Texas Instruments Incorporated
Texas Instruments Incorporated TXN Peers
See (TXN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TXN | $184.99 | +0.46% | 168.1B | 34.90 | $5.30 | +2.92% |
| NVDA | $139.18 | +3.24% | 3.4T | 47.34 | $2.94 | +0.03% |
| AVGO | $241.87 | +1.02% | 1.1T | 111.46 | $2.17 | +0.93% |
| TSM | $197.18 | +0.53% | 1T | 23.70 | $8.32 | +1.26% |
| ASML | $747.07 | +0.07% | 293.7B | 29.65 | $25.20 | +0.90% |
| AMD | $113.03 | +0.15% | 183.3B | 82.50 | $1.37 | N/A |
| QCOM | $148.30 | +0.47% | 162.8B | 15.15 | $9.79 | +2.30% |
| ARM | $128.10 | -5.49% | 135.4B | 170.80 | $0.75 | N/A |
| AMAT | $159.48 | -1.31% | 128B | 19.40 | $8.22 | +1.05% |
| MU | $96.80 | +0.64% | 108.2B | 23.16 | $4.18 | +0.48% |
Stock Comparison
TXN vs NVDA Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 3.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while NVDA trades at $139.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 47.34. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AVGO Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while AVGO trades at $241.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 111.46. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs TSM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while TSM trades at $197.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ASML Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 293.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while ASML trades at $747.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 29.65. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AMD Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 183.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while AMD trades at $113.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 82.50. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs QCOM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 162.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while QCOM trades at $148.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ARM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 135.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while ARM trades at $128.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 170.80. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AMAT Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 128B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while AMAT trades at $159.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MU Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 108.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while MU trades at $96.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs LRCX Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 107.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while LRCX trades at $84.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ADI Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 107.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while ADI trades at $215.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 58.47. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs KLAC Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 102.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while KLAC trades at $773.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs INTC Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while INTC trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MRVL Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while MRVL trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -62.48. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs NXPI Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while NXPI trades at $195.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MPWR Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while MPWR trades at $680.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MCHP Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while MCHP trades at $58.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -5812.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs STM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while STM trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ASX Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while ASX trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs GFS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while GFS trades at $36.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -108.56. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs UMC Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while UMC trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ON Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while ON trades at $42.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ALAB Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while ALAB trades at $96.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 73.75. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs TER Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while TER trades at $81.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ENTG Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while ENTG trades at $72.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 35.48. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs SWKS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while SWKS trades at $69.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs CREE Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MTSI Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while MTSI trades at $123.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -103.78. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs BRKS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs QRVO Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while QRVO trades at $76.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 127.35. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs OLED Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while OLED trades at $145.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs NVMI Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while NVMI trades at $217.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs LSCC Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while LSCC trades at $46.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 124.35. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs RMBS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while RMBS trades at $54.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs CRUS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while CRUS trades at $99.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ALGM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while ALGM trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -66.03. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs SITM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while SITM trades at $196.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -51.77. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ONTO Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while ONTO trades at $95.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AMKR Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while AMKR trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs TSEM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while TSEM trades at $40.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs SLAB Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while SLAB trades at $123.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -24.27. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs CAMT Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while CAMT trades at $68.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs SMTC Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while SMTC trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -21.29. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -15.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs IPGP Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while IPGP trades at $67.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -14.83. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs POWI Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while POWI trades at $50.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 79.13. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AMBA Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while AMBA trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -21.83. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs FORM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while FORM trades at $31.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 45.13. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs SYNA Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while SYNA trades at $59.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs DIOD Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while DIOD trades at $45.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 82.91. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs VSH Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while VSH trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -29.77. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ACLS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while ACLS trades at $58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs KLIC Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while KLIC trades at $32.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 88.43. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ACMR Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while ACMR trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs VECO Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while VECO trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs PLAB Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while PLAB trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs SGH Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs NVTS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while NVTS trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MXL Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while MXL trades at $11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AAOI Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while AAOI trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs UCTT Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 911.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while UCTT trades at $20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 32.56. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs COHU Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 823.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while COHU trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs LASR Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 769.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while LASR trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -13.66. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs HIMX Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 729.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while HIMX trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs IMOS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 685.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while IMOS trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AOSL Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 633.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while AOSL trades at $21.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -27.65. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ICHR Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 556.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while ICHR trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -34.70. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs INDI Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 553.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while INDI trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs SIMO Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while SIMO trades at $63.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs CEVA Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 460.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while CEVA trades at $19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 214.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs SKYT Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 436.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while SKYT trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -53.47. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs LAES Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 422.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while LAES trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs XPER Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 356.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while XPER trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -18.14. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs NVEC Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 353.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while NVEC trades at $73.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs POET Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 344.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while POET trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to POET's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AIP Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 328.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while AIP trades at $7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs TGAN Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AEHR Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 296.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while AEHR trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AEHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs VLN Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 234.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while VLN trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs VLN-WT Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 217.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while VLN-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs WOLF Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 208.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while WOLF trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs BZAI Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 205.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while BZAI trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ATOM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 191.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while ATOM trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs DQ Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 184.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while DQ trades at $13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs OIIM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MX Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while MX trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MRAM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 127.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while MRAM trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 141.75. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs QUIK Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while QUIK trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -11.99. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs GSIT Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while GSIT trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs INTT Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while INTT trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -638.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AXTI Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 69.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while AXTI trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ICG Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while ICG trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MOSY Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs WISA Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WISA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs NA Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while NA trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ASYS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while ASYS trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs GCTS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while GCTS trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs SQNS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, SQNS has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while SQNS trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas SQNS's P/E ratio is 0.81. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SQNS's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to SQNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MOBX Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, MOBX has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while MOBX trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas MOBX's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MOBX's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MOBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs PXLW Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.1B. In comparison, PXLW has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $184.99, while PXLW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 34.90, whereas PXLW's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PXLW's ROE of +3.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to PXLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.