Quantum eMotion Corp.

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.4T. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while NVDA trades at $180.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 36.67. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check NVDA's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while TSM trades at $353.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check TSM's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while AVGO trades at $313.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 65.66. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AVGO's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 524.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while ASML trades at $1,360.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 46.67. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ASML's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 427.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while MU trades at $379.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 36.09. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MU's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 311.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while AMD trades at $190.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 74.01. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AMD's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 278.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while AMAT trades at $351.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 36.03. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AMAT's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 271.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while LRCX trades at $217.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 44.71. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check LRCX's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 215.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while INTC trades at $43.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -718.33. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check INTC's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 189.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while KLAC trades at $1,441.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 42.02. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check KLAC's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while TXN trades at $202.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 37.19. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check TXN's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 165.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while ADI trades at $338.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 74.50. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ADI's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 147.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while QCOM trades at $138.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check QCOM's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 129.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while ARM trades at $121.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 162.29. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ARM's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while MRVL trades at $77.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MRVL's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while NXPI trades at $215.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check NXPI's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while MPWR trades at $1,074.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 83.94. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MPWR's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while ASX trades at $22.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 39.14. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ASX's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while TER trades at $304.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 87.92. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check TER's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while MCHP trades at $71.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -237.97. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MCHP's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while STM trades at $31.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 175.72. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check STM's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while GFS trades at $47.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -590.25. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check GFS's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while ON trades at $63.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 218.69. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ON's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while UMC trades at $9.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check UMC's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while Q trades at $116.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 44.51. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check Q's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while ENTG trades at $126.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 81.80. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ENTG's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while ALAB trades at $109.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 90.00. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ALAB's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while MTSI trades at $241.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 109.05. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MTSI's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while TSEM trades at $125.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 64.37. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check TSEM's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while NVMI trades at $425.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 53.49. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check NVMI's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while LSCC trades at $93.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 4674.00. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check LSCC's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while AMKR trades at $44.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 29.73. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AMKR's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while SITM trades at $406.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -237.67. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check SITM's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while ONTO trades at $207.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 74.94. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ONTO's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CREE's ROE of +11.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check CREE's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while RMBS trades at $87.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 41.51. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check RMBS's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while SWKS trades at $58.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check SWKS's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while SMTC trades at $90.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 161.02. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SMTC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check SMTC's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check BRKS's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while QRVO trades at $81.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check QRVO's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while CAMT trades at $162.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 154.87. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check CAMT's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while FORM trades at $92.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 134.46. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check FORM's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while CRUS trades at $138.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check CRUS's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while SLAB trades at $203.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -102.85. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check SLAB's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while AAOI trades at $95.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -27.64. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AAOI's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while ALGM trades at $34.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -496.00. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ALGM's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while IPGP trades at $131.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 177.93. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check IPGP's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while OLED trades at $103.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check OLED's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while SIMO trades at $119.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check SIMO's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while KLIC trades at $66.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is -55.65. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to KLIC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check KLIC's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while LASR trades at $63.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -70.87. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check LASR's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while ACMR trades at $51.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ACMR's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while DIOD trades at $66.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 46.71. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check DIOD's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while SYNA trades at $77.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -48.47. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check SYNA's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while UCTT trades at $59.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -16.69. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check UCTT's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while POWI trades at $48.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 123.08. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check POWI's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while ACLS trades at $85.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ACLS's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while AMBA trades at $57.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -30.56. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AMBA's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while VSH trades at $17.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -256.43. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check VSH's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while PLAB trades at $35.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check PLAB's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while NVTS trades at $8.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check NVTS's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while VECO trades at $32.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 39.12. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check VECO's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while AXTI trades at $41.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -78.79. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AXTI's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while ICHR trades at $45.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -29.54. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ICHR's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while DQ trades at $22.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check DQ's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while MXL trades at $17.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -10.94. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MXL's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while SKYT trades at $29.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check SKYT's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while COHU trades at $29.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -18.58. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check COHU's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while IMOS trades at $38.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 637.50. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check IMOS's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while AEHR trades at $41.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -138.80. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AEHR's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while HIMX trades at $7.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check HIMX's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check SGH's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 941.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while WOLF trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to WOLF's ROE of +10.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check WOLF's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 927.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while POET trades at $7.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -9.92. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to POET's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check POET's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 735.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while AIP trades at $16.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -19.73. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AIP's ROE of +3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AIP's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 640.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while INDI trades at $3.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check INDI's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 614.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while AMBQ trades at $29.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -14.89. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AMBQ's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 609.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while AOSL trades at $20.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check AOSL's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 566.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while CEVA trades at $20.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -47.66. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check CEVA's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 514.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while LAES trades at $3.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check LAES's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 330.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while NVEC trades at $68.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check NVEC's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check TGAN's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 284.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while XPER trades at $6.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is 38.41. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check XPER's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 273.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while ALMU trades at $19.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -148.69. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ALMU's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 242.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while MRAM trades at $10.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -530.50. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MRAM's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 234.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while GSIT trades at $8.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -21.73. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check GSIT's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 198.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while NA trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check NA's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 193.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while ASYS trades at $13.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ASYS's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while INTT trades at $12.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -67.89. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check INTT's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 152.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while ATOM trades at $4.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -7.40. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check ATOM's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 147.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while VLN trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check VLN's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check OIIM's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while QUIK trades at $7.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -12.98. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check QUIK's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while BZAI trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -8.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check BZAI's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while MX trades at $2.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MX's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, MOBX has a market cap of 74.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while MOBX trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOBX's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MOBX's ROE of -28.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to MOBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MOBX's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while MOSY trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check MOSY's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while WISA trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to WISA's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check WISA's competition here

QNC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QNC stands at 647.9M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 62.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QNC is priced at $3.19, while GCTS trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QNC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, QNC's ROE is -0.49%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QNC is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNC.Check GCTS's competition here