Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.6T. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while NVDA trades at $187.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 46.99. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check NVDA's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while TSM trades at $360.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 35.17. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check TSM's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while AVGO trades at $333.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 69.59. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AVGO's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 569.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while ASML trades at $1,458.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 50.04. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ASML's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 481.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while MU trades at $417.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 40.70. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check MU's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 326.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while AMD trades at $203.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 76.40. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AMD's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 305.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while LRCX trades at $237.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 50.29. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check LRCX's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 297.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while AMAT trades at $369.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AMAT's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 220.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while INTC trades at $44.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -735.17. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check INTC's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 199.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while TXN trades at $218.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 40.32. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check TXN's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 196.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while KLAC trades at $1,469.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 43.49. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check KLAC's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 173.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while ADI trades at $345.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 77.87. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ADI's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 152.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while QCOM trades at $141.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check QCOM's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 133.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while ARM trades at $126.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 167.44. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ARM's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while MRVL trades at $79.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check MRVL's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while NXPI trades at $232.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check NXPI's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while MPWR trades at $1,175.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 94.14. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check MPWR's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while ASX trades at $23.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 42.04. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ASX's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while TER trades at $315.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 93.93. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check TER's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while MCHP trades at $77.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -259.10. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check MCHP's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while STM trades at $33.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 186.81. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check STM's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while ON trades at $68.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 238.31. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ON's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while UMC trades at $10.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check UMC's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while GFS trades at $45.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -577.37. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check GFS's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while Q trades at $112.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 43.62. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check Q's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while ALAB trades at $132.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 106.30. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ALAB's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while ENTG trades at $132.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 86.21. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ENTG's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while MTSI trades at $242.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 110.22. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check MTSI's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while TSEM trades at $125.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 66.22. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check TSEM's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while LSCC trades at $95.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 4888.00. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check LSCC's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while NVMI trades at $442.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 55.50. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check NVMI's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while AMKR trades at $48.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 31.96. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AMKR's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while RMBS trades at $104.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 48.64. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check RMBS's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while ONTO trades at $225.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 60.79. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ONTO's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while SITM trades at $396.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -236.61. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check SITM's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CREE's ROE of +11.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check CREE's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while SWKS trades at $59.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check SWKS's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while SMTC trades at $84.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 154.95. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SMTC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check SMTC's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check BRKS's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while QRVO trades at $81.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check QRVO's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while FORM trades at $92.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 137.04. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check FORM's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while CRUS trades at $140.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check CRUS's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while ALGM trades at $36.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -556.14. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ALGM's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while CAMT trades at $153.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 146.63. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check CAMT's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while SLAB trades at $204.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -103.99. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check SLAB's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while IPGP trades at $130.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 183.04. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check IPGP's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while OLED trades at $117.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check OLED's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while SIMO trades at $132.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 37.05. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check SIMO's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while ACMR trades at $65.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 38.72. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ACMR's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while KLIC trades at $69.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is -59.54. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to KLIC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check KLIC's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while AAOI trades at $46.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -14.95. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AAOI's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while SYNA trades at $83.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -53.01. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check SYNA's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while DIOD trades at $67.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 47.87. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check DIOD's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while LASR trades at $55.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -62.93. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check LASR's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while AMBA trades at $66.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -35.98. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AMBA's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while UCTT trades at $57.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -16.59. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check UCTT's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while VSH trades at $19.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -281.00. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check VSH's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while POWI trades at $45.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 116.69. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check POWI's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while ACLS trades at $80.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ACLS's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while PLAB trades at $37.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check PLAB's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while NVTS trades at $8.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -12.31. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check NVTS's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while VECO trades at $28.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 41.30. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check VECO's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while ICHR trades at $47.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -32.69. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ICHR's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while DQ trades at $24.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check DQ's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while MXL trades at $18.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -11.69. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check MXL's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while COHU trades at $30.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -19.85. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check COHU's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while SKYT trades at $28.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check SKYT's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while AXTI trades at $23.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AXTI's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while HIMX trades at $7.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 30.04. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check HIMX's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while IMOS trades at $33.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 570.00. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check IMOS's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check SGH's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while AEHR trades at $30.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -112.00. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AEHR's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 749.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while POET trades at $5.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -8.01. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to POET's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check POET's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 735.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while INDI trades at $3.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check INDI's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 669.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while AIP trades at $14.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -17.96. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AIP's ROE of +3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AIP's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 666M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while AOSL trades at $22.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AOSL's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 623.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while AMBQ trades at $30.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -15.10. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check AMBQ's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 525.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while CEVA trades at $19.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -194.60. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check CEVA's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 518.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while LAES trades at $3.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check LAES's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 485.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while WOLF trades at $19.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WOLF's ROE of +10.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check WOLF's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check TGAN's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 318.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while NVEC trades at $65.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check NVEC's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 254.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while XPER trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is 34.31. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check XPER's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 251.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while MRAM trades at $11.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -549.50. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check MRAM's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 221.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while ATOM trades at $6.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ATOM's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 217.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while ALMU trades at $15.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -118.31. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ALMU's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 211.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while NA trades at $3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check NA's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 192.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while GSIT trades at $6.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check GSIT's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 171.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while ASYS trades at $11.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check ASYS's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 155.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while VLN trades at $1.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check VLN's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 151.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while BZAI trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -8.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check BZAI's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check OIIM's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 138.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while QUIK trades at $8.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check QUIK's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 122.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while INTT trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -54.33. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check INTT's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while GCTS trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check GCTS's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while MOSY trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check MOSY's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while WISA trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WISA's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check WISA's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, SQNS has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while SQNS trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas SQNS's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to SQNS's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to SQNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check SQNS's competition here

MX plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MX stands at 95.9M. In comparison, WKEY has a market cap of 43M. Regarding current trading prices, MX is priced at $2.78, while WKEY trades at $7.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.59, whereas WKEY's P/E ratio is -11.90. In terms of profitability, MX's ROE is -0.14%, compared to WKEY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MX is less volatile compared to WKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MX.Check WKEY's competition here