Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SLAB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLAB | $219.00 | -0.06% | 7.2B | -145.03 | -$1.51 | N/A |
| NVDA | $218.66 | +1.82% | 5.3T | 33.49 | $6.53 | +0.13% |
| TSM | $444.92 | +1.88% | 2.3T | 37.86 | $11.75 | +0.71% |
| AVGO | $418.91 | -12.59% | 2T | 69.93 | $5.99 | +0.59% |
| MU | $996.00 | -7.74% | 1.1T | 46.91 | $21.23 | +0.05% |
| AMD | $523.20 | -3.56% | 853.1B | 173.25 | $3.02 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,757.47 | +1.80% | 677.4B | 58.21 | $30.19 | +0.50% |
| INTC | $111.78 | -0.83% | 561.9B | -186.33 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| LRCX | $336.41 | -2.12% | 420.7B | 63.47 | $5.30 | +0.30% |
| ARM | $393.44 | -4.47% | 418.6B | 457.49 | $0.86 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SLAB vs NVDA Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.3T. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while NVDA trades at $218.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 33.49. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check NVDA's competition here
SLAB vs TSM Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while TSM trades at $444.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 37.86. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check TSM's competition here
SLAB vs AVGO Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while AVGO trades at $418.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 69.93. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AVGO's competition here
SLAB vs MU Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while MU trades at $996.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 46.91. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check MU's competition here
SLAB vs AMD Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 853.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while AMD trades at $523.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 173.25. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AMD's competition here
SLAB vs ASML Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 677.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while ASML trades at $1,757.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 58.21. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ASML's competition here
SLAB vs INTC Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 561.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while INTC trades at $111.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -186.33. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check INTC's competition here
SLAB vs LRCX Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 420.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while LRCX trades at $336.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 63.47. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check LRCX's competition here
SLAB vs ARM Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 418.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while ARM trades at $393.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 457.49. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ARM's competition here
SLAB vs AMAT Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 398.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while AMAT trades at $501.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 47.20. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AMAT's competition here
SLAB vs KLAC Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 278.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while KLAC trades at $2,131.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 60.35. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check KLAC's competition here
SLAB vs TXN Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 277.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while TXN trades at $305.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 52.11. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check TXN's competition here
SLAB vs MRVL Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 276.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while MRVL trades at $316.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 108.63. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check MRVL's competition here
SLAB vs QCOM Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 255.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while QCOM trades at $242.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check QCOM's competition here
SLAB vs ADI Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 208.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while ADI trades at $428.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 63.71. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ADI's competition here
SLAB vs ASX Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while ASX trades at $38.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 59.04. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ASX's competition here
SLAB vs NXPI Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 81.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while NXPI trades at $322.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check NXPI's competition here
SLAB vs MPWR Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 81.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while MPWR trades at $1,652.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 117.71. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check MPWR's competition here
SLAB vs STM Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while STM trades at $78.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 489.62. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check STM's competition here
SLAB vs TER Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while TER trades at $406.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 75.21. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check TER's competition here
SLAB vs ALAB Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while ALAB trades at $358.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 240.30. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ALAB's competition here
SLAB vs MCHP Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while MCHP trades at $96.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 437.64. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check MCHP's competition here
SLAB vs UMC Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while UMC trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 32.99. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check UMC's competition here
SLAB vs ON Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while ON trades at $131.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 97.64. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ON's competition here
SLAB vs CBRS Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while CBRS trades at $215.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 500.93. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check CBRS's competition here
SLAB vs GFS Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while GFS trades at $84.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 51.02. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check GFS's competition here
SLAB vs Q Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while Q trades at $154.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 49.93. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check Q's competition here
SLAB vs TSEM Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while TSEM trades at $261.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 120.42. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check TSEM's competition here
SLAB vs MTSI Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while MTSI trades at $382.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 163.56. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check MTSI's competition here
SLAB vs ENTG Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while ENTG trades at $139.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 81.33. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ENTG's competition here
SLAB vs LSCC Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while LSCC trades at $151.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 1085.14. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check LSCC's competition here
SLAB vs SITM Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while SITM trades at $706.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -759.89. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check SITM's competition here
SLAB vs RMBS Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while RMBS trades at $169.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 80.60. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check RMBS's competition here
SLAB vs AMKR Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while AMKR trades at $73.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 42.43. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AMKR's competition here
SLAB vs NVMI Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while NVMI trades at $520.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 65.46. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check NVMI's competition here
SLAB vs AAOI Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while AAOI trades at $202.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -312.05. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AAOI's competition here
SLAB vs SMTC Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while SMTC trades at $169.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -403.21. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check SMTC's competition here
SLAB vs ONTO Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while ONTO trades at $274.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 128.43. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ONTO's competition here
SLAB vs SWKS Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while SWKS trades at $79.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check SWKS's competition here
SLAB vs ALGM Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while ALGM trades at $53.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -670.25. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ALGM's competition here
SLAB vs SIMO Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while SIMO trades at $294.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 58.24. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check SIMO's competition here
SLAB vs FORM Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while FORM trades at $126.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 145.52. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check FORM's competition here
SLAB vs CREE Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check CREE's competition here
SLAB vs QRVO Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while QRVO trades at $103.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check QRVO's competition here
SLAB vs CRUS Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while CRUS trades at $175.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check CRUS's competition here
SLAB vs VSH Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while VSH trades at $63.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 6367.30. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check VSH's competition here
