Xperi Inc. (XPER) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while NVDA trades at $215.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check NVDA's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while TSM trades at $440.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 38.11. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check TSM's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while AVGO trades at $487.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 93.69. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check AVGO's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while MU trades at $1,073.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 50.26. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check MU's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 850.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while AMD trades at $537.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 174.43. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check AMD's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 657.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while ASML trades at $1,734.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 56.85. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check ASML's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 542.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while INTC trades at $111.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -179.77. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check INTC's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 428.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while ARM trades at $412.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 473.78. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check ARM's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 418.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while LRCX trades at $343.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 63.34. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check LRCX's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 388.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while AMAT trades at $499.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 46.12. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check AMAT's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 280.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while TXN trades at $309.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 52.76. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check TXN's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 267.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while KLAC trades at $2,128.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 57.92. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check KLAC's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 254.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while MRVL trades at $302.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 99.93. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check MRVL's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 253.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while QCOM trades at $249.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check QCOM's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 206.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while ADI trades at $437.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 63.16. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check ADI's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 86.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while ASX trades at $39.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 60.41. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check ASX's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while NXPI trades at $320.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check NXPI's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while MPWR trades at $1,674.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 116.57. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check MPWR's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while STM trades at $80.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 496.88. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check STM's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while TER trades at $404.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 72.80. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check TER's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while ALAB trades at $359.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 242.01. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check ALAB's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while UMC trades at $21.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 35.62. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check UMC's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while MCHP trades at $96.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 440.73. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check MCHP's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while CBRS trades at $215.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 550.05. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check CBRS's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while ON trades at $132.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 94.59. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check ON's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while GFS trades at $86.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 53.89. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check GFS's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while Q trades at $155.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 50.23. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check Q's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while TSEM trades at $266.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 126.59. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check TSEM's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while MTSI trades at $388.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 164.10. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check MTSI's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while ENTG trades at $140.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 82.61. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check ENTG's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while LSCC trades at $154.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 1009.00. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check LSCC's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while AMKR trades at $75.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 42.95. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check AMKR's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while SITM trades at $711.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -762.04. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check SITM's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while RMBS trades at $168.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 79.80. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check RMBS's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while NVMI trades at $529.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 65.47. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check NVMI's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while AAOI trades at $183.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -311.34. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check AAOI's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while SMTC trades at $162.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -406.41. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check SMTC's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while ONTO trades at $280.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 129.85. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check ONTO's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while SWKS trades at $81.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 32.97. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check SWKS's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while SIMO trades at $306.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 59.78. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check SIMO's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check CREE's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while FORM trades at $125.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 143.80. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check FORM's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while ALGM trades at $53.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -629.12. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check ALGM's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while QRVO trades at $105.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check QRVO's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while CRUS trades at $178.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check CRUS's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while CAMT trades at $184.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 191.06. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check CAMT's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while VSH trades at $63.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 6248.00. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check VSH's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while MXL trades at $91.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -58.39. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check MXL's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check BRKS's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while SLAB trades at $218.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -143.91. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check SLAB's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while NVTS trades at $30.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -41.05. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check NVTS's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while ACMR trades at $89.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 70.18. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check ACMR's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while KLIC trades at $107.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 105.20. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check KLIC's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while SYNA trades at $144.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -116.83. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check SYNA's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while DIOD trades at $117.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 61.69. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check DIOD's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while IPGP trades at $123.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 179.35. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check IPGP's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while AXTI trades at $105.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -346.66. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check AXTI's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while ACLS trades at $158.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 49.31. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check ACLS's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while POWI trades at $85.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 280.63. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check POWI's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while PI trades at $136.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -159.18. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check PI's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while LASR trades at $76.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -254.53. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check LASR's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while HIMX trades at $23.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 126.21. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check HIMX's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while UCTT trades at $91.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -21.03. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check UCTT's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while VECO trades at $60.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 160.61. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check VECO's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while AEHR trades at $115.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -297.37. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check AEHR's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while AMBA trades at $73.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -48.68. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check AMBA's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while WOLF trades at $64.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check WOLF's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while COHU trades at $56.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -48.39. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check COHU's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while ICHR trades at $72.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -50.64. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check ICHR's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while IMOS trades at $62.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 80.79. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check IMOS's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while SKYT trades at $38.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check SKYT's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while PLAB trades at $32.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check PLAB's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while POET trades at $15.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -16.43. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check POET's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while AMBQ trades at $84.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check AMBQ's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while AIP trades at $37.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -48.03. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check AIP's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while AOSL trades at $52.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -14.82. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check AOSL's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while CEVA trades at $49.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -107.85. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check CEVA's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check SGH's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while INDI trades at $4.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check INDI's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 753.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while QNC trades at $3.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check QNC's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 706M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while MRAM trades at $28.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 3011.00. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check MRAM's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 543.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while NVEC trades at $109.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check NVEC's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 529M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while LAES trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -15.46. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check LAES's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 386.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while QUIK trades at $22.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check QUIK's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 376.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while ALMU trades at $26.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -75.89. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check ALMU's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 346.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while VLN trades at $3.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check VLN's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check TGAN's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 320.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while ATOM trades at $8.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -15.15. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check ATOM's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 318.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while ASYS trades at $21.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 121.94. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check ASYS's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while GSIT trades at $9.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -24.88. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check GSIT's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 303.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while MX trades at $8.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -20.34. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check MX's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while BZAI trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check BZAI's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 214.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while INTT trades at $16.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 426.50. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check INTT's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while GCTS trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check GCTS's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 171M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while NA trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas NA's P/E ratio is 2.51. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check NA's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check OIIM's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 138.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while ARBE trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check ARBE's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 126.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while TRT trades at $12.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 313.75. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check TRT's competition here

XPER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, XPER stands at 385.9M. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XPER is priced at $7.43, while IDBA trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

XPER currently has a P/E ratio of -8.08, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, XPER's ROE is -0.10%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, XPER is less volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XPER.Check IDBA's competition here