ACM Research, Inc.
ACM Research, Inc. ACMR Peers
See (ACMR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACMR | $25.90 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 16.91 | $1.57 | N/A |
| NVDA | $157.99 | +0.00% | 3.7T | 49.29 | $3.11 | +0.03% |
| AVGO | $275.65 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 96.97 | $2.73 | +0.87% |
| TSM | $226.49 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 26.87 | $8.36 | +1.16% |
| ASML | $801.39 | +0.00% | 310.8B | 30.78 | $25.68 | +0.83% |
| AMD | $141.90 | +0.00% | 220.7B | 99.35 | $1.37 | N/A |
| TXN | $207.62 | +0.00% | 191.2B | 39.86 | $5.28 | +2.55% |
| QCOM | $159.26 | +0.00% | 175B | 16.25 | $9.81 | +2.15% |
| ARM | $161.74 | +0.00% | 165.2B | 208.44 | $0.75 | N/A |
| AMAT | $183.07 | +0.00% | 147.5B | 22.36 | $8.22 | +0.90% |
Stock Comparison
ACMR vs NVDA Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while NVDA trades at $157.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 49.29. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AVGO Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while AVGO trades at $275.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 96.97. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs TSM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while TSM trades at $226.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ASML Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 310.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while ASML trades at $801.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AMD Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 220.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while AMD trades at $141.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 99.35. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs TXN Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 191.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while TXN trades at $207.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 39.86. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs QCOM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 175B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while QCOM trades at $159.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ARM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 165.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while ARM trades at $161.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 208.44. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AMAT Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 147.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while AMAT trades at $183.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MU Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 135.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while MU trades at $123.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs LRCX Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 123.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while LRCX trades at $97.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ADI Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 119.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while ADI trades at $238.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 65.39. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs KLAC Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 118.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while KLAC trades at $895.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs INTC Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 99.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while INTC trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MRVL Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while MRVL trades at $77.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -133.75. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs NXPI Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while NXPI trades at $218.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MCHP Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while MCHP trades at $70.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -7168.00. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MCHP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MPWR Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while MPWR trades at $731.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs STM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while STM trades at $30.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ON Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while ON trades at $52.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 37.23. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ASX Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while ASX trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs GFS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while GFS trades at $38.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -116.00. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs UMC Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while UMC trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs TER Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while TER trades at $89.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ALAB Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while ALAB trades at $90.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 67.68. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ENTG Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while ENTG trades at $80.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 40.36. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs SWKS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while SWKS trades at $74.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MTSI Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while MTSI trades at $143.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -115.45. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs CREE Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs QRVO Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while QRVO trades at $84.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 148.41. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs NVMI Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while NVMI trades at $275.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 40.49. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs BRKS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs OLED Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while OLED trades at $154.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs LSCC Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while LSCC trades at $48.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 135.51. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs RMBS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while RMBS trades at $64.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ALGM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while ALGM trades at $34.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -88.21. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs CRUS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while CRUS trades at $104.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AMKR Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while AMKR trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ONTO Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while ONTO trades at $100.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs SITM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while SITM trades at $213.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -54.39. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs SLAB Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while SLAB trades at $147.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -29.19. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs TSEM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while TSEM trades at $43.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs SMTC Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while SMTC trades at $45.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -25.87. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs CAMT Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while CAMT trades at $84.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 31.43. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs POWI Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while POWI trades at $55.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 89.97. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs IPGP Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while IPGP trades at $68.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -15.72. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AMBA Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while AMBA trades at $66.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -25.88. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs FORM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while FORM trades at $34.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 50.62. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs DIOD Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while DIOD trades at $52.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 100.55. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs SYNA Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while SYNA trades at $64.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs SIMO Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while SIMO trades at $75.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ACLS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while ACLS trades at $69.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs VSH Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while VSH trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -33.41. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs KLIC Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while KLIC trades at $34.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 96.49. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs HIMX Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while HIMX trades at $8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AAOI Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while AAOI trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs VECO Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while VECO trades at $20.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MXL Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while MXL trades at $14.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs NVTS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while NVTS trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -11.83. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs PLAB Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while PLAB trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs SGH Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs UCTT Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while UCTT trades at $22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 38.39. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs DQ Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while DQ trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs LASR Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 946.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while LASR trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -16.79. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs COHU Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 912.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while COHU trades at $19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -10.67. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AOSL Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 790.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while AOSL trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -34.48. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ICHR Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 719.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while ICHR trades at $19.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -44.85. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs INDI Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 711.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while INDI trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs IMOS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 659.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while IMOS trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs CEVA Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 520.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while CEVA trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 241.67. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs SKYT Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 478M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while SKYT trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -58.53. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs LAES Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 447.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while LAES trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -6.51. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs POET Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 442.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while POET trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POET's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AEHR Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 420.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while AEHR trades at $12.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AIP Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 378.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while AIP trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -11.13. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs XPER Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 370.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while XPER trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -18.86. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs NVEC Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 358.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while NVEC trades at $73.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs TGAN Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs BZAI Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 297.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while BZAI trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs VLN Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 268M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while VLN trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ALMU Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 257M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while ALMU trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -62.58. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs VLN-WT Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while VLN-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ATOM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while ATOM trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs NA Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 148.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while NA trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MRAM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 147.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while MRAM trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 164.00. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MX Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 146.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while MX trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs OIIM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs WOLF Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 126.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while WOLF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs GSIT Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 96.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while GSIT trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs QUIK Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 93M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while QUIK trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -14.32. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AXTI Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 91.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while AXTI trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs INTT Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while INTT trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -722.00. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs GCTS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while GCTS trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ASYS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while ASYS trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MOSY Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs WISA Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WISA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ICG Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 59.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while ICG trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MOBXW Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MOBXW has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while MOBXW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MOBXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOBXW's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to MOBXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MOBX Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MOBX has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $25.90, while MOBX trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 16.91, whereas MOBX's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOBX's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to MOBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.