TE Connectivity plc (TEL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.9T. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while NVDA trades at $202.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 34.73. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check NVDA's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while TSM trades at $398.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 33.19. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check TSM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while AVGO trades at $370.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 45.61. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AVGO's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 958.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while MU trades at $848.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MU's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 808.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while AMD trades at $495.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 108.24. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AMD's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 673.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while ASML trades at $1,747.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 54.58. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ASML's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 487.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while INTC trades at $95.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 170.14. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check INTC's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 420.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while AMAT trades at $529.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 53.56. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AMAT's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 391.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while LRCX trades at $313.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 58.78. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check LRCX's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 284.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while ARM trades at $267.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 150.95. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ARM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 277.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while KLAC trades at $212.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check KLAC's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 258.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while TXN trades at $284.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 48.63. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check TXN's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 182.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while ADI trades at $375.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 38.07. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ADI's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 181.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while QCOM trades at $171.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check QCOM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 165.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while MRVL trades at $188.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 62.27. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MRVL's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while ASX trades at $38.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 56.43. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ASX's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while NXPI trades at $266.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check NXPI's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while MPWR trades at $1,312.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 69.68. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MPWR's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while STM trades at $62.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 105.19. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check STM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while UMC trades at $21.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 32.71. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check UMC's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while ALAB trades at $303.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 143.22. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ALAB's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while TER trades at $322.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 55.77. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check TER's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while MCHP trades at $80.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 49.67. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MCHP's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while CBRS trades at $172.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -4321.50. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check CBRS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while CRDO trades at $202.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 59.26. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check CRDO's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while ON trades at $87.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 35.82. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ON's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while GFS trades at $57.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 32.29. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check GFS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while Q trades at $136.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 41.72. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check Q's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while TSEM trades at $234.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 94.40. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check TSEM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while ENTG trades at $138.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 47.19. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ENTG's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while MTSI trades at $267.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 67.69. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MTSI's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while LSCC trades at $125.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 100.18. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check LSCC's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while AMKR trades at $62.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 35.97. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AMKR's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while SITM trades at $554.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 128.76. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SITM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while ONTO trades at $279.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 57.69. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ONTO's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while NVMI trades at $437.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 49.54. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check NVMI's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while SMTC trades at $124.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 67.91. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SMTC's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while RMBS trades at $101.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 39.94. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check RMBS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check CREE's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while SWKS trades at $59.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SWKS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while SIMO trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 58.35. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SIMO's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while ALGM trades at $46.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 86.07. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ALGM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while FORM trades at $105.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 65.17. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check FORM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check BRKS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while QRVO trades at $85.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check QRVO's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while SLAB trades at $217.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 143.07. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SLAB's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while CRUS trades at $137.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check CRUS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while CAMT trades at $146.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 46.84. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check CAMT's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while MXL trades at $71.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 126.04. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MXL's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while ACMR trades at $83.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 56.32. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ACMR's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while VSH trades at $37.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 1260.00. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check VSH's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while KLIC trades at $97.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 61.53. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check KLIC's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while SYNA trades at $114.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SYNA's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while IPGP trades at $104.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 73.83. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check IPGP's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while PI trades at $138.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 68.40. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check PI's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while ACLS trades at $136.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ACLS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while UCTT trades at $92.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 85.58. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check UCTT's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while DIOD trades at $87.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 59.60. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check DIOD's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while POWI trades at $70.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 59.20. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check POWI's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while LASR trades at $69.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 144.27. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check LASR's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while VECO trades at $52.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 47.52. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check VECO's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while ICHR trades at $82.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 418.70. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ICHR's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while NVTS trades at $11.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -60.32. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check NVTS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while AMBA trades at $61.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 93.70. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AMBA's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while AEHR trades at $81.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 2701.67. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AEHR's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while IMOS trades at $68.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 96.12. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check IMOS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while COHU trades at $51.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -284.39. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check COHU's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while OUST trades at $37.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -39.40. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check OUST's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while HIMX trades at $12.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 64.00. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check HIMX's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while AXTI trades at $45.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -191.08. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AXTI's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while AMBQ trades at $72.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AMBQ's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while PLAB trades at $28.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check PLAB's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while WOLF trades at $29.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check WOLF's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while SKYT trades at $31.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -784.00. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SKYT's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while AIP trades at $31.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -110.86. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AIP's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SGH's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while CEVA trades at $37.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 94.93. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check CEVA's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 975.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while POET trades at $7.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -17.12. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check POET's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 935.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while AOSL trades at $31.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -107.83. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AOSL's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 805M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while INDI trades at $3.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check INDI's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 706M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while KOPN trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 718.87. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check KOPN's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 472.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while QNC trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check QNC's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 417.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while NVEC trades at $86.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check NVEC's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 362.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while LAES trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check LAES's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 341.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while MRAM trades at $14.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 110.06. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MRAM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check TGAN's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while ASYS trades at $16.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 57.48. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ASYS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 230.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while QUIK trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check QUIK's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 206.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while ALMU trades at $14.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -121.67. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ALMU's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 184.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while VLN trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check VLN's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check VLN-WT's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while ATOM trades at $5.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -8.65. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ATOM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while GSIT trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -13.28. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check GSIT's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 172.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while INTT trades at $13.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 41.58. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check INTT's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check OIIM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 125.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while MX trades at $3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MX's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 119.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while GCTS trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check GCTS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 102.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while TRT trades at $10.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 182.41. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check TRT's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 59.4B. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $203.31, while IDBA trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 20.02, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check IDBA's competition here