Xilinx, Inc.
Xilinx, Inc. XLNX Peers
See (XLNX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLNX | $194.92 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NVDA | $134.39 | -0.87% | 3.28T | 45.71 | $2.94 | +0.03% |
| AVGO | $231.68 | +0.46% | 1.09T | 107.76 | $2.15 | +0.97% |
| TSM | $193.48 | -0.01% | 1.00T | 23.54 | $8.22 | +1.28% |
| ASML | $748.76 | -0.05% | 294.41B | 30.24 | $24.76 | +0.91% |
| AMD | $113.51 | -1.07% | 184.05B | 82.85 | $1.37 | N/A |
| TXN | $188.71 | +0.20% | 171.44B | 35.81 | $5.27 | +2.86% |
| QCOM | $153.82 | +0.08% | 168.89B | 15.68 | $9.81 | +2.22% |
| ARM | $131.04 | -0.76% | 138.12B | 174.72 | $0.75 | N/A |
| AMAT | $165.73 | -0.13% | 134.65B | 20.19 | $8.21 | +0.97% |
Stock Comparison
XLNX vs NVDA Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 3.28T. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while NVDA trades at $134.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 45.71. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs AVGO Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.09T. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while AVGO trades at $231.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 107.76. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs TSM Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.00T. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while TSM trades at $193.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs ASML Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 294.41B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while ASML trades at $748.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs AMD Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 184.05B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while AMD trades at $113.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 82.85. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs TXN Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 171.44B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while TXN trades at $188.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 35.81. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs QCOM Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 168.89B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while QCOM trades at $153.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs ARM Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 138.12B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while ARM trades at $131.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 174.72. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs AMAT Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 134.65B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while AMAT trades at $165.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs ADI Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 111.34B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while ADI trades at $224.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 71.95. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs MU Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 109.63B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while MU trades at $98.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs LRCX Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 107.82B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while LRCX trades at $84.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs KLAC Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 104.51B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while KLAC trades at $790.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 28.79. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs INTC Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 92.78B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while INTC trades at $21.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs NXPI Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 53.07B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while NXPI trades at $210.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs MRVL Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 53.06B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while MRVL trades at $61.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -60.22. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs MPWR Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 33.52B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while MPWR trades at $700.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs MCHP Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 32.70B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while MCHP trades at $60.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -6080.00. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs STM Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 23.15B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while STM trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs GFS Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 21.63B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while GFS trades at $39.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -115.06. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs ASX Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 21.53B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while ASX trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs UMC Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 19.73B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while UMC trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs ON Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 18.50B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while ON trades at $44.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 30.74. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs ALAB Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 15.58B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while ALAB trades at $94.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 72.11. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs TER Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 13.06B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while TER trades at $81.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs ENTG Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 11.55B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while ENTG trades at $76.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 37.39. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs SWKS Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.00B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while SWKS trades at $73.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs CREE Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.84B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs MTSI Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 9.19B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while MTSI trades at $123.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -103.79. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs BRKS Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.82B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs QRVO Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.37B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while QRVO trades at $78.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 136.07. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs OLED Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 7.18B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while OLED trades at $151.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 31.42. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs LSCC Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 6.92B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while LSCC trades at $50.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 136.11. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs RMBS Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 5.98B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while RMBS trades at $55.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 29.14. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs CRUS Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.63B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while CRUS trades at $105.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs NVMI Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while NVMI trades at $188.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs ALGM Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 5.02B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while ALGM trades at $27.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -69.90. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs AMKR Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 4.79B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while AMKR trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs ONTO Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while ONTO trades at $97.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs TSEM Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 4.60B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while TSEM trades at $41.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs SITM Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while SITM trades at $182.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -44.99. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs SMTC Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while SMTC trades at $39.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -17.41. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -15.76%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs CAMT Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while CAMT trades at $65.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs POWI Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while POWI trades at $52.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 82.55. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs SLAB Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while SLAB trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs IPGP Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while IPGP trades at $66.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -14.71. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs AMBA Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while AMBA trades at $64.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -22.63. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs SYNA Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while SYNA trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs FORM Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while FORM trades at $31.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 46.25. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs DIOD Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while DIOD trades at $47.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 87.20. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs VSH Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while VSH trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs ACLS Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while ACLS trades at $62.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs KLIC Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while KLIC trades at $33.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 89.89. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs ACMR Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while ACMR trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs PLAB Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while PLAB trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs VECO Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while VECO trades at $20.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs SGH Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs AAOI Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while AAOI trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs MXL Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while MXL trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs UCTT Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 970.71M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while UCTT trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 34.68. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs COHU Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 825.89M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while COHU trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -9.65. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs HIMX Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 738.08M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while HIMX trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs IMOS Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 686.51M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while IMOS trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs LASR Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 684.24M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while LASR trades at $13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -12.14. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs AOSL Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 669.90M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while AOSL trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -29.23. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs ICHR Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 607.33M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while ICHR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -37.87. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs CEVA Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 495.07M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while CEVA trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 230.00. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs INDI Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 491.13M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while INDI trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs WOLF Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 487.89M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while WOLF trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs SIMO Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 466.32M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while SIMO trades at $55.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs NVTS Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 383.62M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while NVTS trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs LAES Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 372.15M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while LAES trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs XPER Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 368.01M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while XPER trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -18.73. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs POET Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 364.59M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while POET trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to POET's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs NVEC Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 339.71M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while NVEC trades at $70.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs SKYT Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 327.12M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while SKYT trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -48.64. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs TGAN Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.12M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs AIP Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 309.38M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while AIP trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs AEHR Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 266.16M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while AEHR trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AEHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs VLN Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 256.90M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while VLN trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs VLN-WT Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 231.04M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while VLN-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs BZAI Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 223.70M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while BZAI trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs ATOM Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 220.76M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while ATOM trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs DQ Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 190.64M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while DQ trades at $14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs MX Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 146.06M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while MX trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs OIIM Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143.02M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs MRAM Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 137.05M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while MRAM trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 152.50. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs QUIK Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 87.73M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while QUIK trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -13.51. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs GSIT Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 83.21M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while GSIT trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -7.74. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs INTT Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 75.58M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while INTT trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -605.00. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs ICG Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 70.77M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while ICG trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs AXTI Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 64.76M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while AXTI trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs MOSY Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.33M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs NA Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 63.07M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while NA trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs WISA Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 62.96M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WISA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs GCTS Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 62.42M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while GCTS trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs ASYS Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 54.39M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while ASYS trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs SQNS Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, SQNS has a market cap of 48.24M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while SQNS trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQNS's P/E ratio is 0.87. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SQNS's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is more volatile compared to SQNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.
XLNX vs MOBX Comparison
XLNX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XLNX stands at N/A. In comparison, MOBX has a market cap of 36.87M. Regarding current trading prices, XLNX is priced at $194.92, while MOBX trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XLNX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOBX's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, XLNX's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MOBX's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, XLNX is less volatile compared to MOBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XLNX.