NVIDIA Corporation

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while AVGO trades at $298.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 108.76. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check AVGO's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while TSM trades at $238.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check TSM's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 300.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while ASML trades at $763.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 27.04. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check ASML's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 270.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while AMD trades at $166.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 99.18. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check AMD's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 187.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while TXN trades at $205.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 37.73. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check TXN's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 171.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while QCOM trades at $159.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check QCOM's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 148.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while ARM trades at $140.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 212.52. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check ARM's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 131.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while LRCX trades at $103.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check LRCX's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 131.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while AMAT trades at $164.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check AMAT's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 130.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while MU trades at $116.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check MU's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 126.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while ADI trades at $255.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 65.05. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check ADI's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 117.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while KLAC trades at $888.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check KLAC's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 106.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while INTC trades at $24.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check INTC's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while MRVL trades at $74.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -130.28. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check MRVL's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while NXPI trades at $237.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check NXPI's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while MPWR trades at $850.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check MPWR's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while MCHP trades at $67.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -198.88. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check MCHP's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while ALAB trades at $178.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 228.92. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check ALAB's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while STM trades at $27.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 57.70. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check STM's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while ASX trades at $10.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check ASX's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while ON trades at $50.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 48.56. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check ON's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while TER trades at $118.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check TER's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while GFS trades at $33.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -161.00. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check GFS's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while UMC trades at $6.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check UMC's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while ENTG trades at $85.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 43.91. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check ENTG's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while SWKS trades at $75.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 30.15. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check SWKS's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check CREE's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while MTSI trades at $128.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -133.68. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check MTSI's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while LSCC trades at $65.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 285.78. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check LSCC's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while QRVO trades at $92.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 108.67. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check QRVO's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while RMBS trades at $75.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 35.56. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check RMBS's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check BRKS's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while NVMI trades at $259.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 35.26. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check NVMI's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while OLED trades at $143.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check OLED's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while TSEM trades at $60.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check TSEM's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while SITM trades at $245.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -70.88. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check SITM's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while AMKR trades at $24.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check AMKR's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while CRUS trades at $116.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check CRUS's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while ALGM trades at $31.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -85.54. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check ALGM's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while ONTO trades at $108.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check ONTO's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while SMTC trades at $58.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 93.21. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check SMTC's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while SLAB trades at $141.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -44.18. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check SLAB's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while CAMT trades at $84.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check CAMT's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while IPGP trades at $83.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check IPGP's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while AMBA trades at $70.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -28.33. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check AMBA's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while SYNA trades at $70.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -57.83. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check SYNA's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while SIMO trades at $79.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 34.20. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check SIMO's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while POWI trades at $46.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 78.14. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check POWI's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while DIOD trades at $55.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 40.37. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check DIOD's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while ACLS trades at $80.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check ACLS's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while FORM trades at $29.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 51.61. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check FORM's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while VSH trades at $15.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -23.71. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check VSH's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while KLIC trades at $37.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 417.78. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check KLIC's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while ACMR trades at $29.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check ACMR's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while DQ trades at $23.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check DQ's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while AAOI trades at $25.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check AAOI's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while MXL trades at $17.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check MXL's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while VECO trades at $24.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check VECO's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while LASR trades at $29.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check LASR's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while HIMX trades at $8.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check HIMX's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while PLAB trades at $22.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check PLAB's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while NVTS trades at $6.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -9.23. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check NVTS's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check SGH's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while UCTT trades at $23.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -7.04. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check UCTT's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 943M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while COHU trades at $20.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -10.98. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check COHU's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 921.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while INDI trades at $4.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check INDI's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 867.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while AOSL trades at $29.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check AOSL's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 774.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while AEHR trades at $25.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -199.15. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check AEHR's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 607.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while ICHR trades at $17.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -29.02. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check ICHR's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 581M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while SKYT trades at $12.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -35.47. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check SKYT's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 558.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while IMOS trades at $15.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 39.64. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check IMOS's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 548.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while CEVA trades at $22.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -382.83. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check CEVA's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 491.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while POET trades at $5.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to POET's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check POET's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 417.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while AIP trades at $9.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -12.39. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to AIP's ROE of +11.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check AIP's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 402.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while NA trades at $5.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check NA's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 396.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while BZAI trades at $3.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check BZAI's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 392.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while LAES trades at $2.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check LAES's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 329.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while ALMU trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -80.19. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check ALMU's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check TGAN's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 312.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while NVEC trades at $64.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check NVEC's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 278.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while XPER trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -86.00. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check XPER's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 244.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while VLN-WT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check VLN-WT's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 216.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while VLN trades at $2.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check VLN's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 206.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while WOLF trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check WOLF's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 147.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while MRAM trades at $6.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 72.33. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check MRAM's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check OIIM's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 127.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while AXTI trades at $2.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check AXTI's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 106.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while ATOM trades at $3.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check ATOM's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 103.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while MX trades at $2.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check MX's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 93.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while GSIT trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -5.93. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check GSIT's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 92.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while INTT trades at $7.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -123.33. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check INTT's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while QUIK trades at $5.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -11.21. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check QUIK's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while ASYS trades at $5.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check ASYS's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 71.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while GCTS trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check GCTS's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, MOBXW has a market cap of 65.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while MOBXW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas MOBXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to MOBXW's ROE of -51.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to MOBXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check MOBXW's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while MOSY trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check MOSY's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while WISA trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to WISA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check WISA's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while ICG trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 37.60. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check ICG's competition here

NVDA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NVDA stands at 4.4T. In comparison, MOBX has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NVDA is priced at $181.77, while MOBX trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NVDA currently has a P/E ratio of 58.80, whereas MOBX's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, NVDA's ROE is +1.07%, compared to MOBX's ROE of -51.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NVDA is less volatile compared to MOBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NVDA.Check MOBX's competition here