ACM Research, Inc.
ACM Research, Inc. ACMR Peers
See (ACMR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACMR | $24.70 | +4.62% | 1.6B | 15.73 | $1.57 | N/A |
| NVDA | $141.69 | +1.21% | 3.5T | 45.85 | $3.09 | +0.03% |
| AVGO | $246.90 | -5.01% | 1.2T | 90.44 | $2.73 | +0.90% |
| TSM | $205.13 | +0.88% | 1.1T | 24.66 | $8.32 | +1.20% |
| ASML | $753.02 | +0.70% | 296.1B | 29.99 | $25.11 | +0.99% |
| AMD | $116.19 | +0.43% | 188.4B | 84.20 | $1.38 | N/A |
| TXN | $192.39 | +1.00% | 174.8B | 35.89 | $5.36 | +2.79% |
| QCOM | $149.24 | +1.14% | 163.9B | 15.23 | $9.80 | +2.30% |
| ARM | $133.11 | +2.75% | 140.7B | 177.48 | $0.75 | N/A |
| AMAT | $166.74 | +1.55% | 133.8B | 20.28 | $8.22 | +0.99% |
Stock Comparison
ACMR vs NVDA Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 3.5T. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while NVDA trades at $141.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 45.85. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AVGO Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while AVGO trades at $246.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 90.44. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs TSM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while TSM trades at $205.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ASML Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 296.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while ASML trades at $753.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 29.99. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AMD Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 188.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while AMD trades at $116.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 84.20. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs TXN Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 174.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while TXN trades at $192.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 35.89. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs QCOM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 163.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while QCOM trades at $149.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ARM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 140.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while ARM trades at $133.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 177.48. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AMAT Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 133.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while AMAT trades at $166.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MU Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 121.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while MU trades at $108.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs LRCX Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 110.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while LRCX trades at $86.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ADI Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 110.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while ADI trades at $222.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 60.39. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs KLAC Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 106.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while KLAC trades at $808.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 29.40. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs INTC Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while INTC trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MRVL Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while MRVL trades at $68.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -119.91. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs NXPI Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while NXPI trades at $207.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MCHP Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while MCHP trades at $65.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -6525.00. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MPWR Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while MPWR trades at $687.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs STM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while STM trades at $28.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ASX Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while ASX trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ON Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while ON trades at $50.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs GFS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while GFS trades at $37.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -110.97. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs UMC Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while UMC trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ALAB Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while ALAB trades at $90.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 69.27. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs TER Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while TER trades at $85.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ENTG Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while ENTG trades at $72.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 35.74. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs SWKS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while SWKS trades at $71.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs CREE Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MTSI Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while MTSI trades at $125.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -105.05. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs BRKS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs QRVO Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while QRVO trades at $78.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 135.48. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs OLED Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while OLED trades at $151.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs LSCC Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while LSCC trades at $48.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 129.78. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs NVMI Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while NVMI trades at $217.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs RMBS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while RMBS trades at $57.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ALGM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while ALGM trades at $28.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -73.87. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs CRUS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while CRUS trades at $100.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs SITM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while SITM trades at $205.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -54.17. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AMKR Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while AMKR trades at $19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ONTO Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while ONTO trades at $96.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs TSEM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while TSEM trades at $40.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs SLAB Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while SLAB trades at $126.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -25.12. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs CAMT Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while CAMT trades at $73.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs SMTC Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while SMTC trades at $37.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -15.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs POWI Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while POWI trades at $54.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 85.55. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs IPGP Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while IPGP trades at $68.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -15.25. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs FORM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while FORM trades at $32.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 46.62. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs SYNA Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while SYNA trades at $62.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs DIOD Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while DIOD trades at $49.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 89.82. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AMBA Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while AMBA trades at $53.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -21.52. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs VSH Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while VSH trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -31.58. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ACLS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while ACLS trades at $63.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs KLIC Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while KLIC trades at $33.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 89.65. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs VECO Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while VECO trades at $20.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs NVTS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while NVTS trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -11.66. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs PLAB Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while PLAB trades at $18.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs SGH Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MXL Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while MXL trades at $12.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs DQ Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 959.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while DQ trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AAOI Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 944.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while AAOI trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs UCTT Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 935.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while UCTT trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs LASR Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 870.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while LASR trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -15.44. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs COHU Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 849.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while COHU trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -9.92. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs HIMX Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 759.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while HIMX trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs IMOS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 714.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while IMOS trades at $19.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AOSL Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 683.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while AOSL trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -29.83. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ICHR Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 615.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while ICHR trades at $18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -38.38. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs INDI Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 559.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while INDI trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs CEVA Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 484.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while CEVA trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 224.89. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs SKYT Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 433.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while SKYT trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -53.12. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs LAES Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while LAES trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs XPER Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 358.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while XPER trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -18.23. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs POET Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 353.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while POET trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POET's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs NVEC Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 350.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while NVEC trades at $72.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AEHR Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 337.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while AEHR trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AIP Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 332.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while AIP trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs TGAN Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ALMU Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 299.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while ALMU trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -72.92. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs BZAI Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 258.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while BZAI trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs VLN Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while VLN trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs VLN-WT Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while VLN-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs WOLF Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 217.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while WOLF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ATOM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 191.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while ATOM trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs OIIM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs SIMO Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 140.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while SIMO trades at $67.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 24.66. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MRAM Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 133.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while MRAM trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 148.25. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MX Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while MX trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs NA Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 104M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while NA trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs QUIK Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 89.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while QUIK trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -14.20. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs GSIT Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while GSIT trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs AXTI Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while AXTI trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs INTT Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while INTT trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -617.00. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MOSY Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs WISA Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WISA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ICG Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while ICG trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 29.86. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs ASYS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while ASYS trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs GCTS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while GCTS trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs SQNS Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SQNS has a market cap of 47.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while SQNS trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas SQNS's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SQNS's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to SQNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.
ACMR vs MOBX Comparison
ACMR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ACMR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MOBX has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, ACMR is priced at $24.70, while MOBX trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ACMR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.73, whereas MOBX's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, ACMR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOBX's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ACMR is more volatile compared to MOBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACMR.