Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMAT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMAT | $450.06 | +0.08% | 357.3B | 42.38 | $10.62 | +0.42% |
| NVDA | $211.14 | -1.45% | 5.1T | 32.33 | $6.53 | +0.02% |
| TSM | $418.45 | -1.51% | 2.2T | 35.75 | $11.71 | +0.76% |
| AVGO | $446.77 | +4.73% | 2.1T | 87.36 | $5.12 | +0.57% |
| MU | $971.00 | +5.14% | 1.1T | 45.91 | $21.15 | +0.05% |
| AMD | $516.10 | -0.38% | 842.2B | 171.02 | $3.02 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,612.76 | +0.44% | 621.6B | 53.69 | $30.04 | +0.54% |
| INTC | $114.68 | -5.14% | 576.4B | -188.00 | -$0.61 | N/A |
| LRCX | $318.18 | +0.06% | 398.3B | 60.32 | $5.28 | +0.32% |
| ARM | $353.29 | +5.37% | 375.9B | 415.64 | $0.85 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AMAT vs NVDA Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while NVDA trades at $211.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check NVDA's competition here
AMAT vs TSM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while TSM trades at $418.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 35.75. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check TSM's competition here
AMAT vs AVGO Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while AVGO trades at $446.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 87.36. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AVGO's competition here
AMAT vs MU Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while MU trades at $971.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 45.91. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check MU's competition here
AMAT vs AMD Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 842.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while AMD trades at $516.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 171.02. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AMD's competition here
AMAT vs ASML Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 621.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while ASML trades at $1,612.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 53.69. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ASML's competition here
AMAT vs INTC Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 576.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while INTC trades at $114.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -188.00. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check INTC's competition here
AMAT vs LRCX Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 398.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while LRCX trades at $318.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 60.32. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check LRCX's competition here
AMAT vs ARM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 375.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while ARM trades at $353.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 415.64. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ARM's competition here
AMAT vs TXN Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 278.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while TXN trades at $305.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 52.26. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check TXN's competition here
AMAT vs QCOM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 264.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while QCOM trades at $251.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check QCOM's competition here
AMAT vs KLAC Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 251B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while KLAC trades at $1,921.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 55.38. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check KLAC's competition here
AMAT vs ADI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 201.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while ADI trades at $413.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 61.58. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ADI's competition here
AMAT vs MRVL Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 179.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while MRVL trades at $205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 70.45. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check MRVL's competition here
AMAT vs ASX Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while ASX trades at $38.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 59.02. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ASX's competition here
AMAT vs NXPI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while NXPI trades at $321.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check NXPI's competition here
AMAT vs MPWR Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while MPWR trades at $1,566.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 111.47. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check MPWR's competition here
AMAT vs STM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 61.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while STM trades at $69.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 433.25. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check STM's competition here
AMAT vs ALAB Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while ALAB trades at $342.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 233.20. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ALAB's competition here
AMAT vs TER Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while TER trades at $374.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 69.75. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check TER's competition here
AMAT vs UMC Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while UMC trades at $22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check UMC's competition here
AMAT vs CBRS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while CBRS trades at $236.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 578.02. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check CBRS's competition here
AMAT vs MCHP Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while MCHP trades at $94.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 430.23. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check MCHP's competition here
AMAT vs ON Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while ON trades at $120.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 88.69. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ON's competition here
AMAT vs GFS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while GFS trades at $79.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 45.44. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check GFS's competition here
AMAT vs Q Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while Q trades at $156.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 50.14. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check Q's competition here
AMAT vs TSEM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while TSEM trades at $255.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 117.62. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check TSEM's competition here
AMAT vs MTSI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while MTSI trades at $364.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 155.17. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check MTSI's competition here
AMAT vs ENTG Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while ENTG trades at $138.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 80.23. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ENTG's competition here
AMAT vs LSCC Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while LSCC trades at $147.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 980.53. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check LSCC's competition here
AMAT vs SITM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while SITM trades at $710.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -755.53. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check SITM's competition here
AMAT vs AMKR Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while AMKR trades at $69.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 39.98. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AMKR's competition here
AMAT vs NVMI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while NVMI trades at $502.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 62.87. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check NVMI's competition here
AMAT vs RMBS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while RMBS trades at $145.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 68.94. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check RMBS's competition here
AMAT vs SMTC Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while SMTC trades at $152.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -363.19. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check SMTC's competition here
AMAT vs ONTO Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while ONTO trades at $258.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 120.80. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ONTO's competition here
AMAT vs AAOI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while AAOI trades at $158.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -247.52. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AAOI's competition here
AMAT vs SWKS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while SWKS trades at $77.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 32.44. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check SWKS's competition here
AMAT vs CREE Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check CREE's competition here
AMAT vs FORM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while FORM trades at $124.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 146.55. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check FORM's competition here
AMAT vs SIMO Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while SIMO trades at $276.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 54.93. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check SIMO's competition here
AMAT vs QRVO Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while QRVO trades at $103.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 29.79. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check QRVO's competition here
AMAT vs ALGM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while ALGM trades at $47.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -598.37. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ALGM's competition here
AMAT vs CRUS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while CRUS trades at $169.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check CRUS's competition here
AMAT vs MXL Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while MXL trades at $92.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -61.14. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check MXL's competition here
AMAT vs CAMT Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while CAMT trades at $171.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 175.16. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check CAMT's competition here
AMAT vs BRKS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check BRKS's competition here
AMAT vs SLAB Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while SLAB trades at $217.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -142.22. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check SLAB's competition here
AMAT vs VSH Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while VSH trades at $52.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 5206.00. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check VSH's competition here
AMAT vs NVTS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while NVTS trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -46.67. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check NVTS's competition here
AMAT vs ACMR Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while ACMR trades at $86.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 66.08. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ACMR's competition here
AMAT vs KLIC Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while KLIC trades at $101.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 98.92. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check KLIC's competition here
AMAT vs SYNA Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while SYNA trades at $137.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -109.82. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check SYNA's competition here
AMAT vs IPGP Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while IPGP trades at $114.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 168.41. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check IPGP's competition here
AMAT vs DIOD Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while DIOD trades at $105.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 56.93. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check DIOD's competition here
AMAT vs AXTI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while AXTI trades at $103.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -322.37. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AXTI's competition here
AMAT vs POWI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while POWI trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check POWI's competition here
AMAT vs ACLS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while ACLS trades at $150.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 46.71. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ACLS's competition here
AMAT vs PI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while PI trades at $151.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -169.66. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check PI's competition here
AMAT vs LASR Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while LASR trades at $74.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -247.07. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check LASR's competition here
AMAT vs UCTT Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while UCTT trades at $85.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -19.95. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check UCTT's competition here
AMAT vs HIMX Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while HIMX trades at $20.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 108.26. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check HIMX's competition here
AMAT vs VECO Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while VECO trades at $57.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 151.68. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check VECO's competition here
AMAT vs AMBA Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while AMBA trades at $72.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -44.83. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AMBA's competition here
AMAT vs AEHR Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while AEHR trades at $92.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -242.97. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AEHR's competition here
AMAT vs WOLF Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while WOLF trades at $59.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check WOLF's competition here
AMAT vs COHU Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while COHU trades at $52.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -44.33. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check COHU's competition here
AMAT vs ICHR Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while ICHR trades at $71.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -48.32. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ICHR's competition here
AMAT vs IMOS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while IMOS trades at $70.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 87.83. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check IMOS's competition here
AMAT vs SKYT Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while SKYT trades at $38.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check SKYT's competition here
AMAT vs PLAB Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while PLAB trades at $32.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check PLAB's competition here
AMAT vs AMBQ Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while AMBQ trades at $79.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AMBQ's competition here
AMAT vs AIP Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while AIP trades at $35.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -45.51. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AIP's competition here
AMAT vs POET Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while POET trades at $12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -14.63. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check POET's competition here
AMAT vs AOSL Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while AOSL trades at $45.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AOSL's competition here
AMAT vs CEVA Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while CEVA trades at $39.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -86.91. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check CEVA's competition here
AMAT vs SGH Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check SGH's competition here
AMAT vs INDI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while INDI trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -6.57. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check INDI's competition here
AMAT vs QNC Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 713M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while QNC trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check QNC's competition here
AMAT vs MRAM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 618.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while MRAM trades at $26.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 2638.00. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check MRAM's competition here
AMAT vs LAES Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 496.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while LAES trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check LAES's competition here
AMAT vs NVEC Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 473.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while NVEC trades at $97.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 31.19. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check NVEC's competition here
AMAT vs XPER Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 383.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while XPER trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -8.02. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check XPER's competition here
AMAT vs VLN Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 370.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while VLN trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -10.35. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check VLN's competition here
AMAT vs QUIK Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 367.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while QUIK trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -28.01. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check QUIK's competition here
AMAT vs ATOM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 324.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while ATOM trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -15.35. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ATOM's competition here
AMAT vs TGAN Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check TGAN's competition here
AMAT vs MX Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 319.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while MX trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -21.39. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check MX's competition here
AMAT vs ASYS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 308.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while ASYS trades at $21.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 118.17. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ASYS's competition here
AMAT vs ALMU Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 305.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while ALMU trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -61.66. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ALMU's competition here
AMAT vs GSIT Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 289.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while GSIT trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check GSIT's competition here
AMAT vs INTT Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 212M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while INTT trades at $16.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 421.88. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check INTT's competition here
AMAT vs BZAI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 196.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while BZAI trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check BZAI's competition here
AMAT vs GCTS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 194.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while GCTS trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check GCTS's competition here
AMAT vs NA Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 179.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while NA trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check NA's competition here
AMAT vs OIIM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check OIIM's competition here
AMAT vs ARBE Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while ARBE trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ARBE's competition here
AMAT vs TRT Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 127.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while TRT trades at $12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 315.50. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check TRT's competition here
AMAT vs IDBA Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 357.3B. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $450.06, while IDBA trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.38, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check IDBA's competition here