Cirrus Logic, Inc.
Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRUS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRUS | $141.43 | +0.81% | 7.3B | 18.75 | $7.58 | N/A |
| NVDA | $191.08 | +1.69% | 4.6T | 46.99 | $4.04 | +0.02% |
| TSM | $368.17 | +2.16% | 1.9T | 35.17 | $10.54 | +0.66% |
| AVGO | $330.64 | -1.00% | 1.6T | 69.59 | $4.78 | +0.73% |
| ASML | $1,473.70 | +1.01% | 569.6B | 50.04 | $29.37 | +0.47% |
| MU | $421.10 | +0.90% | 481.9B | 40.70 | $10.52 | +0.11% |
| AMD | $195.86 | -3.69% | 326.4B | 76.40 | $2.62 | N/A |
| LRCX | $239.26 | +0.79% | 305.8B | 50.29 | $4.87 | +0.40% |
| AMAT | $373.01 | +0.86% | 297.9B | 38.50 | $9.75 | +0.49% |
| INTC | $43.55 | -2.40% | 220.3B | -735.17 | -$0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CRUS vs NVDA Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.6T. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while NVDA trades at $191.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 46.99. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check NVDA's competition here
CRUS vs TSM Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while TSM trades at $368.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 35.17. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check TSM's competition here
CRUS vs AVGO Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while AVGO trades at $330.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 69.59. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AVGO's competition here
CRUS vs ASML Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 569.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while ASML trades at $1,473.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 50.04. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ASML's competition here
CRUS vs MU Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 481.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while MU trades at $421.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 40.70. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check MU's competition here
CRUS vs AMD Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 326.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while AMD trades at $195.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 76.40. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AMD's competition here
CRUS vs LRCX Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 305.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while LRCX trades at $239.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 50.29. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check LRCX's competition here
CRUS vs AMAT Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 297.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while AMAT trades at $373.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AMAT's competition here
CRUS vs INTC Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 220.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while INTC trades at $43.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -735.17. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check INTC's competition here
CRUS vs TXN Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 199.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while TXN trades at $221.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 40.32. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check TXN's competition here
CRUS vs KLAC Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 196.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while KLAC trades at $1,466.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 43.49. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check KLAC's competition here
CRUS vs ADI Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 173.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while ADI trades at $354.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 77.87. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ADI's competition here
CRUS vs QCOM Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 152.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while QCOM trades at $140.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check QCOM's competition here
CRUS vs ARM Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 133.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while ARM trades at $122.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 167.44. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ARM's competition here
CRUS vs MRVL Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while MRVL trades at $76.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check MRVL's competition here
CRUS vs NXPI Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while NXPI trades at $227.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check NXPI's competition here
CRUS vs MPWR Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while MPWR trades at $1,185.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 94.14. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check MPWR's competition here
CRUS vs ASX Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while ASX trades at $23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 42.04. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ASX's competition here
CRUS vs TER Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while TER trades at $314.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 93.93. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check TER's competition here
CRUS vs MCHP Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while MCHP trades at $75.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -259.10. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check MCHP's competition here
CRUS vs STM Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while STM trades at $33.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 186.81. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check STM's competition here
CRUS vs ON Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while ON trades at $68.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 238.31. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ON's competition here
CRUS vs UMC Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while UMC trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check UMC's competition here
CRUS vs GFS Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while GFS trades at $45.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -577.37. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check GFS's competition here
CRUS vs Q Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while Q trades at $111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 43.62. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check Q's competition here
CRUS vs ALAB Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while ALAB trades at $127.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 106.30. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ALAB's competition here
CRUS vs ENTG Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while ENTG trades at $134.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 86.21. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ENTG's competition here
CRUS vs MTSI Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while MTSI trades at $240.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 110.22. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check MTSI's competition here
CRUS vs TSEM Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while TSEM trades at $126.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 66.22. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check TSEM's competition here
CRUS vs LSCC Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while LSCC trades at $97.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 4888.00. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check LSCC's competition here
CRUS vs NVMI Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while NVMI trades at $438.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 55.50. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check NVMI's competition here
CRUS vs AMKR Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while AMKR trades at $46.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 31.96. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AMKR's competition here
CRUS vs RMBS Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while RMBS trades at $95.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 48.64. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check RMBS's competition here
CRUS vs ONTO Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while ONTO trades at $208.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 60.79. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ONTO's competition here
CRUS vs SITM Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while SITM trades at $393.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -236.61. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check SITM's competition here
CRUS vs CREE Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CREE's ROE of +11.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check CREE's competition here
CRUS vs SWKS Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while SWKS trades at $59.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check SWKS's competition here
CRUS vs SMTC Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while SMTC trades at $86.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 154.95. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMTC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check SMTC's competition here
CRUS vs BRKS Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check BRKS's competition here
CRUS vs QRVO Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while QRVO trades at $81.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check QRVO's competition here
CRUS vs FORM Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while FORM trades at $95.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 137.04. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check FORM's competition here
CRUS vs ALGM Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while ALGM trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -556.14. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ALGM's competition here
CRUS vs CAMT Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while CAMT trades at $147.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 146.63. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check CAMT's competition here
CRUS vs SLAB Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while SLAB trades at $204.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -103.99. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check SLAB's competition here
CRUS vs IPGP Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while IPGP trades at $133.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 183.04. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check IPGP's competition here
CRUS vs OLED Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while OLED trades at $100.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check OLED's competition here
CRUS vs SIMO Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while SIMO trades at $136.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 37.05. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check SIMO's competition here
CRUS vs ACMR Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while ACMR trades at $63.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 38.72. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ACMR's competition here
CRUS vs KLIC Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while KLIC trades at $69.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is -59.54. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KLIC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check KLIC's competition here
CRUS vs AAOI Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while AAOI trades at $53.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -14.95. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AAOI's competition here
CRUS vs SYNA Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while SYNA trades at $81.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -53.01. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check SYNA's competition here
CRUS vs DIOD Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while DIOD trades at $67.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 47.87. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check DIOD's competition here
CRUS vs LASR Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while LASR trades at $54.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -62.93. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check LASR's competition here
CRUS vs AMBA Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while AMBA trades at $66.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -35.98. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AMBA's competition here
CRUS vs UCTT Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while UCTT trades at $59.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -16.59. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check UCTT's competition here
CRUS vs VSH Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while VSH trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -281.00. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check VSH's competition here
CRUS vs POWI Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while POWI trades at $45.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 116.69. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check POWI's competition here
CRUS vs ACLS Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while ACLS trades at $79.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ACLS's competition here
CRUS vs PLAB Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while PLAB trades at $36.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check PLAB's competition here
CRUS vs NVTS Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while NVTS trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -12.31. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check NVTS's competition here
CRUS vs VECO Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while VECO trades at $28.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 41.30. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check VECO's competition here
CRUS vs ICHR Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while ICHR trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -32.69. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ICHR's competition here
CRUS vs DQ Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while DQ trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check DQ's competition here
CRUS vs MXL Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while MXL trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -11.69. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check MXL's competition here
CRUS vs COHU Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while COHU trades at $30.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -19.85. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check COHU's competition here
CRUS vs SKYT Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while SKYT trades at $27.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check SKYT's competition here
CRUS vs AXTI Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while AXTI trades at $27.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AXTI's competition here
CRUS vs HIMX Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while HIMX trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 30.04. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check HIMX's competition here
CRUS vs IMOS Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while IMOS trades at $35.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 570.00. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check IMOS's competition here
CRUS vs SGH Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check SGH's competition here
CRUS vs AEHR Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while AEHR trades at $34.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -112.00. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AEHR's competition here
CRUS vs POET Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 749.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while POET trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -8.01. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to POET's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check POET's competition here
CRUS vs INDI Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 735.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while INDI trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check INDI's competition here
CRUS vs AIP Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 669.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while AIP trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -17.96. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIP's ROE of +3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AIP's competition here
CRUS vs AOSL Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 666M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while AOSL trades at $21.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AOSL's competition here
CRUS vs AMBQ Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 623.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while AMBQ trades at $29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -15.10. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check AMBQ's competition here
CRUS vs CEVA Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 525.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while CEVA trades at $18.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -194.60. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check CEVA's competition here
CRUS vs LAES Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 518.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while LAES trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check LAES's competition here
CRUS vs WOLF Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 485.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while WOLF trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WOLF's ROE of +10.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check WOLF's competition here
CRUS vs TGAN Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check TGAN's competition here
CRUS vs NVEC Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 318.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while NVEC trades at $66.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check NVEC's competition here
CRUS vs XPER Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 254.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while XPER trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is 34.31. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check XPER's competition here
CRUS vs MRAM Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 251.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while MRAM trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -549.50. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check MRAM's competition here
CRUS vs ATOM Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 221.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while ATOM trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ATOM's competition here
CRUS vs ALMU Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 217.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while ALMU trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -118.31. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ALMU's competition here
CRUS vs NA Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 211.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while NA trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check NA's competition here
CRUS vs GSIT Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 192.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while GSIT trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check GSIT's competition here
CRUS vs ASYS Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 171.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while ASYS trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check ASYS's competition here
CRUS vs VLN Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 155.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while VLN trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check VLN's competition here
CRUS vs BZAI Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 151.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while BZAI trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -8.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check BZAI's competition here
CRUS vs OIIM Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check OIIM's competition here
CRUS vs QUIK Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 138.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while QUIK trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check QUIK's competition here
CRUS vs INTT Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 122.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while INTT trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -54.33. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check INTT's competition here
CRUS vs MX Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 95.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while MX trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check MX's competition here
CRUS vs GCTS Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while GCTS trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check GCTS's competition here
CRUS vs MOSY Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check MOSY's competition here
CRUS vs WISA Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WISA's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check WISA's competition here
CRUS vs SQNS Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, SQNS has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while SQNS trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas SQNS's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SQNS's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to SQNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check SQNS's competition here
CRUS vs WKEY Comparison February 2026
CRUS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRUS stands at 7.3B. In comparison, WKEY has a market cap of 43M. Regarding current trading prices, CRUS is priced at $141.43, while WKEY trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRUS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.75, whereas WKEY's P/E ratio is -11.90. In terms of profitability, CRUS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WKEY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRUS is less volatile compared to WKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRUS.Check WKEY's competition here