Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMAT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMAT | $585.88 | -8.48% | 465.2B | 55.12 | $10.63 | +0.33% |
| NVDA | $200.04 | -4.13% | 4.8T | 30.63 | $6.53 | +0.14% |
| TSM | $436.39 | -6.69% | 2.3T | 37.48 | $11.65 | +0.80% |
| AVGO | $380.15 | -3.06% | 1.8T | 63.25 | $6.01 | +0.67% |
| MU | $1,051.77 | -13.18% | 1.2T | 49.61 | $21.20 | +0.05% |
| AMD | $519.85 | -5.76% | 847.7B | 174.45 | $2.98 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,778.46 | -7.82% | 685.5B | 59.86 | $29.71 | +0.50% |
| INTC | $132.28 | -6.14% | 664.8B | -216.85 | -$0.61 | N/A |
| LRCX | $371.33 | -9.33% | 464.4B | 70.33 | $5.28 | +0.28% |
| ARM | $366.39 | -10.14% | 389.8B | 441.43 | $0.83 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AMAT vs NVDA Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.8T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while NVDA trades at $200.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check NVDA's competition here
AMAT vs TSM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while TSM trades at $436.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check TSM's competition here
AMAT vs AVGO Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while AVGO trades at $380.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 63.25. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AVGO's competition here
AMAT vs MU Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while MU trades at $1,051.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 49.61. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check MU's competition here
AMAT vs AMD Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 847.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while AMD trades at $519.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 174.45. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AMD's competition here
AMAT vs ASML Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 685.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while ASML trades at $1,778.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 59.86. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ASML's competition here
AMAT vs INTC Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 664.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while INTC trades at $132.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -216.85. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check INTC's competition here
AMAT vs LRCX Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 464.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while LRCX trades at $371.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 70.33. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check LRCX's competition here
AMAT vs ARM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 389.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while ARM trades at $366.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 441.43. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ARM's competition here
AMAT vs KLAC Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 319.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while KLAC trades at $244.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 69.26. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check KLAC's competition here
AMAT vs TXN Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 277.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while TXN trades at $304.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 52.04. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check TXN's competition here
AMAT vs MRVL Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 244.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while MRVL trades at $279.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 95.56. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check MRVL's competition here
AMAT vs QCOM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 215.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while QCOM trades at $204.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check QCOM's competition here
AMAT vs ADI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 198.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while ADI trades at $407.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 60.55. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ADI's competition here
AMAT vs ASX Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 87.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while ASX trades at $39.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 62.16. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ASX's competition here
AMAT vs NXPI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while NXPI trades at $299.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check NXPI's competition here
AMAT vs MPWR Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while MPWR trades at $1,423.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 101.77. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check MPWR's competition here
AMAT vs ALAB Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while ALAB trades at $397.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 266.46. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ALAB's competition here
AMAT vs TER Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 65.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while TER trades at $420.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check TER's competition here
AMAT vs UMC Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 65.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while UMC trades at $26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 42.34. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check UMC's competition here
AMAT vs STM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while STM trades at $72.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 453.50. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check STM's competition here
AMAT vs MCHP Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while MCHP trades at $93.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 423.91. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check MCHP's competition here
AMAT vs CBRS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while CBRS trades at $226.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -1600.10. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check CBRS's competition here
AMAT vs ON Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while ON trades at $117.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 86.64. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ON's competition here
AMAT vs GFS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while GFS trades at $83.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 47.38. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check GFS's competition here
AMAT vs Q Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while Q trades at $161.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 51.85. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check Q's competition here
AMAT vs TSEM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while TSEM trades at $282.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 131.47. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check TSEM's competition here
AMAT vs MTSI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while MTSI trades at $372.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 158.36. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check MTSI's competition here
AMAT vs ENTG Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while ENTG trades at $168.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 97.24. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ENTG's competition here
AMAT vs AMKR Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while AMKR trades at $86.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 49.84. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AMKR's competition here
AMAT vs LSCC Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while LSCC trades at $144.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 1032.89. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check LSCC's competition here
AMAT vs SITM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while SITM trades at $706.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -744.11. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check SITM's competition here
AMAT vs NVMI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while NVMI trades at $527.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 66.07. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check NVMI's competition here
AMAT vs ONTO Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while ONTO trades at $315.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 146.31. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ONTO's competition here
AMAT vs SMTC Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while SMTC trades at $163.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -408.20. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check SMTC's competition here
AMAT vs RMBS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while RMBS trades at $128.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 60.76. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check RMBS's competition here
AMAT vs AAOI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while AAOI trades at $147.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -226.83. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AAOI's competition here
AMAT vs FORM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while FORM trades at $142.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 164.13. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check FORM's competition here
AMAT vs SWKS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while SWKS trades at $73.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 30.60. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check SWKS's competition here
AMAT vs SIMO Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while SIMO trades at $319.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 63.17. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check SIMO's competition here
AMAT vs ALGM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while ALGM trades at $55.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -694.00. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ALGM's competition here
AMAT vs CREE Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check CREE's competition here
AMAT vs QRVO Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while QRVO trades at $99.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check QRVO's competition here
AMAT vs VSH Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while VSH trades at $58.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 5903.00. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check VSH's competition here
AMAT vs MXL Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while MXL trades at $89.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -58.61. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check MXL's competition here
AMAT vs CRUS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while CRUS trades at $157.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check CRUS's competition here
AMAT vs BRKS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check BRKS's competition here
AMAT vs CAMT Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while CAMT trades at $169.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 172.85. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check CAMT's competition here
AMAT vs SLAB Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while SLAB trades at $218.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -143.89. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check SLAB's competition here
AMAT vs KLIC Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while KLIC trades at $127.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 122.21. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check KLIC's competition here
AMAT vs ACMR Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while ACMR trades at $99.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 75.63. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ACMR's competition here
AMAT vs ACLS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while ACLS trades at $171.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 53.12. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ACLS's competition here
AMAT vs NVTS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while NVTS trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -33.90. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check NVTS's competition here
AMAT vs SYNA Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while SYNA trades at $134.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -107.53. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check SYNA's competition here
AMAT vs DIOD Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while DIOD trades at $112.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 60.58. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check DIOD's competition here
AMAT vs UCTT Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while UCTT trades at $111.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 103.36. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check UCTT's competition here
AMAT vs IPGP Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while IPGP trades at $107.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 156.01. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check IPGP's competition here
AMAT vs VECO Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while VECO trades at $74.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 196.95. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check VECO's competition here
AMAT vs POWI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while POWI trades at $80.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 268.57. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check POWI's competition here
AMAT vs PI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while PI trades at $125.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -139.13. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check PI's competition here
AMAT vs LASR Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while LASR trades at $66.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -221.47. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check LASR's competition here
AMAT vs AXTI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while AXTI trades at $77.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -243.47. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AXTI's competition here
AMAT vs AEHR Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while AEHR trades at $102.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -269.45. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AEHR's competition here
AMAT vs ICHR Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while ICHR trades at $92.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -62.30. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ICHR's competition here
AMAT vs COHU Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while COHU trades at $64.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -54.09. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check COHU's competition here
AMAT vs HIMX Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while HIMX trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 88.29. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check HIMX's competition here
AMAT vs AMBA Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while AMBA trades at $65.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -40.69. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AMBA's competition here
AMAT vs WOLF Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while WOLF trades at $48.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check WOLF's competition here
AMAT vs IMOS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while IMOS trades at $65.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 82.71. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check IMOS's competition here
AMAT vs AIP Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while AIP trades at $41.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -52.18. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AIP's competition here
AMAT vs PLAB Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while PLAB trades at $31.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check PLAB's competition here
AMAT vs SKYT Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while SKYT trades at $36.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check SKYT's competition here
AMAT vs AMBQ Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while AMBQ trades at $79.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AMBQ's competition here
AMAT vs POET Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while POET trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -12.77. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check POET's competition here
AMAT vs AOSL Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while AOSL trades at $45.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -12.52. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check AOSL's competition here
AMAT vs CEVA Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while CEVA trades at $45.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -98.87. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check CEVA's competition here
AMAT vs SGH Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check SGH's competition here
AMAT vs INDI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 783.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while INDI trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check INDI's competition here
AMAT vs QNC Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 693.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while QNC trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check QNC's competition here
AMAT vs MRAM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 528.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while MRAM trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 2255.00. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check MRAM's competition here
AMAT vs LAES Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 476.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while LAES trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check LAES's competition here
AMAT vs NVEC Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 466.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while NVEC trades at $96.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check NVEC's competition here
AMAT vs VLN-WT Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 395.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check VLN-WT's competition here
AMAT vs XPER Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 388.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while XPER trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check XPER's competition here
AMAT vs QUIK Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 353.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while QUIK trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -26.58. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check QUIK's competition here
AMAT vs TGAN Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check TGAN's competition here
AMAT vs ALMU Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while ALMU trades at $21.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -62.40. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ALMU's competition here
AMAT vs ASYS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 294.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while ASYS trades at $20.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 112.94. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ASYS's competition here
AMAT vs ATOM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while ATOM trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -11.58. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check ATOM's competition here
AMAT vs VLN Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 227.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while VLN trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check VLN's competition here
AMAT vs INTT Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 221.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while INTT trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 441.00. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check INTT's competition here
AMAT vs GSIT Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 218.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while GSIT trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -16.36. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check GSIT's competition here
AMAT vs MX Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 189.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while MX trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -12.71. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check MX's competition here
AMAT vs BZAI Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 165.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while BZAI trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check BZAI's competition here
AMAT vs GCTS Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 163.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while GCTS trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check GCTS's competition here
AMAT vs BZAIW Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, BZAIW has a market cap of 157.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while BZAIW trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas BZAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BZAIW's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to BZAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check BZAIW's competition here
AMAT vs OIIM Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check OIIM's competition here
AMAT vs TRT Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 135.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while TRT trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 334.00. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check TRT's competition here
AMAT vs IDBA Comparison June 2026
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 465.2B. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $585.88, while IDBA trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 55.12, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.40%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.Check IDBA's competition here