Quantum eMotion Corp.
Quantum eMotion Corp. (QNC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QNC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QNC | $2.34 | -1.68% | 475.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NVDA | $174.48 | +1.03% | 4.3T | 35.85 | $4.90 | +0.02% |
| TSM | $340.30 | +3.36% | 1.8T | 32.74 | $10.34 | +0.78% |
| AVGO | $316.12 | +1.81% | 1.5T | 62.99 | $5.12 | +0.76% |
| ASML | $1,389.00 | +5.45% | 527.7B | 48.35 | $28.32 | +0.51% |
| MU | $391.17 | -7.50% | 456B | 19.08 | $21.19 | +0.11% |
| AMD | $200.43 | -0.45% | 330.5B | 77.36 | $2.62 | N/A |
| LRCX | $237.89 | +4.17% | 291.4B | 48.01 | $4.86 | +0.43% |
| AMAT | $374.58 | +4.91% | 287.1B | 37.10 | $9.75 | +0.50% |
| INTC | $43.28 | -1.34% | 219.8B | -733.50 | -$0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QNC vs NVDA Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.3T. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while NVDA trades at $174.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 35.85. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check NVDA's competition here
QNC vs TSM Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while TSM trades at $340.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check TSM's competition here
QNC vs AVGO Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while AVGO trades at $316.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 62.99. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AVGO's competition here
QNC vs ASML Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 527.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while ASML trades at $1,389.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 48.35. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ASML's competition here
QNC vs MU Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 456B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while MU trades at $391.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MU's competition here
QNC vs AMD Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 330.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while AMD trades at $200.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 77.36. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AMD's competition here
QNC vs LRCX Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 291.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while LRCX trades at $237.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 48.01. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check LRCX's competition here
QNC vs AMAT Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 287.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while AMAT trades at $374.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 37.10. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AMAT's competition here
QNC vs INTC Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 219.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while INTC trades at $43.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -733.50. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check INTC's competition here
QNC vs KLAC Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 198.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while KLAC trades at $1,555.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 44.04. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check KLAC's competition here
QNC vs TXN Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 172B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while TXN trades at $193.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check TXN's competition here
QNC vs ADI Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 152.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while ADI trades at $320.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 56.97. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ADI's competition here
QNC vs ARM Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 145.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while ARM trades at $139.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 182.52. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ARM's competition here
QNC vs QCOM Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 137.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while QCOM trades at $127.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check QCOM's competition here
QNC vs MRVL Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while MRVL trades at $91.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 29.37. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MRVL's competition here
QNC vs MPWR Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while MPWR trades at $1,086.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 83.89. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MPWR's competition here
QNC vs NXPI Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while NXPI trades at $195.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check NXPI's competition here
QNC vs TER Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while TER trades at $316.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 87.84. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check TER's competition here
QNC vs ASX Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while ASX trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 39.42. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ASX's competition here
QNC vs MCHP Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while MCHP trades at $65.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -214.47. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MCHP's competition here
QNC vs STM Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while STM trades at $31.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 175.89. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check STM's competition here
QNC vs GFS Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while GFS trades at $45.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check GFS's competition here
QNC vs Q Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while Q trades at $117.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check Q's competition here
QNC vs ON Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while ON trades at $62.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 206.52. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ON's competition here
QNC vs UMC Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while UMC trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check UMC's competition here
QNC vs ALAB Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while ALAB trades at $121.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 101.53. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ALAB's competition here
QNC vs TSEM Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while TSEM trades at $176.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 89.19. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check TSEM's competition here
QNC vs ENTG Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while ENTG trades at $120.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 74.20. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ENTG's competition here
QNC vs MTSI Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while MTSI trades at $240.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 103.74. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MTSI's competition here
QNC vs NVMI Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while NVMI trades at $484.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 59.15. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check NVMI's competition here
QNC vs LSCC Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while LSCC trades at $95.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 4615.50. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check LSCC's competition here
QNC vs AMKR Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while AMKR trades at $48.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 30.76. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AMKR's competition here
QNC vs ONTO Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while ONTO trades at $218.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 75.44. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ONTO's competition here
QNC vs RMBS Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while RMBS trades at $92.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 44.24. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check RMBS's competition here
QNC vs CREE Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CREE's ROE of +11.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check CREE's competition here
QNC vs SITM Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while SITM trades at $346.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -199.96. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check SITM's competition here
QNC vs SWKS Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while SWKS trades at $55.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check SWKS's competition here
QNC vs CAMT Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while CAMT trades at $177.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 164.09. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check CAMT's competition here
QNC vs BRKS Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check BRKS's competition here
QNC vs FORM Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while FORM trades at $105.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 140.87. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check FORM's competition here
QNC vs QRVO Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while QRVO trades at $79.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check QRVO's competition here
QNC vs AAOI Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while AAOI trades at $109.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -149.62. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AAOI's competition here
QNC vs SMTC Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while SMTC trades at $78.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -166.35. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check SMTC's competition here
QNC vs CRUS Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while CRUS trades at $140.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check CRUS's competition here
QNC vs SLAB Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while SLAB trades at $207.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -104.53. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check SLAB's competition here
QNC vs ALGM Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while ALGM trades at $32.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -453.43. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ALGM's competition here
QNC vs IPGP Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while IPGP trades at $124.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 163.22. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check IPGP's competition here
QNC vs OLED Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while OLED trades at $94.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check OLED's competition here
QNC vs SIMO Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while SIMO trades at $116.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 33.99. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check SIMO's competition here
QNC vs LASR Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while LASR trades at $69.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -148.83. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check LASR's competition here
QNC vs KLIC Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while KLIC trades at $67.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is -54.42. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to KLIC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check KLIC's competition here
QNC vs DIOD Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while DIOD trades at $71.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 47.60. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check DIOD's competition here
QNC vs ACMR Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while ACMR trades at $45.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 32.70. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ACMR's competition here
QNC vs SYNA Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while SYNA trades at $74.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -45.86. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check SYNA's competition here
QNC vs AXTI Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while AXTI trades at $67.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -131.51. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AXTI's competition here
QNC vs UCTT Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while UCTT trades at $65.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -15.26. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check UCTT's competition here
QNC vs POWI Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while POWI trades at $49.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 122.00. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check POWI's competition here
QNC vs ACLS Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while ACLS trades at $94.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ACLS's competition here
QNC vs VSH Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while VSH trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -249.36. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check VSH's competition here
QNC vs AMBA Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while AMBA trades at $53.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -30.66. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AMBA's competition here
QNC vs PLAB Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while PLAB trades at $42.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check PLAB's competition here
QNC vs NVTS Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while NVTS trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -16.11. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check NVTS's competition here
QNC vs VECO Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while VECO trades at $34.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 53.56. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check VECO's competition here
QNC vs ICHR Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while ICHR trades at $50.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -31.67. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ICHR's competition here
QNC vs HIMX Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while HIMX trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check HIMX's competition here
QNC vs MXL Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while MXL trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -10.85. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MXL's competition here
QNC vs DQ Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while DQ trades at $21.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -8.42. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check DQ's competition here
QNC vs SKYT Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while SKYT trades at $28.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check SKYT's competition here
QNC vs COHU Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while COHU trades at $31.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -19.02. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check COHU's competition here
QNC vs IMOS Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while IMOS trades at $37.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 90.81. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check IMOS's competition here
QNC vs AEHR Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while AEHR trades at $38.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -123.77. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AEHR's competition here
QNC vs SGH Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check SGH's competition here
QNC vs POET Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 798.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while POET trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to POET's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check POET's competition here
QNC vs WOLF Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 747.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while WOLF trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to WOLF's ROE of +10.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check WOLF's competition here
QNC vs AIP Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 727.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while AIP trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -19.52. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AIP's ROE of +3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AIP's competition here
QNC vs AOSL Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 650M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while AOSL trades at $22.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AOSL's competition here
QNC vs INDI Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 538.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while INDI trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check INDI's competition here
QNC vs AMBQ Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 532.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while AMBQ trades at $24.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -12.90. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AMBQ's competition here
QNC vs CEVA Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 522.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while CEVA trades at $19.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -42.82. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check CEVA's competition here
QNC vs LAES Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 388.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while LAES trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check LAES's competition here
QNC vs TGAN Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check TGAN's competition here
QNC vs NVEC Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 321.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while NVEC trades at $66.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check NVEC's competition here
QNC vs XPER Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 272.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while XPER trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check XPER's competition here
QNC vs MRAM Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 210.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while MRAM trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -304.00. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MRAM's competition here
QNC vs NA Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 200.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while NA trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check NA's competition here
QNC vs ALMU Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 183.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while ALMU trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -99.85. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ALMU's competition here
QNC vs INTT Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 179.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while INTT trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -68.52. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check INTT's competition here
QNC vs GSIT Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 174.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while GSIT trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -16.14. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check GSIT's competition here
QNC vs ASYS Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 163.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while ASYS trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ASYS's competition here
QNC vs QUIK Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 158.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while QUIK trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -12.18. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check QUIK's competition here
QNC vs ATOM Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 149.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while ATOM trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ATOM's competition here
QNC vs OIIM Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check OIIM's competition here
QNC vs BZAI Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 134.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while BZAI trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -8.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check BZAI's competition here
QNC vs VLN Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while VLN trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check VLN's competition here
QNC vs MX Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while MX trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -7.05. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MX's competition here
QNC vs GCTS Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while GCTS trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check GCTS's competition here
QNC vs MOSY Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MOSY's competition here
QNC vs WISA Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to WISA's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check WISA's competition here
QNC vs TRT Comparison March 2026
QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $2.34, while TRT trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is -301.20. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check TRT's competition here