Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.5T. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while NVDA trades at $225.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 38.58. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check NVDA's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while TSM trades at $430.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 35.88. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check TSM's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while AVGO trades at $417.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 51.39. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AVGO's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SKHY has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while SKHY trades at $165.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas SKHY's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SKHY's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to SKHY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check SKHY's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while MU trades at $949.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check MU's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 787.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while AMD trades at $483.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 83.86. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AMD's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 712.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while ASML trades at $1,847.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 57.71. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ASML's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 527.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while INTC trades at $104.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 183.44. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check INTC's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 424.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while AMAT trades at $534.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 54.05. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AMAT's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 421.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while LRCX trades at $337.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 57.91. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check LRCX's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 297.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while ARM trades at $278.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 157.43. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ARM's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 273.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while KLAC trades at $209.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 61.04. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check KLAC's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 249.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while TXN trades at $273.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 46.82. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check TXN's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 194.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while MRVL trades at $222.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 73.33. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check MRVL's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 185.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while ADI trades at $381.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 38.66. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ADI's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 173B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while QCOM trades at $164.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check QCOM's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 87.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while ASX trades at $39.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 58.29. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ASX's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while MPWR trades at $1,362.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 72.36. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check MPWR's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 64.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while TER trades at $410.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 71.07. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check TER's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while TEL trades at $214.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check TEL's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while NXPI trades at $231.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check NXPI's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while ALAB trades at $322.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 130.15. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ALAB's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while CBRS trades at $231.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -5775.25. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CBRS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check CBRS's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while CRDO trades at $265.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 77.77. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check CRDO's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while UMC trades at $19.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check UMC's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while STM trades at $53.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 91.42. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check STM's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while MCHP trades at $77.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 47.66. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check MCHP's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while ON trades at $81.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ON's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while Q trades at $142.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 37.21. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check Q's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while GFS trades at $52.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check GFS's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while TSEM trades at $252.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 88.44. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check TSEM's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while ENTG trades at $163.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 51.03. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ENTG's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while MTSI trades at $307.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 69.00. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check MTSI's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while SITM trades at $687.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 111.32. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SITM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check SITM's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while LSCC trades at $128.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 83.40. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check LSCC's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while ONTO trades at $337.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 69.69. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ONTO's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while AMKR trades at $57.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AMKR's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while NVMI trades at $411.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 45.02. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check NVMI's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while SMTC trades at $133.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 72.60. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check SMTC's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while RMBS trades at $99.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 39.11. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check RMBS's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while SWKS trades at $69.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check SWKS's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while FORM trades at $131.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 81.28. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check FORM's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check CREE's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while QRVO trades at $98.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check QRVO's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while SIMO trades at $249.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 54.86. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check SIMO's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while ALGM trades at $44.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 81.72. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ALGM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ALGM's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while CAMT trades at $172.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 55.39. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check CAMT's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check BRKS's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while SLAB trades at $218.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 143.62. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check SLAB's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while MXL trades at $76.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 134.47. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check MXL's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while CRUS trades at $121.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check CRUS's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while ACMR trades at $81.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 54.49. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ACMR's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while KLIC trades at $95.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 35.35. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check KLIC's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while VSH trades at $33.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 114.88. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check VSH's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while DIOD trades at $97.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 52.82. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check DIOD's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while ACLS trades at $143.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 31.93. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ACLS's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while SYNA trades at $107.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check SYNA's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while UCTT trades at $92.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 61.53. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check UCTT's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while AEHR trades at $123.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 4110.00. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AEHR's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while AXTI trades at $77.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -322.71. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AXTI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AXTI's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while AMBA trades at $81.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 124.18. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AMBA's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while NVTS trades at $13.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -71.89. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check NVTS's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while IPGP trades at $83.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 86.54. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check IPGP's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while POWI trades at $62.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 51.50. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check POWI's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while VECO trades at $53.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 50.07. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check VECO's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while LASR trades at $50.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 110.50. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check LASR's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while OUST trades at $45.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -48.01. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check OUST's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while COHU trades at $58.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -325.00. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check COHU's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while HIMX trades at $14.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 71.17. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check HIMX's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while ICHR trades at $71.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 139.59. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ICHR's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while IMOS trades at $57.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 78.09. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check IMOS's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while PLAB trades at $33.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check PLAB's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while WOLF trades at $31.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check WOLF's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while SKYT trades at $32.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -811.50. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check SKYT's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while AMBQ trades at $64.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AMBQ's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while AEVA trades at $22.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -13.35. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AEVA's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while AIP trades at $27.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -98.54. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AIP's ROE of -3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AIP's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while POET trades at $8.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -20.64. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check POET's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check SGH's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 916.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while AOSL trades at $30.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -105.59. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check AOSL's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 895M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while KOPN trades at $4.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 911.32. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check KOPN's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 874.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while INDI trades at $4.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -14.79. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check INDI's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 846.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while CEVA trades at $30.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 75.93. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check CEVA's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 562.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while NVEC trades at $116.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 37.05. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check NVEC's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 405.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check VLN-WT's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 394.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while MRAM trades at $16.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -352.09. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check MRAM's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 379.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while LAES trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check LAES's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check TGAN's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 322.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while ALMU trades at $17.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -146.67. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ALMU's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 279.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while ASYS trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 43.24. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ASYS's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 259.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while GSIT trades at $6.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check GSIT's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 222.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while QUIK trades at $12.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -23.70. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check QUIK's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 210M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while VLN trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -11.41. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check VLN's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 209.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while ATOM trades at $5.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -8.34. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check ATOM's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while GCTS trades at $2.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check GCTS's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 170.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while INTT trades at $13.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 41.21. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check INTT's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 166.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while BZAI trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check BZAI's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check OIIM's competition here

Impinj, Inc. (NASDAQ: PI) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PI stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 136.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PI is priced at $178.81 on the NASDAQ, while MX trades at $3.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PI currently has a P/E ratio of 88.52, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -13.36. In terms of profitability, PI's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PI is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PI.Check MX's competition here