Sequans Communications S.A.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 2.86T. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while NVDA trades at $117.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 39.91. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 976.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while AVGO trades at $207.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 96.19. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 908.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while TSM trades at $175.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ASMLF has a market cap of 279.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ASMLF trades at $710.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ASMLF's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ASMLF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ASMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 278.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ASML trades at $707.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 35.59. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 164.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while AMD trades at $101.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 74.23. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 159.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while QCOM trades at $145.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 150.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while TXN trades at $165.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 31.43. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 126.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while AMAT trades at $156.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 122.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ARM trades at $116.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 153.32. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 100.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ADI trades at $202.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 64.55. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 95.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while LRCX trades at $74.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 95.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MU trades at $85.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 93.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while KLAC trades at $703.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 91.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while INTC trades at $20.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SLEGF has a market cap of 72.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SLEGF trades at $188.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SLEGF's P/E ratio is 376.19. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SLEGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SLEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, TOELY has a market cap of 71.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while TOELY trades at $78.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas TOELY's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to TOELY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to TOELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 49.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MRVL trades at $57.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 47.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while NXPI trades at $188.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, IFNNY has a market cap of 45.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while IFNNY trades at $35.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas IFNNY's P/E ratio is 28.98. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to IFNNY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to IFNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, IFNNF has a market cap of 44.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while IFNNF trades at $34.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas IFNNF's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to IFNNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to IFNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, RNECY has a market cap of 43.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while RNECY trades at $5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas RNECY's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to RNECY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to RNECY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ATEYY has a market cap of 33.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ATEYY trades at $46.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ATEYY's P/E ratio is 30.47. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ATEYY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ATEYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ADTTF has a market cap of 30.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ADTTF trades at $42.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ADTTF's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ADTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ADTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 30.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MPWR trades at $639.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 26.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MCHP trades at $49.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 86.21. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ASMIY has a market cap of 24.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ASMIY trades at $505.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ASMIY's P/E ratio is 45.49. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ASMIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ASMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ASMXF has a market cap of 24.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ASMXF trades at $503.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ASMXF's P/E ratio is 45.47. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ASMXF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to ASMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, DSCSY has a market cap of 23.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while DSCSY trades at $21.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas DSCSY's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to DSCSY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to DSCSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, RNECF has a market cap of 23.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while RNECF trades at $12.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas RNECF's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to RNECF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to RNECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, STMEF has a market cap of 20.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while STMEF trades at $23.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas STMEF's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to STMEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to STMEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 20.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while STM trades at $23.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 19.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ASX trades at $9.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 19.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while GFS trades at $35.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -105.59. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, DISPF has a market cap of 19.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while DISPF trades at $181.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas DISPF's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to DISPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to DISPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 18.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while UMC trades at $7.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 16.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ON trades at $39.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 12.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while TER trades at $76.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 11.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ALAB trades at $71.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 54.69. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ALAB's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 11.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ENTG trades at $77.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 37.76. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SWKS trades at $67.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, HHUSF has a market cap of 9.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while HHUSF trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas HHUSF's P/E ratio is 166.67. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to HHUSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to HHUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, BESIY has a market cap of 9.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while BESIY trades at $120.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas BESIY's P/E ratio is 47.00. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to BESIY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to BESIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, BESVF has a market cap of 9.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while BESVF trades at $119.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas BESVF's P/E ratio is 46.81. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to BESVF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to BESVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 8.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MTSI trades at $119.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -83.68. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, LSRCF has a market cap of 8.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while LSRCF trades at $97.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas LSRCF's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to LSRCF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to LSRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, LSRCY has a market cap of 8.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while LSRCY trades at $19.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas LSRCY's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to LSRCY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to LSRCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 6.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while LSCC trades at $49.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 132.92. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 6.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while QRVO trades at $72.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 124.78. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while OLED trades at $142.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 29.54. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, DINRF has a market cap of 6.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while DINRF trades at $63.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas DINRF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to DINRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to DINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ONTO trades at $126.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 5.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while RMBS trades at $51.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 31.27. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 5.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while NVMI trades at $186.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 32.53. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while CRUS trades at $97.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 4.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while AMKR trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SITM trades at $182.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -44.99. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 4.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while TSEM trades at $37.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ALGM trades at $21.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -60.20. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ASMVF has a market cap of 3.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ASMVF trades at $9.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ASMVF's P/E ratio is 84.28. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ASMVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to ASMVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ROHCY has a market cap of 3.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ROHCY trades at $9.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ROHCY's P/E ratio is 57.64. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ROHCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ROHCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ROHCF has a market cap of 3.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ROHCF trades at $9.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ROHCF's P/E ratio is 57.50. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ROHCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ROHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while CAMT trades at $68.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SMTC trades at $34.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -15.37. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -15.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while POWI trades at $51.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 92.39. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SLAB trades at $90.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MLXSF has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MLXSF trades at $64.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MLXSF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MLXSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to MLXSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SUMCF has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SUMCF trades at $7.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SUMCF's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SUMCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SUMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while IPGP trades at $58.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -14.36. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SYNA trades at $59.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while FORM trades at $29.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 43.43. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while AMBA trades at $52.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -18.61. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SUOPY has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SUOPY trades at $12.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SUOPY's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SUOPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SUOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, NRSDY has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while NRSDY trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas NRSDY's P/E ratio is -186.67. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to NRSDY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to NRSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, NDCVF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while NDCVF trades at $10.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas NDCVF's P/E ratio is -179.50. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to NDCVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to NDCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SLOIY has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SLOIY trades at $28.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SLOIY's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SLOIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SLOIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ACLS trades at $58.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while DIOD trades at $39.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 42.03. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, AMSSY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while AMSSY trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas AMSSY's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to AMSSY's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to AMSSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while VSH trades at $12.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -55.91. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SLOIF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SLOIF trades at $48.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SLOIF's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SLOIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to SLOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while KLIC trades at $31.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 85.73. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, AIXXF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while AIXXF trades at $14.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas AIXXF's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to AIXXF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to AIXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, AWEVF has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while AWEVF trades at $1.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas AWEVF's P/E ratio is -31.83. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to AWEVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to AWEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ACMR trades at $22.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, AIIXY has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while AIIXY trades at $24.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas AIIXY's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to AIIXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to AIIXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, OXINF has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while OXINF trades at $22.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas OXINF's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to OXINF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to OXINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while PLAB trades at $19.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, FUJXF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while FUJXF trades at $14.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas FUJXF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to FUJXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to FUJXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SSLLF has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SSLLF trades at $39.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SSLLF's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SSLLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SSLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while VECO trades at $19.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SANJF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SANJF trades at $42.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SANJF's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SANJF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to SANJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 969.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MXL trades at $11.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ASMVY has a market cap of 941.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ASMVY trades at $20.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ASMVY's P/E ratio is 63.59. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ASMVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ASMVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 909.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while UCTT trades at $20.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 32.48. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 819.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while AAOI trades at $14.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 751.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while COHU trades at $16.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -10.85. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, AUKUF has a market cap of 746.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while AUKUF trades at $7.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas AUKUF's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to AUKUF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to AUKUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SESMF has a market cap of 729.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SESMF trades at $38.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SESMF's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SESMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SESMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, XFABF has a market cap of 701.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while XFABF trades at $5.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas XFABF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to XFABF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to XFABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, PVLYL has a market cap of 691.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while PVLYL trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas PVLYL's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to PVLYL's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to PVLYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 688.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while WOLF trades at $4.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 649.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while HIMX trades at $7.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 608.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while AOSL trades at $20.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -25.84. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SILXF has a market cap of 596.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SILXF trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SILXF's P/E ratio is -41.83. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SILXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to SILXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SILXY has a market cap of 594.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SILXY trades at $12.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SILXY's P/E ratio is -41.70. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SILXY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SILXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 570.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ICHR trades at $16.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -26.11. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MITNF has a market cap of 509.09M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MITNF trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MITNF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MITNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MITNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 483.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while CEVA trades at $20.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -54.70. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SFDMY has a market cap of 471.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SFDMY trades at $49.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SFDMY's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SFDMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to SFDMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 466.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SIMO trades at $55.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 457.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while INDI trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 425.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while LASR trades at $8.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, THPTF has a market cap of 367.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while THPTF trades at $19.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas THPTF's P/E ratio is 31.85. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to THPTF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to THPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 364.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while XPER trades at $8.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -25.84. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 362.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while NVTS trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 345.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while POET trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to POET's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 327.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SKYT trades at $6.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -48.64. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 326.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while NVEC trades at $67.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, BRCHF has a market cap of 313.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while BRCHF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas BRCHF's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to BRCHF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to BRCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 307.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while AIP trades at $7.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -8.63. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to AIP's ROE of -8.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 262.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while LAES trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 256.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while VLN trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 252.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while BZAI trades at $2.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -4.13. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 250.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while AEHR trades at $8.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to AEHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 249.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while VLN-WT trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, WBTNF has a market cap of 249.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while WBTNF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas WBTNF's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to WBTNF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to WBTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, NLST has a market cap of 230.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while NLST trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas NLST's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to NLST's ROE of +50.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to NLST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 199.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ATOM trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 187.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ALMU trades at $12.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MCRNF has a market cap of 182.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MCRNF trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MCRNF's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MCRNF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to MCRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 176.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while DQ trades at $13.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, IQEPY has a market cap of 139.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while IQEPY trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas IQEPY's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to IQEPY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to IQEPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 130.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MRAM trades at $5.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 145.75. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 121.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MX trades at $3.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, RNWEF has a market cap of 117.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while RNWEF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas RNWEF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to RNWEF's ROE of +4.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to RNWEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, FRDSF has a market cap of 100.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while FRDSF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas FRDSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to FRDSF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to FRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, IQEPF has a market cap of 100.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while IQEPF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas IQEPF's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to IQEPF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to IQEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 94.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while QUIK trades at $5.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -22.92. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 88.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while GSIT trades at $3.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -8.26. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, QNCCF has a market cap of 86.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while QNCCF trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas QNCCF's P/E ratio is -45.39. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to QNCCF's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to QNCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 78.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while INTT trades at $6.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -628.00. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, RNWEY has a market cap of 75.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while RNWEY trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas RNWEY's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to RNWEY's ROE of +4.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to RNWEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 73.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ICG trades at $2.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 71.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while NA trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 71.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while GCTS trades at $1.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, PAGDF has a market cap of 67.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while PAGDF trades at $33.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas PAGDF's P/E ratio is -56.40. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to PAGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to PAGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, PRKR has a market cap of 63.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while PRKR trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas PRKR's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to PRKR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to PRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MOSY trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 62.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while WISA trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to WISA's ROE of -65.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 59.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while AXTI trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MYBUF has a market cap of 58.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MYBUF trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MYBUF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MYBUF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MYBUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, BUGLF has a market cap of 57.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while BUGLF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas BUGLF's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to BUGLF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to BUGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 49.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ASYS trades at $3.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 43.63. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ASYS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ARRXF has a market cap of 48.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ARRXF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ARRXF's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ARRXF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to ARRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, CYBL has a market cap of 40.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while CYBL trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas CYBL's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to CYBL's ROE of -23.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to CYBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, OBDCF has a market cap of 34.74M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while OBDCF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas OBDCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to OBDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to OBDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, PXLW has a market cap of 34.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while PXLW trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas PXLW's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to PXLW's ROE of +13.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to PXLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SODI has a market cap of 33.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SODI trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SODI's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SODI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to SODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, NNOCF has a market cap of 32.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while NNOCF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas NNOCF's P/E ratio is -8.26. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to NNOCF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to NNOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 31.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while IMOS trades at $17.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MOBX has a market cap of 29.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MOBX trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MOBX's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MOBX's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MOBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MMTIF has a market cap of 29.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MMTIF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MMTIF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MMTIF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to MMTIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, EMKR has a market cap of 28.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while EMKR trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas EMKR's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to EMKR's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to EMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, NXTBF has a market cap of 26.