Aehr Test Systems
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for AEHR
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for AEHR
Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AEHR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEHR | $44.32 | +11.92% | 1.4B | -147.73 | -$0.30 | N/A |
| NVDA | $177.39 | +0.93% | 4.3T | 36.20 | $4.90 | +0.02% |
| TSM | $339.04 | -0.72% | 1.8T | 32.79 | $10.34 | +0.78% |
| AVGO | $314.55 | +0.34% | 1.5T | 61.20 | $5.14 | +0.79% |
| ASML | $1,317.23 | -3.13% | 507.7B | 46.09 | $28.58 | +0.53% |
| MU | $366.24 | -0.44% | 413B | 17.28 | $21.19 | +0.14% |
| AMD | $217.50 | +3.47% | 354.6B | 83.33 | $2.61 | N/A |
| AMAT | $348.47 | -1.51% | 276.5B | 35.70 | $9.76 | +0.53% |
| LRCX | $218.44 | -1.61% | 272.8B | 44.85 | $4.87 | +0.46% |
| INTC | $50.38 | +4.89% | 251.6B | -839.67 | -$0.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AEHR vs NVDA Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.3T. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while NVDA trades at $177.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check NVDA's competition here
AEHR vs TSM Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while TSM trades at $339.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 32.79. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check TSM's competition here
AEHR vs AVGO Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while AVGO trades at $314.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 61.20. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check AVGO's competition here
AEHR vs ASML Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 507.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while ASML trades at $1,317.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 46.09. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check ASML's competition here
AEHR vs MU Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 413B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while MU trades at $366.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check MU's competition here
AEHR vs AMD Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 354.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while AMD trades at $217.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 83.33. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check AMD's competition here
AEHR vs AMAT Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 276.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while AMAT trades at $348.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 35.70. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check AMAT's competition here
AEHR vs LRCX Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 272.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while LRCX trades at $218.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 44.85. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check LRCX's competition here
AEHR vs INTC Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 251.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while INTC trades at $50.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -839.67. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check INTC's competition here
AEHR vs KLAC Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 199.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while KLAC trades at $1,516.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 44.16. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check KLAC's competition here
AEHR vs TXN Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 177.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while TXN trades at $194.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 35.69. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check TXN's competition here
AEHR vs ARM Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 158.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while ARM trades at $149.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 198.81. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check ARM's competition here
AEHR vs ADI Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 155.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while ADI trades at $318.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 58.09. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check ADI's competition here
AEHR vs QCOM Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 135.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while QCOM trades at $126.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check QCOM's competition here
AEHR vs MRVL Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 93.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while MRVL trades at $107.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is 34.89. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MRVL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check MRVL's competition here
AEHR vs MPWR Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while MPWR trades at $1,118.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 86.91. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check MPWR's competition here
AEHR vs NXPI Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while NXPI trades at $194.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check NXPI's competition here
AEHR vs ASX Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while ASX trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 40.51. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check ASX's competition here
AEHR vs TER Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while TER trades at $309.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 89.22. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check TER's competition here
AEHR vs MCHP Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while MCHP trades at $65.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -218.67. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check MCHP's competition here
AEHR vs STM Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while STM trades at $34.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 190.67. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check STM's competition here
AEHR vs ON Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while ON trades at $62.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 214.45. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check ON's competition here
AEHR vs Q Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, Q has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while Q trades at $116.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas Q's P/E ratio is 35.31. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to Q's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to Q. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check Q's competition here
AEHR vs GFS Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while GFS trades at $43.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GFS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check GFS's competition here
AEHR vs TSEM Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while TSEM trades at $197.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 101.44. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check TSEM's competition here
AEHR vs UMC Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while UMC trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check UMC's competition here
AEHR vs ALAB Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while ALAB trades at $117.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 96.02. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check ALAB's competition here
AEHR vs MTSI Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while MTSI trades at $238.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is 108.32. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MTSI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check MTSI's competition here
AEHR vs ENTG Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while ENTG trades at $116.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 75.10. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check ENTG's competition here
AEHR vs NVMI Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while NVMI trades at $442.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 55.63. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check NVMI's competition here
AEHR vs LSCC Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while LSCC trades at $95.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 4751.00. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check LSCC's competition here
AEHR vs AMKR Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while AMKR trades at $46.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check AMKR's competition here
AEHR vs ONTO Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while ONTO trades at $215.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 77.53. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check ONTO's competition here
AEHR vs RMBS Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while RMBS trades at $93.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 44.09. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check RMBS's competition here
AEHR vs CREE Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CREE's ROE of +11.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check CREE's competition here
AEHR vs SITM Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while SITM trades at $347.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -200.61. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check SITM's competition here
AEHR vs SWKS Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while SWKS trades at $55.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check SWKS's competition here
AEHR vs FORM Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while FORM trades at $103.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 149.51. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check FORM's competition here
AEHR vs BRKS Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BRKS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check BRKS's competition here
AEHR vs AAOI Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while AAOI trades at $103.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -162.36. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check AAOI's competition here
AEHR vs SMTC Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while SMTC trades at $82.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -179.67. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check SMTC's competition here
AEHR vs CRUS Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while CRUS trades at $147.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check CRUS's competition here
AEHR vs QRVO Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while QRVO trades at $78.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check QRVO's competition here
AEHR vs CAMT Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while CAMT trades at $157.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 153.14. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check CAMT's competition here
AEHR vs SLAB Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while SLAB trades at $209.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -105.09. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check SLAB's competition here
AEHR vs ALGM Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while ALGM trades at $32.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -465.71. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check ALGM's competition here
AEHR vs IPGP Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while IPGP trades at $113.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is 156.08. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IPGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check IPGP's competition here
AEHR vs OLED Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while OLED trades at $89.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check OLED's competition here
AEHR vs SIMO Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while SIMO trades at $113.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 31.29. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check SIMO's competition here
AEHR vs LASR Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while LASR trades at $60.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -127.91. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check LASR's competition here
AEHR vs KLIC Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while KLIC trades at $64.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is -53.40. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KLIC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check KLIC's competition here
AEHR vs DIOD Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while DIOD trades at $68.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check DIOD's competition here
AEHR vs ACLS Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while ACLS trades at $95.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check ACLS's competition here
AEHR vs POWI Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while POWI trades at $52.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 134.28. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check POWI's competition here
AEHR vs SYNA Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while SYNA trades at $74.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is -46.64. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SYNA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check SYNA's competition here
AEHR vs UCTT Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while UCTT trades at $63.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is -15.79. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UCTT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check UCTT's competition here
AEHR vs ACMR Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while ACMR trades at $40.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 29.59. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check ACMR's competition here
AEHR vs VSH Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while VSH trades at $18.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -265.43. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check VSH's competition here
AEHR vs PLAB Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while PLAB trades at $40.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check PLAB's competition here
AEHR vs AXTI Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while AXTI trades at $52.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -107.84. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check AXTI's competition here
AEHR vs AMBA Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while AMBA trades at $50.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -28.39. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check AMBA's competition here
AEHR vs VECO Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while VECO trades at $34.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 58.24. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check VECO's competition here
AEHR vs NVTS Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while NVTS trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -15.44. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check NVTS's competition here
AEHR vs ICHR Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while ICHR trades at $48.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -31.25. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check ICHR's competition here
AEHR vs MXL Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while MXL trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -11.38. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check MXL's competition here
AEHR vs COHU Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while COHU trades at $32.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -20.21. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check COHU's competition here
AEHR vs DQ Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while DQ trades at $21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -8.34. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check DQ's competition here
AEHR vs HIMX Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while HIMX trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check HIMX's competition here
AEHR vs SKYT Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while SKYT trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SKYT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check SKYT's competition here
AEHR vs IMOS Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while IMOS trades at $36.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 85.37. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check IMOS's competition here
AEHR vs SGH Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SGH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check SGH's competition here
AEHR vs AIP Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 827.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while AIP trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -22.20. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AIP's ROE of +3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check AIP's competition here
AEHR vs WOLF Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 787.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while WOLF trades at $17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WOLF's ROE of +10.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check WOLF's competition here
AEHR vs POET Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 744.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while POET trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to POET's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check POET's competition here
AEHR vs AOSL Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 675.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while AOSL trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -6.47. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check AOSL's competition here
AEHR vs INDI Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while INDI trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check INDI's competition here
AEHR vs AMBQ Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AMBQ has a market cap of 606.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while AMBQ trades at $28.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas AMBQ's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AMBQ's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to AMBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check AMBQ's competition here
AEHR vs CEVA Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 545.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while CEVA trades at $19.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is -44.64. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check CEVA's competition here
AEHR vs QNC Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, QNC has a market cap of 499.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while QNC trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas QNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to QNC's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to QNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check QNC's competition here
AEHR vs NVEC Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 335.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while NVEC trades at $69.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check NVEC's competition here
AEHR vs LAES Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 327.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while LAES trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check LAES's competition here
AEHR vs TGAN Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check TGAN's competition here
AEHR vs XPER Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 268.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while XPER trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XPER's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check XPER's competition here
AEHR vs BZAI Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 219.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while BZAI trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BZAI's ROE of -9.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check BZAI's competition here
AEHR vs MRAM Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 219.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while MRAM trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is -316.00. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check MRAM's competition here
AEHR vs NA Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 199.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while NA trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check NA's competition here
AEHR vs ALMU Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 190.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while ALMU trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -103.38. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check ALMU's competition here
AEHR vs INTT Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 175.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while INTT trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check INTT's competition here
AEHR vs ASYS Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 174.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while ASYS trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check ASYS's competition here
AEHR vs QUIK Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while QUIK trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -13.09. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check QUIK's competition here
AEHR vs GSIT Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 158.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while GSIT trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check GSIT's competition here
AEHR vs OIIM Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check OIIM's competition here
AEHR vs ATOM Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 132.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while ATOM trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check ATOM's competition here
AEHR vs VLN Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while VLN trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check VLN's competition here
AEHR vs MX Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 104.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while MX trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check MX's competition here
AEHR vs GCTS Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while GCTS trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check GCTS's competition here
AEHR vs MOSY Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check MOSY's competition here
AEHR vs WISA Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WISA's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check WISA's competition here
AEHR vs TRT Comparison April 2026
AEHR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEHR stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TRT has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEHR is priced at $44.32, while TRT trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEHR currently has a P/E ratio of -147.73, whereas TRT's P/E ratio is -292.50. In terms of profitability, AEHR's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEHR is more volatile compared to TRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEHR.Check TRT's competition here