SemiLEDs Corporation (LEDS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LEDS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEDS | $1.90 | +4.40% | 15.7M | -6.55 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| NVDA | $205.19 | +0.16% | 5T | 31.37 | $6.54 | +0.14% |
| TSM | $423.93 | +0.68% | 2.2T | 36.37 | $11.65 | +0.83% |
| AVGO | $382.07 | -0.91% | 1.8T | 63.36 | $6.03 | +0.65% |
| MU | $981.61 | -1.43% | 1.1T | 46.24 | $21.23 | +0.05% |
| AMD | $511.57 | +4.73% | 834.2B | 170.52 | $3.00 | N/A |
| ASML | $1,863.55 | -1.89% | 718.2B | 62.39 | $29.87 | +0.47% |
| INTC | $124.57 | +6.51% | 626.1B | -207.62 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| LRCX | $366.81 | +1.18% | 458.7B | 69.34 | $5.29 | +0.27% |
| AMAT | $567.25 | +2.64% | 450.4B | 53.36 | $10.63 | +0.34% |
Stock Comparison
LEDS vs NVDA Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 5T. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while NVDA trades at $205.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check NVDA's competition here
LEDS vs TSM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while TSM trades at $423.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 36.37. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check TSM's competition here
LEDS vs AVGO Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while AVGO trades at $382.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 63.36. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AVGO's competition here
LEDS vs MU Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while MU trades at $981.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 46.24. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check MU's competition here
LEDS vs AMD Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 834.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while AMD trades at $511.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 170.52. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AMD's competition here
LEDS vs ASML Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 718.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while ASML trades at $1,863.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 62.39. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ASML's competition here
LEDS vs INTC Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 626.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while INTC trades at $124.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -207.62. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check INTC's competition here
LEDS vs LRCX Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 458.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while LRCX trades at $366.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 69.34. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check LRCX's competition here
LEDS vs AMAT Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 450.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while AMAT trades at $567.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 53.36. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AMAT's competition here
LEDS vs ARM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 405.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while ARM trades at $380.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 453.35. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ARM's competition here
LEDS vs KLAC Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 332.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while KLAC trades at $254.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check KLAC's competition here
LEDS vs TXN Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 274B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while TXN trades at $301.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 51.47. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check TXN's competition here
LEDS vs MRVL Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 244.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while MRVL trades at $279.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 96.12. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check MRVL's competition here
LEDS vs QCOM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 223.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while QCOM trades at $211.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check QCOM's competition here
LEDS vs ADI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 203.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while ADI trades at $417.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 62.17. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ADI's competition here
LEDS vs ASX Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 83.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while ASX trades at $38.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 59.53. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ASX's competition here
LEDS vs MPWR Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 77.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while MPWR trades at $1,577.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 112.75. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check MPWR's competition here
LEDS vs NXPI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while NXPI trades at $304.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 29.12. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check NXPI's competition here
LEDS vs STM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while STM trades at $77.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 482.75. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check STM's competition here
LEDS vs TER Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while TER trades at $403.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 74.81. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check TER's competition here
LEDS vs ALAB Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while ALAB trades at $367.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 249.76. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ALAB's competition here
LEDS vs UMC Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while UMC trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check UMC's competition here
LEDS vs MCHP Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while MCHP trades at $95.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 432.91. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check MCHP's competition here
LEDS vs CBRS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, CBRS has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while CBRS trades at $214.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas CBRS's P/E ratio is 497.67. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to CBRS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to CBRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check CBRS's competition here
LEDS vs ON Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while ON trades at $116.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 85.88. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ON's competition here
LEDS vs GFS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while GFS trades at $81.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 51.51. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check GFS's competition here
LEDS vs Q Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while Q trades at $150.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check Q's competition here
LEDS vs TSEM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while TSEM trades at $262.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 122.29. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check TSEM's competition here
LEDS vs MTSI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while MTSI trades at $379.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 162.34. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check MTSI's competition here
LEDS vs ENTG Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while ENTG trades at $150.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 87.01. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ENTG's competition here
LEDS vs AMKR Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while AMKR trades at $82.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 47.57. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AMKR's competition here
LEDS vs LSCC Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while LSCC trades at $144.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 1032.36. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check LSCC's competition here
LEDS vs SITM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while SITM trades at $729.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -793.36. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check SITM's competition here
LEDS vs NVMI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while NVMI trades at $583.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 73.10. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check NVMI's competition here
LEDS vs ONTO Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while ONTO trades at $323.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 151.46. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ONTO's competition here
LEDS vs RMBS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while RMBS trades at $146.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 69.79. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check RMBS's competition here
LEDS vs SMTC Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while SMTC trades at $166.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -406.61. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check SMTC's competition here
LEDS vs AAOI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while AAOI trades at $169.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -256.14. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AAOI's competition here
LEDS vs SWKS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while SWKS trades at $73.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check SWKS's competition here
LEDS vs FORM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while FORM trades at $139.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 160.01. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check FORM's competition here
LEDS vs CREE Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to CREE's ROE of -59.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check CREE's competition here
LEDS vs SIMO Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while SIMO trades at $280.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 55.65. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check SIMO's competition here
LEDS vs ALGM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while ALGM trades at $50.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -630.06. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ALGM's competition here
LEDS vs CAMT Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while CAMT trades at $193.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 197.21. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check CAMT's competition here
LEDS vs QRVO Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while QRVO trades at $98.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check QRVO's competition here
LEDS vs CRUS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while CRUS trades at $164.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check CRUS's competition here
LEDS vs VSH Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while VSH trades at $59.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is 5943.00. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to VSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check VSH's competition here
LEDS vs BRKS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check BRKS's competition here
LEDS vs MXL Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while MXL trades at $84.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -55.57. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check MXL's competition here
LEDS vs SLAB Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while SLAB trades at $219.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -143.47. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check SLAB's competition here
LEDS vs ACMR Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while ACMR trades at $93.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 71.72. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ACMR's competition here
LEDS vs KLIC Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while KLIC trades at $113.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 109.83. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check KLIC's competition here
LEDS vs NVTS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while NVTS trades at $23.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -37.14. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check NVTS's competition here
LEDS vs ACLS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while ACLS trades at $180.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 55.76. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ACLS's competition here
LEDS vs SYNA Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while SYNA trades at $138.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -110.75. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check SYNA's competition here
LEDS vs DIOD Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while DIOD trades at $108.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 58.78. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check DIOD's competition here
LEDS vs UCTT Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while UCTT trades at $108.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -25.38. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check UCTT's competition here
LEDS vs IPGP Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while IPGP trades at $114.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 168.60. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check IPGP's competition here
LEDS vs VECO Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while VECO trades at $77.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 203.89. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check VECO's competition here
LEDS vs AXTI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while AXTI trades at $97.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -303.69. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AXTI's competition here
LEDS vs POWI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while POWI trades at $78.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 261.27. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check POWI's competition here
LEDS vs PI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while PI trades at $132.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -147.52. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check PI's competition here
LEDS vs LASR Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while LASR trades at $69.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -232.20. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check LASR's competition here
LEDS vs AEHR Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while AEHR trades at $108.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -285.45. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AEHR's competition here
LEDS vs HIMX Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while HIMX trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 93.16. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check HIMX's competition here
LEDS vs ICHR Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while ICHR trades at $86.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -58.65. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ICHR's competition here
LEDS vs AMBA Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while AMBA trades at $67.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -42.10. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AMBA's competition here
LEDS vs COHU Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while COHU trades at $61.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -51.54. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check COHU's competition here
LEDS vs IMOS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while IMOS trades at $61.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 78.42. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check IMOS's competition here
LEDS vs WOLF Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while WOLF trades at $43.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -52.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check WOLF's competition here
LEDS vs AIP Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while AIP trades at $41.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -51.90. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AIP's ROE of +4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AIP's competition here
LEDS vs PLAB Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while PLAB trades at $31.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check PLAB's competition here
LEDS vs AMBQ Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while AMBQ trades at $84.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -18.41. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AMBQ's competition here
LEDS vs SKYT Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while SKYT trades at $36.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check SKYT's competition here
LEDS vs POET Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while POET trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -14.92. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to POET's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check POET's competition here
LEDS vs AOSL Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while AOSL trades at $45.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -13.38. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check AOSL's competition here
LEDS vs CEVA Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while CEVA trades at $46.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -100.07. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check CEVA's competition here
LEDS vs SGH Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check SGH's competition here
LEDS vs INDI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 866.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while INDI trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.39. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check INDI's competition here
LEDS vs QNC Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 648.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while QNC trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check QNC's competition here
LEDS vs MRAM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 572.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while MRAM trades at $24.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 2441.00. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check MRAM's competition here
LEDS vs NVEC Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 565.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while NVEC trades at $116.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check NVEC's competition here
LEDS vs LAES Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 442M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while LAES trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check LAES's competition here
LEDS vs QUIK Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 386.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while QUIK trades at $21.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -29.08. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check QUIK's competition here
LEDS vs XPER Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 372.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while XPER trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check XPER's competition here
LEDS vs ALMU Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 357.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while ALMU trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ALMU's competition here
LEDS vs ASYS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 347.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while ASYS trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 133.28. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ASYS's competition here
LEDS vs TGAN Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check TGAN's competition here
LEDS vs ATOM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 292.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while ATOM trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -13.85. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ATOM's competition here
LEDS vs GSIT Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 251.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while GSIT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -18.79. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check GSIT's competition here
LEDS vs VLN Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 232.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while VLN trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -7.13. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check VLN's competition here
LEDS vs MX Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 227.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while MX trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -15.24. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check MX's competition here
LEDS vs INTT Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 218.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while INTT trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is 435.00. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to INTT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check INTT's competition here
LEDS vs BZAI Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while BZAI trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check BZAI's competition here
LEDS vs BZAIW Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, BZAIW has a market cap of 151.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while BZAIW trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas BZAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to BZAIW's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to BZAIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check BZAIW's competition here
LEDS vs GCTS Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 144.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while GCTS trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check GCTS's competition here
LEDS vs OIIM Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check OIIM's competition here
LEDS vs TRT Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 110.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while TRT trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 218.40. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check TRT's competition here
LEDS vs ARBE Comparison June 2026
LEDS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEDS stands at 15.7M. In comparison, ARBE has a market cap of 107.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEDS is priced at $1.90, while ARBE trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEDS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.55, whereas ARBE's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, LEDS's ROE is -0.90%, compared to ARBE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LEDS is more volatile compared to ARBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEDS.Check ARBE's competition here