IDEX Biometrics ASA (IDBA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IDBA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDBA | $4.88 | +1.67% | 90.8M | -2.01 | -$2.43 | N/A |
| NVDA | $202.81 | -2.21% | 4.9T | 34.73 | $5.84 | +0.14% |
| TSM | $398.37 | -2.77% | 2.1T | 33.19 | $12.00 | +0.88% |
| AVGO | $370.83 | -0.97% | 1.8T | 45.61 | $8.13 | +0.69% |
| MU | $848.95 | -0.50% | 958.8B | 18.82 | $45.12 | +0.06% |
| AMD | $495.76 | -1.03% | 808.4B | 108.24 | $4.58 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,747.58 | -2.09% | 673.5B | 54.58 | $32.02 | +0.50% |
| INTC | $95.04 | -7.72% | 487.4B | 170.14 | $0.57 | N/A |
| AMAT | $529.66 | -5.57% | 420.5B | 53.56 | $9.89 | +0.36% |
| LRCX | $313.30 | -2.39% | 391.8B | 58.78 | $5.33 | +0.33% |
Stock Comparison
IDBA vs NVDA Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.9T. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while NVDA trades at $202.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 34.73. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check NVDA's competition here
IDBA vs TSM Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while TSM trades at $398.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 33.19. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check TSM's competition here
IDBA vs AVGO Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while AVGO trades at $370.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 45.61. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check AVGO's competition here
IDBA vs MU Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 958.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while MU trades at $848.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check MU's competition here
IDBA vs AMD Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 808.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while AMD trades at $495.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 108.24. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check AMD's competition here
IDBA vs ASML Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 673.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while ASML trades at $1,747.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 54.58. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check ASML's competition here
IDBA vs INTC Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 487.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while INTC trades at $95.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 170.14. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check INTC's competition here
IDBA vs AMAT Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 420.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while AMAT trades at $529.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 53.56. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check AMAT's competition here
IDBA vs LRCX Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 391.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while LRCX trades at $313.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 58.78. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check LRCX's competition here
IDBA vs ARM Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 284.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while ARM trades at $267.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 150.95. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check ARM's competition here
IDBA vs KLAC Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 277.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while KLAC trades at $212.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check KLAC's competition here
IDBA vs TXN Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 258.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while TXN trades at $284.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 48.63. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check TXN's competition here
IDBA vs ADI Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 182.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while ADI trades at $375.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 38.07. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check ADI's competition here
IDBA vs QCOM Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 181.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while QCOM trades at $171.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check QCOM's competition here
IDBA vs MRVL Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 165.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while MRVL trades at $188.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 62.27. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check MRVL's competition here
IDBA vs ASX Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while ASX trades at $38.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 56.43. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check ASX's competition here
IDBA vs NXPI Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while NXPI trades at $266.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check NXPI's competition here
IDBA vs MPWR Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while MPWR trades at $1,312.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 69.68. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check MPWR's competition here
IDBA vs TEL Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while TEL trades at $203.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check TEL's competition here
IDBA vs STM Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while STM trades at $62.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 105.19. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check STM's competition here
IDBA vs UMC Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while UMC trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 32.71. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check UMC's competition here
IDBA vs ALAB Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while ALAB trades at $303.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 143.22. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check ALAB's competition here
IDBA vs TER Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while TER trades at $322.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 55.77. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check TER's competition here
IDBA vs MCHP Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while MCHP trades at $80.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 49.67. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check MCHP's competition here
IDBA vs CBRS Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while CBRS trades at $172.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -4321.50. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check CBRS's competition here
IDBA vs CRDO Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while CRDO trades at $202.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 59.26. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check CRDO's competition here
IDBA vs ON Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while ON trades at $87.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 35.82. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check ON's competition here
IDBA vs GFS Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while GFS trades at $57.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 32.29. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check GFS's competition here
IDBA vs Q Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while Q trades at $136.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 41.72. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check Q's competition here
IDBA vs TSEM Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while TSEM trades at $234.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 94.40. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check TSEM's competition here
IDBA vs ENTG Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while ENTG trades at $138.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 47.19. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check ENTG's competition here
IDBA vs MTSI Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while MTSI trades at $267.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 67.69. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check MTSI's competition here
IDBA vs LSCC Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while LSCC trades at $125.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 100.18. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check LSCC's competition here
IDBA vs AMKR Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while AMKR trades at $62.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 35.97. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check AMKR's competition here
IDBA vs SITM Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while SITM trades at $554.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 128.76. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check SITM's competition here
IDBA vs ONTO Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while ONTO trades at $279.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 57.69. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check ONTO's competition here
IDBA vs NVMI Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while NVMI trades at $437.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 49.54. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check NVMI's competition here
IDBA vs SMTC Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while SMTC trades at $124.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 67.91. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check SMTC's competition here
IDBA vs RMBS Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while RMBS trades at $101.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 39.94. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check RMBS's competition here
IDBA vs CREE Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check CREE's competition here
IDBA vs SWKS Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while SWKS trades at $59.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check SWKS's competition here
IDBA vs SIMO Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while SIMO trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 58.35. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check SIMO's competition here
IDBA vs ALGM Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while ALGM trades at $46.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 86.07. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check ALGM's competition here
IDBA vs FORM Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while FORM trades at $105.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 65.17. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check FORM's competition here
IDBA vs BRKS Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check BRKS's competition here
IDBA vs QRVO Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while QRVO trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check QRVO's competition here
IDBA vs SLAB Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while SLAB trades at $217.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 143.07. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check SLAB's competition here
IDBA vs CRUS Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while CRUS trades at $137.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check CRUS's competition here
IDBA vs CAMT Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while CAMT trades at $146.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 46.84. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check CAMT's competition here
IDBA vs MXL Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while MXL trades at $71.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 126.04. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check MXL's competition here
IDBA vs ACMR Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while ACMR trades at $83.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 56.32. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check ACMR's competition here
IDBA vs VSH Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while VSH trades at $37.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 1260.00. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check VSH's competition here
IDBA vs KLIC Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while KLIC trades at $97.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 61.53. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check KLIC's competition here
IDBA vs SYNA Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while SYNA trades at $114.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check SYNA's competition here
IDBA vs IPGP Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while IPGP trades at $104.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 73.83. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check IPGP's competition here
IDBA vs PI Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while PI trades at $138.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 68.40. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check PI's competition here
IDBA vs ACLS Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while ACLS trades at $136.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check ACLS's competition here
IDBA vs UCTT Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while UCTT trades at $92.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 85.58. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check UCTT's competition here
IDBA vs DIOD Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while DIOD trades at $87.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 59.60. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check DIOD's competition here
IDBA vs POWI Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while POWI trades at $70.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 59.20. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check POWI's competition here
IDBA vs LASR Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while LASR trades at $69.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 144.27. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check LASR's competition here
IDBA vs VECO Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while VECO trades at $52.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 47.52. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check VECO's competition here
IDBA vs ICHR Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while ICHR trades at $82.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 418.70. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check ICHR's competition here
IDBA vs NVTS Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while NVTS trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -60.32. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check NVTS's competition here
IDBA vs AMBA Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while AMBA trades at $61.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 93.70. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check AMBA's competition here
IDBA vs AEHR Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while AEHR trades at $81.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 2701.67. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check AEHR's competition here
IDBA vs IMOS Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while IMOS trades at $68.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 96.12. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check IMOS's competition here
IDBA vs COHU Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while COHU trades at $51.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -284.39. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check COHU's competition here
IDBA vs OUST Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while OUST trades at $37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -39.40. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check OUST's competition here
IDBA vs HIMX Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while HIMX trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 64.00. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check HIMX's competition here
IDBA vs AXTI Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while AXTI trades at $45.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -191.08. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check AXTI's competition here
IDBA vs AMBQ Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while AMBQ trades at $72.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check AMBQ's competition here
IDBA vs PLAB Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while PLAB trades at $28.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check PLAB's competition here
IDBA vs WOLF Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while WOLF trades at $29.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check WOLF's competition here
IDBA vs SKYT Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while SKYT trades at $31.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -784.00. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check SKYT's competition here
IDBA vs AIP Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while AIP trades at $31.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -110.86. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check AIP's competition here
IDBA vs SGH Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check SGH's competition here
IDBA vs CEVA Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while CEVA trades at $37.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 94.93. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check CEVA's competition here
IDBA vs POET Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 975.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while POET trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -17.12. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check POET's competition here
IDBA vs AOSL Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 935.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while AOSL trades at $31.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -107.83. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check AOSL's competition here
IDBA vs INDI Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 805M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while INDI trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check INDI's competition here
IDBA vs KOPN Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 706M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while KOPN trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 718.87. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check KOPN's competition here
IDBA vs QNC Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 472.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while QNC trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check QNC's competition here
IDBA vs NVEC Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 417.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while NVEC trades at $86.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check NVEC's competition here
IDBA vs LAES Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 362.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while LAES trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check LAES's competition here
IDBA vs MRAM Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 341.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while MRAM trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 110.06. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check MRAM's competition here
IDBA vs TGAN Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check TGAN's competition here
IDBA vs ASYS Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while ASYS trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 57.48. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check ASYS's competition here
IDBA vs QUIK Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 230.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while QUIK trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check QUIK's competition here
IDBA vs ALMU Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 206.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while ALMU trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -121.67. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check ALMU's competition here
IDBA vs VLN Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 184.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while VLN trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check VLN's competition here
IDBA vs VLN-WT Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check VLN-WT's competition here
IDBA vs ATOM Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while ATOM trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -8.65. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check ATOM's competition here
IDBA vs GSIT Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while GSIT trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -13.28. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check GSIT's competition here
IDBA vs INTT Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 172.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while INTT trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 41.58. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check INTT's competition here
IDBA vs OIIM Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check OIIM's competition here
IDBA vs MX Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 125.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while MX trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check MX's competition here
IDBA vs GCTS Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 119.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while GCTS trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check GCTS's competition here
IDBA vs TRT Comparison July 2026
IDBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IDBA stands at 90.8M. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 102.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IDBA is priced at $4.88, while TRT trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IDBA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.01, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 182.41. In terms of profitability, IDBA's ROE is -1.56%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IDBA is more volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IDBA.Check TRT's competition here