Aeva Technologies, Inc.
Aeva Technologies, Inc. AEVAW Peers
See (AEVAW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEVAW | $0.40 | +23.01% | 22.1M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NVDA | $144.69 | +1.92% | 3.5T | 46.67 | $3.10 | +0.03% |
| AVGO | $252.08 | +1.36% | 1.2T | 92.00 | $2.74 | +0.88% |
| TSM | $215.64 | +2.15% | 1.1T | 25.79 | $8.36 | +1.21% |
| ASML | $775.23 | +1.87% | 304.8B | 30.11 | $25.75 | +1.01% |
| AMD | $126.40 | +8.82% | 204.9B | 92.26 | $1.37 | N/A |
| TXN | $199.22 | +2.16% | 181B | 37.17 | $5.36 | +2.70% |
| QCOM | $156.87 | +1.39% | 172.2B | 16.02 | $9.79 | +2.20% |
| ARM | $142.04 | +4.79% | 150.1B | 189.39 | $0.75 | N/A |
| AMAT | $176.56 | +3.50% | 141.7B | 20.99 | $8.41 | +0.94% |
Stock Comparison
AEVAW vs NVDA Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 3.5T. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while NVDA trades at $144.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 46.67. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs AVGO Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while AVGO trades at $252.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 92.00. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs TSM Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while TSM trades at $215.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs ASML Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 304.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while ASML trades at $775.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 30.11. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs AMD Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 204.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while AMD trades at $126.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 92.26. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs TXN Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 181B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while TXN trades at $199.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 37.17. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs QCOM Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 172.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while QCOM trades at $156.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs ARM Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 150.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while ARM trades at $142.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 189.39. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs AMAT Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 141.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while AMAT trades at $176.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs MU Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 133.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while MU trades at $119.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs LRCX Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 119.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while LRCX trades at $93.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs KLAC Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 118.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while KLAC trades at $892.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 32.46. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs ADI Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 115B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while ADI trades at $231.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 62.82. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs INTC Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while INTC trades at $20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs MRVL Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while MRVL trades at $70.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -123.56. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs NXPI Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while NXPI trades at $217.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs MCHP Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while MCHP trades at $68.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -6821.90. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs MPWR Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while MPWR trades at $706.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs STM Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while STM trades at $29.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs ASX Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while ASX trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs ON Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while ON trades at $53.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs UMC Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while UMC trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs GFS Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while GFS trades at $37.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -110.59. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs ALAB Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while ALAB trades at $95.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 72.75. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs TER Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while TER trades at $87.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs ENTG Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while ENTG trades at $78.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 38.37. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs SWKS Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while SWKS trades at $71.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs CREE Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs MTSI Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while MTSI trades at $131.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -110.23. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs BRKS Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs QRVO Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while QRVO trades at $80.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 139.21. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs OLED Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while OLED trades at $155.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 32.41. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs NVMI Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while NVMI trades at $230.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 34.81. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs LSCC Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while LSCC trades at $47.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 129.35. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs RMBS Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while RMBS trades at $60.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs ALGM Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while ALGM trades at $31.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -79.92. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs CRUS Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while CRUS trades at $104.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs SITM Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while SITM trades at $218.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -57.34. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs AMKR Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while AMKR trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs ONTO Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while ONTO trades at $98.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs SLAB Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while SLAB trades at $143.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -28.14. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs TSEM Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while TSEM trades at $40.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs SMTC Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while SMTC trades at $40.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -24.33. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -15.76%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs CAMT Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while CAMT trades at $75.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs POWI Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while POWI trades at $56.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 88.58. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs IPGP Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while IPGP trades at $68.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -15.07. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs FORM Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while FORM trades at $34.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 50.55. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs SYNA Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while SYNA trades at $63.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs DIOD Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while DIOD trades at $50.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 92.44. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs AMBA Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while AMBA trades at $52.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -21.04. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs ACLS Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while ACLS trades at $68.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs VSH Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while VSH trades at $15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -32.79. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs KLIC Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while KLIC trades at $35.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 95.54. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs ACMR Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while ACMR trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs NVTS Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while NVTS trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -13.57. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs VECO Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while VECO trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs PLAB Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while PLAB trades at $18.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs SGH Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs MXL Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while MXL trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs DQ Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 963.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while DQ trades at $14.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs AAOI Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 959.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while AAOI trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs LASR Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 935.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while LASR trades at $18.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs UCTT Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 929.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while UCTT trades at $20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs COHU Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 863.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while COHU trades at $18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -10.09. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs HIMX Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 801M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while HIMX trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs IMOS Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 712M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while IMOS trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs AOSL Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 704.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while AOSL trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -30.74. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs INDI Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 664.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while INDI trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs ICHR Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 610.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while ICHR trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -38.04. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs CEVA Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 489.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while CEVA trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 227.56. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs LAES Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 453.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while LAES trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs SKYT Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 412.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while SKYT trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -50.53. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs XPER Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 370.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while XPER trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -18.86. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs POET Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 354.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while POET trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to POET's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs AEHR Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 350.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while AEHR trades at $11.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to AEHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs AIP Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 345.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while AIP trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -10.15. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs NVEC Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 345M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while NVEC trades at $71.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs TGAN Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs BZAI Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 248.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while BZAI trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs ALMU Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 233.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while ALMU trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -56.81. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs VLN Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 215.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while VLN trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs VLN-WT Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 201.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while VLN-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs WOLF Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 201.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while WOLF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs NA Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 169.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while NA trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -5.22. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs ATOM Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 163M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while ATOM trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -8.05. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs SIMO Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 146.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while SIMO trades at $69.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs OIIM Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs MX Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 141.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while MX trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs MRAM Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 132.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while MRAM trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 147.75. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs AXTI Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 94.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while AXTI trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs QUIK Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while QUIK trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -14.44. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs INTT Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while INTT trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -688.00. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs GSIT Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 81.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while GSIT trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs GCTS Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while GCTS trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs MOSY Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs WISA Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to WISA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs ASYS Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while ASYS trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs ICG Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while ICG trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.
AEVAW vs SQNS Comparison
AEVAW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEVAW stands at 22.1M. In comparison, SQNS has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEVAW is priced at $0.40, while SQNS trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEVAW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQNS's P/E ratio is 0.87. In terms of profitability, AEVAW's ROE is -1.33%, compared to SQNS's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AEVAW is more volatile compared to SQNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEVAW.