Silicon Laboratories Inc.
Silicon Laboratories Inc. SLAB Peers
See (SLAB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLAB | $90.00 | -1.75% | 2.92B | -15.18 | -$5.93 | N/A |
NVDA | $134.83 | -0.38% | 3.29T | 45.86 | $2.94 | +0.03% |
AVGO | $232.61 | +0.21% | 1.09T | 107.69 | $2.16 | +0.96% |
TSM | $194.32 | -0.23% | 1.01T | 23.58 | $8.24 | +1.28% |
ASML | $758.36 | -1.37% | 298.19B | 30.92 | $24.53 | +0.89% |
AMD | $114.99 | -2.32% | 186.44B | 79.85 | $1.44 | N/A |
TXN | $187.83 | +0.26% | 170.64B | 35.57 | $5.28 | +2.87% |
QCOM | $152.61 | -0.24% | 167.57B | 15.40 | $9.91 | +2.24% |
AMAT | $174.75 | +0.35% | 141.97B | 22.87 | $7.64 | +0.92% |
ARM | $133.07 | -0.28% | 140.26B | 177.43 | $0.75 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SLAB vs NVDA Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 3.29T. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while NVDA trades at $134.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 45.86. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs AVGO Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.09T. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while AVGO trades at $232.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 107.69. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs TSM Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.01T. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while TSM trades at $194.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs ASML Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 298.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while ASML trades at $758.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs AMD Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 186.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while AMD trades at $114.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 79.85. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs TXN Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 170.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while TXN trades at $187.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 35.57. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs QCOM Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 167.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while QCOM trades at $152.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs AMAT Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 141.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while AMAT trades at $174.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs ARM Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 140.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while ARM trades at $133.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 177.43. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs ADI Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 112.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while ADI trades at $227.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 72.56. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs LRCX Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 108.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while LRCX trades at $84.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs MU Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 106.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while MU trades at $95.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs KLAC Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 106.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while KLAC trades at $806.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 29.35. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs INTC Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 94.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while INTC trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs MRVL Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 56.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while MRVL trades at $65.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -63.92. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs NXPI Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 53.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while NXPI trades at $210.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs MPWR Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 34.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while MPWR trades at $710.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs MCHP Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 32.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while MCHP trades at $60.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -6080.00. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs STM Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 23.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while STM trades at $25.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs ASX Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 22.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while ASX trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs GFS Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 21.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while GFS trades at $39.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -116.29. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs UMC Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 19.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while UMC trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs ON Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 18.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while ON trades at $44.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs ALAB Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 15.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while ALAB trades at $92.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 68.29. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs TER Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 13.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while TER trades at $82.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 23.51. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs ENTG Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 11.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while ENTG trades at $78.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs SWKS Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while SWKS trades at $72.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs CREE Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs MTSI Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 9.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while MTSI trades at $122.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -102.97. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs BRKS Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs QRVO Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while QRVO trades at $78.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 135.21. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs OLED Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while OLED trades at $153.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 31.83. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs LSCC Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 7.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while LSCC trades at $52.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 141.22. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs RMBS Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 6.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while RMBS trades at $56.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs NVMI Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 5.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while NVMI trades at $195.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs CRUS Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while CRUS trades at $106.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs ALGM Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 4.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while ALGM trades at $27.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -69.28. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs AMKR Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 4.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while AMKR trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs ONTO Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while ONTO trades at $98.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs TSEM Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while TSEM trades at $42.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs SITM Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while SITM trades at $182.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -44.99. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs SMTC Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while SMTC trades at $39.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -17.67. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -15.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs POWI Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while POWI trades at $54.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 84.78. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs CAMT Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while CAMT trades at $66.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs IPGP Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while IPGP trades at $65.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs AMBA Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while AMBA trades at $62.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -22.06. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs FORM Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while FORM trades at $32.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 47.57. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs SYNA Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while SYNA trades at $65.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs DIOD Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while DIOD trades at $48.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 88.13. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs VSH Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while VSH trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -31.44. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs ACLS Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while ACLS trades at $62.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs KLIC Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while KLIC trades at $34.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 92.27. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs ACMR Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while ACMR trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs PLAB Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while PLAB trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs VECO Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while VECO trades at $21.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs SGH Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs MXL Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while MXL trades at $12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs AAOI Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while AAOI trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs UCTT Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while UCTT trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 36.32. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs COHU Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 829.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while COHU trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs HIMX Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 738.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while HIMX trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs AOSL Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 698.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while AOSL trades at $23.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -30.47. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs ICHR Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 647.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while ICHR trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -40.38. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs LASR Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 631.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while LASR trades at $12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs WOLF Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 589.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while WOLF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs INDI Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 541.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while INDI trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs CEVA Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 510.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while CEVA trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 237.00. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs SIMO Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 466.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while SIMO trades at $55.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs NVTS Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 397.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while NVTS trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs XPER Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 378.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while XPER trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -19.26. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs POET Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 349.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while POET trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to POET's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs NVEC Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 343.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while NVEC trades at $71.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs SKYT Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 327.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while SKYT trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -48.64. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs TGAN Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs AIP Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 319.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while AIP trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -8.85. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AIP's ROE of -8.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs AEHR Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 276.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while AEHR trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AEHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs LAES Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 271.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while LAES trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs VLN Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 265.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while VLN trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -7.61. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs VLN-WT Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 232.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while VLN-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs ATOM Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 222.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while ATOM trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -10.98. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs BZAI Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 220.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while BZAI trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -54.25. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs DQ Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 198.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while DQ trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs OIIM Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs MX Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 142.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while MX trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs MRAM Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 138.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while MRAM trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 154.25. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs QUIK Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 94.79M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while QUIK trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -23.08. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs GSIT Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 86.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while GSIT trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -8.05. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs ICG Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 77.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while ICG trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs INTT Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 75.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while INTT trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -606.50. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs NA Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 70.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while NA trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs AXTI Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 66.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while AXTI trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs MOSY Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs WISA Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 62.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WISA's ROE of -65.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs GCTS Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 59.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while GCTS trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs ASYS Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 49.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while ASYS trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 43.63. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs SQNS Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, SQNS has a market cap of 46.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while SQNS trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas SQNS's P/E ratio is 0.84. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SQNS's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to SQNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs MOBX Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, MOBX has a market cap of 38.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while MOBX trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas MOBX's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MOBX's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to MOBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs PXLW Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, PXLW has a market cap of 36.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while PXLW trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas PXLW's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PXLW's ROE of +13.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to PXLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.
SLAB vs IMOS Comparison
SLAB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLAB stands at 2.92B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 34.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SLAB is priced at $90.00, while IMOS trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLAB currently has a P/E ratio of -15.18, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, SLAB's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLAB is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLAB.