Ambarella, Inc.
Ambarella, Inc. AMBA Peers
See (AMBA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBA | $68.12 | +0.14% | 2.9B | -27.10 | -$2.49 | N/A |
| NVDA | $166.13 | +1.99% | 4T | 52.77 | $3.11 | +0.03% |
| AVGO | $274.92 | -1.07% | 1.3T | 100.88 | $2.73 | +1.03% |
| TSM | $231.59 | -0.11% | 1.2T | 26.98 | $8.52 | +1.37% |
| ASML | $799.73 | -0.01% | 315.4B | 31.23 | $25.68 | +0.82% |
| AMD | $146.98 | +6.19% | 233.7B | 105.23 | $1.37 | N/A |
| TXN | $221.29 | +2.26% | 199.6B | 41.60 | $5.28 | +3.04% |
| QCOM | $158.50 | -0.53% | 174.7B | 16.23 | $9.80 | +2.16% |
| AMAT | $198.41 | +1.55% | 158.9B | 24.09 | $8.22 | +1.04% |
| ARM | $148.75 | +0.49% | 157B | 200.76 | $0.74 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AMBA vs NVDA Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4T. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while NVDA trades at $166.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AVGO Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while AVGO trades at $274.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 100.88. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs TSM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while TSM trades at $231.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ASML Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 315.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while ASML trades at $799.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AMD Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 233.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while AMD trades at $146.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 105.23. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs TXN Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 199.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while TXN trades at $221.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 41.60. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs QCOM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 174.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while QCOM trades at $158.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AMAT Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 158.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while AMAT trades at $198.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ARM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 157B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while ARM trades at $148.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 200.76. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MU Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 137.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while MU trades at $124.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs LRCX Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 129.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while LRCX trades at $101.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs KLAC Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 122.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while KLAC trades at $928.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ADI Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 121.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while ADI trades at $244.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 66.43. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs INTC Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while INTC trades at $23.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MRVL Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while MRVL trades at $72.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -128.68. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs NXPI Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while NXPI trades at $230.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MCHP Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while MCHP trades at $74.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -7508.00. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MPWR Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while MPWR trades at $736.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs STM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while STM trades at $32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ON Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while ON trades at $59.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 39.15. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs GFS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while GFS trades at $41.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -121.26. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ASX Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while ASX trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs UMC Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while UMC trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ALAB Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while ALAB trades at $98.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 74.04. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs TER Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while TER trades at $96.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ENTG Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while ENTG trades at $87.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 43.16. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs SWKS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while SWKS trades at $75.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MTSI Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while MTSI trades at $136.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -115.20. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs CREE Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs QRVO Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while QRVO trades at $88.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 155.72. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs NVMI Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while NVMI trades at $283.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs BRKS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs LSCC Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while LSCC trades at $53.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 148.41. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs OLED Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while OLED trades at $155.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs RMBS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while RMBS trades at $64.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ALGM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while ALGM trades at $36.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -96.15. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs CRUS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while CRUS trades at $104.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AMKR Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while AMKR trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs SITM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while SITM trades at $206.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -55.28. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ONTO Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while ONTO trades at $102.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs TSEM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while TSEM trades at $45.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs SLAB Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while SLAB trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -27.99. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs SMTC Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while SMTC trades at $47.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -28.94. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs CAMT Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while CAMT trades at $89.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 34.29. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs POWI Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while POWI trades at $57.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 91.72. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs IPGP Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while IPGP trades at $73.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -16.60. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs FORM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while FORM trades at $36.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 52.64. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs SYNA Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while SYNA trades at $68.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs DIOD Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while DIOD trades at $57.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 105.06. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs SIMO Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while SIMO trades at $74.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ACLS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while ACLS trades at $75.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs VSH Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while VSH trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -37.25. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs KLIC Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while KLIC trades at $36.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 99.92. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ACMR Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while ACMR trades at $28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs HIMX Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while HIMX trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AAOI Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while AAOI trades at $28.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs DQ Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while DQ trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MXL Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while MXL trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs VECO Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while VECO trades at $21.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs NVTS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while NVTS trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs PLAB Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while PLAB trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs UCTT Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while UCTT trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 40.35. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs SGH Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs COHU Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 957.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while COHU trades at $20.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -11.19. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs LASR Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 919.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while LASR trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -16.31. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AOSL Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 834.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while AOSL trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -36.42. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ICHR Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 809M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while ICHR trades at $23.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -50.45. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs INDI Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 752.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while INDI trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs IMOS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 678.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while IMOS trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs POET Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 593.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while POET trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -8.56. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to POET's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs CEVA Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 554.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while CEVA trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 257.78. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs SKYT Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 491.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while SKYT trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -60.21. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs LAES Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 437.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while LAES trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AEHR Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 434.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while AEHR trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -112.23. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AIP Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 387.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while AIP trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs NVEC Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 370.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while NVEC trades at $75.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs XPER Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 364.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while XPER trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -18.99. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs TGAN Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs BZAI Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 297.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while BZAI trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs VLN Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 290.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while VLN trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ALMU Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 265M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while ALMU trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -64.54. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs WOLF Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 249.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while WOLF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs VLN-WT Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 193.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while VLN-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs NA Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 182.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while NA trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ATOM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 159.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while ATOM trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MRAM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 153.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while MRAM trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 170.88. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MX Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 147.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while MX trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs OIIM Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs GSIT Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 126M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while GSIT trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -10.76. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs QUIK Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 106.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while QUIK trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -16.39. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AXTI Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 103.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while AXTI trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs SQNS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SQNS has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while SQNS trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas SQNS's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SQNS's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to SQNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs INTT Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 94.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while INTT trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -755.00. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ICG Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 81.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while ICG trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs GCTS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while GCTS trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs ASYS Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while ASYS trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs MOSY Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs WISA Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to WISA's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.
AMBA vs AEVAW Comparison
AMBA plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMBA stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AEVAW has a market cap of 43.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMBA is priced at $68.12, while AEVAW trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMBA currently has a P/E ratio of -27.10, whereas AEVAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMBA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AEVAW's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMBA is less volatile compared to AEVAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMBA.