Micron Technology, Inc.
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MU | $681.54 | -5.95% | 768.6B | 32.21 | $21.16 | +0.07% |
| NVDA | $222.32 | -1.33% | 5.4T | 45.47 | $4.89 | +0.02% |
| TSM | $395.95 | -2.08% | 2.1T | 33.99 | $11.65 | +0.81% |
| AVGO | $420.71 | -1.05% | 2T | 81.85 | $5.14 | +0.59% |
| AMD | $420.99 | -0.73% | 686.5B | 139.86 | $3.01 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,472.39 | -1.96% | 567.5B | 48.53 | $30.34 | +0.60% |
| INTC | $108.17 | -0.55% | 543.7B | -180.28 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| LRCX | $277.96 | -2.37% | 347.6B | 52.45 | $5.30 | +0.37% |
| AMAT | $413.57 | -5.28% | 328.2B | 38.98 | $10.61 | +0.45% |
| TXN | $300.60 | -0.70% | 273.6B | 51.47 | $5.84 | +1.89% |
Stock Comparison
MU vs NVDA Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while NVDA trades at $222.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 45.47. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NVDA's competition here
MU vs TSM Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while TSM trades at $395.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 33.99. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TSM's competition here
MU vs AVGO Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while AVGO trades at $420.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 81.85. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AVGO's competition here
MU vs AMD Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 686.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while AMD trades at $420.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 139.86. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMD's competition here
MU vs ASML Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 567.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while ASML trades at $1,472.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 48.53. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ASML's competition here
MU vs INTC Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 543.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while INTC trades at $108.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -180.28. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check INTC's competition here
MU vs LRCX Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 347.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while LRCX trades at $277.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 52.45. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check LRCX's competition here
MU vs AMAT Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 328.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while AMAT trades at $413.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 38.98. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMAT's competition here
MU vs TXN Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 273.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while TXN trades at $300.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 51.47. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TXN's competition here
MU vs KLAC Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 229.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while KLAC trades at $1,756.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 49.67. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check KLAC's competition here
MU vs ARM Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 228.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while ARM trades at $215.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 250.14. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ARM's competition here
MU vs QCOM Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 214.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while QCOM trades at $203.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check QCOM's competition here
MU vs ADI Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 204.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while ADI trades at $418.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 76.52. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ADI's competition here
MU vs MRVL Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 147.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while MRVL trades at $168.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 54.85. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MRVL's competition here
MU vs NXPI Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while NXPI trades at $291.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NXPI's competition here
MU vs MPWR Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 73B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while MPWR trades at $1,486.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 106.55. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MPWR's competition here
MU vs ASX Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while ASX trades at $31.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 48.69. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ASX's competition here
MU vs CBRS Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while CBRS trades at $296.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 706.31. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CBRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CBRS's competition here
MU vs STM Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 54.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while STM trades at $60.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 381.06. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check STM's competition here
MU vs TER Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while TER trades at $321.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 59.34. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TER's competition here
MU vs MCHP Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while MCHP trades at $92.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 421.64. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MCHP's competition here
MU vs ON Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while ON trades at $109.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 80.46. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ON's competition here
MU vs UMC Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while UMC trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check UMC's competition here
MU vs GFS Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while GFS trades at $67.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 48.81. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check GFS's competition here
MU vs ALAB Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while ALAB trades at $215.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 144.68. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ALAB's competition here
MU vs Q Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while Q trades at $149.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 48.07. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check Q's competition here
MU vs TSEM Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while TSEM trades at $248.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 114.85. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TSEM's competition here
MU vs MTSI Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while MTSI trades at $356.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 150.32. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MTSI's competition here
MU vs ENTG Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while ENTG trades at $127.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 73.53. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ENTG's competition here
MU vs SITM Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while SITM trades at $725.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -780.20. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SITM's competition here
MU vs LSCC Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while LSCC trades at $123.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 879.64. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check LSCC's competition here
MU vs AMKR Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while AMKR trades at $66.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 37.95. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMKR's competition here
MU vs NVMI Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while NVMI trades at $486.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 60.92. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NVMI's competition here
MU vs AAOI Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while AAOI trades at $173.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -266.55. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AAOI's competition here
MU vs RMBS Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while RMBS trades at $123.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 59.22. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check RMBS's competition here
MU vs ONTO Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while ONTO trades at $254.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 118.37. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ONTO's competition here
MU vs SMTC Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while SMTC trades at $132.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -294.20. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SMTC's competition here
MU vs SWKS Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while SWKS trades at $70.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 29.31. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SWKS's competition here
MU vs CREE Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CREE's competition here
MU vs FORM Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while FORM trades at $117.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 134.97. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check FORM's competition here
MU vs QRVO Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while QRVO trades at $94.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check QRVO's competition here
MU vs CRUS Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while CRUS trades at $160.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CRUS's competition here
MU vs SIMO Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while SIMO trades at $239.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 47.57. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SIMO's competition here
MU vs MXL Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while MXL trades at $87.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -57.54. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MXL's competition here
MU vs BRKS Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check BRKS's competition here
MU vs ALGM Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while ALGM trades at $41.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -516.87. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ALGM's competition here
MU vs SLAB Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while SLAB trades at $216.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -142.51. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SLAB's competition here
MU vs CAMT Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while CAMT trades at $155.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CAMT's competition here
MU vs KLIC Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while KLIC trades at $99.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 96.47. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check KLIC's competition here
MU vs VSH Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while VSH trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 3695.50. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check VSH's competition here
MU vs AXTI Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while AXTI trades at $105.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -330.87. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AXTI's competition here
MU vs SYNA Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while SYNA trades at $119.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -94.66. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SYNA's competition here
MU vs NVTS Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while NVTS trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -31.22. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NVTS's competition here
MU vs IPGP Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while IPGP trades at $106.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 156.40. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check IPGP's competition here
MU vs ACLS Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while ACLS trades at $146.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 45.28. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ACLS's competition here
MU vs DIOD Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while DIOD trades at $94.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 51.26. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check DIOD's competition here
MU vs PI Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while PI trades at $139.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -154.78. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check PI's competition here
MU vs ACMR Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while ACMR trades at $63.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 48.28. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ACMR's competition here
MU vs LASR Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while LASR trades at $70.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -236.10. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check LASR's competition here
MU vs POWI Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while POWI trades at $67.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 225.40. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check POWI's competition here
MU vs UCTT Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while UCTT trades at $77.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -18.09. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check UCTT's competition here
MU vs AMBA Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while AMBA trades at $78.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -44.31. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMBA's competition here
MU vs VECO Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while VECO trades at $55.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 146.45. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check VECO's competition here
MU vs HIMX Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while HIMX trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 95.26. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check HIMX's competition here
MU vs WOLF Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while WOLF trades at $59.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check WOLF's competition here
MU vs PLAB Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while PLAB trades at $47.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check PLAB's competition here
MU vs AEHR Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while AEHR trades at $83.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -219.92. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AEHR's competition here
MU vs ICHR Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while ICHR trades at $66.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ICHR's competition here
MU vs COHU Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while COHU trades at $44.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -37.14. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check COHU's competition here
MU vs IMOS Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while IMOS trades at $51.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 65.06. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check IMOS's competition here
MU vs POET Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while POET trades at $14.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -20.90. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check POET's competition here
MU vs SKYT Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while SKYT trades at $34.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SKYT's competition here
MU vs AIP Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while AIP trades at $33.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -42.14. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AIP's competition here
MU vs AMBQ Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while AMBQ trades at $71.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AMBQ's competition here
MU vs AOSL Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while AOSL trades at $38.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -10.70. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check AOSL's competition here
MU vs SGH Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check SGH's competition here
MU vs CEVA Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while CEVA trades at $36.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -79.54. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check CEVA's competition here
MU vs INDI Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 826.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while INDI trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check INDI's competition here
MU vs MRAM Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 782M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while MRAM trades at $33.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 3335.00. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MRAM's competition here
MU vs QNC Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 588M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while QNC trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check QNC's competition here
MU vs NVEC Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 406.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while NVEC trades at $84.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NVEC's competition here
MU vs LAES Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 397.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while LAES trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -11.62. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check LAES's competition here
MU vs XPER Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 370.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while XPER trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -7.76. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check XPER's competition here
MU vs QUIK Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 327.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while QUIK trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -24.61. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check QUIK's competition here
MU vs TGAN Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TGAN's competition here
MU vs VLN Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while VLN trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -9.13. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check VLN's competition here
MU vs ALMU Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while ALMU trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -59.31. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ALMU's competition here
MU vs ASYS Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 290.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while ASYS trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 111.19. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ASYS's competition here
MU vs GSIT Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 261.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while GSIT trades at $8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -21.33. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check GSIT's competition here
MU vs ATOM Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 260.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while ATOM trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -12.32. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ATOM's competition here
MU vs INTT Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 223.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while INTT trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 445.00. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check INTT's competition here
MU vs NA Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 165.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while NA trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check NA's competition here
MU vs BZAI Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while BZAI trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check BZAI's competition here
MU vs TRT Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 154M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while TRT trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 380.75. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check TRT's competition here
MU vs MX Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 147.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while MX trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check MX's competition here
MU vs GCTS Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 147.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while GCTS trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check GCTS's competition here
MU vs OIIM Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check OIIM's competition here
MU vs ARBE Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 122.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while ARBE trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check ARBE's competition here
MU vs IDBA Comparison May 2026
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 768.6B. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $681.54, while IDBA trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 32.21, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.Check IDBA's competition here