Sequans Communications S.A. (SQNS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SQNS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQNS | $3.29 | +1.86% | 51.8M | -0.50 | -$6.60 | N/A |
| NVDA | $196.93 | +0.71% | 4.8T | 33.72 | $5.84 | +0.14% |
| TSM | $432.57 | -4.25% | 2.2T | 35.94 | $12.04 | +0.77% |
| AVGO | $370.78 | -0.83% | 1.8T | 45.61 | $8.13 | +0.67% |
| MU | $938.38 | -4.71% | 1.1T | 20.80 | $45.12 | +0.05% |
| AMD | $516.11 | -6.51% | 841.6B | 112.69 | $4.58 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,747.28 | -4.26% | 673.4B | 57.91 | $30.17 | +0.48% |
| INTC | $110.39 | -9.66% | 554.8B | 193.67 | $0.57 | N/A |
| AMAT | $554.50 | -6.46% | 440.3B | 56.07 | $9.89 | +0.32% |
| LRCX | $326.13 | -6.87% | 407.8B | 61.19 | $5.33 | +0.29% |
Stock Comparison
SQNS vs NVDA Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.8T. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while NVDA trades at $196.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 33.72. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check NVDA's competition here
SQNS vs TSM Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while TSM trades at $432.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 35.94. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check TSM's competition here
SQNS vs AVGO Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while AVGO trades at $370.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 45.61. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check AVGO's competition here
SQNS vs MU Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while MU trades at $938.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check MU's competition here
SQNS vs AMD Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 841.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while AMD trades at $516.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 112.69. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check AMD's competition here
SQNS vs ASML Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 673.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while ASML trades at $1,747.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 57.91. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check ASML's competition here
SQNS vs INTC Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 554.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while INTC trades at $110.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is 193.67. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check INTC's competition here
SQNS vs AMAT Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 440.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while AMAT trades at $554.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 56.07. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check AMAT's competition here
SQNS vs LRCX Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 407.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while LRCX trades at $326.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 61.19. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check LRCX's competition here
SQNS vs ARM Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 319.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while ARM trades at $300.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 169.73. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check ARM's competition here
SQNS vs KLAC Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 282.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while KLAC trades at $216.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check KLAC's competition here
SQNS vs TXN Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 266.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while TXN trades at $293.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 50.22. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check TXN's competition here
SQNS vs MRVL Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 201.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while MRVL trades at $230.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 76.14. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check MRVL's competition here
SQNS vs QCOM Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 192.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while QCOM trades at $182.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check QCOM's competition here
SQNS vs ADI Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 184.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while ADI trades at $379.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 38.44. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check ADI's competition here
SQNS vs ASX Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 86.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while ASX trades at $39.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check ASX's competition here
SQNS vs NXPI Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while NXPI trades at $273.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check NXPI's competition here
SQNS vs ALAB Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while ALAB trades at $382.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 180.61. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check ALAB's competition here
SQNS vs MPWR Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while MPWR trades at $1,272.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 67.59. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check MPWR's competition here
SQNS vs STM Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while STM trades at $67.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 114.03. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check STM's competition here
SQNS vs UMC Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while UMC trades at $23.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check UMC's competition here
SQNS vs TEL Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while TEL trades at $197.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check TEL's competition here
SQNS vs TER Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while TER trades at $343.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 59.36. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check TER's competition here
SQNS vs MCHP Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while MCHP trades at $84.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 51.63. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check MCHP's competition here
SQNS vs CBRS Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while CBRS trades at $176.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is -4415.25. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check CBRS's competition here
SQNS vs GFS Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while GFS trades at $65.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 36.99. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check GFS's competition here
SQNS vs ON Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while ON trades at $91.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 37.34. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check ON's competition here
SQNS vs Q Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while Q trades at $140.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 39.71. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check Q's competition here
SQNS vs TSEM Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while TSEM trades at $211.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 85.46. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check TSEM's competition here
SQNS vs MTSI Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while MTSI trades at $304.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 77.17. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check MTSI's competition here
SQNS vs ENTG Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while ENTG trades at $135.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 45.95. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check ENTG's competition here
SQNS vs LSCC Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while LSCC trades at $130.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 104.48. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check LSCC's competition here
SQNS vs AMKR Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while AMKR trades at $65.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check AMKR's competition here
SQNS vs SITM Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while SITM trades at $592.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is 137.40. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check SITM's competition here
SQNS vs NVMI Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while NVMI trades at $446.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 50.60. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check NVMI's competition here
SQNS vs ONTO Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while ONTO trades at $279.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 57.78. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS and ONTO have similar daily volatility (8.37).Check ONTO's competition here
SQNS vs SMTC Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while SMTC trades at $126.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 68.70. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check SMTC's competition here
SQNS vs RMBS Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while RMBS trades at $105.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 41.70. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check RMBS's competition here
SQNS vs SIMO Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while SIMO trades at $294.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 65.10. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check SIMO's competition here
SQNS vs CREE Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check CREE's competition here
SQNS vs ALGM Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while ALGM trades at $51.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is 95.46. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check ALGM's competition here
SQNS vs AAOI Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while AAOI trades at $114.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -346.70. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check AAOI's competition here
SQNS vs SWKS Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while SWKS trades at $59.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check SWKS's competition here
SQNS vs FORM Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while FORM trades at $106.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 65.46. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check FORM's competition here
SQNS vs BRKS Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check BRKS's competition here
SQNS vs MXL Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while MXL trades at $85.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is 150.56. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check MXL's competition here
SQNS vs QRVO Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while QRVO trades at $85.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check QRVO's competition here
SQNS vs CRUS Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while CRUS trades at $146.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check CRUS's competition here
SQNS vs SLAB Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while SLAB trades at $217.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is 143.29. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check SLAB's competition here
SQNS vs CAMT Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while CAMT trades at $133.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 42.71. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check CAMT's competition here
SQNS vs ACMR Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while ACMR trades at $94.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 63.53. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check ACMR's competition here
SQNS vs VSH Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while VSH trades at $42.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 1406.17. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check VSH's competition here
SQNS vs KLIC Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while KLIC trades at $105.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 67.01. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check KLIC's competition here
SQNS vs SYNA Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while SYNA trades at $119.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check SYNA's competition here
SQNS vs PI Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while PI trades at $138.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas PI's P/E ratio is 68.39. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check PI's competition here
SQNS vs DIOD Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while DIOD trades at $91.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 62.72. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check DIOD's competition here
SQNS vs IPGP Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while IPGP trades at $96.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 69.00. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check IPGP's competition here
SQNS vs UCTT Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while UCTT trades at $90.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 84.06. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check UCTT's competition here
SQNS vs ACLS Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while ACLS trades at $131.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 28.91. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check ACLS's competition here
SQNS vs POWI Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while POWI trades at $66.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 56.16. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check POWI's competition here
SQNS vs NVTS Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while NVTS trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -73.63. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check NVTS's competition here
SQNS vs LASR Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while LASR trades at $59.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is 122.94. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check LASR's competition here
SQNS vs VECO Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while VECO trades at $53.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 48.50. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check VECO's competition here
SQNS vs AMBA Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while AMBA trades at $71.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is 108.82. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check AMBA's competition here
SQNS vs ICHR Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while ICHR trades at $85.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is 425.05. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check ICHR's competition here
SQNS vs OUST Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while OUST trades at $44.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -46.87. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check OUST's competition here
SQNS vs AXTI Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while AXTI trades at $58.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -242.29. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check AXTI's competition here
SQNS vs HIMX Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while HIMX trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 70.25. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check HIMX's competition here
SQNS vs COHU Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while COHU trades at $50.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -283.17. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check COHU's competition here
SQNS vs IMOS Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while IMOS trades at $65.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 88.99. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check IMOS's competition here
SQNS vs AEHR Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while AEHR trades at $66.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -743.78. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check AEHR's competition here
SQNS vs WOLF Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while WOLF trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check WOLF's competition here
SQNS vs AMBQ Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while AMBQ trades at $75.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check AMBQ's competition here
SQNS vs SKYT Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while SKYT trades at $33.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -834.50. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check SKYT's competition here
SQNS vs PLAB Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while PLAB trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check PLAB's competition here
SQNS vs AIP Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while AIP trades at $31.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -111.86. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check AIP's competition here
SQNS vs CEVA Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while CEVA trades at $42.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 106.90. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check CEVA's competition here
SQNS vs SGH Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check SGH's competition here
SQNS vs POET Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while POET trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -19.16. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check POET's competition here
SQNS vs AOSL Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while AOSL trades at $34.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -119.90. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check AOSL's competition here
SQNS vs INDI Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 870.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while INDI trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -14.71. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check INDI's competition here
SQNS vs KOPN Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 701.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while KOPN trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 714.15. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check KOPN's competition here
SQNS vs QNC Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 606.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while QNC trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check QNC's competition here
SQNS vs NVEC Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 445.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while NVEC trades at $92.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check NVEC's competition here
SQNS vs MRAM Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 414.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while MRAM trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 70.10. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check MRAM's competition here
SQNS vs LAES Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 399.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while LAES trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check LAES's competition here
SQNS vs XPER Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 382.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while XPER trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check XPER's competition here
SQNS vs TGAN Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check TGAN's competition here
SQNS vs QUIK Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 266.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while QUIK trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check QUIK's competition here
SQNS vs ASYS Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 259.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while ASYS trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 61.62. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check ASYS's competition here
SQNS vs ALMU Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 247.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while ALMU trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -145.75. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check ALMU's competition here
SQNS vs ATOM Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 220.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while ATOM trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check ATOM's competition here
SQNS vs VLN Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 219.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while VLN trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -11.91. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check VLN's competition here
SQNS vs GSIT Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 205.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while GSIT trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -15.71. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check GSIT's competition here
SQNS vs INTT Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while INTT trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 44.06. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check INTT's competition here
SQNS vs VLN-WT Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 176.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while VLN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check VLN-WT's competition here
SQNS vs OIIM Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check OIIM's competition here
SQNS vs GCTS Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 140.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while GCTS trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check GCTS's competition here
SQNS vs MX Comparison July 2026
SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 51.8M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 138.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $3.29, while MX trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -13.55. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is -1.35%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.Check MX's competition here