Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See MU's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for MU and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MU | $1,015.80 | +3.92% | 1.1T | 22.51 | $45.12 | +0.05% |
| NVDA | $222.27 | +1.34% | 5.4T | 38.06 | $5.84 | +0.24% |
| TSM | $434.67 | +1.02% | 2.3T | 31.44 | $13.81 | +0.88% |
| AVGO | $357.61 | +2.97% | 1.7T | 36.64 | $9.76 | +0.71% |
| SKHY | $187.50 | +2.46% | 1.3T | 12.29 | $15.29 | N/A |
| AMD | $559.82 | +9.23% | 888.8B | 94.63 | $5.76 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,679.92 | +3.08% | 647.5B | 52.46 | $32.02 | +0.55% |
| INTC | $108.60 | -0.18% | 547.8B | 190.53 | $0.57 | N/A |
| LRCX | $288.11 | +6.98% | 360.3B | 49.50 | $5.82 | +0.37% |
| AMAT | $444.57 | +7.03% | 331.4B | 42.20 | $9.89 | +0.45% |
Stock Comparison
NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ: NVDA)
MU vs NVDA Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while NVDA trades at $222.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 38.06. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NVDA's competition here
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (NYSE: TSM)
MU vs TSM Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while TSM trades at $434.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TSM's competition here
Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ: AVGO)
MU vs AVGO Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while AVGO trades at $357.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AVGO's competition here
SK hynix Inc. (NASDAQ: SKHY)
MU vs SKHY Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, SKHY has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while SKHY trades at $187.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SKHY's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SKHY's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to SKHY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SKHY's competition here
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMD)
MU vs AMD Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 888.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while AMD trades at $559.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 94.63. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMD's competition here
ASML Holding N.V. (NASDAQ: ASML)
MU vs ASML Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 647.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while ASML trades at $1,679.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 52.46. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ASML's competition here
Intel Corp. (NASDAQ: INTC)
MU vs INTC Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 547.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while INTC trades at $108.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 190.53. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check INTC's competition here
Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ: LRCX)
MU vs LRCX Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 360.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while LRCX trades at $288.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check LRCX's competition here
Applied Materials, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMAT)
MU vs AMAT Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 331.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while AMAT trades at $444.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMAT's competition here
Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: ARM)
MU vs ARM Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 294.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while ARM trades at $275.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 155.71. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ARM's competition here
Texas Instruments Incorporated (NASDAQ: TXN)
MU vs TXN Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 243.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while TXN trades at $266.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 40.58. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TXN's competition here
KLA Corporation (NASDAQ: KLAC)
MU vs KLAC Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 231.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while KLAC trades at $176.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 51.60. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check KLAC's competition here
Marvell Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MRVL)
MU vs MRVL Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 213.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while MRVL trades at $244.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 74.02. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MRVL's competition here
QUALCOMM Incorporated (NASDAQ: QCOM)
MU vs QCOM Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 186.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while QCOM trades at $177.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check QCOM's competition here
Analog Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: ADI)
MU vs ADI Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 176.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while ADI trades at $375.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 36.78. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ADI's competition here
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. (NYSE: ASX)
MU vs ASX Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 91.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while ASX trades at $41.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 48.38. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ASX's competition here
United Microelectronics Corporation (NYSE: UMC)
MU vs UMC Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while UMC trades at $24.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check UMC's competition here
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: MPWR)
MU vs MPWR Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while MPWR trades at $1,217.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 64.67. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MPWR's competition here
TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL)
MU vs TEL Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while TEL trades at $205.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TEL's competition here
Teradyne, Inc. (NASDAQ: TER)
MU vs TER Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while TER trades at $371.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 48.37. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TER's competition here
NXP Semiconductors N.V. (NASDAQ: NXPI)
MU vs NXPI Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while NXPI trades at $227.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NXPI's competition here
Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: ALAB)
MU vs ALAB Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while ALAB trades at $303.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 118.37. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ALAB's competition here
Cerebras Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: CBRS)
MU vs CBRS Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while CBRS trades at $198.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -4959.25. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CBRS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CBRS's competition here
STMicroelectronics N.V. (NYSE: STM)
MU vs STM Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while STM trades at $50.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 85.03. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check STM's competition here
Microchip Technology Incorporated (NASDAQ: MCHP)
MU vs MCHP Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while MCHP trades at $73.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 44.95. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MCHP's competition here
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (NASDAQ: CRDO)
MU vs CRDO Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while CRDO trades at $175.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 51.43. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CRDO's competition here
ON Semiconductor Corporation (NASDAQ: ON)
MU vs ON Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while ON trades at $69.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ON's competition here
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (NASDAQ: GFS)
MU vs GFS Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while GFS trades at $47.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check GFS's competition here
Tower Semiconductor Ltd. (NASDAQ: TSEM)
MU vs TSEM Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while TSEM trades at $223.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 78.18. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TSEM's competition here
Qnity Electronics, Inc. (NYSE: Q)
MU vs Q Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while Q trades at $120.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check Q's competition here
Entegris, Inc. (NASDAQ: ENTG)
MU vs ENTG Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while ENTG trades at $142.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 44.31. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ENTG's competition here
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: MTSI)
MU vs MTSI Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while MTSI trades at $275.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 61.99. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MTSI's competition here
Semtech Corporation (NASDAQ: SMTC)
MU vs SMTC Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while SMTC trades at $185.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 100.54. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SMTC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SMTC's competition here
SiTime Corporation (NASDAQ: SITM)
MU vs SITM Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while SITM trades at $614.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 99.40. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SITM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SITM's competition here
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (NASDAQ: LSCC)
MU vs LSCC Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while LSCC trades at $110.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 72.05. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check LSCC's competition here
Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: SWKS)
MU vs SWKS Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while SWKS trades at $88.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SWKS's competition here
Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO)
MU vs ONTO Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while ONTO trades at $263.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 54.40. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ONTO's competition here
Amkor Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMKR)
MU vs AMKR Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while AMKR trades at $50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMKR's competition here
Nova Ltd. (NASDAQ: NVMI)
MU vs NVMI Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while NVMI trades at $356.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 38.96. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NVMI's competition here
Qorvo, Inc. (NASDAQ: QRVO)
MU vs QRVO Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while QRVO trades at $117.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check QRVO's competition here
Wolfspeed, Inc. (NASDAQ: CREE)
MU vs CREE Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CREE's ROE of -3.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CREE's competition here
Rambus Inc. (NASDAQ: RMBS)
MU vs RMBS Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while RMBS trades at $87.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check RMBS's competition here
FormFactor, Inc. (NASDAQ: FORM)
MU vs FORM Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while FORM trades at $118.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 73.07. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check FORM's competition here
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (NASDAQ: SIMO)
MU vs SIMO Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while SIMO trades at $272.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 60.12. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SIMO's competition here
Brooks Automation, Inc. (NASDAQ: BRKS)
MU vs BRKS Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check BRKS's competition here
MaxLinear, Inc. (NASDAQ: MXL)
MU vs MXL Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while MXL trades at $81.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 142.32. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MXL's competition here
Silicon Laboratories Inc. (NASDAQ: SLAB)
MU vs SLAB Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while SLAB trades at $220.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 145.07. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SLAB's competition here
Camtek Ltd. (NASDAQ: CAMT)
MU vs CAMT Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while CAMT trades at $149.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 47.79. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CAMT's competition here
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALGM)
MU vs ALGM Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while ALGM trades at $34.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 61.31. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ALGM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ALGM's competition here
Cirrus Logic, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRUS)
MU vs CRUS Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while CRUS trades at $118.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CRUS's competition here
Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI)
MU vs PI Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while PI trades at $181.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 89.56. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check PI's competition here
Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. (NYSE: VSH)
MU vs VSH Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while VSH trades at $32.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 112.17. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check VSH's competition here
Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: KLIC)
MU vs KLIC Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while KLIC trades at $83.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 30.68. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check KLIC's competition here
ACM Research, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACMR)
MU vs ACMR Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while ACMR trades at $68.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 45.48. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ACMR's competition here
Diodes Incorporated (NASDAQ: DIOD)
MU vs DIOD Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while DIOD trades at $92.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 50.20. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check DIOD's competition here
Synaptics Incorporated (NASDAQ: SYNA)
MU vs SYNA Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while SYNA trades at $93.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SYNA's competition here
AXT, Inc. (NASDAQ: AXTI)
MU vs AXTI Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while AXTI trades at $70.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -291.79. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AXTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AXTI's competition here
IPG Photonics Corporation (NASDAQ: IPGP)
MU vs IPGP Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while IPGP trades at $76.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 78.92. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check IPGP's competition here
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACLS)
MU vs ACLS Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while ACLS trades at $109.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ACLS's competition here
Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: UCTT)
MU vs UCTT Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while UCTT trades at $70.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 46.78. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check UCTT's competition here
Aehr Test Systems (NASDAQ: AEHR)
MU vs AEHR Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while AEHR trades at $93.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 3116.33. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AEHR's competition here
Navitas Semiconductor Corp (NASDAQ: NVTS)
MU vs NVTS Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while NVTS trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -60.16. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NVTS's competition here
Ambarella, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMBA)
MU vs AMBA Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while AMBA trades at $66.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 101.38. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMBA's competition here
Power Integrations, Inc. (NASDAQ: POWI)
MU vs POWI Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while POWI trades at $50.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 41.64. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check POWI's competition here
Penguin Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: PENG)
MU vs PENG Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while PENG trades at $53.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to PENG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to PENG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check PENG's competition here
Cohu, Inc. (NASDAQ: COHU)
MU vs COHU Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while COHU trades at $57.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -320.83. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is similarly volatile compared to COHU. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check COHU's competition here
Veeco Instruments Inc. (NASDAQ: VECO)
MU vs VECO Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while VECO trades at $42.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check VECO's competition here
Ouster, Inc. (NASDAQ: OUST)
MU vs OUST Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while OUST trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -37.29. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check OUST's competition here
Himax Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: HIMX)
MU vs HIMX Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while HIMX trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 68.06. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check HIMX's competition here
nLIGHT, Inc. (NASDAQ: LASR)
MU vs LASR Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while LASR trades at $39.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 83.00. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check LASR's competition here
ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES Inc. (NASDAQ: IMOS)
MU vs IMOS Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while IMOS trades at $61.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check IMOS's competition here
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (NASDAQ: ICHR)
MU vs ICHR Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while ICHR trades at $54.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 107.45. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ICHR's competition here
Photronics, Inc. (NASDAQ: PLAB)
MU vs PLAB Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while PLAB trades at $29.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check PLAB's competition here
SkyWater Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: SKYT)
MU vs SKYT Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while SKYT trades at $32.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -811.50. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SKYT's competition here
Ambiq Micro, Inc. (NYSE: AMBQ)
MU vs AMBQ Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while AMBQ trades at $65.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMBQ's competition here
Wolfspeed Inc. (NYSE: WOLF)
MU vs WOLF Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while WOLF trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check WOLF's competition here
SMART Global Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SGH)
MU vs SGH Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SGH's competition here
Arteris, Inc. (NASDAQ: AIP)
MU vs AIP Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while AIP trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -79.89. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AIP's ROE of -3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AIP's competition here
POET Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: POET)
MU vs POET Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while POET trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -18.07. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check POET's competition here
Aeva Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AEVA)
MU vs AEVA Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while AEVA trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AEVA's competition here
Kopin Corp. (NASDAQ: KOPN)
MU vs KOPN Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 878.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while KOPN trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 894.34. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check KOPN's competition here
CEVA, Inc. (NASDAQ: CEVA)
MU vs CEVA Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while CEVA trades at $30.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 75.68. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CEVA's competition here
Daqo New Energy Corp. (NYSE: DQ)
MU vs DQ Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 815.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while DQ trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check DQ's competition here
Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (NASDAQ: AOSL)
MU vs AOSL Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 760.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while AOSL trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -87.59. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AOSL's competition here
indie Semiconductor, Inc. (NASDAQ: INDI)
MU vs INDI Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 648.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while INDI trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -10.96. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check INDI's competition here
NVE Corporation (NASDAQ: NVEC)
MU vs NVEC Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 486.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while NVEC trades at $100.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NVEC's competition here
Quantum eMotion Corp. (AMEX: QNC)
MU vs QNC Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 371.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while QNC trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is -169.50. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check QNC's competition here
Everspin Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: MRAM)
MU vs MRAM Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 358.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while MRAM trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -319.67. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MRAM's competition here
Valens Semiconductor Ltd. WT (NYSE: VLN-WT)
MU vs VLN-WT Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 341.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check VLN-WT's competition here
Transphorm, Inc. (NASDAQ: TGAN)
MU vs TGAN Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TGAN's competition here
SEALSQ Corp (NASDAQ: LAES)
MU vs LAES Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 319.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while LAES trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -8.02. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check LAES's competition here
Amtech Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: ASYS)
MU vs ASYS Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 248.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while ASYS trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 38.38. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ASYS's competition here
Aeluma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALMU)
MU vs ALMU Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while ALMU trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -96.21. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ALMU's competition here
GSI Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: GSIT)
MU vs GSIT Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 204.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while GSIT trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -11.57. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check GSIT's competition here
QuickLogic Corporation (NASDAQ: QUIK)
MU vs QUIK Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 190M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while QUIK trades at $10.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -20.23. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check QUIK's competition here
GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc. (NYSE: GCTS)
MU vs GCTS Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 189.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while GCTS trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check GCTS's competition here
Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (NYSE: VLN)
MU vs VLN Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 179.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while VLN trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -9.76. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check VLN's competition here
Atomera Incorporated (NASDAQ: ATOM)
MU vs ATOM Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 159.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while ATOM trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ATOM's competition here
O2Micro International Limited (NASDAQ: OIIM)
MU vs OIIM Comparison September 2026
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MU) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 1.1T. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $1,015.80 on the NASDAQ, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.51, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.71%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check OIIM's competition here