Valens Semiconductor Ltd. WT
Valens Semiconductor Ltd. WT (VLN-WT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VLN-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VLN-WT | $0.05 | +0.00% | 229.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NVDA | $182.02 | +0.00% | 4.4T | 58.02 | $3.11 | +0.02% |
| AVGO | $311.23 | +0.00% | 1.4T | 111.40 | $2.75 | +0.75% |
| TSM | $241.00 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 25.69 | $9.30 | +1.13% |
| ASML | $755.21 | +0.00% | 291.8B | 26.54 | $27.96 | +0.91% |
| AMD | $180.95 | +0.00% | 288.1B | 106.93 | $1.66 | N/A |
| TXN | $193.71 | +0.00% | 176.9B | 35.64 | $5.46 | +2.80% |
| QCOM | $158.09 | +0.00% | 170.3B | 15.25 | $10.35 | +2.18% |
| ARM | $140.55 | +0.00% | 147.1B | 210.47 | $0.66 | N/A |
| MU | $125.29 | +0.00% | 135.2B | 21.77 | $5.55 | +0.38% |
Stock Comparison
VLN-WT vs NVDA Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.4T. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while NVDA trades at $182.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 58.02. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check NVDA's competition here
VLN-WT vs AVGO Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AVGO trades at $311.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 111.40. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check AVGO's competition here
VLN-WT vs TSM Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while TSM trades at $241.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check TSM's competition here
VLN-WT vs ASML Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 291.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ASML trades at $755.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 26.54. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check ASML's competition here
VLN-WT vs AMD Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 288.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AMD trades at $180.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 106.93. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check AMD's competition here
VLN-WT vs TXN Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 176.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while TXN trades at $193.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 35.64. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check TXN's competition here
VLN-WT vs QCOM Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 170.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while QCOM trades at $158.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check QCOM's competition here
VLN-WT vs ARM Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 147.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ARM trades at $140.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 210.47. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check ARM's competition here
VLN-WT vs MU Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 135.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MU trades at $125.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check MU's competition here
VLN-WT vs AMAT Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 129.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AMAT trades at $188.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check AMAT's competition here
VLN-WT vs LRCX Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 125.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while LRCX trades at $107.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check LRCX's competition here
VLN-WT vs KLAC Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while KLAC trades at $955.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check KLAC's competition here
VLN-WT vs ADI Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 114.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ADI trades at $236.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 62.94. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check ADI's competition here
VLN-WT vs INTC Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 107.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while INTC trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check INTC's competition here
VLN-WT vs MRVL Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MRVL trades at $79.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -133.67. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check MRVL's competition here
VLN-WT vs NXPI Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while NXPI trades at $231.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check NXPI's competition here
VLN-WT vs MPWR Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MPWR trades at $848.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check MPWR's competition here
VLN-WT vs MCHP Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MCHP trades at $65.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -193.26. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check MCHP's competition here
VLN-WT vs ALAB Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ALAB trades at $190.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 232.31. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check ALAB's competition here
VLN-WT vs STM Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while STM trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 37.19. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check STM's competition here
VLN-WT vs ASX Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ASX trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check ASX's competition here
VLN-WT vs ON Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ON trades at $51.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 48.65. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check ON's competition here
VLN-WT vs GFS Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while GFS trades at $33.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -157.48. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check GFS's competition here
VLN-WT vs TER Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while TER trades at $111.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 37.99. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check TER's competition here
VLN-WT vs UMC Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while UMC trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check UMC's competition here
VLN-WT vs ENTG Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ENTG trades at $78.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 39.55. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check ENTG's competition here
VLN-WT vs SWKS Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while SWKS trades at $75.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check SWKS's competition here
VLN-WT vs CREE Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check CREE's competition here
VLN-WT vs MTSI Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MTSI trades at $125.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -128.22. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check MTSI's competition here
VLN-WT vs LSCC Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while LSCC trades at $63.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 276.22. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check LSCC's competition here
VLN-WT vs QRVO Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while QRVO trades at $90.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 105.12. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check QRVO's competition here
VLN-WT vs RMBS Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while RMBS trades at $76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 35.17. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check RMBS's competition here
VLN-WT vs BRKS Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check BRKS's competition here
VLN-WT vs NVMI Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while NVMI trades at $270.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 34.61. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check NVMI's competition here
VLN-WT vs OLED Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while OLED trades at $143.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check OLED's competition here
VLN-WT vs AMKR Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AMKR trades at $24.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check AMKR's competition here
VLN-WT vs SITM Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while SITM trades at $226.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -63.82. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check SITM's competition here
VLN-WT vs CRUS Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while CRUS trades at $112.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check CRUS's competition here
VLN-WT vs ALGM Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ALGM trades at $31.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -82.97. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check ALGM's competition here
VLN-WT vs ONTO Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ONTO trades at $110.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 26.55. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check ONTO's competition here
VLN-WT vs TSEM Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while TSEM trades at $47.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check TSEM's competition here
VLN-WT vs SMTC Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while SMTC trades at $50.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -29.66. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check SMTC's competition here
VLN-WT vs SLAB Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while SLAB trades at $133.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -40.71. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check SLAB's competition here
VLN-WT vs CAMT Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while CAMT trades at $87.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check CAMT's competition here
VLN-WT vs IPGP Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while IPGP trades at $79.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -16.32. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check IPGP's competition here
VLN-WT vs AMBA Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AMBA trades at $68.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -26.90. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check AMBA's competition here
VLN-WT vs POWI Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while POWI trades at $47.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 78.47. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check POWI's competition here
VLN-WT vs SYNA Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while SYNA trades at $68.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -54.75. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check SYNA's competition here
VLN-WT vs ACLS Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ACLS trades at $83.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check ACLS's competition here
VLN-WT vs SIMO Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while SIMO trades at $75.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 31.89. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check SIMO's competition here
VLN-WT vs DIOD Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while DIOD trades at $53.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check DIOD's competition here
VLN-WT vs FORM Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while FORM trades at $30.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 50.35. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check FORM's competition here
VLN-WT vs VSH Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while VSH trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -22.83. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check VSH's competition here
VLN-WT vs KLIC Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while KLIC trades at $37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 401.22. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check KLIC's competition here
VLN-WT vs ACMR Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ACMR trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check ACMR's competition here
VLN-WT vs DQ Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while DQ trades at $21.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check DQ's competition here
VLN-WT vs NVTS Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while NVTS trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -10.48. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check NVTS's competition here
VLN-WT vs VECO Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while VECO trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check VECO's competition here
VLN-WT vs AAOI Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AAOI trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check AAOI's competition here
VLN-WT vs MXL Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MXL trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check MXL's competition here
VLN-WT vs LASR Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while LASR trades at $26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -26.99. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check LASR's competition here
VLN-WT vs HIMX Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while HIMX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check HIMX's competition here
VLN-WT vs PLAB Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while PLAB trades at $21.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check PLAB's competition here
VLN-WT vs SGH Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check SGH's competition here
VLN-WT vs UCTT Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while UCTT trades at $23.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check UCTT's competition here
VLN-WT vs COHU Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 927.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while COHU trades at $20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -10.68. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check COHU's competition here
VLN-WT vs INDI Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 897.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while INDI trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check INDI's competition here
VLN-WT vs AOSL Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 788.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AOSL trades at $27.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check AOSL's competition here
VLN-WT vs ICHR Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 616.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ICHR trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -29.43. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check ICHR's competition here
VLN-WT vs IMOS Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 579.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while IMOS trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 41.10. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check IMOS's competition here
VLN-WT vs CEVA Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 556.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while CEVA trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -388.50. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check CEVA's competition here
VLN-WT vs SKYT Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while SKYT trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -33.56. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check SKYT's competition here
VLN-WT vs AEHR Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 547.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AEHR trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -140.85. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check AEHR's competition here
VLN-WT vs POET Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 456.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while POET trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to POET's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check POET's competition here
VLN-WT vs AIP Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 400.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AIP trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AIP's ROE of +11.70%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check AIP's competition here
VLN-WT vs LAES Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 382.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while LAES trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check LAES's competition here
VLN-WT vs BZAI Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while BZAI trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check BZAI's competition here
VLN-WT vs TGAN Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check TGAN's competition here
VLN-WT vs NVEC Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 304.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while NVEC trades at $63.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check NVEC's competition here
VLN-WT vs ALMU Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 298.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ALMU trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -72.58. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check ALMU's competition here
VLN-WT vs XPER Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 273.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while XPER trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -84.57. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check XPER's competition here
VLN-WT vs NA Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 273.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while NA trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check NA's competition here
VLN-WT vs VLN Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 223.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while VLN trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check VLN's competition here
VLN-WT vs WOLF Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 210.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while WOLF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check WOLF's competition here
VLN-WT vs OIIM Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check OIIM's competition here
VLN-WT vs MRAM Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 135.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MRAM trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check MRAM's competition here
VLN-WT vs ATOM Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 106.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ATOM trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check ATOM's competition here
VLN-WT vs MX Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MX trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check MX's competition here
VLN-WT vs AXTI Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 93.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AXTI trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check AXTI's competition here
VLN-WT vs GSIT Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 92.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while GSIT trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check GSIT's competition here
VLN-WT vs QUIK Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 89M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while QUIK trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check QUIK's competition here
VLN-WT vs INTT Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 85.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while INTT trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -114.33. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check INTT's competition here
VLN-WT vs ASYS Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ASYS trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check ASYS's competition here
VLN-WT vs GCTS Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 70.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while GCTS trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check GCTS's competition here
VLN-WT vs ICG Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ICG trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check ICG's competition here
VLN-WT vs MOSY Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check MOSY's competition here
VLN-WT vs WISA Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to WISA's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check WISA's competition here
VLN-WT vs MOBXW Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, MOBXW has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MOBXW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOBXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MOBXW's ROE of -10.89%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MOBXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check MOBXW's competition here
VLN-WT vs PXLW Comparison August 2025
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 229.7M. In comparison, PXLW has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while PXLW trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXLW's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PXLW's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to PXLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.Check PXLW's competition here