Applied Materials, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. AMAT Peers
See (AMAT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMAT | $169.46 | -1.96% | 136B | 20.62 | $8.22 | +0.98% |
| NVDA | $143.85 | -1.12% | 3.5T | 46.40 | $3.10 | +0.03% |
| AVGO | $249.99 | -0.51% | 1.2T | 91.24 | $2.74 | +1.14% |
| TSM | $209.50 | -1.87% | 1.1T | 25.06 | $8.36 | +1.25% |
| ASML | $756.53 | -0.67% | 297.5B | 29.58 | $25.58 | +1.03% |
| AMD | $128.24 | +1.14% | 207.9B | 93.61 | $1.37 | N/A |
| TXN | $198.20 | -0.08% | 180.1B | 37.54 | $5.28 | +2.72% |
| QCOM | $151.32 | -1.50% | 166.1B | 15.46 | $9.79 | +2.27% |
| ARM | $145.11 | -0.64% | 153.4B | 193.48 | $0.75 | N/A |
| MU | $123.60 | +1.46% | 138.1B | 29.57 | $4.18 | +0.37% |
Stock Comparison
AMAT vs NVDA Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 3.5T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while NVDA trades at $143.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 46.40. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs AVGO Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while AVGO trades at $249.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 91.24. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs TSM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while TSM trades at $209.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ASML Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 297.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while ASML trades at $756.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 29.58. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs AMD Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 207.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while AMD trades at $128.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 93.61. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs TXN Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 180.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while TXN trades at $198.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 37.54. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs QCOM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 166.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while QCOM trades at $151.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ARM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 153.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while ARM trades at $145.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 193.48. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MU Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 138.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while MU trades at $123.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs LRCX Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 115.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while LRCX trades at $90.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ADI Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while ADI trades at $228.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 61.88. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs KLAC Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 112.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while KLAC trades at $850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs INTC Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 92B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while INTC trades at $21.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MRVL Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while MRVL trades at $73.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -128.96. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs NXPI Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while NXPI trades at $208.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MCHP Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while MCHP trades at $68.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -6897.00. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MPWR Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while MPWR trades at $685.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs STM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while STM trades at $28.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ON Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while ON trades at $52.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 36.70. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ASX Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while ASX trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs GFS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while GFS trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -110.21. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs UMC Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while UMC trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ALAB Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while ALAB trades at $93.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 71.05. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs TER Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while TER trades at $86.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ENTG Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while ENTG trades at $75.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 36.97. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs SWKS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while SWKS trades at $72.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MTSI Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while MTSI trades at $136.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -115.12. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs CREE Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs BRKS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs QRVO Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while QRVO trades at $79.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 137.78. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs OLED Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while OLED trades at $151.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 31.45. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs LSCC Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while LSCC trades at $50.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 136.27. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs NVMI Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while NVMI trades at $231.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 34.92. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs RMBS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while RMBS trades at $59.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 31.09. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ALGM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while ALGM trades at $30.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -79.38. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs SITM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while SITM trades at $228.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -59.92. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs CRUS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while CRUS trades at $104.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs AMKR Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while AMKR trades at $20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ONTO Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while ONTO trades at $95.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs SLAB Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while SLAB trades at $141.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -27.76. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs TSEM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while TSEM trades at $39.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs SMTC Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while SMTC trades at $41.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -24.93. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -15.76%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs CAMT Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while CAMT trades at $73.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs POWI Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while POWI trades at $53.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 83.58. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs IPGP Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while IPGP trades at $66.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -14.60. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs FORM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while FORM trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 47.17. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs SYNA Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while SYNA trades at $63.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs DIOD Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while DIOD trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 92.73. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs AMBA Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while AMBA trades at $51.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -20.76. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ACLS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while ACLS trades at $66.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs VSH Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while VSH trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -31.76. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs KLIC Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while KLIC trades at $33.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 90.43. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ACMR Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while ACMR trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs NVTS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while NVTS trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -13.23. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs AAOI Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while AAOI trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs VECO Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while VECO trades at $19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MXL Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while MXL trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs SGH Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs PLAB Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while PLAB trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs DQ Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 926.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while DQ trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs UCTT Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 900.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while UCTT trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs LASR Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 860.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while LASR trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -15.26. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs COHU Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 846.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while COHU trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -9.89. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs HIMX Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 779.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while HIMX trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs AOSL Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 717.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while AOSL trades at $24.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -31.31. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs IMOS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 666.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while IMOS trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs INDI Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 617.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while INDI trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs SIMO Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 594.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while SIMO trades at $69.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ICHR Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 587.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while ICHR trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -36.62. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs CEVA Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 493.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while CEVA trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 229.33. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs LAES Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 452.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while LAES trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -6.59. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs SKYT Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 425.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while SKYT trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -52.06. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs XPER Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 352.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while XPER trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -17.95. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs AIP Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 347.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while AIP trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -10.22. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs POET Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 340.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while POET trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to POET's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs NVEC Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 336.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while NVEC trades at $69.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs AEHR Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while AEHR trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AEHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs TGAN Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs BZAI Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 275.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while BZAI trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs VLN-WT Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 261M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while VLN-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs VLN Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 231.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while VLN trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ALMU Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 210.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while ALMU trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -51.27. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs NA Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 203.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while NA trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ATOM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 153.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while ATOM trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs OIIM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs WOLF Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while WOLF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MX Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while MX trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MRAM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 135.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while MRAM trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 150.75. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs QUIK Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 93.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while QUIK trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -14.39. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs INTT Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while INTT trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -689.30. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs AXTI Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while AXTI trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs GSIT Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while GSIT trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -7.35. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs GCTS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while GCTS trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MOSY Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs WISA Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WISA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ASYS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while ASYS trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs PXLW Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, PXLW has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while PXLW trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas PXLW's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PXLW's ROE of +3.69%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to PXLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs SQNS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, SQNS has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while SQNS trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas SQNS's P/E ratio is 0.87. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SQNS's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to SQNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MOBXW Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 136B. In comparison, MOBXW has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $169.46, while MOBXW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.62, whereas MOBXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MOBXW's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MOBXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.