Wolfspeed, Inc.
Wolfspeed, Inc. WOLF Peers
See (WOLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WOLF | $1.71 | +33.20% | 265.34M | -0.21 | -$8.26 | N/A |
| NVDA | $132.79 | +0.75% | 3.24T | 45.17 | $2.94 | +0.03% |
| AVGO | $230.53 | +0.35% | 1.08T | 106.73 | $2.16 | +0.96% |
| TSM | $196.29 | +2.36% | 1.02T | 23.76 | $8.26 | +1.26% |
| ASML | $740.70 | +0.48% | 291.24B | 29.89 | $24.78 | +0.99% |
| AMD | $110.71 | -1.20% | 179.51B | 80.81 | $1.37 | N/A |
| TXN | $180.21 | -2.81% | 163.72B | 34.13 | $5.28 | +2.96% |
| QCOM | $147.36 | -2.61% | 161.80B | 15.04 | $9.80 | +2.29% |
| ARM | $129.28 | -0.90% | 136.65B | 174.70 | $0.74 | N/A |
| AMAT | $160.52 | -1.05% | 130.41B | 19.50 | $8.23 | +1.03% |
Stock Comparison
WOLF vs NVDA Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 3.24T. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while NVDA trades at $132.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 45.17. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AVGO Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.08T. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while AVGO trades at $230.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 106.73. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs TSM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.02T. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while TSM trades at $196.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ASML Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 291.24B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while ASML trades at $740.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 29.89. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AMD Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 179.51B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while AMD trades at $110.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 80.81. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs TXN Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 163.72B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while TXN trades at $180.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs QCOM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 161.80B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while QCOM trades at $147.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ARM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 136.65B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while ARM trades at $129.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 174.70. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AMAT Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 130.41B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while AMAT trades at $160.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MU Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 105.98B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while MU trades at $94.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs LRCX Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 105.60B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while LRCX trades at $82.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ADI Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 105.11B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while ADI trades at $211.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 67.71. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs KLAC Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 101.50B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while KLAC trades at $767.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs INTC Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 89.64B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while INTC trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MRVL Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 53.44B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while MRVL trades at $61.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -60.65. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs NXPI Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 49.64B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while NXPI trades at $196.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MPWR Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 32.18B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while MPWR trades at $672.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MCHP Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 31.22B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while MCHP trades at $58.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -5805.00. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs STM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 22.47B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while STM trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ASX Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 21.48B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while ASX trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs GFS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 20.72B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while GFS trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -110.24. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs UMC Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 20.29B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while UMC trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ON Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 17.67B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while ON trades at $42.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ALAB Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 15.55B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while ALAB trades at $94.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 71.98. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs TER Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 12.59B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while TER trades at $78.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ENTG Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 11.08B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while ENTG trades at $73.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 35.87. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs SWKS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.56B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while SWKS trades at $70.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs CREE Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.84B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MTSI Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 9.04B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while MTSI trades at $121.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -102.10. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs BRKS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.82B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs QRVO Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.08B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while QRVO trades at $76.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 131.21. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs OLED Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 6.92B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while OLED trades at $145.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs LSCC Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 6.52B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while LSCC trades at $47.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 128.19. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs RMBS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 5.86B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while RMBS trades at $54.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs CRUS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.43B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while CRUS trades at $102.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs NVMI Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 5.41B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while NVMI trades at $184.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs SITM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 4.84B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while SITM trades at $204.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -53.69. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ALGM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 4.77B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while ALGM trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -66.44. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ONTO Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while ONTO trades at $94.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AMKR Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while AMKR trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs TSEM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 4.56B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while TSEM trades at $40.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs SLAB Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4.00B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while SLAB trades at $122.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -24.07. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs SMTC Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 3.27B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while SMTC trades at $37.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -16.72. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -15.76%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs CAMT Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while CAMT trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs POWI Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while POWI trades at $50.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 78.92. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs IPGP Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while IPGP trades at $65.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -14.49. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AMBA Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.68B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while AMBA trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -22.23. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs FORM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while FORM trades at $30.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 44.61. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs SYNA Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while SYNA trades at $60.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs DIOD Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while DIOD trades at $45.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 83.33. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs VSH Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while VSH trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -29.57. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ACLS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while ACLS trades at $59.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs KLIC Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while KLIC trades at $32.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 87.19. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ACMR Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while ACMR trades at $22.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs PLAB Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while PLAB trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs VECO Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while VECO trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs SGH Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MXL Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while MXL trades at $11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AAOI Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 978.14M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while AAOI trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs NVTS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 968.63M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while NVTS trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs UCTT Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 915.17M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while UCTT trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 32.69. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs COHU Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 803.57M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while COHU trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -9.39. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs HIMX Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 718.84M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while HIMX trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs LASR Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 703.03M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while LASR trades at $14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -12.47. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs IMOS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 688.33M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while IMOS trades at $18.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AOSL Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 628.23M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while AOSL trades at $21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -27.42. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ICHR Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 570.83M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while ICHR trades at $16.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs SIMO Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 548.07M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while SIMO trades at $65.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs CEVA Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 472.83M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while CEVA trades at $19.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 219.67. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs INDI Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 471.64M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while INDI trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs SKYT Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 438.10M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while SKYT trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -53.65. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs LAES Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 424.83M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while LAES trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs NVEC Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 353.89M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while NVEC trades at $73.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs XPER Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 353.85M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while XPER trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -18.01. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs POET Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 346.63M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while POET trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to POET's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs TGAN Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.12M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AIP Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 302.24M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while AIP trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AEHR Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 262.88M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while AEHR trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AEHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs VLN-WT Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 258.21M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while VLN-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs VLN Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 249.50M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while VLN trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs BZAI Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 249.13M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while BZAI trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ATOM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 203.26M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while ATOM trades at $6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs DQ Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 181.03M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while DQ trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs OIIM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143.02M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MX Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 140.83M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while MX trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MRAM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 138.17M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while MRAM trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 153.75. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs GSIT Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 82.18M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while GSIT trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs QUIK Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 81.56M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while QUIK trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ICG Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 80.67M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while ICG trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs INTT Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 73.71M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while INTT trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -590.00. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AXTI Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 71.60M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while AXTI trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MOSY Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.33M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs WISA Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 62.96M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to WISA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs NA Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 61.91M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while NA trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ASYS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 59.12M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while ASYS trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs GCTS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 56.86M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while GCTS trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs SQNS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, SQNS has a market cap of 46.21M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while SQNS trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SQNS's P/E ratio is 0.83. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to SQNS's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to SQNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MOBX Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, MOBX has a market cap of 38.79M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while MOBX trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MOBX's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MOBX's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MOBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs PXLW Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 265.34M. In comparison, PXLW has a market cap of 31.84M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.71, while PXLW trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas PXLW's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to PXLW's ROE of +3.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to PXLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.