MagnaChip Semiconductor (MX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MX | $3.92 | -2.61% | 138.3M | -13.54 | -$0.28 | N/A |
| NVDA | $212.12 | +0.55% | 4.9T | 34.85 | $5.84 | +0.14% |
| TSM | $423.87 | -2.36% | 2.2T | 35.13 | $12.00 | +0.83% |
| AVGO | $393.88 | -1.52% | 1.8T | 47.24 | $8.13 | +0.66% |
| MU | $982.80 | +0.36% | 1.1T | 20.77 | $45.12 | +0.06% |
| AMD | $554.64 | -0.58% | 871.4B | 116.68 | $4.58 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,789.87 | -0.41% | 665.2B | 57.21 | $30.17 | +0.51% |
| INTC | $108.67 | -1.07% | 518.3B | 180.91 | $0.57 | N/A |
| AMAT | $597.62 | -0.81% | 456.8B | 58.18 | $9.89 | +0.33% |
| LRCX | $348.39 | -0.56% | 412.6B | 61.90 | $5.33 | +0.32% |
Stock Comparison
MX vs NVDA Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.9T. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while NVDA trades at $212.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check NVDA's competition here
MX vs TSM Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while TSM trades at $423.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 35.13. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check TSM's competition here
MX vs AVGO Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while AVGO trades at $393.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 47.24. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AVGO's competition here
MX vs MU Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while MU trades at $982.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check MU's competition here
MX vs AMD Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 871.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while AMD trades at $554.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 116.68. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AMD's competition here
MX vs ASML Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 665.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while ASML trades at $1,789.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 57.21. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ASML's competition here
MX vs INTC Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 518.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while INTC trades at $108.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 180.91. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check INTC's competition here
MX vs AMAT Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 456.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while AMAT trades at $597.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 58.18. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AMAT's competition here
MX vs LRCX Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 412.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while LRCX trades at $348.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 61.90. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check LRCX's competition here
MX vs ARM Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 318.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while ARM trades at $284.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 168.92. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ARM's competition here
MX vs KLAC Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 290.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while KLAC trades at $232.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check KLAC's competition here
MX vs TXN Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 271.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while TXN trades at $306.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check TXN's competition here
MX vs QCOM Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 193.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while QCOM trades at $180.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check QCOM's competition here
MX vs MRVL Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 190.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while MRVL trades at $223.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 71.79. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check MRVL's competition here
MX vs ADI Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 188B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while ADI trades at $395.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 39.15. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ADI's competition here
MX vs ASX Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while ASX trades at $40.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 59.59. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ASX's competition here
MX vs NXPI Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 70.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while NXPI trades at $286.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check NXPI's competition here
MX vs MPWR Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while MPWR trades at $1,394.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 68.58. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check MPWR's competition here
MX vs ALAB Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while ALAB trades at $369.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 170.78. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ALAB's competition here
MX vs STM Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while STM trades at $70.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 116.05. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check STM's competition here
MX vs UMC Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while UMC trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 36.08. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check UMC's competition here
MX vs TEL Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while TEL trades at $201.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check TEL's competition here
MX vs TER Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while TER trades at $355.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 59.02. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check TER's competition here
MX vs CBRS Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while CBRS trades at $195.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -5115.50. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check CBRS's competition here
MX vs MCHP Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while MCHP trades at $87.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 51.67. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check MCHP's competition here
MX vs ON Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while ON trades at $94.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ON's competition here
MX vs GFS Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while GFS trades at $63.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 35.92. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check GFS's competition here
MX vs Q Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while Q trades at $142.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 43.13. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check Q's competition here
MX vs TSEM Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while TSEM trades at $260.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 92.61. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check TSEM's competition here
MX vs MTSI Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while MTSI trades at $303.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 74.49. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check MTSI's competition here
MX vs ENTG Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while ENTG trades at $141.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 46.35. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ENTG's competition here
MX vs LSCC Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while LSCC trades at $134.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 104.59. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check LSCC's competition here
MX vs AMKR Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while AMKR trades at $69.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 37.75. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AMKR's competition here
MX vs SITM Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while SITM trades at $622.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 139.80. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check SITM's competition here
MX vs ONTO Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while ONTO trades at $320.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 62.80. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ONTO's competition here
MX vs NVMI Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while NVMI trades at $479.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 51.20. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check NVMI's competition here
MX vs SMTC Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while SMTC trades at $140.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 71.82. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check SMTC's competition here
MX vs RMBS Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while RMBS trades at $106.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 40.59. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check RMBS's competition here
MX vs SIMO Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while SIMO trades at $313.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 66.12. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check SIMO's competition here
MX vs CREE Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check CREE's competition here
MX vs ALGM Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while ALGM trades at $52.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 94.18. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ALGM's competition here
MX vs AAOI Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while AAOI trades at $124.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -339.03. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AAOI's competition here
MX vs SWKS Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while SWKS trades at $57.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check SWKS's competition here
MX vs FORM Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while FORM trades at $116.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 68.09. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check FORM's competition here
MX vs MXL Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while MXL trades at $92.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 156.67. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check MXL's competition here
MX vs BRKS Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check BRKS's competition here
MX vs QRVO Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while QRVO trades at $84.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check QRVO's competition here
MX vs CRUS Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while CRUS trades at $137.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check CRUS's competition here