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while NXTBF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas NXTBF's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to NXTBF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to NXTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 22.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while TRT trades at $5.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is 41.15. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to TRT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SCIA has a market cap of 19.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SCIA trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SCIA's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SCIA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SCIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, WKEY has a market cap of 18.79M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while WKEY trades at $4.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas WKEY's P/E ratio is -10.15. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to WKEY's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to WKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, LEDS has a market cap of 17.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while LEDS trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas LEDS's P/E ratio is -21.80. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to LEDS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to LEDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, GUER has a market cap of 15.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while GUER trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas GUER's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to GUER's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to GUER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, WSKEF has a market cap of 13.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while WSKEF trades at $2.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas WSKEF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to WSKEF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to WSKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SMTK has a market cap of 8.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SMTK trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SMTK's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SMTK's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to SMTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, BCHPY has a market cap of 6.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while BCHPY trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas BCHPY's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to BCHPY's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to BCHPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, AEVAW has a market cap of 5.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while AEVAW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas AEVAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to AEVAW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to AEVAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, PSFT has a market cap of 5.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while PSFT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas PSFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to PSFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to PSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, RBCN has a market cap of 4.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while RBCN trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas RBCN's P/E ratio is -8.91. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to RBCN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to RBCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, PRSO has a market cap of 4.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while PRSO trades at $0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas PRSO's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to PRSO's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to PRSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MOBXW has a market cap of 3.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MOBXW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MOBXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MOBXW's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MOBXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MANZF has a market cap of 2.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MANZF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MANZF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MANZF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MANZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, NMGC has a market cap of 1.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while NMGC trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas NMGC's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to NMGC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to NMGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SPVNF has a market cap of 1.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SPVNF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SPVNF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SPVNF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to SPVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, STRI has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while STRI trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas STRI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to STRI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to STRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ITCJ has a market cap of 335013.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ITCJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ITCJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ITCJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to ITCJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, ODII has a market cap of 292018.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while ODII trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas ODII's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to ODII's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to ODII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, GSTX has a market cap of 169584.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while GSTX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas GSTX's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to GSTX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to GSTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, CXCQ has a market cap of 82500.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while CXCQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas CXCQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to CXCQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to CXCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, TXCCQ has a market cap of 4665.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while TXCCQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas TXCCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to TXCCQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to TXCCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MTNX has a market cap of 4453.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MTNX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MTNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MTNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to MTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, STRB has a market cap of 1471.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while STRB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas STRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to STRB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to STRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, SRII has a market cap of 350.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while SRII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas SRII's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to SRII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to SRII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, HSCO has a market cap of 200.00. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while HSCO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas HSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to HSCO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to HSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, AVGOP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while AVGOP trades at $1,406.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas AVGOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to AVGOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to AVGOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, NVTSW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while NVTSW trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas NVTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to NVTSW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to NVTSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, NPTN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while NPTN trades at $16.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas NPTN's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to NPTN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to NPTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, RESN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while RESN trades at $4.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas RESN's P/E ratio is -7.78. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to RESN's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to RESN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, DSPG comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while DSPG trades at $21.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas DSPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to DSPG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to DSPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, XLNX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while XLNX trades at $194.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas XLNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to XLNX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to XLNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, RKLY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while RKLY trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas RKLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to RKLY's ROE of -100.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is less volatile compared to RKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, CYBE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while CYBE trades at $54.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas CYBE's P/E ratio is 25.35. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to CYBE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to CYBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, MXIM comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while MXIM trades at $103.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas MXIM's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to MXIM's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to MXIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, CCMP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while CCMP trades at $173.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas CCMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to CCMP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to CCMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.

SQNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SQNS stands at 38.34M. In comparison, INDIW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SQNS is priced at $1.51, while INDIW trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SQNS currently has a P/E ratio of 0.76, whereas INDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQNS's ROE is +2.85%, compared to INDIW's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SQNS is more volatile compared to INDIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQNS.