TE Connectivity plc (TEL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.7T. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while NVDA trades at $192.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 32.97. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check NVDA's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while TSM trades at $432.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 35.90. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check TSM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while AVGO trades at $365.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 44.75. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AVGO's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while MU trades at $1,132.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MU's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 847.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while AMD trades at $521.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 113.50. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AMD's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 691.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while ASML trades at $1,794.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 64.36. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ASML's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 641.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while INTC trades at $128.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 224.07. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check INTC's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 497.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while AMAT trades at $626.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 72.38. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AMAT's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 472.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while LRCX trades at $379.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 70.83. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check LRCX's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 355.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while ARM trades at $334.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 188.85. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ARM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 324.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while KLAC trades at $248.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check KLAC's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 259.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while TXN trades at $285.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 48.87. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check TXN's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 233.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while MRVL trades at $266.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 91.05. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MRVL's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 199.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while QCOM trades at $189.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check QCOM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 188.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while ADI trades at $386.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 39.24. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ADI's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while ASX trades at $40.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 59.07. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ASX's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while NXPI trades at $277.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check NXPI's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while TER trades at $436.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 75.58. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check TER's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while ALAB trades at $391.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 184.78. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ALAB's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while MPWR trades at $1,313.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 69.75. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MPWR's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while UMC trades at $25.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 39.57. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check UMC's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while STM trades at $71.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 121.03. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check STM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while MCHP trades at $87.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 53.94. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MCHP's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while GFS trades at $79.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 44.82. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check GFS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while CBRS trades at $181.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -4539.75. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check CBRS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while ON trades at $90.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 37.15. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ON's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while Q trades at $158.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 44.70. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check Q's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while MTSI trades at $369.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 93.45. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MTSI's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while TSEM trades at $249.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 100.77. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check TSEM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while ENTG trades at $161.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 54.91. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ENTG's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while AMKR trades at $78.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 44.98. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AMKR's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while LSCC trades at $138.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 111.01. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check LSCC's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while SITM trades at $672.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 155.96. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SITM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while ONTO trades at $323.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 66.99. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ONTO's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while NVMI trades at $488.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 55.33. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check NVMI's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while SMTC trades at $149.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 81.39. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SMTC's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while RMBS trades at $114.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 45.17. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check RMBS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while AAOI trades at $135.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -411.18. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AAOI's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while ALGM trades at $57.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 107.20. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ALGM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while SIMO trades at $305.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 67.39. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SIMO's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while SWKS trades at $68.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SWKS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while FORM trades at $130.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 80.70. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check FORM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check CREE's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while MXL trades at $96.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 169.47. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MXL's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while QRVO trades at $93.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check QRVO's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check BRKS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while VSH trades at $56.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 1877.67. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check VSH's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while CRUS trades at $146.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check CRUS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while SLAB trades at $218.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 143.70. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SLAB's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while CAMT trades at $153.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 49.27. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check CAMT's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while ACMR trades at $104.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ACMR's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while KLIC trades at $125.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 79.25. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check KLIC's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while UCTT trades at $118.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 110.02. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check UCTT's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while ACLS trades at $173.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 38.07. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ACLS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while DIOD trades at $104.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 71.33. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check DIOD's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while SYNA trades at $121.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SYNA's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while IPGP trades at $107.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 76.56. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check IPGP's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while POWI trades at $79.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 66.70. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check POWI's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while VECO trades at $70.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 64.50. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check VECO's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while NVTS trades at $17.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -91.05. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check NVTS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while PI trades at $132.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 65.61. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check PI's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while LASR trades at $61.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 127.85. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check LASR's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while ICHR trades at $94.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 470.00. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ICHR's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while AXTI trades at $70.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -292.29. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AXTI's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while COHU trades at $64.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -354.79. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check COHU's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while AEHR trades at $91.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -1016.44. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AEHR's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while AMBA trades at $62.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 94.14. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AMBA's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while OUST trades at $42.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -44.70. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check OUST's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while HIMX trades at $14.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 71.95. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check HIMX's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while WOLF trades at $45.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check WOLF's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while IMOS trades at $60.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 81.81. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check IMOS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while AIP trades at $43.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -154.61. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AIP's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while PLAB trades at $30.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check PLAB's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while SKYT trades at $34.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -873.00. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SKYT's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while AMBQ trades at $80.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AMBQ's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while AOSL trades at $43.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -151.69. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AOSL's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while POET trades at $9.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -21.87. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check POET's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while CEVA trades at $42.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 105.80. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check CEVA's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SGH's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 750.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while INDI trades at $3.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check INDI's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 698.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while KOPN trades at $3.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 720.75. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check KOPN's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 652.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while QNC trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check QNC's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 510M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while MRAM trades at $21.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 86.24. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MRAM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 465.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while NVEC trades at $96.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check NVEC's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 444.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while LAES trades at $3.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -11.18. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check LAES's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 388.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while XPER trades at $8.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check XPER's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 324.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while QUIK trades at $18.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -34.55. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check QUIK's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check TGAN's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 283.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while ALMU trades at $20.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -166.83. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ALMU's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 279.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while ASYS trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 66.41. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ASYS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 255.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while VLN-WT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check VLN-WT's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 230.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while ATOM trades at $7.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ATOM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 217.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while GSIT trades at $6.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -16.68. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check GSIT's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 214.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while VLN trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -11.65. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check VLN's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 206.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while INTT trades at $16.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 49.89. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check INTT's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 170.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while MX trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -16.64. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MX's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check OIIM's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 134.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while GCTS trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check GCTS's competition here

TEL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 57.8B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 119.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $197.74, while TRT trades at $11.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 32.14, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 211.49. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check TRT's competition here