GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.2T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while NVDA trades at $173.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 56.22. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVDA's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while AVGO trades at $288.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 105.73. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AVGO's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while TSM trades at $235.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TSM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 278.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while AMD trades at $171.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 126.27. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMD's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 271.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while ASML trades at $689.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ASML's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 164.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while TXN trades at $180.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TXN's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 159.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while QCOM trades at $148.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check QCOM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 145.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while ARM trades at $137.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 208.45. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ARM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 144.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while AMAT trades at $179.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMAT's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 123.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while LRCX trades at $96.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LRCX's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 117.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while MU trades at $104.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MU's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 117.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while KLAC trades at $886.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check KLAC's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 110B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while ADI trades at $221.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 60.40. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ADI's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 84.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while INTC trades at $19.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check INTC's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 64.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while MRVL trades at $74.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -130.61. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MRVL's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while NXPI trades at $209.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NXPI's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while MPWR trades at $785.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MPWR's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while MCHP trades at $66.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -6636.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MCHP's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while ON trades at $56.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 39.47. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ON's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while STM trades at $25.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 36.33. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check STM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while ASX trades at $10.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ASX's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while ALAB trades at $131.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 100.08. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ALAB's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while UMC trades at $6.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check UMC's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while TER trades at $104.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 36.17. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TER's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while ENTG trades at $75.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 38.80. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ENTG's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while SWKS trades at $67.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SWKS's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while MTSI trades at $136.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -114.55. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MTSI's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CREE's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while BRKS trades at $113.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check BRKS's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while QRVO trades at $84.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 98.95. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check QRVO's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while RMBS trades at $72.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 34.32. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check RMBS's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while NVMI trades at $263.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 39.75. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVMI's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while OLED trades at $144.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 30.18. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check OLED's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while LSCC trades at $48.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 132.41. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LSCC's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while ALGM trades at $31.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -84.49. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ALGM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while AMKR trades at $21.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMKR's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while CRUS trades at $102.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CRUS's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while TSEM trades at $44.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TSEM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while SITM trades at $193.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -50.95. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SITM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while ONTO trades at $94.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ONTO's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while CAMT trades at $95.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 36.59. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CAMT's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while SMTC trades at $50.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -29.85. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SMTC's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while SLAB trades at $128.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SLAB's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while IPGP trades at $75.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -16.64. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check IPGP's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while AMBA trades at $63.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -25.60. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMBA's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while POWI trades at $47.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 74.42. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check POWI's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while SIMO trades at $76.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SIMO's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while SYNA trades at $60.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SYNA's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while DIOD trades at $48.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 88.93. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check DIOD's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while FORM trades at $28.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 50.75. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check FORM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while ACLS trades at $68.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ACLS's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while VSH trades at $15.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -33.28. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check VSH's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while ACMR trades at $29.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ACMR's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while KLIC trades at $32.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 87.32. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check KLIC's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while NVTS trades at $7.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -15.02. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVTS's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while DQ trades at $20.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check DQ's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while MXL trades at $15.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -6.16. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MXL's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while VECO trades at $20.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check VECO's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while AAOI trades at $21.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AAOI's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while PLAB trades at $19.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check PLAB's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SGH's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while UCTT trades at $22.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check UCTT's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 994.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while LASR trades at $20.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -17.64. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LASR's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 889.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while COHU trades at $19.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check COHU's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 738.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while AOSL trades at $24.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -32.23. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AOSL's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 728.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while INDI trades at $3.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check INDI's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 661.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while ICHR trades at $19.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -41.23. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ICHR's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 615.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while IMOS trades at $16.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check IMOS's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 503.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while AEHR trades at $16.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -129.54. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AEHR's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 495.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while CEVA trades at $20.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 230.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CEVA's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 489.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while POET trades at $5.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -6.59. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to POET's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check POET's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 421.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while SKYT trades at $8.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -51.65. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SKYT's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 413.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while LAES trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LAES's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 384.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while BZAI trades at $3.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check BZAI's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 379.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while AIP trades at $9.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AIP's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 378.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while HIMX trades at $8.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check HIMX's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 328.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while ALMU trades at $20.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -80.08. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ALMU's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TGAN's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 320.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while NA trades at $4.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NA's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 293.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while NVEC trades at $60.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVEC's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 265.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while XPER trades at $5.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -13.53. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check XPER's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while VLN trades at $2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -7.18. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check VLN's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 235.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while WOLF trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check WOLF's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 215.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while VLN-WT trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check VLN-WT's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 143.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while ATOM trades at $4.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ATOM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check OIIM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 135M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while MRAM trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 150.25. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MRAM's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 109.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while GSIT trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check GSIT's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 106.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while MX trades at $2.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MX's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while QUIK trades at $6.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -15.05. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check QUIK's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while INTT trades at $7.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -709.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check INTT's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 87.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while AXTI trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AXTI's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while ICG trades at $2.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ICG's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while GCTS trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check GCTS's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 65.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while ASYS trades at $4.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ASYS's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while MOSY trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MOSY's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while WISA trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WISA's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check WISA's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, PXLW has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while PXLW trades at $10.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas PXLW's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PXLW's ROE of +3.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to PXLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check PXLW's competition here

GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 20.2B. In comparison, MOBX has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $36.58, while MOBX trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -107.59, whereas MOBX's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MOBX's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MOBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MOBX's competition here