SEALSQ Corp (LAES) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LAES) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAES | $2.73 | -5.05% | 399.3M | -10.03 | -$0.28 | N/A |
| NVDA | $209.01 | +3.07% | 5.1T | 36.12 | $5.84 | +0.13% |
| TSM | $429.68 | -1.67% | 2.3T | 36.06 | $12.04 | +0.80% |
| AVGO | $388.50 | -3.14% | 1.9T | 49.20 | $8.13 | +0.64% |
| MU | $908.45 | -8.39% | 1.1T | 21.70 | $45.12 | +0.05% |
| AMD | $530.03 | -3.05% | 909.7B | 121.81 | $4.58 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,744.31 | -3.32% | 692.7B | 59.57 | $30.17 | +0.49% |
| INTC | $104.22 | -7.40% | 552.1B | 192.70 | $0.57 | N/A |
| AMAT | $574.59 | -2.39% | 478.4B | 60.92 | $9.89 | +0.32% |
| LRCX | $330.53 | -0.79% | 441.7B | 66.26 | $5.33 | +0.30% |
Stock Comparison
LAES vs NVDA Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while NVDA trades at $209.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 36.12. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check NVDA's competition here
LAES vs TSM Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while TSM trades at $429.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 36.06. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check TSM's competition here
LAES vs AVGO Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while AVGO trades at $388.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 49.20. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check AVGO's competition here
LAES vs MU Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while MU trades at $908.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check MU's competition here
LAES vs AMD Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 909.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while AMD trades at $530.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 121.81. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check AMD's competition here
LAES vs ASML Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 692.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while ASML trades at $1,744.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 59.57. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check ASML's competition here
LAES vs INTC Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 552.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while INTC trades at $104.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 192.70. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check INTC's competition here
LAES vs AMAT Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 478.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while AMAT trades at $574.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 60.92. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check AMAT's competition here
LAES vs LRCX Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 441.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while LRCX trades at $330.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 66.26. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check LRCX's competition here
LAES vs ARM Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 344.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while ARM trades at $298.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 182.71. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check ARM's competition here
LAES vs KLAC Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 302.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while KLAC trades at $221.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check KLAC's competition here
LAES vs TXN Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 283.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while TXN trades at $301.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 53.34. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check TXN's competition here
LAES vs MRVL Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 206.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while MRVL trades at $220.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 77.83. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check MRVL's competition here
LAES vs QCOM Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 199.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while QCOM trades at $186.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check QCOM's competition here
LAES vs ADI Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 192.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while ADI trades at $385.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 40.13. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check ADI's competition here
LAES vs ASX Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 93.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while ASX trades at $41.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 62.78. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check ASX's competition here
LAES vs NXPI Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while NXPI trades at $283.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check NXPI's competition here
LAES vs ALAB Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while ALAB trades at $385.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 194.59. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check ALAB's competition here
LAES vs MPWR Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while MPWR trades at $1,304.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 71.84. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check MPWR's competition here
LAES vs STM Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while STM trades at $69.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 121.10. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check STM's competition here
LAES vs UMC Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while UMC trades at $23.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 37.45. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check UMC's competition here
LAES vs TEL Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while TEL trades at $201.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check TEL's competition here
LAES vs TER Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while TER trades at $342.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 62.21. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check TER's competition here
LAES vs CBRS Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while CBRS trades at $207.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -5377.00. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check CBRS's competition here
LAES vs MCHP Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while MCHP trades at $85.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 54.35. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check MCHP's competition here
LAES vs GFS Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while GFS trades at $66.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 38.75. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check GFS's competition here
LAES vs ON Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while ON trades at $91.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 39.33. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check ON's competition here
LAES vs Q Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while Q trades at $141.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 43.98. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check Q's competition here
LAES vs TSEM Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while TSEM trades at $218.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 89.82. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check TSEM's competition here
LAES vs MTSI Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while MTSI trades at $295.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 78.11. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check MTSI's competition here
LAES vs ENTG Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while ENTG trades at $138.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 49.44. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check ENTG's competition here
LAES vs LSCC Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while LSCC trades at $131.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 111.62. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check LSCC's competition here
LAES vs AMKR Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while AMKR trades at $66.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check AMKR's competition here
LAES vs SITM Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while SITM trades at $604.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 145.93. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check SITM's competition here
LAES vs ONTO Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while ONTO trades at $304.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 66.30. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check ONTO's competition here
LAES vs NVMI Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while NVMI trades at $457.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 53.90. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check NVMI's competition here
LAES vs SMTC Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while SMTC trades at $131.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 74.04. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check SMTC's competition here
LAES vs RMBS Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while RMBS trades at $105.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 44.14. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check RMBS's competition here
LAES vs SIMO Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while SIMO trades at $306.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 72.04. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check SIMO's competition here
LAES vs ALGM Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while ALGM trades at $52.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 101.61. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check ALGM's competition here
LAES vs CREE Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check CREE's competition here
LAES vs AAOI Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while AAOI trades at $113.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -363.39. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check AAOI's competition here
LAES vs FORM Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while FORM trades at $110.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 72.54. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check FORM's competition here
LAES vs SWKS Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while SWKS trades at $59.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check SWKS's competition here
LAES vs MXL Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while MXL trades at $84.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 160.18. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check MXL's competition here
LAES vs BRKS Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check BRKS's competition here
LAES vs CRUS Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while CRUS trades at $146.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check CRUS's competition here
LAES vs QRVO Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while QRVO trades at $85.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check QRVO's competition here
LAES vs SLAB Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while SLAB trades at $218.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 143.84. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check SLAB's competition here
LAES vs CAMT Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while CAMT trades at $137.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 46.09. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check CAMT's competition here
LAES vs ACMR Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while ACMR trades at $98.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 69.13. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check ACMR's competition here
LAES vs VSH Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while VSH trades at $41.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 1489.50. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check VSH's competition here
LAES vs KLIC Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while KLIC trades at $109.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 71.78. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check KLIC's competition here
LAES vs SYNA Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while SYNA trades at $120.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check SYNA's competition here
LAES vs UCTT Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while UCTT trades at $100.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 98.40. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check UCTT's competition here
LAES vs IPGP Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while IPGP trades at $105.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 76.95. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check IPGP's competition here
LAES vs DIOD Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while DIOD trades at $92.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 66.01. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check DIOD's competition here
LAES vs ACLS Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while ACLS trades at $139.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 31.51. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check ACLS's competition here
LAES vs PI Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while PI trades at $144.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 71.30. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check PI's competition here
LAES vs LASR Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while LASR trades at $72.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 150.10. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check LASR's competition here
LAES vs POWI Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while POWI trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 60.56. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check POWI's competition here
LAES vs VECO Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while VECO trades at $56.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 52.18. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check VECO's competition here
LAES vs ICHR Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while ICHR trades at $94.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 501.50. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check ICHR's competition here
LAES vs AMBA Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while AMBA trades at $73.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 117.12. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check AMBA's competition here
LAES vs NVTS Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while NVTS trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -70.89. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check NVTS's competition here
LAES vs OUST Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while OUST trades at $41.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -46.04. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check OUST's competition here
LAES vs HIMX Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while HIMX trades at $14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 76.15. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check HIMX's competition here
LAES vs AXTI Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while AXTI trades at $52.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -238.37. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check AXTI's competition here
LAES vs IMOS Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while IMOS trades at $71.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 102.41. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check IMOS's competition here
LAES vs COHU Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while COHU trades at $53.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -312.06. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check COHU's competition here
LAES vs AEHR Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while AEHR trades at $68.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -806.67. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check AEHR's competition here
LAES vs AMBQ Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while AMBQ trades at $82.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check AMBQ's competition here
LAES vs WOLF Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while WOLF trades at $34.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check WOLF's competition here
LAES vs PLAB Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while PLAB trades at $28.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check PLAB's competition here
LAES vs AIP Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while AIP trades at $33.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -124.18. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check AIP's competition here
LAES vs SKYT Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while SKYT trades at $31.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -813.50. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check SKYT's competition here
LAES vs CEVA Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while CEVA trades at $44.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 113.85. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check CEVA's competition here
LAES vs AOSL Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while AOSL trades at $35.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -129.52. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check AOSL's competition here
LAES vs SGH Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check SGH's competition here
LAES vs POET Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while POET trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check POET's competition here
LAES vs INDI Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 938.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while INDI trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -15.86. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check INDI's competition here
LAES vs KOPN Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 722.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while KOPN trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 735.85. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check KOPN's competition here
LAES vs QNC Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 603.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while QNC trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check QNC's competition here
LAES vs NVEC Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 439.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while NVEC trades at $88.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 28.91. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check NVEC's competition here
LAES vs MRAM Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 431.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while MRAM trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 73.04. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check MRAM's competition here
LAES vs XPER Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 375.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while XPER trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check XPER's competition here
LAES vs VLN-WT Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 348.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while VLN-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check VLN-WT's competition here
LAES vs TGAN Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check TGAN's competition here
LAES vs QUIK Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 277.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while QUIK trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -29.53. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check QUIK's competition here
LAES vs ASYS Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 270.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while ASYS trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 64.34. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check ASYS's competition here
LAES vs ALMU Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 249.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while ALMU trades at $16.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -146.67. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check ALMU's competition here
LAES vs VLN Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 224.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while VLN trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -12.21. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check VLN's competition here
LAES vs ATOM Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 215.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while ATOM trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check ATOM's competition here
LAES vs GSIT Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 209.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while GSIT trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -16.05. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check GSIT's competition here
LAES vs INTT Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 189.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while INTT trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 45.70. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check INTT's competition here
LAES vs MX Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while MX trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -14.36. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check MX's competition here
LAES vs OIIM Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check OIIM's competition here
LAES vs GCTS Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 140.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while GCTS trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check GCTS's competition here
LAES vs TRT Comparison July 2026
LAES plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAES stands at 399.3M. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 104.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LAES is priced at $2.73, while TRT trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAES currently has a P/E ratio of -10.03, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 185.46. In terms of profitability, LAES's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LAES is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAES.Check TRT's competition here