SLAB vs MXL Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while MXL trades at $94.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -61.98. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check MXL's competition here
SLAB vs CAMT Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while CAMT trades at $181.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 184.86. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check CAMT's competition here
SLAB vs BRKS Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check BRKS's competition here
SLAB vs NVTS Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while NVTS trades at $30.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -48.63. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check NVTS's competition here
SLAB vs ACMR Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while ACMR trades at $90.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 68.86. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ACMR's competition here
SLAB vs KLIC Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while KLIC trades at $107.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 103.38. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check KLIC's competition here
SLAB vs SYNA Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while SYNA trades at $141.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -112.87. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check SYNA's competition here
SLAB vs IPGP Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while IPGP trades at $122.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 180.21. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check IPGP's competition here
SLAB vs DIOD Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while DIOD trades at $112.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 60.81. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check DIOD's competition here
SLAB vs ACLS Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while ACLS trades at $161.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 50.29. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ACLS's competition here
SLAB vs AXTI Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while AXTI trades at $105.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -331.22. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AXTI's competition here
SLAB vs POWI Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while POWI trades at $85.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 284.33. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check POWI's competition here
SLAB vs LASR Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while LASR trades at $74.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -249.63. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check LASR's competition here
SLAB vs UCTT Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while UCTT trades at $93.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -21.86. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check UCTT's competition here
SLAB vs HIMX Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while HIMX trades at $23.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 125.95. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check HIMX's competition here
SLAB vs PI Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while PI trades at $136.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -151.31. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check PI's competition here
SLAB vs VECO Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while VECO trades at $63.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 167.49. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check VECO's competition here
SLAB vs AEHR Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while AEHR trades at $116.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -306.79. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AEHR's competition here
SLAB vs WOLF Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while WOLF trades at $67.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check WOLF's competition here
SLAB vs AMBA Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while AMBA trades at $72.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -44.75. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AMBA's competition here
SLAB vs COHU Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while COHU trades at $55.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -46.93. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check COHU's competition here
SLAB vs ICHR Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while ICHR trades at $71.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -48.01. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ICHR's competition here
SLAB vs IMOS Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while IMOS trades at $63.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 81.10. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check IMOS's competition here
SLAB vs POET Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while POET trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -18.42. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check POET's competition here
SLAB vs SKYT Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while SKYT trades at $37.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check SKYT's competition here
SLAB vs PLAB Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while PLAB trades at $31.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check PLAB's competition here
SLAB vs AMBQ Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while AMBQ trades at $85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -18.48. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AMBQ's competition here
SLAB vs AIP Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while AIP trades at $37.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -47.08. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AIP's competition here
SLAB vs AOSL Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while AOSL trades at $50.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -13.96. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AOSL's competition here
SLAB vs CEVA Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while CEVA trades at $49.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -107.78. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check CEVA's competition here
SLAB vs SGH Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check SGH's competition here
SLAB vs INDI Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while INDI trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check INDI's competition here
SLAB vs QNC Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 721.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while QNC trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check QNC's competition here
SLAB vs MRAM Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 666.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while MRAM trades at $28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 2842.00. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check MRAM's competition here
SLAB vs NVEC Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 527.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while NVEC trades at $109.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 34.74. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check NVEC's competition here
SLAB vs LAES Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 517.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while LAES trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -15.12. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check LAES's competition here
SLAB vs QUIK Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 420.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while QUIK trades at $23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -31.65. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check QUIK's competition here
SLAB vs ALMU Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 385.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while ALMU trades at $27.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -77.74. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ALMU's competition here
SLAB vs XPER Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 374.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while XPER trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check XPER's competition here
SLAB vs VLN Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 339M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while VLN trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -10.39. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check VLN's competition here
SLAB vs TGAN Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check TGAN's competition here
SLAB vs ASYS Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 317.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while ASYS trades at $21.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 121.72. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ASYS's competition here
SLAB vs MX Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 311.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while MX trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -20.87. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check MX's competition here
SLAB vs ATOM Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 294.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while ATOM trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -13.92. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ATOM's competition here
SLAB vs GSIT Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while GSIT trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -22.74. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check GSIT's competition here
SLAB vs INTT Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 216M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while INTT trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 429.75. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check INTT's competition here
SLAB vs BZAI Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 202.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while BZAI trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check BZAI's competition here
SLAB vs GCTS Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 181.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while GCTS trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check GCTS's competition here
SLAB vs NA Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 148.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while NA trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check NA's competition here
SLAB vs OIIM Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check OIIM's competition here
SLAB vs ARBE Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 131.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while ARBE trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ARBE's competition here
SLAB vs TRT Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while TRT trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 250.20. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check TRT's competition here
SLAB vs IDBA Comparison June 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.2B. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $219.00, while IDBA trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -145.03, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check IDBA's competition here