Silicon Laboratories Inc.
Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SLAB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLAB | $216.59 | -0.33% | 7.1B | -142.49 | -$1.52 | N/A |
| NVDA | $225.32 | -4.42% | 5.5T | 45.98 | $4.90 | +0.02% |
| TSM | $404.35 | -3.20% | 2.1T | 34.20 | $11.83 | +0.78% |
| AVGO | $425.19 | -3.32% | 2T | 82.88 | $5.13 | +0.58% |
| MU | $724.66 | -6.62% | 817.2B | 34.15 | $21.22 | +0.07% |
| AMD | $424.10 | -5.69% | 691.5B | 140.90 | $3.01 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,501.81 | -5.22% | 578.8B | 49.37 | $30.42 | +0.58% |
| INTC | $108.77 | -6.18% | 546.7B | -181.28 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| LRCX | $284.72 | -4.82% | 355.8B | 53.79 | $5.29 | +0.35% |
| AMAT | $436.62 | -0.89% | 346.5B | 44.83 | $9.74 | +0.42% |
Stock Comparison
SLAB vs NVDA Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.5T. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while NVDA trades at $225.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 45.98. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check NVDA's competition here
SLAB vs TSM Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while TSM trades at $404.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 34.20. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check TSM's competition here
SLAB vs AVGO Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while AVGO trades at $425.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 82.88. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AVGO's competition here
SLAB vs MU Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 817.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while MU trades at $724.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 34.15. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check MU's competition here
SLAB vs AMD Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 691.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while AMD trades at $424.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 140.90. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AMD's competition here
SLAB vs ASML Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 578.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while ASML trades at $1,501.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 49.37. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ASML's competition here
SLAB vs INTC Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 546.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while INTC trades at $108.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -181.28. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check INTC's competition here
SLAB vs LRCX Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 355.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while LRCX trades at $284.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 53.79. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check LRCX's competition here
SLAB vs AMAT Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 346.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while AMAT trades at $436.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 44.83. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AMAT's competition here
SLAB vs TXN Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 275.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while TXN trades at $302.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 51.75. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check TXN's competition here
SLAB vs KLAC Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 235.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while KLAC trades at $1,804.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 51.07. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check KLAC's competition here
SLAB vs ARM Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 222.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while ARM trades at $209.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 246.07. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ARM's competition here
SLAB vs QCOM Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 212.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while QCOM trades at $201.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check QCOM's competition here
SLAB vs ADI Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 203.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while ADI trades at $417.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 76.05. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ADI's competition here
SLAB vs MRVL Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 154.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while MRVL trades at $176.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 57.62. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check MRVL's competition here
SLAB vs MPWR Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 76.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while MPWR trades at $1,550.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 110.48. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check MPWR's competition here
SLAB vs ASX Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while ASX trades at $33.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 50.46. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ASX's competition here
SLAB vs NXPI Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 73.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while NXPI trades at $291.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check NXPI's competition here
SLAB vs STM Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while STM trades at $61.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 383.81. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check STM's competition here
SLAB vs TER Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while TER trades at $337.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 62.80. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check TER's competition here
SLAB vs MCHP Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while MCHP trades at $93.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 426.59. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check MCHP's competition here
SLAB vs ON Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while ON trades at $113.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 82.55. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ON's competition here
SLAB vs UMC Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while UMC trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check UMC's competition here
SLAB vs ALAB Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while ALAB trades at $232.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 156.16. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ALAB's competition here
SLAB vs GFS Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while GFS trades at $71.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 51.10. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check GFS's competition here
SLAB vs Q Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while Q trades at $157.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 50.72. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check Q's competition here
SLAB vs TSEM Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while TSEM trades at $273.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 126.84. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check TSEM's competition here
SLAB vs MTSI Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while MTSI trades at $375.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 158.48. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check MTSI's competition here
SLAB vs SITM Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while SITM trades at $774.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -832.32. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check SITM's competition here
SLAB vs ENTG Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while ENTG trades at $133.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ENTG's competition here
SLAB vs AMKR Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while AMKR trades at $70.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 40.43. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AMKR's competition here
SLAB vs LSCC Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while LSCC trades at $120.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 857.93. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check LSCC's competition here
SLAB vs NVMI Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while NVMI trades at $509.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 64.04. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check NVMI's competition here
SLAB vs AAOI Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while AAOI trades at $190.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -292.86. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AAOI's competition here
SLAB vs RMBS Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while RMBS trades at $127.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 60.45. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check RMBS's competition here
SLAB vs ONTO Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while ONTO trades at $271.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 125.86. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ONTO's competition here
SLAB vs SMTC Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while SMTC trades at $137.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -299.09. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check SMTC's competition here
SLAB vs SWKS Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while SWKS trades at $68.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check SWKS's competition here
SLAB vs CREE Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check CREE's competition here
SLAB vs FORM Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while FORM trades at $126.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 145.14. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check FORM's competition here
SLAB vs SIMO Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while SIMO trades at $259.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 58.03. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check SIMO's competition here
SLAB vs MXL Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while MXL trades at $92.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -60.75. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check MXL's competition here
SLAB vs CRUS Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while CRUS trades at $159.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check CRUS's competition here
SLAB vs QRVO Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while QRVO trades at $92.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check QRVO's competition here
SLAB vs ALGM Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while ALGM trades at $43.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -538.75. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ALGM's competition here
SLAB vs BRKS Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check BRKS's competition here
SLAB vs CAMT Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while CAMT trades at $168.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 171.79. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check CAMT's competition here
SLAB vs AXTI Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while AXTI trades at $123.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -386.81. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AXTI's competition here
SLAB vs KLIC Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while KLIC trades at $102.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 98.12. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check KLIC's competition here
SLAB vs VSH Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while VSH trades at $37.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 3724.98. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check VSH's competition here
SLAB vs NVTS Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while NVTS trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -33.84. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check NVTS's competition here
SLAB vs SYNA Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while SYNA trades at $128.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -102.58. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check SYNA's competition here
SLAB vs ACLS Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while ACLS trades at $155.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 48.04. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ACLS's competition here
SLAB vs DIOD Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while DIOD trades at $100.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 54.08. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check DIOD's competition here
SLAB vs IPGP Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while IPGP trades at $102.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 151.12. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check IPGP's competition here
SLAB vs OLED Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while OLED trades at $92.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check OLED's competition here
SLAB vs LASR Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while LASR trades at $75.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -252.03. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check LASR's competition here
SLAB vs ACMR Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while ACMR trades at $63.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ACMR's competition here
SLAB vs POWI Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while POWI trades at $73.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 244.13. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check POWI's competition here
SLAB vs UCTT Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while UCTT trades at $85.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -20.03. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check UCTT's competition here
SLAB vs VECO Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while VECO trades at $58.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 154.32. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check VECO's competition here
SLAB vs AMBA Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while AMBA trades at $81.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -45.60. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AMBA's competition here
SLAB vs HIMX Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while HIMX trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 100.32. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check HIMX's competition here
SLAB vs AEHR Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while AEHR trades at $99.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -261.84. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AEHR's competition here
SLAB vs WOLF Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while WOLF trades at $62.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check WOLF's competition here
SLAB vs PLAB Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while PLAB trades at $50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check PLAB's competition here
SLAB vs ICHR Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while ICHR trades at $73.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -49.51. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ICHR's competition here
SLAB vs COHU Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while COHU trades at $47.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -39.61. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check COHU's competition here
SLAB vs POET Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while POET trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -23.49. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check POET's competition here
SLAB vs IMOS Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while IMOS trades at $50.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 64.27. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check IMOS's competition here
SLAB vs SKYT Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while SKYT trades at $34.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check SKYT's competition here
SLAB vs AIP Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while AIP trades at $33.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -42.67. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AIP's competition here
SLAB vs AMBQ Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while AMBQ trades at $70.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -15.32. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AMBQ's competition here
SLAB vs DQ Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while DQ trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check DQ's competition here
SLAB vs AOSL Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while AOSL trades at $38.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check AOSL's competition here
SLAB vs SGH Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check SGH's competition here
SLAB vs CEVA Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while CEVA trades at $36.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -79.37. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check CEVA's competition here
SLAB vs INDI Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 885.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while INDI trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.51. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check INDI's competition here
SLAB vs MRAM Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 880.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while MRAM trades at $37.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 3757.00. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check MRAM's competition here
SLAB vs QNC Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 588M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while QNC trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check QNC's competition here
SLAB vs NVEC Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 434.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while NVEC trades at $89.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check NVEC's competition here
SLAB vs LAES Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 409.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while LAES trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check LAES's competition here
SLAB vs XPER Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 371.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while XPER trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -7.78. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check XPER's competition here
SLAB vs ALMU Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 352.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while ALMU trades at $24.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -71.03. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ALMU's competition here
SLAB vs QUIK Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 338.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while QUIK trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -25.47. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check QUIK's competition here
SLAB vs TGAN Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check TGAN's competition here
SLAB vs VLN Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 320.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while VLN trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -9.82. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check VLN's competition here
SLAB vs ASYS Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 305.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while ASYS trades at $21.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 117.11. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ASYS's competition here
SLAB vs ATOM Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 286M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while ATOM trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -13.54. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check ATOM's competition here
SLAB vs GSIT Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 281.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while GSIT trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -22.94. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check GSIT's competition here
SLAB vs INTT Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 231.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while INTT trades at $18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 460.50. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check INTT's competition here
SLAB vs TRT Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 200.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while TRT trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is -1001.25. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check TRT's competition here
SLAB vs NA Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 173.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while NA trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check NA's competition here
SLAB vs BZAI Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while BZAI trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -9.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check BZAI's competition here
SLAB vs MX Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 158.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while MX trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check MX's competition here
SLAB vs OIIM Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check OIIM's competition here
SLAB vs GCTS Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 105M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while GCTS trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check GCTS's competition here
SLAB vs MOSY Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check MOSY's competition here
SLAB vs WISA Comparison May 2026
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 7.1B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $216.59, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -142.49, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WISA's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.Check WISA's competition here