MX vs SLAB Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while SLAB trades at $218.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 143.91. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check SLAB's competition here
MX vs CAMT Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while CAMT trades at $148.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 43.84. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check CAMT's competition here
MX vs ACMR Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while ACMR trades at $98.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 63.14. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ACMR's competition here
MX vs VSH Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while VSH trades at $41.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 1398.00. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check VSH's competition here
MX vs KLIC Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while KLIC trades at $110.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 67.40. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check KLIC's competition here
MX vs SYNA Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while SYNA trades at $123.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check SYNA's competition here
MX vs PI Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while PI trades at $146.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 72.29. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check PI's competition here
MX vs IPGP Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while IPGP trades at $106.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 74.81. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check IPGP's competition here
MX vs UCTT Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while UCTT trades at $103.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 90.97. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check UCTT's competition here
MX vs DIOD Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while DIOD trades at $94.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 63.21. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check DIOD's competition here
MX vs ACLS Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while ACLS trades at $142.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 30.01. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ACLS's competition here
MX vs LASR Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while LASR trades at $70.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 143.31. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check LASR's competition here
MX vs POWI Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while POWI trades at $71.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 58.35. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check POWI's competition here
MX vs VECO Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while VECO trades at $58.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 50.69. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check VECO's competition here
MX vs AMBA Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while AMBA trades at $73.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 109.09. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AMBA's competition here
MX vs ICHR Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while ICHR trades at $95.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 452.05. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ICHR's competition here
MX vs NVTS Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while NVTS trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -67.74. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check NVTS's competition here
MX vs OUST Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while OUST trades at $42.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -42.59. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check OUST's competition here
MX vs COHU Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while COHU trades at $55.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -293.39. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check COHU's competition here
MX vs HIMX Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while HIMX trades at $14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 71.35. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check HIMX's competition here
MX vs IMOS Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while IMOS trades at $64.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 93.43. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check IMOS's competition here
MX vs AXTI Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while AXTI trades at $57.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -210.25. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AXTI's competition here
MX vs AEHR Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while AEHR trades at $71.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -755.78. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AEHR's competition here
MX vs AMBQ Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while AMBQ trades at $84.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -4.08. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AMBQ's competition here
MX vs WOLF Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while WOLF trades at $34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check WOLF's competition here
MX vs PLAB Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while PLAB trades at $29.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check PLAB's competition here
MX vs SKYT Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while SKYT trades at $32.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -795.25. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check SKYT's competition here
MX vs AIP Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while AIP trades at $33.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -117.11. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AIP's competition here
MX vs CEVA Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while CEVA trades at $43.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 106.78. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check CEVA's competition here
MX vs SGH Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check SGH's competition here
MX vs POET Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while POET trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -18.53. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check POET's competition here
MX vs AOSL Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while AOSL trades at $34.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -119.62. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AOSL's competition here
MX vs INDI Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 870.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while INDI trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -14.71. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check INDI's competition here
MX vs KOPN Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 672.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while KOPN trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 684.91. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check KOPN's competition here
MX vs QNC Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 536.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while QNC trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check QNC's competition here
MX vs NVEC Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 427.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while NVEC trades at $91.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check NVEC's competition here
MX vs MRAM Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 397M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while MRAM trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 67.13. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check MRAM's competition here
MX vs LAES Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while LAES trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check LAES's competition here
MX vs XPER Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 377.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while XPER trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check XPER's competition here
MX vs TGAN Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check TGAN's competition here
MX vs ASYS Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 261.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while ASYS trades at $18.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 62.10. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ASYS's competition here
MX vs QUIK Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 259.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while QUIK trades at $14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -27.62. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check QUIK's competition here
MX vs ALMU Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 229.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while ALMU trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -135.17. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ALMU's competition here
MX vs VLN Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 214.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while VLN trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -11.68. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check VLN's competition here
MX vs ATOM Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 203.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while ATOM trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ATOM's competition here
MX vs GSIT Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 193M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while GSIT trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -14.78. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check GSIT's competition here
MX vs INTT Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 181.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while INTT trades at $14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 43.82. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check INTT's competition here
MX vs OIIM Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check OIIM's competition here
MX vs GCTS Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 134.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while GCTS trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check GCTS's competition here
MX vs VLN-WT Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 126.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check VLN-WT's competition here
MX vs TRT Comparison July 2026
MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 138.3M. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $3.92, while TRT trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MX currently has a P/E ratio of -13.54, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 173.97. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check TRT's competition here