TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while NVDA trades at $225.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 38.58. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check NVDA's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while TSM trades at $430.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 35.88. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to TSM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check TSM's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while AVGO trades at $417.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 51.39. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AVGO's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, SKHY has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while SKHY trades at $165.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas SKHY's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SKHY's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SKHY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SKHY's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while MU trades at $949.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MU's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 787.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while AMD trades at $483.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 83.86. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AMD's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 712.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while ASML trades at $1,847.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 57.71. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ASML. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ASML's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 527.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while INTC trades at $104.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 183.44. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check INTC's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 424.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while AMAT trades at $534.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 54.05. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AMAT's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 421.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while LRCX trades at $337.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 57.91. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check LRCX's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 297.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while ARM trades at $278.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 157.43. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ARM's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 273.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while KLAC trades at $209.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 61.04. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check KLAC's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 249.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while TXN trades at $273.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 46.82. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to TXN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check TXN's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 194.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while MRVL trades at $222.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 73.33. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MRVL's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 185.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while ADI trades at $381.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 38.66. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ADI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ADI's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 173B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while QCOM trades at $164.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check QCOM's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 87.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while ASX trades at $39.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 58.29. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ASX's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while MPWR trades at $1,362.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 72.36. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MPWR's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 64.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while TER trades at $410.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 71.07. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check TER's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while NXPI trades at $231.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check NXPI's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while ALAB trades at $322.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 130.15. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ALAB's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while CBRS trades at $231.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -5775.25. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CBRS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check CBRS's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while CRDO trades at $265.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 77.77. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check CRDO's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while UMC trades at $19.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check UMC's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while STM trades at $53.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 91.42. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to STM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check STM's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while MCHP trades at $77.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 47.66. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MCHP's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while ON trades at $81.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ON's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while Q trades at $142.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 37.21. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to Q. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check Q's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while GFS trades at $52.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check GFS's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while TSEM trades at $252.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 88.44. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check TSEM's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while ENTG trades at $163.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 51.03. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ENTG's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while MTSI trades at $307.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 69.00. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MTSI's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while SITM trades at $687.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 111.32. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SITM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SITM's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while LSCC trades at $128.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 83.40. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check LSCC's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while ONTO trades at $337.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 69.69. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ONTO's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while AMKR trades at $57.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AMKR's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while NVMI trades at $411.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 45.02. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check NVMI's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while SMTC trades at $133.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 72.60. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SMTC's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while RMBS trades at $99.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 39.11. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check RMBS's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while SWKS trades at $69.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SWKS's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while FORM trades at $131.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 81.28. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check FORM's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to CREE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check CREE's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while QRVO trades at $98.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check QRVO's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while SIMO trades at $249.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 54.86. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SIMO's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while ALGM trades at $44.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 81.72. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALGM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ALGM's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while CAMT trades at $172.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 55.39. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check CAMT's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check BRKS's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while SLAB trades at $218.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 143.62. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SLAB's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while MXL trades at $76.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 134.47. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MXL's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while CRUS trades at $121.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check CRUS's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while PI trades at $178.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 88.52. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check PI's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while ACMR trades at $81.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 54.49. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ACMR's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while KLIC trades at $95.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 35.35. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check KLIC's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while VSH trades at $33.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 114.88. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check VSH's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while DIOD trades at $97.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 52.82. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check DIOD's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while ACLS trades at $143.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 31.93. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ACLS's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while SYNA trades at $107.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SYNA's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while UCTT trades at $92.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 61.53. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check UCTT's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while AEHR trades at $123.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 4110.00. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AEHR's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while AXTI trades at $77.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -322.71. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AXTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AXTI's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while AMBA trades at $81.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 124.18. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AMBA's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while NVTS trades at $13.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -71.89. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check NVTS's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while IPGP trades at $83.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 86.54. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check IPGP's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while POWI trades at $62.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 51.50. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check POWI's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while VECO trades at $53.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 50.07. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check VECO's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while LASR trades at $50.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 110.50. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check LASR's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while OUST trades at $45.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -48.01. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check OUST's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while COHU trades at $58.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -325.00. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check COHU's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while HIMX trades at $14.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 71.17. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check HIMX's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while ICHR trades at $71.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 139.59. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ICHR's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while IMOS trades at $57.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 78.09. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check IMOS's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while PLAB trades at $33.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check PLAB's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while WOLF trades at $31.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check WOLF's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while SKYT trades at $32.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -811.50. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SKYT's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while AMBQ trades at $64.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AMBQ's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while AEVA trades at $22.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -13.35. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AEVA's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while AIP trades at $27.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -98.54. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AIP's ROE of -3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AIP's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while POET trades at $8.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -20.64. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check POET's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check SGH's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 916.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while AOSL trades at $30.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -105.59. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check AOSL's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 895M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while KOPN trades at $4.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 911.32. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check KOPN's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 874.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while INDI trades at $4.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -14.79. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check INDI's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 846.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while CEVA trades at $30.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 75.93. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check CEVA's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 562.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while NVEC trades at $116.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 37.05. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check NVEC's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 405.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check VLN-WT's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 394.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while MRAM trades at $16.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -352.09. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MRAM's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 379.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while LAES trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check LAES's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check TGAN's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 322.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while ALMU trades at $17.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -146.67. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ALMU's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 279.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while ASYS trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 43.24. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ASYS's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 259.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while GSIT trades at $6.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check GSIT's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 222.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while QUIK trades at $12.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -23.70. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check QUIK's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 210M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while VLN trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -11.41. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check VLN's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 209.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while ATOM trades at $5.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -8.34. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check ATOM's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while GCTS trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check GCTS's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 170.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while INTT trades at $13.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 41.21. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check INTT's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 166.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while BZAI trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check BZAI's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check OIIM's competition here

TE Connectivity plc (NYSE: TEL) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEL stands at 62.3B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 136.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEL is priced at $214.74 on the NYSE, while MX trades at $3.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEL currently has a P/E ratio of 21.13, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -13.36. In terms of profitability, TEL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEL is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEL.Check MX's competition here