Marvell Technology, Inc.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 3.5T. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while NVDA trades at $141.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 45.85. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while AVGO trades at $246.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 90.44. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while TSM trades at $205.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 296.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while ASML trades at $753.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 29.99. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 188.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while AMD trades at $116.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 84.20. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 174.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while TXN trades at $192.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 35.89. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 163.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while QCOM trades at $149.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 140.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while ARM trades at $133.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 177.48. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 133.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while AMAT trades at $166.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 121.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while MU trades at $108.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 110.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while LRCX trades at $86.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 110.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while ADI trades at $222.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 60.39. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 106.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while KLAC trades at $808.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 29.40. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while INTC trades at $20.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while NXPI trades at $207.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while MCHP trades at $65.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -6525.00. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while MPWR trades at $687.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while STM trades at $28.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while ASX trades at $9.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while ON trades at $50.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while GFS trades at $37.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -110.97. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while UMC trades at $7.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while ALAB trades at $90.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 69.27. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while TER trades at $85.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while ENTG trades at $72.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 35.74. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while SWKS trades at $71.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while MTSI trades at $125.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -105.05. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while QRVO trades at $78.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 135.48. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while OLED trades at $151.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while LSCC trades at $48.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 129.78. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while NVMI trades at $217.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while RMBS trades at $57.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while ALGM trades at $28.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -73.87. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while CRUS trades at $100.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while SITM trades at $205.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -54.17. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while AMKR trades at $19.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while ONTO trades at $96.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while TSEM trades at $40.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while SLAB trades at $126.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -25.12. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while CAMT trades at $73.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while SMTC trades at $37.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -15.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while POWI trades at $54.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 85.55. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while IPGP trades at $68.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -15.25. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while FORM trades at $32.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 46.62. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while SYNA trades at $62.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while DIOD trades at $49.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 89.82. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while AMBA trades at $53.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -21.52. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while VSH trades at $15.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -31.58. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while ACLS trades at $63.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while KLIC trades at $33.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 89.65. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while ACMR trades at $24.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while VECO trades at $20.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while NVTS trades at $6.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -11.66. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while PLAB trades at $18.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while MXL trades at $12.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 959.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while DQ trades at $14.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 944.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while AAOI trades at $16.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 935.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while UCTT trades at $20.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 870.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while LASR trades at $17.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -15.44. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 849.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while COHU trades at $18.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -9.92. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 759.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while HIMX trades at $8.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 714.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while IMOS trades at $19.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 683.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while AOSL trades at $22.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -29.83. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 615.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while ICHR trades at $18.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -38.38. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 559.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while INDI trades at $2.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 484.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while CEVA trades at $20.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 224.89. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 433.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while SKYT trades at $9.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -53.12. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while LAES trades at $3.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 358.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while XPER trades at $7.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -18.23. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 353.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while POET trades at $4.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to POET's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 350.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while NVEC trades at $72.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 337.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while AEHR trades at $11.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AEHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 332.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while AIP trades at $7.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 299.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while ALMU trades at $18.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -72.92. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 258.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while BZAI trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while VLN trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while VLN-WT trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 217.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while WOLF trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 191.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while ATOM trades at $6.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 140.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while SIMO trades at $67.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 133.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while MRAM trades at $5.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 148.25. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while MX trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 104M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while NA trades at $6.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 89.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while QUIK trades at $5.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -14.20. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while GSIT trades at $3.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while AXTI trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while INTT trades at $6.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -617.00. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while MOSY trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while WISA trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WISA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while ICG trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 29.86. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while ASYS trades at $4.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while GCTS trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, SQNS has a market cap of 47.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while SQNS trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas SQNS's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SQNS's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is less volatile compared to SQNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.

MRVL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRVL stands at 58.9B. In comparison, MOBX has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, MRVL is priced at $68.35, while MOBX trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRVL currently has a P/E ratio of -119.91, whereas MOBX's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, MRVL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MOBX's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MRVL is more volatile compared to MOBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRVL.