Applied Materials, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. AMAT Peers
See (AMAT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMAT | $159.48 | -1.31% | 128B | 19.40 | $8.22 | +1.05% |
| NVDA | $139.18 | +3.24% | 3.4T | 47.34 | $2.94 | +0.03% |
| AVGO | $241.87 | +1.02% | 1.1T | 111.46 | $2.17 | +0.93% |
| TSM | $197.18 | +0.53% | 1T | 23.70 | $8.32 | +1.26% |
| ASML | $747.07 | +0.07% | 293.7B | 29.65 | $25.20 | +0.90% |
| AMD | $113.03 | +0.15% | 183.3B | 82.50 | $1.37 | N/A |
| TXN | $184.99 | +0.46% | 168.1B | 34.90 | $5.30 | +2.92% |
| QCOM | $148.30 | +0.47% | 162.8B | 15.15 | $9.79 | +2.30% |
| ARM | $128.10 | -5.49% | 135.4B | 170.80 | $0.75 | N/A |
| MU | $96.80 | +0.64% | 108.2B | 23.16 | $4.18 | +0.48% |
Stock Comparison
AMAT vs NVDA Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 3.4T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while NVDA trades at $139.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 47.34. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs AVGO Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while AVGO trades at $241.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 111.46. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs TSM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while TSM trades at $197.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ASML Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 293.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while ASML trades at $747.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 29.65. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs AMD Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 183.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while AMD trades at $113.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 82.50. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs TXN Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 168.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while TXN trades at $184.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 34.90. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs QCOM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 162.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while QCOM trades at $148.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ARM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 135.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while ARM trades at $128.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 170.80. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MU Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 108.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while MU trades at $96.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs LRCX Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 107.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while LRCX trades at $84.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ADI Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 107.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while ADI trades at $215.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 58.47. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs KLAC Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 102.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while KLAC trades at $773.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs INTC Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while INTC trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MRVL Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while MRVL trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -62.48. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs NXPI Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while NXPI trades at $195.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MPWR Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while MPWR trades at $680.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MCHP Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while MCHP trades at $58.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -5812.00. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs STM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while STM trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ASX Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while ASX trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs GFS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while GFS trades at $36.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -108.56. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs UMC Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while UMC trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ON Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while ON trades at $42.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ALAB Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while ALAB trades at $96.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 73.75. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs TER Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while TER trades at $81.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ENTG Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while ENTG trades at $72.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 35.48. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs SWKS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while SWKS trades at $69.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs CREE Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MTSI Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while MTSI trades at $123.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -103.78. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs BRKS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs QRVO Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while QRVO trades at $76.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 127.35. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs OLED Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while OLED trades at $145.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs NVMI Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while NVMI trades at $217.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs LSCC Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while LSCC trades at $46.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 124.35. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs RMBS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while RMBS trades at $54.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs CRUS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while CRUS trades at $99.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ALGM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while ALGM trades at $25.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -66.03. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs SITM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while SITM trades at $196.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -51.77. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ONTO Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while ONTO trades at $95.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs AMKR Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while AMKR trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs TSEM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while TSEM trades at $40.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs SLAB Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while SLAB trades at $123.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -24.27. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs CAMT Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while CAMT trades at $68.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs SMTC Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while SMTC trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -21.29. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -15.76%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs IPGP Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while IPGP trades at $67.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -14.83. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs POWI Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while POWI trades at $50.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 79.13. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs AMBA Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while AMBA trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -21.83. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs FORM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while FORM trades at $31.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 45.13. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs SYNA Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while SYNA trades at $59.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs DIOD Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while DIOD trades at $45.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 82.91. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs VSH Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while VSH trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -29.77. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ACLS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while ACLS trades at $58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs KLIC Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while KLIC trades at $32.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 88.43. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ACMR Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while ACMR trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs VECO Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while VECO trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs PLAB Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while PLAB trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs SGH Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs NVTS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while NVTS trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MXL Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while MXL trades at $11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs AAOI Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while AAOI trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs UCTT Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 911.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while UCTT trades at $20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 32.56. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs COHU Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 823.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while COHU trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs LASR Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 769.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while LASR trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -13.66. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs HIMX Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 729.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while HIMX trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs IMOS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 685.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while IMOS trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs AOSL Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 633.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while AOSL trades at $21.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -27.65. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ICHR Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 556.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while ICHR trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -34.70. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs INDI Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 553.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while INDI trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs SIMO Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while SIMO trades at $63.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 23.17. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs CEVA Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 460.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while CEVA trades at $19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 214.00. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs SKYT Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 436.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while SKYT trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -53.47. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs LAES Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 422.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while LAES trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs XPER Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 356.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while XPER trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -18.14. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs NVEC Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 353.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while NVEC trades at $73.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs POET Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 344.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while POET trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to POET's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs AIP Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 328.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while AIP trades at $7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs TGAN Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs AEHR Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 296.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while AEHR trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AEHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs VLN Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 234.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while VLN trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs VLN-WT Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 217.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while VLN-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs WOLF Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 208.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while WOLF trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs BZAI Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 205.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while BZAI trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ATOM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 191.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while ATOM trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs DQ Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 184.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while DQ trades at $13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs OIIM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MX Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while MX trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MRAM Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 127.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while MRAM trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 141.75. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs QUIK Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while QUIK trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -11.99. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs GSIT Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while GSIT trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs INTT Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while INTT trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -638.00. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs AXTI Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 69.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while AXTI trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ICG Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while ICG trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MOSY Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs WISA Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WISA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs NA Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while NA trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs ASYS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while ASYS trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs GCTS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while GCTS trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs SQNS Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, SQNS has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while SQNS trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas SQNS's P/E ratio is 0.81. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SQNS's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is more volatile compared to SQNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs MOBX Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, MOBX has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while MOBX trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas MOBX's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MOBX's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to MOBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.
AMAT vs PXLW Comparison
AMAT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMAT stands at 128B. In comparison, PXLW has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMAT is priced at $159.48, while PXLW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMAT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.40, whereas PXLW's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, AMAT's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PXLW's ROE of +3.69%. Regarding short-term risk, AMAT is less volatile compared to PXLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMAT.