Micron Technology, Inc.
Micron Technology, Inc. MU Peers
See (MU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MU | $94.46 | -2.42% | 105.6B | 22.60 | $4.18 | +0.48% |
| NVDA | $134.84 | -3.13% | 3.3T | 43.50 | $3.10 | +0.03% |
| AVGO | $242.07 | +0.04% | 1.1T | 111.04 | $2.18 | +0.93% |
| TSM | $193.20 | -2.00% | 1T | 23.17 | $8.34 | +1.27% |
| ASML | $736.77 | -1.38% | 289.7B | 29.35 | $25.10 | +1.01% |
| AMD | $110.73 | -2.03% | 179.5B | 80.82 | $1.37 | N/A |
| TXN | $182.85 | -1.16% | 166.1B | 34.50 | $5.30 | +2.95% |
| QCOM | $145.20 | -2.12% | 159.4B | 14.82 | $9.80 | +1.74% |
| ARM | $124.39 | -2.90% | 131.5B | 165.85 | $0.75 | N/A |
| AMAT | $156.75 | -1.71% | 125.8B | 19.09 | $8.21 | +1.06% |
Stock Comparison
MU vs NVDA Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 3.3T. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while NVDA trades at $134.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs AVGO Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while AVGO trades at $242.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 111.04. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs TSM Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while TSM trades at $193.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs ASML Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 289.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while ASML trades at $736.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 29.35. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs AMD Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 179.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while AMD trades at $110.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 80.82. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs TXN Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 166.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while TXN trades at $182.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs QCOM Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 159.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while QCOM trades at $145.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs ARM Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 131.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while ARM trades at $124.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 165.85. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs AMAT Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 125.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while AMAT trades at $156.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs ADI Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 106.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while ADI trades at $213.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 57.95. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs LRCX Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while LRCX trades at $80.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs KLAC Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while KLAC trades at $756.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs INTC Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while INTC trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs MRVL Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while MRVL trades at $60.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -58.99. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs NXPI Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while NXPI trades at $191.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs MPWR Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while MPWR trades at $661.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs MCHP Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while MCHP trades at $58.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -5802.00. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs STM Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while STM trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs ASX Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while ASX trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs GFS Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while GFS trades at $35.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -105.35. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs UMC Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while UMC trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs ON Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while ON trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs ALAB Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while ALAB trades at $90.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 69.25. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs TER Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while TER trades at $78.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs ENTG Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while ENTG trades at $68.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 33.70. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs SWKS Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while SWKS trades at $69.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs CREE Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs MTSI Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while MTSI trades at $121.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -101.34. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs BRKS Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs QRVO Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while QRVO trades at $76.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 131.07. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs OLED Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while OLED trades at $143.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 29.65. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs NVMI Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while NVMI trades at $213.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs LSCC Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while LSCC trades at $44.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 121.38. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs RMBS Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while RMBS trades at $53.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs CRUS Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while CRUS trades at $98.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs ALGM Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while ALGM trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -65.00. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs SITM Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while SITM trades at $196.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -51.87. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs ONTO Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while ONTO trades at $91.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs AMKR Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while AMKR trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs TSEM Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while TSEM trades at $39.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs SLAB Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while SLAB trades at $120.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs SMTC Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while SMTC trades at $37.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -22.22. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -15.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs CAMT Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while CAMT trades at $66.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs IPGP Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while IPGP trades at $66.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -14.66. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs POWI Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while POWI trades at $49.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 77.70. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs FORM Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while FORM trades at $29.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 43.26. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs SYNA Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while SYNA trades at $58.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs AMBA Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while AMBA trades at $52.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -18.49. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs DIOD Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while DIOD trades at $44.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 80.73. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs VSH Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while VSH trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -29.27. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs ACLS Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while ACLS trades at $56.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs KLIC Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while KLIC trades at $32.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 86.81. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs ACMR Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while ACMR trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs VECO Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while VECO trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs SGH Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs PLAB Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while PLAB trades at $16.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs MXL Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 983.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while MXL trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs NVTS Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 978.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while NVTS trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -11.09. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs UCTT Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 874.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while UCTT trades at $19.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs AAOI Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 854.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while AAOI trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs COHU Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 793.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while COHU trades at $17.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -9.28. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs LASR Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 748M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while LASR trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -13.27. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs HIMX Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 712.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while HIMX trades at $8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs IMOS Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 676M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while IMOS trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs AOSL Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 630.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while AOSL trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -27.52. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs ICHR Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 537.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while ICHR trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -33.53. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs SIMO Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 515.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while SIMO trades at $61.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs INDI Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 513.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while INDI trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs CEVA Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 448M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while CEVA trades at $18.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 208.11. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs SKYT Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 434.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while SKYT trades at $9.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -53.18. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs LAES Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 383.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while LAES trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs XPER Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 355.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while XPER trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -18.10. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs NVEC Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 344.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while NVEC trades at $71.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 22.81. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs POET Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 340.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while POET trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POET's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs AIP Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 326.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while AIP trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs TGAN Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs AEHR Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 284M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while AEHR trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs VLN Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 236.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while VLN trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs ALMU Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 224.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while ALMU trades at $14.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -54.63. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs VLN-WT Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 217.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while VLN-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs BZAI Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 204.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while BZAI trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs ATOM Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 188.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while ATOM trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -9.76. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs WOLF Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 187.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while WOLF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs DQ Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 178.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while DQ trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs OIIM Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs MX Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while MX trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs MRAM Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 126M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while MRAM trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 140.25. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs QUIK Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while QUIK trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -12.63. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs GSIT Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while GSIT trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs INTT Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 75.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while INTT trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -606.00. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs AXTI Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while AXTI trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs MOSY Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs WISA Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WISA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs ICG Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while ICG trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs NA Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while NA trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs ASYS Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while ASYS trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs GCTS Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while GCTS trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs SQNS Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, SQNS has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while SQNS trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas SQNS's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SQNS's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is more volatile compared to SQNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.
MU vs MOBX Comparison
MU plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MU stands at 105.6B. In comparison, MOBX has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MU is priced at $94.46, while MOBX trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MU currently has a P/E ratio of 22.60, whereas MOBX's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, MU's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOBX's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MU is less volatile compared to MOBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MU.