KLA Corporation
KLA Corporation KLAC Peers
See (KLAC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | $921.10 | +0.00% | 122.3B | 33.67 | $27.46 | +0.73% |
| NVDA | $157.25 | +0.00% | 3.9T | 51.19 | $3.11 | +0.03% |
| AVGO | $269.90 | +0.00% | 1.3T | 100.71 | $2.73 | +0.84% |
| TSM | $233.60 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 28.13 | $8.36 | +1.11% |
| ASML | $799.59 | +0.00% | 312.4B | 30.94 | $25.68 | +0.83% |
| AMD | $138.52 | +0.00% | 223.4B | 100.58 | $1.37 | N/A |
| TXN | $215.59 | +0.00% | 196.2B | 40.89 | $5.28 | +2.49% |
| QCOM | $162.32 | +0.00% | 178B | 16.52 | $9.81 | +2.12% |
| ARM | $154.63 | +0.00% | 163.9B | 206.75 | $0.75 | N/A |
| AMAT | $190.01 | +0.00% | 153.1B | 23.22 | $8.22 | +0.87% |
Stock Comparison
KLAC vs NVDA Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while NVDA trades at $157.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 51.19. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs AVGO Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while AVGO trades at $269.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 100.71. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs TSM Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while TSM trades at $233.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs ASML Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 312.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while ASML trades at $799.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs AMD Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 223.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while AMD trades at $138.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 100.58. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs TXN Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 196.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while TXN trades at $215.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 40.89. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs QCOM Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 178B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while QCOM trades at $162.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs ARM Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 163.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while ARM trades at $154.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 206.75. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs AMAT Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 153.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while AMAT trades at $190.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs MU Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 136.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while MU trades at $121.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs LRCX Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while LRCX trades at $98.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs ADI Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 122.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while ADI trades at $245.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 66.85. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs INTC Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while INTC trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs MRVL Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while MRVL trades at $74.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -131.69. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs NXPI Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 58.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while NXPI trades at $231.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs MCHP Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while MCHP trades at $73.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -7290.00. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs MPWR Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while MPWR trades at $764.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs STM Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while STM trades at $31.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 27.36. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs ON Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while ON trades at $55.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 39.31. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs ASX Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while ASX trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs GFS Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while GFS trades at $39.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -117.06. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs UMC Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while UMC trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs ALAB Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while ALAB trades at $88.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 69.24. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs TER Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while TER trades at $94.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs ENTG Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while ENTG trades at $86.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 42.47. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs SWKS Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while SWKS trades at $78.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs MTSI Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while MTSI trades at $139.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -118.22. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs CREE Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs NVMI Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while NVMI trades at $276.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs QRVO Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while QRVO trades at $88.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 151.72. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs BRKS Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs OLED Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while OLED trades at $161.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 33.29. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs LSCC Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while LSCC trades at $52.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 141.51. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs RMBS Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while RMBS trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 34.21. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs ALGM Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while ALGM trades at $35.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -92.13. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs CRUS Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while CRUS trades at $109.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs AMKR Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while AMKR trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs TSEM Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while TSEM trades at $43.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs ONTO Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while ONTO trades at $103.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs SITM Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while SITM trades at $209.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -56.16. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs SLAB Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while SLAB trades at $152.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -30.09. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs CAMT Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while CAMT trades at $87.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 34.07. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs SMTC Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while SMTC trades at $43.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -26.69. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs POWI Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while POWI trades at $59.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 93.03. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs IPGP Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while IPGP trades at $73.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -16.29. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs AMBA Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while AMBA trades at $66.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -27.04. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs FORM Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while FORM trades at $36.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 52.43. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs DIOD Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while DIOD trades at $56.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 104.49. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs SYNA Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while SYNA trades at $68.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs SIMO Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while SIMO trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs ACLS Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while ACLS trades at $72.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs VSH Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while VSH trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -35.85. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs KLIC Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while KLIC trades at $36.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 99.35. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs ACMR Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while ACMR trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs HIMX Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while HIMX trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs AAOI Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while AAOI trades at $26.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs VECO Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while VECO trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs MXL Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while MXL trades at $14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs DQ Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while DQ trades at $17.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs NVTS Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while NVTS trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -12.13. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs PLAB Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while PLAB trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs UCTT Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while UCTT trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 40.74. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs SGH Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs LASR Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 988.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while LASR trades at $19.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -17.54. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs COHU Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 954.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while COHU trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -11.15. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs AOSL Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 827.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while AOSL trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -36.10. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs ICHR Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 775.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while ICHR trades at $22.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -48.34. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs INDI Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 728.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while INDI trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs IMOS Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 689.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while IMOS trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs CEVA Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 547.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while CEVA trades at $22.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 254.44. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs SKYT Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 527.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while SKYT trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -64.59. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs POET Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 500.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while POET trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -7.21. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to POET's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs AEHR Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 460M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while AEHR trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to AEHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs LAES Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 453.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while LAES trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs AIP Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 387.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while AIP trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs XPER Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 371.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while XPER trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -18.93. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs NVEC Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 370M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while NVEC trades at $76.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs TGAN Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs BZAI Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 287.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while BZAI trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs VLN-WT Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while VLN-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs VLN Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 283.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while VLN trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs ALMU Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 273.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while ALMU trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -66.69. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs WOLF Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 183.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while WOLF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs ATOM Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 155.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while ATOM trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -7.65. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs MRAM Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 153.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while MRAM trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 171.00. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs MX Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 148.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while MX trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs OIIM Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs NA Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while NA trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs GSIT Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 98.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while GSIT trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -8.41. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs QUIK Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 98.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while QUIK trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -15.12. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs AXTI Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 97.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while AXTI trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs INTT Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while INTT trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -714.00. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs GCTS Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 74.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while GCTS trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs ASYS Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 64M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while ASYS trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs MOSY Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs WISA Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to WISA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs ICG Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 60.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while ICG trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs AEVAW Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, AEVAW has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while AEVAW trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas AEVAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to AEVAW's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to AEVAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.
KLAC vs MOBXW Comparison
KLAC plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLAC stands at 122.3B. In comparison, MOBXW has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLAC is priced at $921.10, while MOBXW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLAC currently has a P/E ratio of 33.67, whereas MOBXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLAC's ROE is +1.02%, compared to MOBXW's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, KLAC is less volatile compared to MOBXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLAC.