.99 | +2.15% | 671B | 54.37 | $32.02 | +0.52% |
| INTC | $101.65 | +1.84% | 512.7B | 178.33 | $0.57 | N/A |
| AMAT | $539.14 | +2.21% | 428.1B | 54.51 | $9.89 | +0.35% |
| LRCX | $311.35 | +1.82% | 389.4B | 58.41 | $5.33 | +0.33% |
Stock Comparison
NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ: NVDA)
MU vs NVDA Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while NVDA trades at $223.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 38.35. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NVDA's competition here
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (NYSE: TSM)
MU vs TSM Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while TSM trades at $420.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 34.99. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TSM's competition here
Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ: AVGO)
MU vs AVGO Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while AVGO trades at $427.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 52.62. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AVGO's competition here
SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHY)
MU vs SKHY Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, SKHY has a market cap of 979B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while SKHY trades at $137.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas SKHY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SKHY's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to SKHY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SKHY's competition here
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMD)
MU vs AMD Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 788.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while AMD trades at $483.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 83.92. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMD's competition here
ASML Holding N.V. (NASDAQ: ASML)
MU vs ASML Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 671B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while ASML trades at $1,740.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 54.37. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ASML's competition here
Intel Corp. (NASDAQ: INTC)
MU vs INTC Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 512.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while INTC trades at $101.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 178.33. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check INTC's competition here
Applied Materials, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMAT)
MU vs AMAT Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 428.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while AMAT trades at $539.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 54.51. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMAT's competition here
Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX)
MU vs LRCX Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 389.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while LRCX trades at $311.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 58.41. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check LRCX's competition here
Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: ARM)
MU vs ARM Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 301.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while ARM trades at $282.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 159.64. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ARM's competition here
Texas Instruments Incorporated (NASDAQ: TXN)
MU vs TXN Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 261.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while TXN trades at $286.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 48.99. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TXN's competition here
KLA Corporation (NASDAQ: KLAC)
MU vs KLAC Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 258.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while KLAC trades at $198.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 57.76. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check KLAC's competition here
Marvell Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MRVL)
MU vs MRVL Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 191.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while MRVL trades at $218.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 72.18. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MRVL's competition here
Analog Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: ADI)
MU vs ADI Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 189.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while ADI trades at $389.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 39.55. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ADI's competition here
QUALCOMM Incorporated (NASDAQ: QCOM)
MU vs QCOM Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 176.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while QCOM trades at $167.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check QCOM's competition here
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. (NYSE: ASX)
MU vs ASX Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 82.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while ASX trades at $37.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 55.01. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ASX's competition here
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: MPWR)
MU vs MPWR Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while MPWR trades at $1,401.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 74.43. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MPWR's competition here
TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL)
MU vs TEL Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while TEL trades at $216.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TEL's competition here
NXP Semiconductors N.V. (NASDAQ: NXPI)
MU vs NXPI Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while NXPI trades at $239.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NXPI's competition here
Teradyne, Inc. (NASDAQ: TER)
MU vs TER Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while TER trades at $379.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 65.62. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TER's competition here
Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: ALAB)
MU vs ALAB Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while ALAB trades at $334.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 134.75. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ALAB's competition here
Cerebras Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: CBRS)
MU vs CBRS Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while CBRS trades at $226.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -5668.25. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CBRS's competition here
STMicroelectronics N.V. (NYSE: STM)
MU vs STM Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while STM trades at $56.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 95.08. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check STM's competition here
United Microelectronics Corporation (NYSE: UMC)
MU vs UMC Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while UMC trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check UMC's competition here
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (NASDAQ: CRDO)
MU vs CRDO Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while CRDO trades at $249.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 73.07. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CRDO's competition here
Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ: MCHP)
MU vs MCHP Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while MCHP trades at $84.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 51.96. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MCHP's competition here
ON Semiconductor Corporation (NASDAQ: ON)
MU vs ON Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while ON trades at $81.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ON's competition here
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS)
MU vs GFS Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while GFS trades at $53.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check GFS's competition here
Qnity Electronics, Inc. (NYSE: Q)
MU vs Q Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while Q trades at $138.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 36.03. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check Q's competition here
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (NASDAQ: TSEM)
MU vs TSEM Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while TSEM trades at $252.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 88.28. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TSEM's competition here
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MTSI)
MU vs MTSI Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while MTSI trades at $310.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 69.85. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MTSI's competition here
Entegris, Inc. (NASDAQ: ENTG)
MU vs ENTG Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while ENTG trades at $152.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 47.38. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ENTG's competition here
SiTime Corporation (NASDAQ: SITM)
MU vs SITM Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while SITM trades at $725.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 117.36. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SITM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SITM's competition here
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (NASDAQ: LSCC)
MU vs LSCC Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while LSCC trades at $130.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 84.44. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check LSCC's competition here
Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO)
MU vs ONTO Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while ONTO trades at $308.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 63.66. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ONTO's competition here
Amkor Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMKR)
MU vs AMKR Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while AMKR trades at $55.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 31.58. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMKR's competition here
Semtech Corporation (NASDAQ: SMTC)
MU vs SMTC Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while SMTC trades at $139.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 75.77. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SMTC's competition here
Nova Ltd. (NASDAQ: NVMI)
MU vs NVMI Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while NVMI trades at $393.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 43.00. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NVMI's competition here
Rambus Inc. (NASDAQ: RMBS)
MU vs RMBS Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while RMBS trades at $101.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 39.97. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check RMBS's competition here
Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: SWKS)
MU vs SWKS Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while SWKS trades at $70.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SWKS's competition here
Wolfspeed, Inc. (NASDAQ: CREE)
MU vs CREE Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CREE's competition here
FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM)
MU vs FORM Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while FORM trades at $117.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 72.46. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check FORM's competition here
Qorvo, Inc. (NASDAQ: QRVO)
MU vs QRVO Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while QRVO trades at $99.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check QRVO's competition here
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (NASDAQ: SIMO)
MU vs SIMO Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while SIMO trades at $256.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 56.54. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SIMO's competition here
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALGM)
MU vs ALGM Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while ALGM trades at $43.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 81.06. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ALGM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ALGM's competition here
Brooks Automation, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRKS)
MU vs BRKS Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check BRKS's competition here
Camtek Ltd. (NASDAQ: CAMT)
MU vs CAMT Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while CAMT trades at $155.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 49.79. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CAMT's competition here
Silicon Laboratories Inc. (NASDAQ: SLAB)
MU vs SLAB Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while SLAB trades at $219.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 144.22. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SLAB's competition here
MaxLinear, Inc. (NASDAQ: MXL)
MU vs MXL Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while MXL trades at $74.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 131.54. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MXL's competition here
Cirrus Logic, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRUS)
MU vs CRUS Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while CRUS trades at $124.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CRUS's competition here
Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI)
MU vs PI Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while PI trades at $183.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 90.77. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check PI's competition here
ACM Research, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACMR)
MU vs ACMR Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while ACMR trades at $83.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 56.24. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ACMR's competition here
Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (NYSE: VSH)
MU vs VSH Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while VSH trades at $35.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 122.10. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check VSH's competition here
Diodes Incorporated (NASDAQ: DIOD)
MU vs DIOD Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while DIOD trades at $105.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 57.16. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check DIOD's competition here
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: KLIC)
MU vs KLIC Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while KLIC trades at $91.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 33.69. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check KLIC's competition here
AXT, Inc. (NASDAQ: AXTI)
MU vs AXTI Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while AXTI trades at $88.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -369.08. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AXTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AXTI's competition here
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACLS)
MU vs ACLS Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while ACLS trades at $140.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 31.31. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ACLS's competition here
Synaptics Incorporated (NASDAQ: SYNA)
MU vs SYNA Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while SYNA trades at $106.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SYNA's competition here
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: UCTT)
MU vs UCTT Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while UCTT trades at $87.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 57.78. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check UCTT's competition here
IPG Photonics Corporation (NASDAQ: IPGP)
MU vs IPGP Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while IPGP trades at $90.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 93.02. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check IPGP's competition here
Ambarella, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMBA)
MU vs AMBA Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while AMBA trades at $86.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 131.48. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMBA's competition here
Navitas Semiconductor Corp (NASDAQ: NVTS)
MU vs NVTS Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while NVTS trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -73.11. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NVTS's competition here
Power Integrations, Inc. (NASDAQ: POWI)
MU vs POWI Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while POWI trades at $64.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 53.38. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check POWI's competition here
Aehr Test Systems (NASDAQ: AEHR)
MU vs AEHR Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while AEHR trades at $103.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 3435.67. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AEHR's competition here
Veeco Instruments Inc. (NASDAQ: VECO)
MU vs VECO Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while VECO trades at $52.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 49.33. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check VECO's competition here
nLIGHT, Inc. (NASDAQ: LASR)
MU vs LASR Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while LASR trades at $56.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 116.99. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check LASR's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NASDAQ: OUST)
MU vs OUST Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while OUST trades at $43.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -46.17. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check OUST's competition here
Himax Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: HIMX)
MU vs HIMX Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while HIMX trades at $14.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 70.92. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check HIMX's competition here
Cohu, Inc. (NASDAQ: COHU)
MU vs COHU Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while COHU trades at $52.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -293.78. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check COHU's competition here
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (NASDAQ: ICHR)
MU vs ICHR Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while ICHR trades at $68.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 133.96. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ICHR's competition here
Photronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: PLAB)
MU vs PLAB Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while PLAB trades at $32.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check PLAB's competition here
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES Inc. (NASDAQ: IMOS)
MU vs IMOS Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while IMOS trades at $52.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 71.00. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check IMOS's competition here
Aeva Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AEVA)
MU vs AEVA Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while AEVA trades at $26.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -15.85. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AEVA's competition here
Wolfspeed Inc. (NYSE: WOLF)
MU vs WOLF Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while WOLF trades at $32.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check WOLF's competition here
Ambiq Micro, Inc. (NYSE: AMBQ)
MU vs AMBQ Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while AMBQ trades at $67.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMBQ's competition here
SkyWater Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: SKYT)
MU vs SKYT Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while SKYT trades at $32.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -811.50. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SKYT's competition here
Arteris, Inc. (NASDAQ: AIP)
MU vs AIP Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while AIP trades at $29.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -106.36. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AIP's ROE of -3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AIP's competition here
POET Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: POET)
MU vs POET Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while POET trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -20.64. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check POET's competition here
SMART Global Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SGH)
MU vs SGH Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SGH's competition here
Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (NASDAQ: AOSL)
MU vs AOSL Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while AOSL trades at $36.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -124.41. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AOSL's competition here
CEVA, Inc. (NASDAQ: CEVA)
MU vs CEVA Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while CEVA trades at $38.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 96.68. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CEVA's competition here
indie Semiconductor, Inc. (NASDAQ: INDI)
MU vs INDI Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 853.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while INDI trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -14.43. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check INDI's competition here
Kopin Corp. (NASDAQ: KOPN)
MU vs KOPN Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 791.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while KOPN trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 805.66. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check KOPN's competition here
NVE Corporation (NASDAQ: NVEC)
MU vs NVEC Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 609.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while NVEC trades at $125.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 40.11. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NVEC's competition here
Everspin Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: MRAM)
MU vs MRAM Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 390.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while MRAM trades at $16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -348.12. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MRAM's competition here
SEALSQ Corp (NASDAQ: LAES)
MU vs LAES Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 366.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while LAES trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -9.21. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check LAES's competition here
Valens Semiconductor Ltd. WT (NYSE: VLN-WT)
MU vs VLN-WT Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check VLN-WT's competition here
Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU)
MU vs ALMU Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 335M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while ALMU trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -152.50. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ALMU's competition here
Transphorm, Inc. (NASDAQ: TGAN)
MU vs TGAN Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TGAN's competition here
QuickLogic Corporation (NASDAQ: QUIK)
MU vs QUIK Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 257.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while QUIK trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -27.40. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check QUIK's competition here
GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. (NYSE: GCTS)
MU vs GCTS Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 233.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while GCTS trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check GCTS's competition here
Amtech Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: ASYS)
MU vs ASYS Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 225.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while ASYS trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 41.97. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ASYS's competition here
GSI Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: GSIT)
MU vs GSIT Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 214M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while GSIT trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -16.39. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check GSIT's competition here
Atomera Incorporated (NASDAQ: ATOM)
MU vs ATOM Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 212.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while ATOM trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ATOM's competition here
Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (NYSE: VLN)
MU vs VLN Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 187.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while VLN trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -10.21. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check VLN's competition here
inTEST Corporation (AMEX: INTT)
MU vs INTT Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 175.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while INTT trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 42.41. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check INTT's competition here
MagnaChip Semiconductor (NYSE: MX)
MU vs MX Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 145.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while MX trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -14.25. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MX's competition here
O2Micro International Limited (NASDAQ: OIIM)
MU vs OIIM Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check OIIM's competition here
Blaize Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BZAI)
MU vs BZAI Comparison August 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 991.1B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 123M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $877.57 on the NASDAQ, while BZAI trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.45, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check BZAI's competition here