Valens Semiconductor Ltd. WT
Valens Semiconductor Ltd. WT VLN-WT Peers
See (VLN-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VLN-WT | $0.05 | -10.26% | 241.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NVDA | $157.99 | +0.15% | 3.9T | 50.80 | $3.11 | +0.03% |
| AVGO | $275.65 | +2.34% | 1.3T | 100.97 | $2.73 | +0.84% |
| TSM | $226.49 | -0.91% | 1.2T | 27.09 | $8.36 | +1.15% |
| ASML | $801.39 | +0.68% | 315.1B | 31.21 | $25.68 | +0.82% |
| AMD | $141.90 | -1.33% | 230.1B | 103.58 | $1.37 | N/A |
| TXN | $207.62 | +0.26% | 188.6B | 39.32 | $5.28 | +2.60% |
| QCOM | $159.26 | +0.45% | 174.9B | 16.23 | $9.81 | +2.17% |
| ARM | $161.74 | -2.25% | 171B | 215.65 | $0.75 | N/A |
| AMAT | $183.07 | -0.08% | 146.9B | 22.27 | $8.22 | +0.91% |
Stock Comparison
VLN-WT vs NVDA Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while NVDA trades at $157.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs AVGO Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AVGO trades at $275.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 100.97. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs TSM Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while TSM trades at $226.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs ASML Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 315.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ASML trades at $801.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 31.21. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs AMD Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 230.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AMD trades at $141.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 103.58. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs TXN Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 188.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while TXN trades at $207.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 39.32. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs QCOM Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 174.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while QCOM trades at $159.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs ARM Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 171B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ARM trades at $161.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 215.65. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs AMAT Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 146.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AMAT trades at $183.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs MU Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 137.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MU trades at $123.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs LRCX Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 124.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while LRCX trades at $97.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs KLAC Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while KLAC trades at $895.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 32.62. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs ADI Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 118.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ADI trades at $238.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 64.68. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs INTC Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 97.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while INTC trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs MRVL Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 66.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MRVL trades at $77.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -135.79. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs NXPI Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while NXPI trades at $218.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs MCHP Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MCHP trades at $70.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -7037.00. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs MPWR Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MPWR trades at $731.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs STM Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while STM trades at $30.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs ASX Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ASX trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs ON Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ON trades at $52.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 36.40. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs GFS Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while GFS trades at $38.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -112.35. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs UMC Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while UMC trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs ALAB Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ALAB trades at $90.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 69.02. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs TER Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while TER trades at $89.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs ENTG Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ENTG trades at $80.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs SWKS Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while SWKS trades at $74.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs MTSI Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MTSI trades at $143.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -120.41. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs CREE Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs NVMI Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while NVMI trades at $275.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 41.51. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs QRVO Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while QRVO trades at $84.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 146.40. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs BRKS Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs OLED Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while OLED trades at $154.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 32.10. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs RMBS Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while RMBS trades at $64.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 33.52. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs LSCC Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while LSCC trades at $48.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 132.41. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs ALGM Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ALGM trades at $34.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -87.67. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs CRUS Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while CRUS trades at $104.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs AMKR Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AMKR trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs SITM Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while SITM trades at $213.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -56.22. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs ONTO Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ONTO trades at $100.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs TSEM Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while TSEM trades at $43.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs SLAB Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while SLAB trades at $147.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -28.89. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs SMTC Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while SMTC trades at $45.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -26.87. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs CAMT Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while CAMT trades at $84.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 32.40. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs POWI Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while POWI trades at $55.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 87.32. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs IPGP Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while IPGP trades at $68.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -15.19. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs AMBA Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AMBA trades at $66.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -26.53. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs FORM Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while FORM trades at $34.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 49.87. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs SIMO Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while SIMO trades at $75.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs SYNA Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while SYNA trades at $64.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs DIOD Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while DIOD trades at $52.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 96.16. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs ACLS Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ACLS trades at $69.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs VSH Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while VSH trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -33.08. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs KLIC Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while KLIC trades at $34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 93.51. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs ACMR Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ACMR trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs AAOI Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AAOI trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs NVTS Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while NVTS trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -12.36. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs MXL Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MXL trades at $14.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs VECO Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while VECO trades at $20.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs PLAB Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while PLAB trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs SGH Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs UCTT Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while UCTT trades at $22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 36.40. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs DQ Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while DQ trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs LASR Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 973M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while LASR trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -17.26. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs COHU Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 894.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while COHU trades at $19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -10.46. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs HIMX Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 780.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while HIMX trades at $8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs AOSL Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 763.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AOSL trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -33.32. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs INDI Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 693.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while INDI trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs ICHR Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 670.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ICHR trades at $19.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -41.79. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs IMOS Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 662.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while IMOS trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs CEVA Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 525.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while CEVA trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 244.22. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs SKYT Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 472.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while SKYT trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -57.88. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs LAES Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 461.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while LAES trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -6.72. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs POET Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 440.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while POET trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -6.35. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to POET's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs AIP Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 400M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AIP trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -11.77. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs AEHR Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 384.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AEHR trades at $12.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AEHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs XPER Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 361.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while XPER trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -18.42. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs NVEC Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 356.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while NVEC trades at $73.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs TGAN Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs BZAI Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 303M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while BZAI trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs VLN Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 278M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while VLN trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs ALMU Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 258.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ALMU trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -62.96. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs NA Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 154.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while NA trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs ATOM Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 154.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ATOM trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs MX Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 143.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MX trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs OIIM Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs MRAM Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 141.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MRAM trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 157.25. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs QUIK Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 97.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while QUIK trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -15.02. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs AXTI Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 95.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AXTI trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs GSIT Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while GSIT trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs INTT Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 92.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while INTT trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -744.00. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs GCTS Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 79.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while GCTS trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs AEVAW Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, AEVAW has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while AEVAW trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEVAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AEVAW's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to AEVAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs ASYS Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ASYS trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs MOSY Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs WISA Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to WISA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs WOLF Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while WOLF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs ICG Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 53.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while ICG trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.
VLN-WT vs MOBXW Comparison
VLN-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLN-WT stands at 241.9M. In comparison, MOBXW has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLN-WT is priced at $0.05, while MOBXW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOBXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLN-WT's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MOBXW's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, VLN-WT is more volatile compared to MOBXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLN-WT.