QuickLogic Corporation
QuickLogic Corporation QUIK Peers
See (QUIK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUIK | $6.55 | +2.66% | 103.48M | -25.19 | -$0.26 | N/A |
| NVDA | $129.84 | +5.56% | 3.17T | 44.16 | $2.94 | +0.03% |
| AVGO | $232.42 | +4.89% | 1.09T | 108.10 | $2.15 | +0.96% |
| TSM | $193.99 | +3.75% | 1.01T | 22.69 | $8.55 | +1.28% |
| ASML | $763.90 | +1.83% | 300.37B | 30.56 | $25.00 | +0.96% |
| AMD | $112.46 | +4.01% | 182.34B | 82.09 | $1.37 | N/A |
| TXN | $188.20 | +0.49% | 170.97B | 35.71 | $5.27 | +2.85% |
| QCOM | $151.34 | -0.51% | 166.17B | 15.44 | $9.80 | +2.24% |
| AMAT | $173.03 | +3.00% | 140.58B | 22.62 | $7.65 | +0.92% |
| ARM | $126.68 | +1.50% | 133.52B | 166.68 | $0.76 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QUIK vs NVDA Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 3.17T. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while NVDA trades at $129.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 44.16. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs AVGO Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.09T. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while AVGO trades at $232.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 108.10. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs TSM Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.01T. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while TSM trades at $193.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs ASML Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 300.37B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while ASML trades at $763.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 30.56. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs AMD Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 182.34B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while AMD trades at $112.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 82.09. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs TXN Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 170.97B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while TXN trades at $188.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 35.71. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs QCOM Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 166.17B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while QCOM trades at $151.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs AMAT Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 140.58B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while AMAT trades at $173.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs ARM Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 133.52B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while ARM trades at $126.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 166.68. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs ADI Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 112.43B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while ADI trades at $226.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 72.19. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs LRCX Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 109.04B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while LRCX trades at $85.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs MU Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 108.33B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while MU trades at $96.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs KLAC Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 105.25B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while KLAC trades at $795.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 28.94. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs INTC Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 98.41B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while INTC trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs MRVL Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 56.56B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while MRVL trades at $65.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -64.20. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs NXPI Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 53.66B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while NXPI trades at $212.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs MPWR Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 35.32B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while MPWR trades at $737.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs MCHP Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 33.51B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while MCHP trades at $62.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is 109.30. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs STM Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 23.32B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while STM trades at $26.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs GFS Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 21.95B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while GFS trades at $39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -116.76. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs ASX Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 21.86B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while ASX trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs UMC Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 19.44B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while UMC trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs ON Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 19.13B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while ON trades at $45.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 31.78. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs ALAB Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 14.47B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while ALAB trades at $87.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 66.99. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs TER Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 13.62B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while TER trades at $84.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs ENTG Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 12.59B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while ENTG trades at $83.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 40.75. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs SWKS Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.90B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while SWKS trades at $72.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs CREE Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.84B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs MTSI Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 9.17B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while MTSI trades at $123.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -86.19. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs BRKS Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.82B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs LSCC Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 7.68B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while LSCC trades at $55.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 151.03. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs OLED Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 7.34B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while OLED trades at $154.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 32.06. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs QRVO Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.34B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while QRVO trades at $78.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 135.48. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs RMBS Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 6.09B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while RMBS trades at $56.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs NVMI Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 5.93B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while NVMI trades at $202.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 35.28. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs CRUS Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.70B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while CRUS trades at $107.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs AMKR Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 4.95B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while AMKR trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs ONTO Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.85B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while ONTO trades at $99.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs ALGM Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 4.84B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while ALGM trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -75.14. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs TSEM Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while TSEM trades at $40.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs SITM Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while SITM trades at $182.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -44.99. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs SMTC Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while SMTC trades at $39.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -15.76%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs POWI Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.15B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while POWI trades at $55.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 98.84. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs CAMT Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 3.13B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while CAMT trades at $68.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs SLAB Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while SLAB trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs IPGP Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while IPGP trades at $65.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -14.51. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs AMBA Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while AMBA trades at $60.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -21.36. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs SYNA Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.54B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while SYNA trades at $65.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs FORM Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while FORM trades at $32.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 46.94. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs DIOD Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while DIOD trades at $48.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs ACLS Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while ACLS trades at $62.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs VSH Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while VSH trades at $14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -64.50. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs KLIC Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while KLIC trades at $34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 93.51. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs ACMR Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while ACMR trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs PLAB Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while PLAB trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs VECO Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while VECO trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs AAOI Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while AAOI trades at $20.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs MXL Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while MXL trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs SGH Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs UCTT Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while UCTT trades at $22.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 36.55. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs COHU Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 844.02M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while COHU trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs AOSL Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 737.75M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while AOSL trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -30.99. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs HIMX Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 721.06M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while HIMX trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs ICHR Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 657.83M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while ICHR trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -41.02. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs LASR Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 655.57M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while LASR trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -10.44. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs WOLF Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 598.95M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while WOLF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs CEVA Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 530.23M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while CEVA trades at $22.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -59.92. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs INDI Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 525.78M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while INDI trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs SIMO Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 466.32M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while SIMO trades at $55.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs NVTS Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 407.73M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while NVTS trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs XPER Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 380.57M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while XPER trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -26.87. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs AIP Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 346.22M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while AIP trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AIP's ROE of -8.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs POET Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 342.34M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while POET trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to POET's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs NVEC Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 341.75M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while NVEC trades at $70.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs SKYT Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 327.12M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while SKYT trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -48.64. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs TGAN Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.12M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs LAES Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 289.16M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while LAES trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs BZAI Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 287.77M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while BZAI trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -70.75. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs AEHR Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 275.39M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while AEHR trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AEHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs VLN Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 257.43M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while VLN trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs VLN-WT Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 243.78M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while VLN-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs ATOM Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 220.46M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while ATOM trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs DQ Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 200.79M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while DQ trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs OIIM Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143.02M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs MRAM Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 138.40M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while MRAM trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 154.00. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs MX Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 116.85M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while MX trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs GSIT Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 90.37M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while GSIT trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs ICG Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 81.57M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while ICG trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs GCTS Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 81.54M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while GCTS trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs INTT Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 76.21M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while INTT trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -610.00. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs NA Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 67.13M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while NA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs AXTI Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 67.03M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while AXTI trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs MOSY Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.33M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs WISA Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 62.96M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to WISA's ROE of -65.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs ASYS Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 49.87M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while ASYS trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is 43.63. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs SQNS Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, SQNS has a market cap of 40.49M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while SQNS trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas SQNS's P/E ratio is 0.80. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SQNS's ROE of +2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to SQNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs MOBX Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, MOBX has a market cap of 38.47M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while MOBX trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas MOBX's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MOBX's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to MOBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs PXLW Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, PXLW has a market cap of 37.07M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while PXLW trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas PXLW's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PXLW's ROE of +13.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is less volatile compared to PXLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.
QUIK vs IMOS Comparison
QUIK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUIK stands at 103.48M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 33.02M. Regarding current trading prices, QUIK is priced at $6.55, while IMOS trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUIK currently has a P/E ratio of -25.19, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, QUIK's ROE is -0.17%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUIK is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUIK.