Brooks Automation, Inc.

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.4T. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while NVDA trades at $180.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 36.86. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check NVDA's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while TSM trades at $338.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check TSM's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while AVGO trades at $322.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 62.92. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check AVGO's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 518.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while ASML trades at $1,345.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 47.22. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check ASML's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 479.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while MU trades at $426.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 40.43. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check MU's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 315.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while AMD trades at $193.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 74.38. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check AMD's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 271B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while AMAT trades at $341.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check AMAT's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 265B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while LRCX trades at $212.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 43.66. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check LRCX's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 228.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while INTC trades at $45.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -762.83. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check INTC's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 186.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while KLAC trades at $1,418.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check KLAC's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 173.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while TXN trades at $190.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 35.07. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check TXN's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 149.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while ADI trades at $306.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 56.06. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check ADI's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 138.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while QCOM trades at $129.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check QCOM's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 122.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while ARM trades at $115.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 156.42. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check ARM's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while MRVL trades at $87.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 29.48. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check MRVL's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while MPWR trades at $1,052.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 82.11. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check MPWR's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while NXPI trades at $190.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check NXPI's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while ASX trades at $21.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 38.38. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check ASX's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while TER trades at $286.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 82.78. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check TER's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while MCHP trades at $61.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -206.47. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check MCHP's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while STM trades at $32.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 182.58. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check STM's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while ON trades at $58.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 201.90. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check ON's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while GFS trades at $41.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check GFS's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while UMC trades at $9.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check UMC's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while Q trades at $109.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check Q's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while ALAB trades at $120.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 91.84. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check ALAB's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while ENTG trades at $108.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 69.86. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check ENTG's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while MTSI trades at $217.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 99.00. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check MTSI's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while TSEM trades at $124.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 64.62. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check TSEM's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while NVMI trades at $428.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 53.44. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check NVMI's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while LSCC trades at $85.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 4288.50. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check LSCC's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while AMKR trades at $42.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 28.66. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check AMKR's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while RMBS trades at $94.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 44.55. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check RMBS's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while CREE trades at $79.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CREE's ROE of +11.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check CREE's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while ONTO trades at $189.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 68.39. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check ONTO's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while SITM trades at $326.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -189.61. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check SITM's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while SWKS trades at $54.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check SWKS's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while SMTC trades at $84.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is 151.52. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SMTC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check SMTC's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while AAOI trades at $96.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -151.27. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check AAOI's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while QRVO trades at $78.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check QRVO's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while FORM trades at $89.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 130.32. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check FORM's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while CAMT trades at $148.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 144.64. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check CAMT's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while CRUS trades at $133.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check CRUS's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while SLAB trades at $203.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -102.53. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check SLAB's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while ALGM trades at $31.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -444.71. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check ALGM's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while IPGP trades at $110.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 145.99. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check IPGP's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while OLED trades at $94.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check OLED's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while SIMO trades at $123.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 33.86. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check SIMO's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while LASR trades at $62.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -133.19. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check LASR's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while KLIC trades at $64.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is -54.09. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KLIC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check KLIC's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while ACMR trades at $46.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 33.85. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check ACMR's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while DIOD trades at $63.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 44.67. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check DIOD's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while SYNA trades at $73.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -46.46. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check SYNA's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while POWI trades at $47.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 121.67. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check POWI's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while ACLS trades at $83.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check ACLS's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while UCTT trades at $54.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -13.74. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check UCTT's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while VSH trades at $17.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -246.14. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check VSH's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while NVTS trades at $10.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -17.72. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check NVTS's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while AMBA trades at $52.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -29.38. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check AMBA's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while AXTI trades at $48.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -99.71. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check AXTI's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while PLAB trades at $33.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check PLAB's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while VECO trades at $30.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 52.46. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check VECO's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while HIMX trades at $9.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 35.14. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check HIMX's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while DQ trades at $23.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -9.14. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check DQ's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while MXL trades at $16.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check MXL's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while ICHR trades at $41.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -26.90. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check ICHR's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while SKYT trades at $27.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check SKYT's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while IMOS trades at $37.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 87.49. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check IMOS's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while COHU trades at $27.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -17.14. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check COHU's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while SGH trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check SGH's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while AEHR trades at $35.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -115.06. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check AEHR's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 900M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while POET trades at $6.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to POET's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check POET's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 753.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while WOLF trades at $16.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WOLF's ROE of +10.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check WOLF's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 665.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while AIP trades at $14.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -17.42. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AIP's ROE of +3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check AIP's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 640.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while AOSL trades at $21.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check AOSL's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 613.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while QNC trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check QNC's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 533.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while AMBQ trades at $25.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check AMBQ's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 513.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while INDI trades at $2.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check INDI's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 506.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while LAES trades at $3.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -9.65. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check LAES's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while CEVA trades at $18.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -41.45. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check CEVA's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while NVEC trades at $67.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check NVEC's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while TGAN trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check TGAN's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 267.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while XPER trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BRKS has daily volatility of 4.10 and XPER has daily volatility of N/A.Check XPER's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 248.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while GSIT trades at $8.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check GSIT's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 209.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while ALMU trades at $14.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -113.92. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check ALMU's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 203.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while MRAM trades at $8.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -294.00. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check MRAM's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 198.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while NA trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check NA's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 187M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while ASYS trades at $12.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check ASYS's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 173.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while INTT trades at $13.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -66.29. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check INTT's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 153.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while QUIK trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -11.69. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check QUIK's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 149.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while ATOM trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check ATOM's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while OIIM trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check OIIM's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 136.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while VLN trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check VLN's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 133M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while BZAI trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -8.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check BZAI's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 101.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while MX trades at $2.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -7.23. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check MX's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while GCTS trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check GCTS's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while MOSY trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check MOSY's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while WISA trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WISA's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check WISA's competition here

BRKS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRKS stands at 7.8B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 50.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BRKS is priced at $113.10, while TRT trades at $5.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRKS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is -289.00. In terms of profitability, BRKS's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BRKS is less volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRKS.Check TRT's competition here