GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. GFS Peers
See (GFS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFS | $41.40 | +1.00% | 22.8B | -121.26 | -$0.34 | N/A |
| NVDA | $166.26 | +2.08% | 4T | 52.77 | $3.11 | +0.03% |
| AVGO | $275.64 | -0.81% | 1.3T | 100.88 | $2.73 | +1.03% |
| TSM | $231.88 | +0.02% | 1.2T | 26.98 | $8.52 | +1.37% |
| ASML | $800.31 | +0.06% | 315.4B | 31.23 | $25.68 | +0.82% |
| AMD | $146.85 | +6.10% | 233.7B | 105.23 | $1.37 | N/A |
| TXN | $221.22 | +2.23% | 199.6B | 41.60 | $5.28 | +3.04% |
| QCOM | $158.41 | -0.59% | 174.7B | 16.23 | $9.80 | +2.16% |
| AMAT | $198.33 | +1.50% | 158.9B | 24.09 | $8.22 | +1.04% |
| ARM | $148.85 | +0.56% | 157B | 200.76 | $0.74 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GFS vs NVDA Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while NVDA trades at $166.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs AVGO Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while AVGO trades at $275.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 100.88. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs TSM Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while TSM trades at $231.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs ASML Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 315.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while ASML trades at $800.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs AMD Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 233.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while AMD trades at $146.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 105.23. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs TXN Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 199.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while TXN trades at $221.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 41.60. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs QCOM Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 174.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while QCOM trades at $158.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs AMAT Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 158.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while AMAT trades at $198.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs ARM Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 157B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while ARM trades at $148.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 200.76. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs MU Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 137.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while MU trades at $124.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs LRCX Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 129.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while LRCX trades at $101.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs KLAC Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 122.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while KLAC trades at $928.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs ADI Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 121.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while ADI trades at $244.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 66.43. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs INTC Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while INTC trades at $23.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs MRVL Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while MRVL trades at $72.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -128.68. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs NXPI Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while NXPI trades at $229.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs MCHP Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while MCHP trades at $74.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -7508.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs MPWR Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while MPWR trades at $737.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs STM Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while STM trades at $32.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs ON Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while ON trades at $59.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 39.15. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs ASX Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while ASX trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs UMC Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while UMC trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs ALAB Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while ALAB trades at $98.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 74.04. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs TER Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while TER trades at $96.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs ENTG Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while ENTG trades at $87.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 43.16. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs SWKS Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while SWKS trades at $75.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs MTSI Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while MTSI trades at $136.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -115.20. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs CREE Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs QRVO Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while QRVO trades at $88.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 155.72. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs NVMI Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while NVMI trades at $283.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs BRKS Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs LSCC Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while LSCC trades at $53.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 148.41. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs OLED Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while OLED trades at $154.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs RMBS Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while RMBS trades at $64.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs ALGM Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while ALGM trades at $36.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -96.15. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs CRUS Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while CRUS trades at $104.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs AMKR Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while AMKR trades at $21.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs SITM Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while SITM trades at $206.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -55.28. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs ONTO Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while ONTO trades at $102.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs TSEM Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while TSEM trades at $45.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs SLAB Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while SLAB trades at $142.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -27.99. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs SMTC Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while SMTC trades at $48.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -28.94. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs CAMT Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while CAMT trades at $89.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 34.29. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs POWI Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while POWI trades at $57.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 91.72. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs IPGP Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while IPGP trades at $73.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -16.60. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs AMBA Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while AMBA trades at $67.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -27.10. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs FORM Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while FORM trades at $36.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 52.64. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs SYNA Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while SYNA trades at $68.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs DIOD Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while DIOD trades at $56.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 105.06. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs SIMO Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while SIMO trades at $74.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs ACLS Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while ACLS trades at $75.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs VSH Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while VSH trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -37.25. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs KLIC Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while KLIC trades at $36.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 99.92. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs ACMR Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while ACMR trades at $28.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs HIMX Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while HIMX trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs AAOI Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while AAOI trades at $28.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs DQ Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while DQ trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs MXL Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while MXL trades at $15.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs VECO Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while VECO trades at $21.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs NVTS Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while NVTS trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs PLAB Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while PLAB trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs UCTT Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while UCTT trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 40.35. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs SGH Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs COHU Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 957.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while COHU trades at $20.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -11.19. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs LASR Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 919.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while LASR trades at $18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -16.31. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs AOSL Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 834.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while AOSL trades at $27.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -36.42. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs ICHR Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 809M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while ICHR trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -50.45. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs INDI Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 752.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while INDI trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs IMOS Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 678.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while IMOS trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs POET Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 593.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while POET trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -8.56. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to POET's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs CEVA Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 554.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while CEVA trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 257.78. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs SKYT Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 491.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while SKYT trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -60.21. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs LAES Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 437.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while LAES trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs AEHR Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 434.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while AEHR trades at $14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -112.23. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs AIP Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 387.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while AIP trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs NVEC Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 370.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while NVEC trades at $75.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs XPER Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 364.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while XPER trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -18.99. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs TGAN Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs BZAI Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 297.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while BZAI trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs VLN Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 290.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while VLN trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs ALMU Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 265M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while ALMU trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -64.54. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs WOLF Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 249.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while WOLF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs VLN-WT Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 193.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while VLN-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs NA Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 182.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while NA trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs ATOM Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 159.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while ATOM trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs MRAM Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 153.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while MRAM trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 170.88. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs MX Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 147.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while MX trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs OIIM Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs GSIT Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 126M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while GSIT trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -10.76. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs QUIK Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 106.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while QUIK trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -16.39. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs AXTI Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 103.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while AXTI trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs SQNS Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, SQNS has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while SQNS trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas SQNS's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SQNS's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SQNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs INTT Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 94.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while INTT trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -755.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs ICG Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 81.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while ICG trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs GCTS Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while GCTS trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs ASYS Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while ASYS trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs MOSY Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs WISA Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WISA's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.
GFS vs AEVAW Comparison
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 22.8B. In comparison, AEVAW has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $41.40, while AEVAW trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -121.26, whereas AEVAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AEVAW's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AEVAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.