Ambarella, Inc.
Ambarella, Inc. AMBA Peers
See (AMBA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBA | $63.51 | +1.42% | 2.69B | -22.36 | -$2.84 | N/A |
| NVDA | $135.40 | +0.42% | 3.30T | 46.05 | $2.94 | +0.03% |
| AVGO | $228.61 | -1.73% | 1.07T | 105.84 | $2.16 | +0.98% |
| TSM | $194.18 | -0.02% | 1.01T | 23.62 | $8.22 | +1.27% |
| ASML | $748.10 | -1.35% | 294.15B | 30.26 | $24.72 | +0.90% |
| AMD | $117.17 | +1.90% | 189.98B | 85.53 | $1.37 | N/A |
| TXN | $188.50 | +0.36% | 171.25B | 35.70 | $5.28 | +2.86% |
| QCOM | $152.50 | -0.07% | 167.44B | 15.56 | $9.80 | +2.23% |
| ARM | $135.96 | +2.17% | 143.30B | 181.28 | $0.75 | N/A |
| AMAT | $165.57 | -5.25% | 134.52B | 21.64 | $7.65 | +0.97% |
Stock Comparison
AMBA vs NVDA Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 3.30T. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while NVDA trades at $135.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 46.05. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AVGO Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.07T. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while AVGO trades at $228.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 105.84. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs TSM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.01T. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while TSM trades at $194.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ASML Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 294.15B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while ASML trades at $748.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 30.26. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AMD Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 189.98B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while AMD trades at $117.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 85.53. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs TXN Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 171.25B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while TXN trades at $188.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 35.70. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs QCOM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 167.44B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while QCOM trades at $152.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ARM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 143.30B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while ARM trades at $135.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 181.28. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AMAT Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 134.52B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while AMAT trades at $165.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ADI Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 112.64B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while ADI trades at $227.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 72.56. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MU Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 109.52B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while MU trades at $98.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs LRCX Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 108.00B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while LRCX trades at $84.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs KLAC Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 104.63B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while KLAC trades at $791.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 28.79. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs INTC Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 94.48B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while INTC trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MRVL Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 55.08B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while MRVL trades at $63.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -62.51. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs NXPI Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 53.70B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while NXPI trades at $212.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MPWR Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 34.25B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while MPWR trades at $715.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MCHP Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 32.92B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while MCHP trades at $61.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -6121.00. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs STM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 23.13B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while STM trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs GFS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 21.86B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while GFS trades at $39.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -82.37. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ASX Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 21.67B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while ASX trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs UMC Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 19.71B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while UMC trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ON Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 18.77B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while ON trades at $44.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 31.19. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ALAB Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 14.93B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while ALAB trades at $90.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 69.13. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs TER Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 13.27B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while TER trades at $82.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ENTG Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 11.85B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while ENTG trades at $78.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 38.35. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs SWKS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.01B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while SWKS trades at $73.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs CREE Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.84B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MTSI Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 9.18B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while MTSI trades at $123.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -103.75. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs BRKS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.82B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs QRVO Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.45B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while QRVO trades at $79.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 137.45. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs OLED Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 7.39B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while OLED trades at $155.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs LSCC Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while LSCC trades at $52.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 141.97. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs RMBS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 6.05B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while RMBS trades at $56.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs CRUS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.65B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while CRUS trades at $106.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs NVMI Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 5.62B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while NVMI trades at $191.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ALGM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 5.07B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while ALGM trades at $27.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -70.54. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AMKR Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 4.87B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while AMKR trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ONTO Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while ONTO trades at $99.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs TSEM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 4.59B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while TSEM trades at $41.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs SITM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while SITM trades at $182.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -44.99. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs SMTC Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while SMTC trades at $39.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -17.67. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -15.76%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs POWI Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.04B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while POWI trades at $53.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 84.33. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs CAMT Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while CAMT trades at $65.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs SLAB Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while SLAB trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs IPGP Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while IPGP trades at $66.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -14.71. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs SYNA Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while SYNA trades at $65.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs FORM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while FORM trades at $32.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 46.46. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs DIOD Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while DIOD trades at $48.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 88.40. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs VSH Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while VSH trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -31.80. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ACLS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while ACLS trades at $61.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs KLIC Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while KLIC trades at $33.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 91.41. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ACMR Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while ACMR trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs PLAB Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while PLAB trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs VECO Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while VECO trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs SGH Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MXL Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while MXL trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AAOI Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while AAOI trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs UCTT Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 995.54M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while UCTT trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 35.56. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs COHU Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 826.12M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while COHU trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -9.65. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs HIMX Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 722.34M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while HIMX trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs IMOS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 698.51M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while IMOS trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AOSL Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 688.65M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while AOSL trades at $23.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -30.05. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs LASR Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 626.40M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while LASR trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ICHR Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 624.39M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while ICHR trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -38.94. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs WOLF Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 604.61M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while WOLF trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs INDI Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 526.21M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while INDI trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs CEVA Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 507.75M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while CEVA trades at $21.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 235.89. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs SIMO Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 466.32M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while SIMO trades at $55.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs NVTS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 398.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while NVTS trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs POET Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 367.71M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while POET trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to POET's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs XPER Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 365.50M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while XPER trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -18.60. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs NVEC Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 349.22M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while NVEC trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs SKYT Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 327.12M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while SKYT trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -48.64. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs TGAN Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.12M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AIP Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 314.83M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while AIP trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -8.62. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs LAES Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 295.43M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while LAES trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AEHR Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 276.58M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while AEHR trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AEHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs VLN-WT Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 264.30M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while VLN-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs VLN Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 263.00M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while VLN trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -7.11. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ATOM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 229.97M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while ATOM trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -11.01. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs BZAI Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 216.59M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while BZAI trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -53.25. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs DQ Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 194.72M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while DQ trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MX Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 148.76M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while MX trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs OIIM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143.02M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MRAM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 137.28M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while MRAM trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 152.75. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs QUIK Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 91.22M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while QUIK trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -22.15. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs GSIT Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 86.79M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while GSIT trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -8.07. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs INTT Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 75.58M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while INTT trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -605.00. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ICG Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 74.97M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while ICG trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AXTI Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 67.95M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while AXTI trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs NA Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 66.74M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while NA trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MOSY Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.33M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs WISA Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 62.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to WISA's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs GCTS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 58.97M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while GCTS trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ASYS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 50.39M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while ASYS trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs SQNS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, SQNS has a market cap of 46.46M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while SQNS trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas SQNS's P/E ratio is 0.84. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SQNS's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to SQNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MOBX Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, MOBX has a market cap of 37.96M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while MOBX trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas MOBX's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MOBX's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to MOBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs PXLW Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.69B. In comparison, PXLW has a market cap of 34.08M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $63.51, while PXLW trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -22.36, whereas PXLW's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PXLW's ROE of +3.69%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to PXLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.