GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GFS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFS | $34.43 | -0.17% | 19B | -163.95 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| NVDA | $179.81 | +1.02% | 4.4T | 58.00 | $3.10 | +0.02% |
| AVGO | $294.23 | +0.08% | 1.4T | 107.78 | $2.73 | +0.78% |
| TSM | $235.59 | +1.12% | 1.2T | 25.61 | $9.20 | +1.14% |
| ASML | $754.46 | -0.06% | 296.7B | 26.94 | $28.01 | +0.90% |
| AMD | $163.36 | -2.62% | 265.1B | 97.24 | $1.68 | N/A |
| TXN | $205.97 | -0.04% | 187.3B | 37.72 | $5.46 | +2.64% |
| QCOM | $156.42 | -1.01% | 168.8B | 15.08 | $10.37 | +2.20% |
| ARM | $137.78 | -0.10% | 145.9B | 208.76 | $0.66 | N/A |
| MU | $116.42 | -1.07% | 130.3B | 20.98 | $5.55 | +0.39% |
Stock Comparison
GFS vs NVDA Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.4T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while NVDA trades at $179.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 58.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVDA's competition here
GFS vs AVGO Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while AVGO trades at $294.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 107.78. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AVGO's competition here
GFS vs TSM Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while TSM trades at $235.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TSM's competition here
GFS vs ASML Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 296.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while ASML trades at $754.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ASML's competition here
GFS vs AMD Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 265.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while AMD trades at $163.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 97.24. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMD's competition here
GFS vs TXN Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 187.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while TXN trades at $205.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 37.72. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TXN's competition here
GFS vs QCOM Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 168.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while QCOM trades at $156.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check QCOM's competition here
GFS vs ARM Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 145.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while ARM trades at $137.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 208.76. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ARM's competition here
GFS vs MU Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 130.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while MU trades at $116.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MU's competition here
GFS vs AMAT Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 130B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while AMAT trades at $161.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMAT's competition here
GFS vs LRCX Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 128.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while LRCX trades at $101.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LRCX's competition here
GFS vs ADI Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 126.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while ADI trades at $254.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 64.76. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ADI's competition here
GFS vs KLAC Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 116.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while KLAC trades at $879.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 28.96. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check KLAC's competition here
GFS vs INTC Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 107.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while INTC trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check INTC's competition here
GFS vs MRVL Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while MRVL trades at $72.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -127.98. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MRVL's competition here
GFS vs NXPI Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while NXPI trades at $236.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NXPI's competition here
GFS vs MPWR Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while MPWR trades at $837.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MPWR's competition here
GFS vs MCHP Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while MCHP trades at $68.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -201.62. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MCHP's competition here
GFS vs ALAB Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while ALAB trades at $174.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 215.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ALAB's competition here
GFS vs STM Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while STM trades at $27.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 58.12. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check STM's competition here
GFS vs ASX Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while ASX trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ASX's competition here
GFS vs ON Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while ON trades at $50.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 48.52. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ON's competition here
GFS vs TER Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while TER trades at $117.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 40.65. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TER's competition here
GFS vs UMC Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while UMC trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check UMC's competition here
GFS vs ENTG Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while ENTG trades at $86.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 44.49. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ENTG's competition here
GFS vs SWKS Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while SWKS trades at $76.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SWKS's competition here
GFS vs CREE Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CREE's competition here
GFS vs MTSI Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while MTSI trades at $126.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -131.97. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MTSI's competition here
GFS vs LSCC Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while LSCC trades at $64.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 281.39. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LSCC's competition here
GFS vs QRVO Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while QRVO trades at $92.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 108.38. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check QRVO's competition here
GFS vs RMBS Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while RMBS trades at $73.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 34.74. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check RMBS's competition here
GFS vs BRKS Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check BRKS's competition here
GFS vs NVMI Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while NVMI trades at $254.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 34.62. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVMI's competition here
GFS vs OLED Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while OLED trades at $142.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check OLED's competition here
GFS vs TSEM Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while TSEM trades at $57.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TSEM's competition here
GFS vs SITM Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while SITM trades at $231.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -66.75. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SITM's competition here
GFS vs AMKR Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while AMKR trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMKR's competition here
GFS vs CRUS Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while CRUS trades at $116.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CRUS's competition here
GFS vs ALGM Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while ALGM trades at $31.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -85.84. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ALGM's competition here
GFS vs ONTO Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while ONTO trades at $108.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ONTO's competition here
GFS vs SLAB Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while SLAB trades at $142.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -44.31. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SLAB's competition here
GFS vs SMTC Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while SMTC trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -30.36. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SMTC's competition here
GFS vs CAMT Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while CAMT trades at $82.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CAMT's competition here
GFS vs IPGP Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while IPGP trades at $81.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check IPGP's competition here
GFS vs AMBA Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while AMBA trades at $70.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -28.37. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AMBA's competition here
GFS vs SYNA Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while SYNA trades at $70.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -57.70. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SYNA's competition here
GFS vs POWI Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while POWI trades at $46.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 78.84. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check POWI's competition here
GFS vs SIMO Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while SIMO trades at $77.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SIMO's competition here
GFS vs DIOD Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while DIOD trades at $55.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 40.34. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check DIOD's competition here
GFS vs ACLS Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while ACLS trades at $80.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ACLS's competition here
GFS vs FORM Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while FORM trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 51.25. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check FORM's competition here
GFS vs VSH Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while VSH trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -23.54. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check VSH's competition here
GFS vs KLIC Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while KLIC trades at $37.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 415.67. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check KLIC's competition here
GFS vs ACMR Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while ACMR trades at $28.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ACMR's competition here
GFS vs DQ Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while DQ trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check DQ's competition here
GFS vs AAOI Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while AAOI trades at $24.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AAOI's competition here
GFS vs VECO Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while VECO trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 24.48. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check VECO's competition here
GFS vs MXL Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while MXL trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -6.73. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MXL's competition here
GFS vs LASR Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while LASR trades at $28.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -29.46. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LASR's competition here
GFS vs HIMX Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while HIMX trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check HIMX's competition here
GFS vs PLAB Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while PLAB trades at $22.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check PLAB's competition here
GFS vs NVTS Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while NVTS trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -9.39. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVTS's competition here
GFS vs SGH Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SGH's competition here
GFS vs UCTT Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while UCTT trades at $23.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -6.95. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check UCTT's competition here
GFS vs COHU Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 946.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while COHU trades at $20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check COHU's competition here
GFS vs INDI Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 909.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while INDI trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check INDI's competition here
GFS vs AOSL Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 836M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while AOSL trades at $28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -8.51. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AOSL's competition here
GFS vs AEHR Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 735.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while AEHR trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -189.15. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AEHR's competition here
GFS vs ICHR Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 613.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while ICHR trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -29.31. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ICHR's competition here
GFS vs SKYT Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 560.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while SKYT trades at $11.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -34.21. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check SKYT's competition here
GFS vs IMOS Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 557.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while IMOS trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 39.54. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check IMOS's competition here
GFS vs CEVA Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 545.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while CEVA trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -380.83. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check CEVA's competition here
GFS vs POET Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 485.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while POET trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to POET's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check POET's competition here
GFS vs AIP Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 417.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while AIP trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -12.07. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AIP's ROE of +11.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AIP's competition here
GFS vs BZAI Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 395.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while BZAI trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check BZAI's competition here
GFS vs NA Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 391.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while NA trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NA's competition here
GFS vs LAES Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 389.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while LAES trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check LAES's competition here
GFS vs TGAN Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check TGAN's competition here
GFS vs NVEC Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 314.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while NVEC trades at $64.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check NVEC's competition here
GFS vs ALMU Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 308M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while ALMU trades at $19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ALMU's competition here
GFS vs XPER Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 288.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while XPER trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -89.14. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check XPER's competition here
GFS vs VLN-WT Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 244.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while VLN-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check VLN-WT's competition here
GFS vs VLN Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 226.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while VLN trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check VLN's competition here
GFS vs WOLF Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 206.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while WOLF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check WOLF's competition here
GFS vs OIIM Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check OIIM's competition here
GFS vs MRAM Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 139.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while MRAM trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 68.56. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MRAM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MRAM's competition here
GFS vs AXTI Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while AXTI trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -5.26. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check AXTI's competition here
GFS vs ATOM Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 104.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while ATOM trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ATOM's competition here
GFS vs MX Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while MX trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MX's competition here
GFS vs QUIK Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 87.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while QUIK trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -11.15. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check QUIK's competition here
GFS vs GSIT Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 87.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while GSIT trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check GSIT's competition here
GFS vs INTT Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 87.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while INTT trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -116.67. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check INTT's competition here
GFS vs ASYS Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while ASYS trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ASYS's competition here
GFS vs GCTS Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while GCTS trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check GCTS's competition here
GFS vs MOBXW Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, MOBXW has a market cap of 65.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while MOBXW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas MOBXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MOBXW's ROE of -51.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MOBXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MOBXW's competition here
GFS vs MOSY Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check MOSY's competition here
GFS vs WISA Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WISA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check WISA's competition here
GFS vs ICG Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while ICG trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 39.40. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check ICG's competition here
GFS vs PXLW Comparison August 2025
GFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFS stands at 19B. In comparison, PXLW has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, GFS is priced at $34.43, while PXLW trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFS currently has a P/E ratio of -163.95, whereas PXLW's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, GFS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PXLW's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GFS is less volatile compared to PXLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFS.Check PXLW's competition here